Everything is so balkanized, I feel like there's intentional fake barriers being made in order to perpetually cause dissonance. The truth is supposed to be just the truth isn't it? Don't these labels stifle the pursuit of knowledge and understanding?
Why are there artificial barriers between Science, Religion, etc.?
Gavin Reed
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
plato.stanford.edu
twitter.com
Carson Jackson
If a renaissance man is someone who excels in many different areas doesn't a worldwide renaissance demand a holistic approach to finding the truth?
Jonathan White
There is no connection there, the question "is there a God" and Scientific pursuit are unrelated and do not intersect. Expecting them too clues everyone in that you're a fag.
Kevin Jones
kill yourself jew
Dylan Collins
>advocates for atheism
>not a kike
Nicholas Sanchez
Julian Rodriguez
> intentional fake barriers being made in order to perpetually cause dissonance.
Not quite.
Caleb Moore
The only gods that will ever exist will be superintelligent AIs.
Aaron Thompson
The Jews get around the universal law of free will by obfuscating the truth within their movies and tv shows and media. They don't tell the truth straight up because they think of us as slaves.
David Brooks
Kill yourself. AI is not a god. AI is a subdimensional evil. DWAVE computers are evil.
Easton Morgan
>Why are there artificial barriers between Religion
Because some are right and some are wrong?
Chase Morgan
What a stupid fucking thread.
Charles Foster
Because there are ideologues in science that are concerned about how the world should be, rather than figuring out what made it the way that it is.
Zachary Sullivan
By shutting out observation from the computers as they work it destroys the laws of this world
Aiden Hall
But what makes you think the one you just happened to be born into is correct, while the countless other ones are wrong? Some holy book? Like every other religion also has?
Jordan Turner
quantum computation relying on "darkness" to compute outside of binary paradigm.
"darkness" being the conditions imposed on quantum processors (such as Dwave) that completely remove the possibility of any human observation of the position of a transistor due to it being placed in a material and energetic vacuum (near zero kelvin), this lack of observational ability breaks the continuum of quantum mechanics because observation guides reality (double slit experiment) and this lack of observation is in reality "utter darkness"
kind of like the abyss.
Kayden Perez
I think the jews detected my "Dark matter is bullshit" threads and started pumping out this loony nonsense to discredit me.
Andrew Jenkins
To expand on that quote:
The dispute between rationalism and empiricism takes place within epistemology, the branch of philosophy devoted to studying the nature, sources and limits of knowledge. The defining questions of epistemology include the following.
1. What is the nature of propositional knowledge, knowledge that a particular proposition about the world is true?
To know a proposition, we must believe it and it must be true, but something more is required, something that distinguishes knowledge from a lucky guess. Let’s call this additional element ‘warrant’. A good deal of philosophical work has been invested in trying to determine the nature of warrant.
2. How can we gain knowledge?
We can form true beliefs just by making lucky guesses. How to gain warranted beliefs is less clear. Moreover, to know the world, we must think about it, and it is unclear how we gain the concepts we use in thought or what assurance, if any, we have that the ways in which we divide up the world using our concepts correspond to divisions that actually exist.
3. What are the limits of our knowledge?
Some aspects of the world may be within the limits of our thought but beyond the limits of our knowledge; faced with competing descriptions of them, we cannot know which description is true. Some aspects of the world may even be beyond the limits of our thought, so that we cannot form intelligible descriptions of them, let alone know that a particular description is true.
Benjamin Peterson
Juan Robinson
Jason Cox
Andrew Torres
Jason Scott
Aaron Martinez
Oliver Thompson
Camden Scott
Aiden Johnson
Connor Morales
Levi Wood
Carter Sullivan