would the death of George Soros change anything?
Would the death of George Soros change anything?
Eli Brown
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
humanevents.com
gulagbound.com
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
imgur.com
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
zerohedge.com
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
mintpressnews.com
archive.is
richardpoe.com
archive.is
archive.is
archive.org
youtube.com
historyandpolitics77.blogspot.com
canvasopedia.org
breitbart.com
express.co.uk
news.sky.com
reuters.com
zerohedge.com
washingtontimes.com
newsmax.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
redstate.com
washingtontimes.com
washingtontimes.com
bloomberg.com
bbc.com
timesofisrael.com
marketwatch.com
esiweb.org
marketwatch.com
seekingalpha.com
moneyweek.com
cointelegraph.com
ft.com
breitbart.com
fortune.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Hunter Cruz
Damage is done.
Connor Nguyen
i mean its not like once this guy dies, all the liberals will die too
Luis Clark
Not in the long-term, but one less string on a puppet is always nice.
Justin Hughes
Children would sleep in silence for an eternity.
Jaxson Flores
Not at all
Luis Bailey
He probably has a couple clones of himself lined up to take his place after the original copy croaks.
Cameron Sanchez
I'm afraid not, he has 4 sons and 2 nephews
Ryan Phillips
But a lot of them won't get any more money for they (((humanitarian aid))) NGOs.
Right?
I hope his son loses all the fortune.
Christian Robinson
He has kids so no
Andrew Baker
>4 sons and 2 nephews
oh shit
But maybe they're all going to squabble over the inheritance and waste it away.
Adrian Cruz
he's just one rat in the nest
there is a whole hive of them
Jaxson Bell
Left liberals would lose their greatest money supplier and a fairly influential thinker. But it would not be the end of the world for them. Others will rise up; it's not like Soros is the only liberal with any agency. So it would definitely do us some good if this fucker bites the dust, but it won't be the big change we all hope for.
Aiden Stewart
His name is legion.
Hudson Bailey
not really. he has children who think like him who would get his money and take his place. also hes just 1 of millions of Jews
Brayden Cruz
They have a army of kikes worldwide
Blake Garcia
He's merely the face. It wouldn't matter.
Kayden Thomas
The point of Open Societies Foundation is to survive him
Carson Wood
The world would be slightly better
Easton Robinson
He has children and a dozen or so institutions already set up and probably funded with trusts.
Him being dead would change little.
Gabriel Johnson
2 weeks of less maneuverability and plots for jews most likely. Some re-organziation for several months. Running plots may fail. Very...very loose guess tho. I would say it would be near low to mediocre level on the world stage.
Brody James
Yes.
"Sugar daddy is gone, now what do we do?"
Kevin Walker
One man can make a huge difference. Very few are as skilled as him at wrecking and subversing nations.
Luke Thomas
Nah. His soiboy faggot son will take the reigns.
Austin Hall
As if. That cunt has less T than a 70 year old man.
Henry Wilson
You think they are rats, they think you are disposable utensil.
Lucas Miller
Soros is just a fall guy for Israel.
You're distracted looking at him while Israel floods Europe with niggers. Jews play both sides.
Jayden Rogers
Yes, there are others, but these people don't grow on trees. One man can make a huge difference and all it takes is one weak successor.
Caleb White
No.
Look into the Ford Foundation. Probably even worse then Soros.
Plus Soros is just a part of a larger network,
Someone else will take his role.
Wyatt Hernandez
Only if he died of a broken heart from the lose of his murdered lineage.
Fortunately for him he's rich and powerful and you guys are faggots
Blake Anderson
Yes it would. He's a cunt but a tough old cunt. His kids haven't lived his life. No matter what he's tried they have been spoiled and are much weaker than him as people. As the old globalists die off so will globalism.
William Barnes
Soros is one part of it. We have the Clintons, the FBI, the Rochschilds, Israeli officials and their brainwashing, the Chinese communist government, the shitskins in the Middle East, the niggers who are having a population boom in Africa, the Mexicans trying to claim America as their own.
Ryder Murphy
The feeling is mutual.
