Let's face it, Elon Musk is based to high hell and he is in the right for buying Pravda and letting people decide what is or isn't credible. However, that is exactly the problem. ((They)) will just shill on Pravda and upvote the goy journalists while downvoting anything based or wrongthink. The people can only go so far before ((They)) just use it as a tool to trick the Goyim.
So much for credibility. Rip based Elon.
He’s from South Africa.
Whites in South Africa are either the biggest cucks or borderline nazis
another reason to be concerned for the sake of """"journalism""""
So the joke here is that musk is leaving out the word "national" right?
Context
Snow the full chain of tweets. He was making fun of socialists
Musk is confirmed based
hes Trump but with youth and Vigor, I enjoy this mans thoughts.
Musk 2024
holy shit he didn't say that did he? fucking sauce that shit rn
Of course not, he was practically crucified just for saying "they" own big media.
Outright naming the jew would've been a major blow to his public image.
dam did he name the Jew!
We need to get the word out though that Reddit like all social media is run by jews who use it to spread lies banning anyone who dares tell the truth because Jews hate america and our freedom of speech.
tech industry insider here
I think Musk is putting on a show because he can't hire competent white engineers due to his self-driving car system (or "lane following" or whatever you want to call it) is super dangerous and nobody wants to be associated with it
he's also known as a slave driver
so he's trying to get engineers to jump ship from Google and Apple and other sjw companies and work for him but it ain't gonna work
What if people post evidence of bias? Like the one where they said there's barely anyone at a rally, but then had to "correct" themselves.
>bias
Like this guy who worked for Fake News CNN plotting to kill anyone who got in his way of exterminating all white people because hes an inbred jew?
>reddit does it quite well
you literally cant post anymore if you dont have a certain amount of karma i.e if you dont suck hivemind dick enough you cant do anything more than comment and going against the grain will quickly get you shadowbanned. how in the fuck is that a good system?
inb4 >go back
he's just trying to impress his waifu grimes by trying to be all alpha
You're right and I had this thought when this tweetstorm first went down. He's still pushing the notion of an authoritative 'fact checker' which is by itself a bad idea. Just acculturating people to this idea would be a disaster.
This is this technocratic memeplex which has been mutating its' way through western civilization for hundreds of years in which we'll eventually create systems and institutions which will obviate the need for morality and intelligence.
>upvote the goy journalists while downvoting anything based or wrongthink.
I thought about this problem years ago, my solution was to make it peer review, only let professors and verified experts in their fields rate journalists and their articles for there respected fields.
And then get the experts to make a more accurate article which competes with other experts and the journalists, the highest rated by peers is shown on the top, this is the only way to remove as much bias as possible from the original source that I can think of, it seems to work for scientific research, this just has to keep up with the normal news cycle.
>professors and verified experts
You know what would happen, right? Liberal professors and "experts".
I wish I was better on the engineering front, first year python kiddy with limited knowledge, will go work at his shit when I get some machine learning knowledge, the more he slaves me the more I make for myself and learn for myself.
Peer review is already broken. Corrupt academics trade citations and reviews to build up impressive CV. It doesn't work in scientific research at all. The majority of studies have no replicable results.
There isn't a systemic solution to "Basically everyone in society who matters is functionally a sociopath" and the more you try to create solutions the worse you make the problem.
Only in their shit fields, besides you can remove an expert if it's not related to the article, a woman's studies professor has no real input to an election for instance.
>Peer review is already broken
It's not great but it sorta works, which is better than the shit show that is the media today.
hey rabbi all professors are libcucks, that is why in any country the jews take over the press as their first step to brainwashing people look how they did it in South Korea to install their central bank.
All of the political science professors I've seen have been horribly biased.
you will fail, you wont get jew professors only rating them you fucking kike, nice try pushing it but everyone knows thats what the jews want.
ignore that poster, they want the same people who run the news being jews to rate the news, which is pants on head retarded.
That poster is an inbred to jump through the hoops they are trying to make something that irrational sound logical because they have a flawed premise.
I think its because the idea of a socialist utopia or communist utopia is more beautiful than capitalism or democracy in theory and it kinda gets them hooked into those ideas. But in practice well........ Alot of Venezuelans starving to death......
to be fair, real fascism has never been tried.
Well... I'm sure political historians can also rate the same things as them.
Fuck... You think I want to actually do this, nope I want someone else to do it, maybe Elon, I don't have Twitter tho and too lazy.
Elon is about to go into chapter 11 bankruptcy. He’s having a mental breakdown. He has less than 2 quarters of cash.
