Name a political ideology more idiotic than Libertarianism

Name a political ideology more idiotic than Libertarianism.
>pro-tip; you literally can't

Even fucking Communism makes more economical sense.

Attached: 1408041554579.jpg (125x125, 3K)

>less big government and more small government
>less sense than communism
You may have autism. Libertarianism isn’t anarchism. The goal isn’t no government, it’s a decentralized, more representative government similar to state or even county style government systems.

we are currently living in a global libertarian financial system

OP is glowing. They come on here to talk badly about libertarians. They want us to listen to TPTB, but will settle for a hivemind that thinks they are rebels. Think Islam. Those who glow love Islam because it is centralized and authoritarian. They hate Protties and Atheists because it is harder to create a hivemind.

Democracy?

Gommunism
:DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

Attached: bol.png (1010x1010, 233K)

Neoliberalism
Fascism
Authoritarianism

Ancap

Anprim

Anything that has racial superiority as a core belief

Communism and economics are mutually exclusive.

Attached: 1523588133834.png (872x886, 220K)

>Communism
>economical sense
pick one

National Socialism

If people care that much about muh pure race and bloodline maybe they should engage in mass incest because muh race and muh bloodline.

This, it’s only retarded Ameribums LARPing

lol hello nigger

What is wrong with minimal government? I don't need a batch of useless tax parasites telling me what to do.

boot kissers love big government because theyre autistic babies who need an iron grip around their throats or they are lost. why do you think the sub 80 iq crowd on Jow Forums love national socialism?

Libertarians are moral cowards.

Attached: Buchanon.png (1262x2094, 952K)

The last people that should be acknowledged are the idiot fucks of the religious right. They worship wealth and authority.

>Le based black man, amirite?
kys

Liberalistism.
The most stupid name ever.

Attached: 2992892696.jpg (1612x1270, 157K)

While it is good to try and make government as small as possible you have to understand that large societies need a fairly hands on governing body to maintan order and functionality. People are retards and if they arent forced to behave a cetain way by authority society falls apart. Its cynical but its the truth.

>libertarians
>open borders
>let in millions of collectivists
>use wizard powers
>invoke spells to cast away in-group preference
>if that fails cast magic dirt on them
makes perfect sense

Why not a strong government to control the framework in which people and the market operate freely, with the guideline being the good of the people the government is suppose to serve?

Like a Strong outer wall, protecting the people inside, allowing them to live and let live and create good contracts among themselves as they wish. With gatekeepers that control who may come inside, and make that single determination by asking the question "Is letting this in good for the people inside the walls or no?"

I'm a libertarian that fully supports carefully controlled borders. Security is one of the only legitimate reason a government has to tax.

Libertarians are by definition not ancaps.

>Why not a strong government
Because strong governments attract the (((commies))), thirsty for power.

Economically, maybe, but overall Communism might be the most idiotic.
It's self-contradictory since its ideals revolve around "power to the people" and "equality", yet it requires an authoritarian government..

Communism isn't an ideology, it's a tool to murder large sums of humans as quickly as possible in order to establish totalitarian control over natural resources. Y'all need to stop legitimizing it and kill everyone who even might be one.

Fuck you spamming ass in every thread today

It's a bot, with several IP's/Flags Report them as illegal, these are underage girls

These are pretty good critiques of meme libertarians. Anyone who thinks it's "authoritarian" to use force to protect yourself or your rights is a retard.

If we want to live in a stable and prosperous society that doesn't rely on a large central state, people need to be vigilant over their own communities, whether that means defending against physical invasion, or managing dissident behavior. But when presented with the freedom and responsibility of being your own defense force, most people will keep putting their time towards work/family/personal leisure. So instead of having localized people's militias, we have a standing army and state police.

As far as certain ideas and behaviors being inherently poisonous to society, there is no reason that local communities cannot or should not enforce whatever moral standards they see fit to keep their society running. If it is truly so, that certain moral instincts come naturally to a healthy human character, then would not do better for a society to let this moral spirit act through it's people, than to leave such matters to the interpretation of the state? True freedom is allowing individual human beings to naturally attune to this moral spirit and enforce it's will over society, rather than behaving through external compulsion.

Otherwise, as long as we as a society continue to outsource duties related to defense/security and moral authority/social order, then we get what we get.

Attached: 1525262585778.png (636x480, 483K)

libertarian ideology does not mean open borders.

Good thing it doesn't exist, eh?

Libertarianism. The radical belief that people should mind their own business.