Bentley Collins
The death of his son surely would. George Soros is 87 years old. He'd probably sperg out, die from old age, then his webbed Liberal ideologue SJW farms would cease to exist. Honestly two individuals dying would do so much benefit in the world; actually ridiculous just how cancer these two are to the entire human race.
Adam Nelson
We'd have to put his own theory to the test. He thinks he's a necessary evil. Listen to his own words, "It's like markets, if I wouldn't do this, someone else would fill the gap", along those lines.
But to answer, no.
What I'd give to interview him.
>tfw will never pillage Europe under a fake Christian name as the "best time of your life"
Alex is a fucking joke.
Not many of those families are really around anymore, unless I'm mistaken, in which case please shed some light.
>Rockefeller
Lost all influence.
>Rothschild
The Red Shield, what do they shield?
Maybe it's just a name.
>no Vanderbilt or Morgan
Anderson Cooper is Vanderbilt. The residual influence of the oil barons is finally starting to dilute. These banker and oil families exude far too much influence in a Representative Republic, let alone a "democracy".
Sebastian Diaz
you would think all these faggots in Europe, at least one of them could buck up and kill this Satanic fuck
Oliver Hughes
The Vanderbilt's problem is they had too many children and the wealth got dispersed among the branches.
Julian Hill
I see.
Think Rothschilds will go the same way in a generation?
How long does the Earth have to deal with these same damn families.
Christian Perry
Pretty sure his father will kill him to harvest adrenochrome in a desperate last act to keep himself alive.
Xavier Campbell
until one of you pussy faggots finally just kills them
I mean seriously these families are responsible for the deaths of millions and yet not one single activist has put them down
at some point you have to realize your slavery is a choice
Camden Edwards
It seems that one of his sons is already on the right track.
Jordan Wilson
I'm not sure why pol, or the right for the most part, hate George Soros? Is it just because he funds a lot of liberal stuff or nah?
From what I understand, he may be jewish but he doesn't fuck with Israel and dislikes how they play victim.
He just seems like some rich guy who cares too much about politics.
Liam Parker
Open Society would get a HUGE cash injection, likely someone even worse will be in charge.
Landon Torres
>why do people hate someone who funds psychotic liberal ideas
yeah man wtf i dont get it either
Jeremiah Fisher
Read his autobiography, then see if you need to ask that question again.
Eli Rogers
Another boogeyman will be found. The type of politics found on Jow Forums needs a shadowy underground figure to justify some of the beliefs
Jaxon Butler
Quite a bit. His children are nowhere near as smart as he is. But honestly him and his son need to go. The biggest irony is for all of his involvement in propping up marxist organizations, if he was to have his wealth seized and redistributed it'd solve his claimed goals much faster than what he's doing. Keyword: claimed goals. What he says he wants and what he wants are not the same thing.
James Gonzalez
No, because his son will inherit his fortune, and his son is WORSE. He's gay and a turbo leftist, more radical than his father.
Gavin Sanchez
Probably not because the Rothschilds were wealthier and incestuously intermarry. They are much more deliberate about preserving their wealth.
Cooper Wright
you realize he's only able to do this because of the loopholes capitalism gives to the rich?
reforming capitalism is the only way to stop billionaires from influencing politics, not the death of one specific creepy old man
John Russell
Lmfao I mean, hyperbole aside, what has he actually done? It just seems like he's funding tons of gay protest shit. He also said he hated GWB and would make it his lifes work to get him out of office... And he served 2 terms. So not sure why you guys think this guy has any real power?
Cool but i'd rather you just tell me then requiring me to read a book.
Ayden Peterson
>Soros dindu nuffin, Jow Forums is just PARANOID
-t. circumcized
Nolan Jackson
that's cool normie, lurk more before posting
Eli Miller
George Soros is worth 8 billion dollars, could be even more than that. Each kid and nephew would get over a billion dollars a piece before taxes. They couldn't spend that money if they tried.
Nolan Cook
Ok so you can't be me any real reasons? Alrighty then.