>jews to rate the news
They already do, atleast this way they compete with eachother til to make it less bias
>Fuck... You think I want to actually do this, nope I want someone else to do it, maybe Elon, I don't have Twitter tho and too lazy.
doesnt help it takes moneh too which we probably dont have since we both are cucked by YOUR central bank in the UK... grrrr....
we need an Elon search engine, need info, just use a muskrat.... or something i dunno...
fake news. Peer review is garbage. The only thing that matters is results. Theories are garbage
>which is better than
No, it's not. It's objectively a bad idea to even have a system at all for this kind of thing. "Checks and balances" is a garbage idea which is actively damaging to checking and balancing anything. Musk's system will be one of false authority selling fake trust which will erode even the small amount of will which exists currently to hold journalists to any standards. There will be a "system" which makes them trustworthy, and attacking the journalist or journalism or their organizations will require a revolution against the "system" which has vetted them. Another step, more abstract, more difficult.
>They already do, atleast this way they compete with eachother til to make it less bias
no user... The jews are the news which is why ALL news stations say the same thing, there is even a webm of them literally all saying the same thing at different networks all different owners but ya know what all the owners are... wait for it... wait for it.... Jews!
These are just facts, anything in their hands is a weapon against you, just like they take away your weapon rights, its time you take away their weapons as well user.
go post that to snopes you inbred kike
hahaha
>doesnt help it takes moneh
I've thought about this too, the experts pay for the service, a small monthly fee.
>Peer review is garbage
>Science is Jewish
Had no idea Pol was anti science.
Snopes is exactly the kind of thing I'm talking about.
>nazi larp flag
lol bro do you know where you are motherfucker?
also his system is fine. Problem is all the backdoors that cia faggots built into his system during the obama years. All those accidents due to the lane-following system aren't accidents, dumbass. They are deliberate in order to burn down Musk and Tesla image in publics eye ever since Musk started speaking out against the CIA glowin faggots and the The True Media Owners.
You didn't notice a coincidence faggot? Well maybe you shouldn't have blown thrown $50,000 on a Bachelors of Arts in Advanced Theoretical Penis Puffery. Faggot.
if you look closely you can see the contrast in colors where whoever made the image used MS paint eye-dropper to try and copy the hex code
what in the fuck
>I've thought about this too, the experts pay for the service, a small monthly fee.
Jews have infinite money from your central bank and the US fed not too mention the US sends 10 million a day to Israel. That is why jews bought off your corrupt government and all news outlets in the west to push their lies.
If its news, its lies, because its Jews... Its that simple and Elon is already winning this fight.
reddit is just a popularity contest of hiveminds; no real discourse
No,fag. He can't even manufacture 5000 of anything anually except knobslobbers such as yourself. Let it go. He'll be jailed before you succumb to AIDS.
>If its news, its lies, because its Jews
Aren't professor jews a different breed to journal jews?
A subspecies that thinks different?
Nothing you are advocating is in any way "scientific". It's PR puffery to sell the idea of the authority of an institution.
Science requires independently verifiable data and reproducible results. Peer Review isn't anymore "scientific" than HR department employee reviews. It's a nonsense idea. Peer Review would have to be capable of deriving truth out of the process when everyone involved in the process is lying. It potentially protects against honest mistakes, but has absolutely nothing to do with protecting against corruption.
>advanced bachelor of Arts in penis puffer
Dude the, only you could be gay enough to even imagine such a course of study.
President Musk: 2024
>Aren't professor jews a different breed to journal jews?
no user jews are jews, their all inbreds.
>It's PR puffery to sell the idea of the authority of an institution.
What's wrong with that, Wikipedia gets by fine using the same principles.
Open source software works.
Bitcoin is still kinda working.
It's not about being an authority, it's about trying to find the most efficient means of removing bullshit.
accurate but the jews will push him into chapter 11 regardless and chapter 7 if they can
factual
>Peer Review isn't anymore "scientific" than HR department employee reviews. It's a nonsense idea. Peer Review would have to be capable of deriving truth out of the process when everyone involved in the process is lying
When journalists write their articles they are making statements of reality, these can be proved and verified and gauged by the evidence and rated accordingly, junk news can be trimmed through lack of evidence etc..
Seems sciency too me.
Elon wasn't this based before Trump. Trump set some sort of template.
lol. is that antvenom, the minecraft youtuber?
The system of Wikipedia fails miserably when there is a controversial topic that attracts partisan posters.
The Holocaust is some bullshit, but Wiki says it really is a fact.
When you go to a page on how to find the tangent line between two circles, everything is 100% accurate.
For the kikes, they are the enemy of the truth.
One of the reasons Jow Forums is so popular is that it is shill-resistant. No up vote system means shills with 1000 interconnected computers can't rig the voting system to get it to the top.
Ever since he went on a date with that weird indie goth singer he's been on a roll. I wonder what she did to him...
Sucked the cuck right out of him
You can tell it's a shop from the pixels and stuff
You can make more than one version of this site.
Make one completely free of Jew rating.
There should be an anti-semitepedia aswell.
Boomer here. Don't understand a word you're saying. Why aren't you working, kid?