when you have nothing against Jews, but Jow Forums is the most reasonable place on the web...

I'm saying Individuals should be held responsible for their actions, not an entire group of people who had nothing to do with something, a group is nothing more than a collective of individuals who have their own personal and individual desires, so the entire collection cannot possibly all hold the same values.

Fuck off.

Attached: hurr.jpg (450x418, 43K)

>Mfw I'm an anarchist and I don't give a shit about race

How do you overcome the "outvoting 300 million communists" problem?

Tell me, faggot, how do you get to hoppean utopia in a rapidly africanizing civic space? How do you gain liberty without whites?

Attached: d65.gif (680x499, 1.64M)

>yeah i dislike welfare leaches of all colors
niggers, spics, arab
> I hate bankers of all ethnicity's
jews

So you hate arabs, niggers, spics, jews? Got it.

Attached: 1528942718457.jpg (222x227, 11K)

Yes its true. I got along well with some and admired qualities in some

wow, totally bro! haha I'm anarchist as well, and also a faggot, so you're in good company!
ANARCHY R00LS haha yes! dude that "cookbook" is dank af, it's lit senpai! FBI FUCK OFF LOL yo checkout r/anarchism!

Attached: 1512374472556.gif (480x271, 2.05M)

Two words; trolley problem

thats the best you could come up with? cant say im impressed by this absolute demonstration of testosterone, sending me to hell. try again faggot and put the onions milk down for the next one.

don't get me wrong I hate political correctness and "social justice" and "progressivism" , but the two sides are caught in a power struggle of master and slave values, both of them are wrong because once one group is put over another you just get the same issues as before, so in an anarchy Proudhon's anarchism to be specific does away with hierarchy via arbitrary things such as money, while allowing those to choose to be productive on a market can be while others if they choose to be in a strictly barter system where your workplace provides you living means

Attached: 993.gif (800x667, 1.23M)

> reddit

You're fucking disgusting.

Nah, you just didn't deserve more effort.

imagine being from paraguay lmao

Slowly, you will start to hate them too.

No, because i dont blame it on the group but the people who did somthing wrong.

So.... like... the jews.

are you actually retarded? take off the memeflag you leaf faggot, you're not fooling anyone.

Attached: 1528677497450.jpg (657x527, 32K)

>Let individual

What great comfort that will be for you in a 80% African civic space

so i assume you wouldnt have a problem walking through the ghetto at night since we cant make assumptions about the people living there

> nota leaf.
yeah but I dong think race mixing is in peoples best interest, that and race mixing isn't very common example being i totally agree there is a white genocide, but this genocide is a result of the master-slave paradigm.

I dont care that they are jews i care that they are thieves.

Theis

Humans are social animals, would a Jew think that another Jew who did something "wrong" for the interest of the group, actually did something wrong.

To quote a Rabbi, "not everyone is guilty, but everyone is responsible."

Yes, humans are social animals but say a while guy molests a kid, you don't automatically assume every white person does the same, that person alone is responsible for their actions.

Attached: 1433025070033.png (600x439, 196K)

weak

here's the thing weakling, you cant be a nationalist if you dont have a shared history and culture and the most important an Identity. you cant have nationalism if all the people have different history and culture, and arent fundamentally ethnically homogeneous in a specific geographical are. saying that you dont care about black people, jews (that have an honest trade) makes you nothing but a ridiculous civic nationalist, because if you would truly understand what nationalism is you wouldnt even be thinking about these people, but guess fucking what? you do care about them. you would rather spit out things that that those (((youtube celebs))) have to say than to actually think.

Attached: Zyklon_B_.gif (500x300, 2.21M)

communism, capitalism, nazism etc... are all basically the same ideology, they only continue the master-slave struggle.

Attached: 5366364C-DF7C-451C-9575-3AC93C66B9F4.jpg (480x672, 73K)

> history was in the past
> culture is a collective abstraction.

No individual should define themselves by these things.

>anarchist
if you want a challenge to your worldview, read pic related; if you don't care, then there's no point in having a discussion in the first place
>I don't give a shit about race
do you give a shit about morality? do you realize that different Races (capital R, not merely ethnic groups) have different survival strategies, and thus can have different moral valuations?
Racial idealism > racial identity
if race is a social construct, the we can construct the race of the future. The discussion should be over what that should be, what traits we want to select for.