Josiah Anderson
No. The elite know he's old. Probably part of the reason he's the individual face of all the shit he's doing now. His replacements are already ready and in their 40's to take over the agenda when he's gone.
Carter Cruz
Death of his kids would. Let him live to see it. Let his friends and allies see it.
Levi Myers
Nobody would be able to breach their securi-
youtube.com
Oh.
Well thanks for the gaslight anyway.
>Billions of tax dollars go to eliminate threats to the United States of America, TLAs do NOTHING to stop the mass exertion of influence by billionaire families and thinktanks who publically threaten the States
O-oh, ok.
Christian Campbell
The immense drive and skill would be lost, his money will still push his ideals for another 30-40 years though.
Parker Fisher
>Cool but just spoonfeed me I don't want to have to do anything myself
You're the exact lack of quality person in this country that contributed and are contributing to it's downfall. Correct your ways or be destroyed when the moment comes. Only warning.
David Price
>what has he actually done? It just seems like he's funding tons of gay protest shit
Lurk longer before you start posting.
humanevents.com
gulagbound.com
Gavin Garcia
It's not about being paranoid, it's about the need of a figure at the end of the chain of arbitrary emotional political decisions. e.g. we need nationalism because ... ... who are all controlled by the secret shadowy organisation of soros an co.
Adrian Brooks
He's nothing else other than a Jow Forumstard boogeyman, a black sheep that underachieving, low IQ masses of anti-social NEETs can blame for their own personal and racial shortcomings.
Luis Lewis
Why did Soros fund black lives matter? How does that benefit himself? It seems like a waste of money where he receives nothing in return.
Colton Hernandez
>It's not about paranoia
...It's about your oscillating contradictory rhetoric.
>the chain of arbitrary emotional political decisions
Are leftists capable of comprehending their political opposition without resorting to psychoanalytic caricature and projection?
>who are all controlled by the secret shadowy organisation
Like the patriarchy, the 1%, white supremacy, the bourgeoisie, etc? We all have enemies, do you seriously believe that ethnic and racial groups don't have conflicting interests -- who are you gaslighting with that nonsense?
Ryan Adams
Ok but that's not a good reason not to just... Tell me? Typically went you ask someone to just give you reasons, you don't tell them to go read an entire book on a matter when you could list it for them?
Personally sounds like you don't know what you're talking about, just saying.
You realize neither of those websites are probably reputable right? The first sight says up front that's 'conservative which means it holds a strong bias.
The second site looks like some random blog site, and half the sources are out of context from George Soro own website or from other random blogs that are using fake sources.
Also your imagine is just a bunch of random nonsense. He funded a bunch of gay protest groups? Like lmfao how do you link that to him being a huge player in some jewish conspiracy?
I'm not super rich by any stretch of the imagination, but one billion dollars on the life style the ultra rich have is easily spent.
Aiden Brooks
He’s one of many but I am looking forward to all of these old fucks dying off. They’ve done enough damage to the world.
Connor Davis
>You realize neither of those websites are probably reputable right?
You realize you can verify their claims regardless of what you "feel" about the status of the websites, right? Google is easy to use.
Leo Ramirez
No
Tyler Campbell
you realize that according to openserets. org, 9 of the top 20 political donors fund republicans? its not like soros is the only one who puts their money into political spooks
Jacob Nelson
I would sleep a little better at night
Nolan Long
>of the top 20 political donors fund republicans?
You completely miss the point, of course he also funds republicans, its points it out in the graphic I posted. This isn't a partisan issue. Notice how the republicans and democrats he funds seem to magically have the same agenda of issues that affect his investments?
Christian Jackson
Newfags and normies ITT, I realize it's hard for you to do research and you don't want to read anything that doesn't have a big shiny corporate logo plastered all over it to let you know it's "credible". Show some measure of critical and independent thinking, and do some reading this weekend. Start here:
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
imgur.com
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
zerohedge.com
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
mintpressnews.com
archive.is
richardpoe.com
archive.is
archive.is
archive.org
youtube.com
historyandpolitics77.blogspot.com
canvasopedia.org
Caleb Diaz
but if its not a partisan issue, why does Jow Forums call him an evil liberal? why even focus on a specific person when the issue is obviously very widespread across both parties
Jacob Reed
No. There are millions waiting to replace him.
