NPR is not funded well, they have no business model so they rely on donations. Because of this, China now controls NPR and is using it as a wing of propaganda against the US.
It is very important that the US stop funding NPR, but more importantly it's very important they start funding an American version of NPR that spits out red pills.
1. Stop funding
2. Start funding another
Other urls found in this thread:
Damnit.
Why is Jow Forums so retarded
>Chinese buy up NPR
>All the lib-faggots become proud CCCP supporters
Any source on the secret deal?
I had to go to the NPR office last year for my job. Holy shit it is 96% feminist landwhales.
Sauce plz, senpai
Who the fuck else would work at NPR without going insane?
>the already insane
>2018
>listens to npr
Anyone who listens to npr in the current year is a fucking retard and unsalvagable
Plz source?
nonsense, it's good opposition research.
just listen to their program saturday/sunday and you'll know what their propaganda narrative will be all week
it's fucking maddening, but worth it to counter their propaganda.
Should be named “Social Justice Radio”
Can't be worse than it is now. I listen to it for opposition research. Here's a NPR daily lineup that is typical
>muh refugees story
>lets interview some hiphop artist
>drumph said this lets talk why hes wrong
>latino cuisine fusion restaurant market dynamics story
>the opioid crisis
>only rural and suburban mansplaining of election
>lgbtqrqrxtzxz win in some district court
>muh it was her turn
>russians
>it was the russians
>altright hatespeech neo nazi doom porn remix
>plx donate to get in our good boy club
>muh just and verdant outcomes
>how white privilege is hurting you
>how white privilege is helping you
>thechildfreelife.jpg
>muh russians
>muh
>mfw
Then BBC comes on and its the same thing just with a british accent.
>making shit up
>the post
It’s still funded by the US government. They make up the rest of their budget via donations.
It's Nigger Problem Radio because that's all they ever talk about.
I believe npr would take money from anyone.... but their propaganda is super hyper sonic Jewish.
Meh, they've been Soros puppets for years, although the tried to cover it up with 'funding from' such-and-such foundation, this-and-that charitable trust. Only idiots continue to take the their shit seriously.
npr is fun to listen to because they don't run commercials. boomer conservative radio is unlistenable because of the commercials.
npr isn't even that left wing. they're mostly just bog standard Democrats. they do a lot of round panel shows where all political sides are represented. honestly as a whole they're probably less left wing than CNN or even MSNBC.
did you hear the shitty jokes this morning about President Trump on their comedy show?
they just can't leave it alone, what the fuck is wrong with liberals.
This is exactly why Jow Forums is so popular.
The media is fucking annoying
the increasingly frequent pledge drives are worse than talk station commercials tbqhwyf
What influence does china have over nprs podcasts? Theres a lot of... Non-political things in there lol.
Are you guys just saying this? Are you guys just bored with yourselves?
This:
I listen on my way in to work, and while it is infuriating to not be able to shut them down (never gotten through in the call in shows -yet) it is a good way to find out what the narrative is going to be/is.
They absolutely suck Muslim, immigrant, women, and every other oppressed class' dick.
Still would appreciate source on the china deal though...
That would secure him 75% of the progressive Democrats at the cost of maybe 10% of bible belters. Chinas propaganda would stand no chance against that bomb.
I don't know what polling data might be available, but my sense from boomers on smaller-time talk radio is that there's a lot of receptivity to the legalization question both from the medical perspective (health care cost and effectiveness is a major consideration, and pot or just CBD is popular among physically and psychologically damaged vets), and from a desire to remove power from the cartels. It might not be as costly in the bible belt as one might think. Might depend for how many that's just "the last straw" or something, but if it's merely made in to a state by state decision process, which is exactly the right thing to do, then that's not quite the same as Trump waving declaring that there's going to be weed everywhere.
I wish there was a /pol-lite/
Not like Jow Forums is a sekrit club or anything just a place with more news and less shitposting. It seems people have tried maybe it’s the shitpostingvthats the magic ingredient
Wait a minute: when did the Chicoms become NPR’s sole funding source?
Is that really the case? I know they suck Soros and Bankster Cock, but did the Chinese come in and replace all the Foundation money that calls the tune over there?
Sorry, I call BS. If the Chinese ran it, you’d be getting stories that were sympathetic to China all the time. There’d be a “tell”. Instead of “muh Russia” and “muh Trans Rights”.
was reinstated a while back, though I haven't lurked any time recently so I can't speak for quality.
>It might not be as costly in the bible belt as one might think
If so, it would even better if he does it
>but if it's merely made in to a state by state decision process, which is exactly the right thing to do, then that's not quite the same as Trump waving declaring that there's going to be weed everywhere.