Attached: e3177e17-20e2-4d39-b77f-563207350c35.png (611x7828, 2.61M)

Don't let the memes fool you Jow Forums is a Jewish board

Attached: 1529055600264.jpg (400x400, 40K)

Fuck off kike.

Attached: jew media final.jpg (4500x4602, 3.88M)

i'm pretty sure making accusations of JIDF is JIDF. But the guy who posts this image with it is OK. because it still spreads some truth. the other ones I'm suspicious of like this

ignored for memeflagging.
and you couldn't be more wrong about what you said. you wont stand still if you dont have a salid fundament to stand on.

I lived in the ghetto part of my city (which is infamous country-wide for having an insane migrant quota, that particular district is around 70% immigrants). Never got mugged or beaten up or got into any other problems for almost 10 years, then I could afford it to move to a nice suburb. There were wannabe gangstas and and blood feuds between sandnigger clans and junkies, part and parcel. The "worst" thing that ever happened to me was some junkie who got angry at me because I didn't want to give him money. Wow, so dangerous.

> anarchists are only against statal authority.

No their not, maybe ancons and ancaps but mutualism is the abolishment of all institutional authority, desu i don't hate fascists or Nazis, they are socialists and so am iso we have similar beliefs just radically different outcomes, and I hate commies, also i don't believe in participatory management of factories or any means of production I prefer cyclical management transferred between projects, your article hasn't said anything new desu, all authority should be abolished.

okay, sure, yeah...

Attached: 6faed28cf98d341d2b607d6a7869110f7178cdaac1864c55449700acf08117d6.png (699x650, 83K)

archive.is/XeQq
>December 26, 1847: Jews. Write an article against this race that poisons everything by sticking its nose into everything without ever mixing with any other people. Demand its expulsion from France with the exception of those individuals married to French women. Abolish synagogues and not admit them to any employment. Finally, pursue the abolition of this religion. It’s not without cause that the Christians called them deicide. The Jew is the enemy of humankind. They must be sent back to Asia or be exterminated. By steel or by fire or by expulsion the Jew must disappear.
t. Proudhorn

Attached: 1432790506833.jpg (530x570, 64K)

Molestation has nothing to do with the success of my group; its a detriment. That said, if you asked a pederast or a pedo what they thought, and they'd be sympathetic.

Maybe you think that doesn't matter because "muh individualism" but individuals create groups and groups create norms. Want to know why the left never looks at white males as "just individuals?" Because we form groups, and these groups create norms which exclude and discourage the behavior and actions of degenerates and parasites.

Not true at all you are what you make of yourself.

> do i belive in morals.

No not on a social scale, I believe each individual should have their own values.

I don't have to agree with everything he believes i admire him for his political philosophy, not his personal bias.

Drop that memeflag. I share your opinion but it's not welcome in Jow Forums's hugbox so you won't get much out of this thread. Are you new or just stupid?

individuals create groups.

No individuals make collectives of individuals, also the norms are only abstractions that can be ignored, unless forced i.e commies, nazis, capitalists, the state. a great example would be the jeans black market in the soviet union, those people broke the mold of communism and replaced it with their own, I'm saying this constant movement of values should be abolished.

That's how most of us started out.
Give it time friend.

No, people are more than race, an individual's ego is something cannot ever be fully comprehended or defined by any one thing be it race, money, etc..

>mutualism is the abolishment of all institutional authority
I have yet to see a mutualist take a firm stand on reproductive issues. Are they against familial authority (as is mentioned further down the image)? Do they have any issue whatsoever with violence as it pertains to existence itself?
>Not true at all you are what you make of yourself.
Someone else agrees with you too.
“Everything is what you make of it, even yourself.” – Joseph Goebbels
>No not on a social scale, I believe each individual should have their own values.
Do you believe that all values should be allowed? Values that harm other beings should be able to exist alongside values which are against causing harm to other beings?
I could go into why a superior worldview is one in which people believe they have a duty not to oppress others as opposed to a right to not be oppressed (the latter is dependent on a higher force for protection, which can potentially turn against the individual in question)
>they only continue the master-slave struggle
incorrect, there is a third option, which is to destroy slavishness, which is the National Socialist position. See pic related.