Matthew Cook
Yes the world would be a better place even if it did not know it.
Ryder Rogers
>but if its not a partisan issue, why does Jow Forums call him an evil liberal?
1.) He's objectively evil.
2.) He's a hardcore leftist.
3.) Jow Forums isn't one person, of course right-wingers here will demonize him through THEIR partisan framework, but there are objective reasons to consider him a threat. In fact, there are just as many who might be libertarian or liberal who have reason to criticize his motives, since his activism has a tendency to coincide exclusively with his investment agenda.
breitbart.com
express.co.uk
news.sky.com
reuters.com
zerohedge.com
washingtontimes.com
newsmax.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
redstate.com
washingtontimes.com
washingtontimes.com
washingtontimes.com
bloomberg.com
bbc.com
Hunter Parker
>but one billion dollars on the life style the ultra rich have is easily spent.
That's assuming you invest absolutely none of it. You could make enough money just off of dividend paying stocks to never have to even touch the initial investment.
Isaiah Jenkins
For example:
>Times of Israel. January, 2018.
>Soros to Facebook and Google; "Your days are numbered".
timesofisrael.com
>November 2017. Market Watch
>Soros dumps Holdings in Facebook among others and invests in companies like ORACLE CORP
marketwatch.com
Soros was hoping the dump would tank Facebook so he could swoop in later like the vulture he is. Instead Facebook got even more valuable, hence his ire towards them.
Luis Perez
Other than our local "based" Jews needing a new scapegoat to pin all Jewish crime on, no.
Aiden Thomas
the guy is incredibly smart and he's surprisingly honest about his intentions too
inertia will keep his empire going for a long time (unless something happens) but they can never fill his shoes, it will slowly decay without him
Joseph Lewis
Personally it sounds like you're not actually interested in knowing and you're just searching for reasons to shoot things down. If you actually cared you'd be looking it up instead of bitching like you are.
Aaron Wood
>He's a hardcore leftist.
funding neoliberals and college SJW's does not make you an actual communist. Commies are not the only group in history to use propaganda/protesters to destabliize a country
>there are objective reasons to consider him a threat.
I wouldn't call zero-hedge or Jow Forums objective sources though. Democrats are the only of the big 2 parties that claims to want money out of politics. whether you believe them or not is up to you, but Republicans and libertarians don't even PRETEND to give a shit about who they take money from
Nolan Johnson
It would make me smile and thank God.
Christian Cruz
This is unfortunately true, just taking a cursory look ITT. The Ford Foundation, war profiteering, oil tycoons. It promotes the worst type of CAPITALIZING. I simply do not know enough of economics to try to suggest an avenue of solution, but to punish the rich because they invested well is ludicrous.
How much influence they can exert onto a "democracy" in our current state, debateable.
Is Soros not a testament to Representative Republicanism in a bizarre way? He (at points of his life) worked extremely hard to maintain his success, and while doing so involved himself deeply into the political drive of the U.S. He is highly educated in matters economical, political, societal, would he not be well represented, in a Republic?
High-quality post, thanks for the read. I'd have to disagree with his notion of pouring scourn into the culture of America ~9/11 implying siding with the enemy. Residual troops near Mecca and Medina, and FUCKING ISRAELI FIRST POLICY, and an oddly prophetic notion of us moving to Jerusalem were OBL's prime motives. A lot of it was Islamic madness, but to ignore the geopolitical motives is a step away from the problem.
>implying OBL had anything to do with 9/11
Doesn't negate his points, in whoever wrote his declaration. What sort of governmental system do you think Soros represents?
Wew lad, thank you for article dump. You're alright.
Hunter Thomas
>funding neoliberals and college SJW's does not make you an actual communist.
You're right, it doesn't. I don't you have to be a "communist" to be a hardcore leftist, the spectrum isn't the same as it was in 1930. The West has its own brand of pseudo-capitalist fabian marxism, not the Bolshevik party communism of the Eastern bloc.