That was kind of implied. But it would be already a great step for the US Cannabis industry if the FEDs would officially wave their okay and stop putting them stones in the way. In addition. If Trump does it clever, as a Republican, he will rob the Dems of a one time instant poll boost, and maybe the next three presidential elections
Agreed. I'm not plugged in to that whole movement, but it seems to me as though an important component would be for whatever relevant lobby groups or whatever to propose a spectrum of sensible limitations for states that might not want to dive right in the way Colorado did. For instance, it's typically legal currently to produce X number of gallons of liquor in your home for personal use, and then you're not subject to the same kinds of laws and regulations as for personal use. So even if you just said you could have X number of plants in your garden for personal use, then that could be the kind of limitation that certain states might find more palatable.
Or, where I live, there are still to this day a whole bunch of bars right on the county line because the next count over used to by a "dry" county many years ago, so folks there would have to go hop the county line to go hang out at a bar. So maybe another actual policy / taxing / regulation point to be talking about rather than
>DUDE WEED LMAO
would be specifically including wording at the state level to allow counties and cities to add their own restrictions on top of what the state might allow by default.
CBD oil AFAIK is already 50-state legal as long as it contains basically no THC, although I think I've heard there are some technicalities like it's not legal to manufacture in all states or something like that. One more sign of the ongoing popular desire to relax the situation.
NPR's MarketPlace has been intentional comedy since the program's inception
TURN OFF BOOMER CONSERVATIVE TALK RADIO AND TURN ON FASH THE NATION! IF YOU DONT DRAIN WHO WE TELL YOU TO DRAIN, WELL SWAMP YOU!
I cant imagine how bad the comedy section is
>DRUMPH? more like GRUMPF! GRUMPF? more like STUMPF! STUMPF? more like BLUMPF! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
The right wing media formula just boils down to poking libs in the eye. People don’t even have to be pissed off. Just say people are triggered over trump or some other nonsense and just slap some twitter screenshots with it. Just keep doing that and you’ll win.
when DOTR comes im just gonna walk into a CNN headquarters with a shotgun and ask everyone on this list to please for a single file line at the front of the lobby
You will certainly get a scaling issue and the question about which regulatory level gets what rights - but that should be decided from state to state, I'm sure that the power networks on the regional and local level differ greatly from state to state. When it comes to standards of manufacturing guess that would be a question for the federal level that would fall into the FDA reign. And I guess here would already be an easy risk great outcome potential political manoeuver. Trump telling the FDA to come up with a report about potential ways to guarantee quality M.J
dude I doubt it honestly. US politcs are 100% a team sport now and all you can really do is rally your own base for big turnouts. luckily trumps base is slightly larger than the Democrats coastal strongholds but the democrats can change that by importing more beaer votes.
When I was first exploring talk radio it didn't take too long to notice how many hosts filled up large parts of their show with
>DID YOU HEAR WHAT RUSH LIMBAUGH JUST SAID
which sort of worked at first a little bit, because it's not unusual to play clips of what other commentators or shows (or these days jewtubers) are up to, but then you realize that a large amount of left-leaning programming boils down to being triggered about whatever the evil person on the right just said.
So like I wouldn't exactly praise Rush as some great commentator so much as a guy who made a boat load of money on keeping up with a certain formula. But when the alternatives are even less creative then that's just disappointing.
>That would secure him 75% of the progressive Democrats
No it wouldn't you dumb faggot. It doesn't matter what Trump does, those people would never vote for him or anyone who doesn't love communism
Don't forget the whole "we don't have commercials but we're going to spend five minutes shilling the international megacorporations who donate to us for the tax deductions" bullshit. At least the ads on the classic rock station I usually listen to are mostly for local businesses.
The other side of it is the agricultural industry, which is yuge here in terms of farm subsidies at the federal level (and then that combines with UN Agenda federal and megacorporation land grabs). So if you were to unlease the possibility of using cannibas for it's many industrial uses at any substantial scale, then now you're going to have to deal with the farming issue at the federal level.
It's a delicate thing to unwind when you get to legalization and scale. The optimist in me would like to point out that farm subsidies have become distortionary and bad for the environment, so maybe if we're going to go through a phase of shaking up international trade relations and have to suffer through some arguably healthy market reorganization, then maybe this would be a good time to simultaneously explore whether and how we might want to allow industrial cannabis usage as a new growth industry, and possibly a market segment where the little guy can do the high-risk / high-reward / high-growth exploratory phase of the game.
Might be, but he would get people from a young new hip industry into his boat, if sold right, might break the myth about him being a bible fag with the Sanders crowd
>Import more
SCOTUS has signalled in Ohio that they are not turning a blind eye on election fraud anymore. The bus party might end soon in the relevant states.
What is a hyperbole faggot
That's what makes the ((DNC)) complaints Russia owns PutinTrump so funny, because the liberals are extensively owned by hostile, illiberal, inhumane regimes like the ones in China and Saudi Arabia.