Attached: 1516822181635.png (924x1636, 178K)

Like I said, give it time and you'll realize that your ideals are not shared by most people and following them will lead to a hellish dystopia for your children and grandchildren.
I too was very idealistic but eventually you'll become more pragmatic as well.

You're a disgrace to your Fatherland.

Attached: 1521095239926.jpg (2778x4890, 3.18M)

>but Jow Forums is the most reasonable place on the web

Attached: 1373.gif (229x176, 987K)

>> mfw I'm an anarchist and I don't give a shit about race.
Then you are low IQ, everything is about race. There will be breakthroughs in science conserning the genome, which will prove everything poll has said about race in a few years. Just wait and you will see.

you just became a retard at some point, pathetic fragile white male

> mfw I'm an anarchist and I don't give a shit about race.
You get the rope too

also we arent fighting "jewish power" we are fighting a group of individuals, also the means of authority can and generally does transfer through revolution, not nesecerilly a civil war but a general change of values, unfortunately by the time this happens it is often the case that.

- joseph gobbles quote
> natsocs want to destroy the slavishness

The Nazis often used false individualism to justify collectivism, this means nothing.

Start giving a shit. Anarchy can't exist in a multiracial society.

Attached: Bigger-vs-Smaller-Government-1.png (728x403, 9K)

It cant exist in a ethno state eitehr, anarchism isnt concerned with race, just mutual aid.

you sound like those idoits who say everything is about gender.

>on Jow Forums
>anarchist
Someone hasn't been paying attention.

>also the norms are only abstractions that can be ignored

Obviously not, or only in the most extreme cases. If we want to take the norms surrounding sex for example, think about what violating the norms regarding something mundane like the rules for courting has on a person's relations with others.
Not only that, but let's take a wider look at norms like consent and property. Its a given in today's society that the state will punish violators of consent and property like rapists and thieves, but I think we could both agree that the state wouldn't be able to stop these crimes if, say, half the population commited them, right? Probably much less to be honest. These rules are upheld by the norms of society far more than by the force of the state, which acts to keep outsiders and fringe elements in line. This becomes evidently true when one has lived in an area where certain crimes are prevalent; the vast majority goes unpunished.

Heck, you show this yourself with your black market blue jeans example. Even a nominally totalitarian state can't control behavior without controlling norms.
This is why working with an understanding of groups and societal behavior is so important, and why "muh individualism" doesn't work, ESPECIALLY when groups become defined by immutable characteristics, like race.

>just mutual aid.
Isn't that communism or socialism or something? With anarchism being some Mad Max shit (which isn't even an anarchistic scenario because they had gangs n shiiiet).

>also we arent fighting "jewish power" we are fighting a group of individuals
I agree. Many of those individuals group up using the Jewish identity, but we oppose other groups that use similar tactics i.e. tribalists in general.
>also the means of authority can and generally does transfer through revolution, not nesecerilly a civil war but a general change of values, unfortunately by the time this happens it is often the case that.
Not sure what you were trying to say here, something seems to have gotten cut off.
>The Nazis often used false individualism to justify collectivism, this means nothing.
What is "false individualism"? If an individual is against the group, then they cannot be allowed within the society; even anarchists believe this.
I suggest you try to engage with the information I'm presenting at least semi-seriously; you seem like an individual who has some noble qualities.

Attached: 1527167960760.jpg (609x9175, 2.05M)

>It cant exist in a ethno state either

When one rejects the idea of owning land, people will eventually take possession of it by force. It happened in the real world already, in the Spanish civil war. There were some decent Anarchist enclaves that actually worked for a time, and then the communists took them over for production in their war against the nationalists.

Anarchism through communism will never happen. That ship has sailed with the influx of collectivist genetics. Communism would build up, but due to the collectivist genetics of those in charge, it wwill simply never go away. Forever cattle.

Anarcho-capitalism is the closest you will get to your idea. Either one or a committee of land owners with minimal or even no rules, who can exclude entry with contracts that can be enforced. If you set that up, a true anarcho-capitalist society that can defend itself, and keep the genetics of people who naturally gravitate AWAY from this idea (usually blacks, amerindians, asians, etc), then you can have your freedom. You'll just have to get over how much it shockingly resembles an ethno-state.

Attached: Hoppe 01.jpg (1000x500, 147K)

Attached: Personal identifiers.png (1036x666, 34K)