> Commies are not the only group in history to use propaganda/protesters to destabliize a country
If one day you bother to actually read any of the links I posted, you might realize he spends his time funding coups, maidan-style riots and uprisings while he tanks currencies and destabilizes entire economies. He's done this just as much to profit it seems as to manipulate politics in a particular region. He's not some kind of "commie" trying to destabilize capitalism, that's not the kind of leftism we have today. Modern leftists are embedded firmly in global finance capital.
Cheers. Glad to help.
Zachary Ross
it would put a lot of people in a good mood for at least a week
Isaiah Jackson
>zero-hedge or Jow Forums objective sources
>Democrats are the only of the big 2 parties that claims to want money out of politics
clearly there's a conflict of logic here
Jacob Morgan
Yes and he lives in Westchester County for crying out loud.
Don't listen to these people saying it wouldn't make a difference they are COWARDS and SODOMITES.
Charles Thomas
*Also of note: SOROS PLAYED MAJOR ROLE in 2013-present EU migrant "crisis"...
Helps to create and facilitate "arab spring" according to Wikileaks...
>Develops 'the merkel plan' which is followed very closely by Germany and the EU
esiweb.org
>Funds leaflets and NGOs telling refugees where to go, how to get money and housing, ships to "rescue" human traffickers and their clients:
>Tells Europe they should borrow money to fund the surge required after taking refugees.
>And then recently, he backs gold.
seekingalpha.com
moneyweek.com
>Bets on the Deutsche bank crashing.
ft.com
EXTRAS
breitbart.com
>Selling the gold he bought straight after Brexit
fortune.com
Blake Allen
>Ik zie aan je kop dat je links stemt.
t. Minister-President Baudet.
Ayden King
>Westchester County
surely he has armed private security
Parker Parker
where's Trump in there?
Jose Ross
hi user, lets start a youtube channel. We can do pewdiepie video effects and mix in some meme's.
Easton Sanchez
His tactics are practically carbon copied from the Protocols FFS it's ridiculous
Ryan Collins
>he spends his time funding coups, maidan-style riots and uprisings
that is my whole point. Shit-stirring for economic gain is not a political position, literally anyone with money can do that.
Hitler did the same thing by supporting nationalist/anti-semitic groups across Europe. western Europe and america did it by funding nationalists to fight communism/the USSR, and before that they literally paid money to sneak lenin back into russia during WWI because they knew his "people's revolution" would take Russia out of the war.
Read a book written by a historian not a nazi for once
Dominic Bell
It's this shit right here, that pic.. (thanks for further reads btw)
See To read the agencies objectives, right out of their own mouth. It's geopolitics, and all of that wouldn't surprise me at all except when Soros turned and started all this stateside. That's when it became in the Agency's obligation to shut it down.
Who was it that ended up handling Antifa, (declaring their organizational status), and BLM?
Wasn't someone with an infinite black budget!
Speaking of, seems so absolutely idiotic in a geopolitical sense. They want to destabilize the reason, abundantly clear. But we already had bases there, and all those leaks about the backdoors the States have into German comms, they were under the States' sphere of influence.
I'm just not high enough IQ to understand how shipping in millions of fighting age, militant Islamists into a stable, loyal, vassal will turn out in favor of the acting parties. I could even reach and say it's MIC wanting to animate an enemy out of clay, i.e. ISIS, but any European conflict will involve mostly conventional small arms, not a huge gain for them. I'm sure it'll turn out ok, in the long game.
You don't deserve that 88.
>shit-stirring for economic gain is not a political position
>goes on to name political parties funding opposition to other political parties
Hm.
Well, ok, I'll go read Protocols, the Henry Ford version. Technically translated/written/distributed by a patriotic American and avid historian!
Lincoln Sullivan
the region*
William Anderson
>shit-stirring for economic gain is not a political position
>goes on to name political parties funding opposition to other political parties
if a variety of parties across a spectrum and over time all do the same thing, it can't really be attributed only to the left, can it?
also, the culprit for Islamic terror is wahhabism and SA, not soros in case you're curious