how accurate is this?
How accurate is this?
Switzerland and Ukraine are not multicultural in the modern sense. They have more than one culture but many countries do. The presence of German minorities in Poland doesn't make it multicultural.
Modern multiculturalism refers to the importation of a potentially infinite number of cultures and giving them all legal and moral equivalency.
yes that looks like an accurate map of the middle east
Also Finland would be indifferent for sure, and Norway and Denmark would be borderline.
>Modern multiculturalism refers to the importation of a potentially infinite number of cultures and giving them all legal and moral equivalency.
this is what the governments of switzerland and ukriane believe in
>this is what the governments of Switzerland and Ukraine believe in
Switzerland is borderline but that DEFINITELY does not describe Ukraine. They have both Russian and Ukranian culture but that it is and they are even oppressive against Russian culture.
ukraine's government is pro fag and refugees
>indifferent
>balkans
i beg to differ
Replace nationalist with corrupt
No, they are not. They are pro-US/western, and I know that is what you are referring to, but so is Suadi Arabia and Japan, that doesn't mean they are multicultural.
poroshenko explicitly stated that he wanted ukraine to become a country for refugees
It's not as cut and dry.
Source?
fags in public get regular beatdowns in ukraine, even more so in the more rural areas
they also get the protection of 5000 police officers, only since maidan has this happened
grossly inaccurate
Can someone quickly explain the difference between all the colors/buzzwords thx
This is a shitty map, because it includes both gypsies (over a million in Serbia) and muslims (arguably non-European by culture) as "European".
Also it implies that Russia is somehow comparable with Western Europe, but it isn't, because it's non European population actually lives in the non-European part of Russia, and almost all European cities in Russia are 100% Russian.
belarus really?
We don't have a national ideology.
cultural ideology
possibly, but saying the government is pro fag is a bit of a stretch. Pride parades are just high profile/public so the police can't get away with beating the shit out of them on the streets
other than that, fags are not accepted at all lol
Serbia is nationalist, you both can suck my giant dick.
>This is a shitty map, because it includes gypsies as European
No, it doesn't. It just uses the census data for gypsies, which massively underestimates their numbers.
We don't have a cultural ideology, we're Italians, that's all.
>Serbia is nationalist
We have a literal Croatian lesbian PM. Wake up retard.
It's the only country in Europe that is both a pure nation state in the strict sense, meaning both an ethnic populace and national control of politics and economy. You can't be both EU member and nationalist, you can be nativist at most.
A random obscure Ukranian rag of dubious quality is not even slightly sufficient to prove the entire ideology of the government of a country that is 98% white.
More importantly, the President in Ukraine is a mostly ceremonial role (checks and balance) and the real power is held by the PM/parliament so he could be a Justin Trudeau level multiculturalist and it wouldn't matter because he isn't the one making the decisions. Italy does currently have a globalist, multiculturalist, President currently and yet you put them as nativist. Rightly so because like Ukraine their real power is held by the parliament.
>how accurate is this?
not accurate at all.
>You can't be both EU member and nationalist
>Nationalism is a political, social, and economic system characterized by the promotion of the interests of a particular nation, especially with the aim of gaining and maintaining sovereignty (self-governance) over the homeland
So there you have it. If your AIM is gaining sovereignty you're nationalist. Hungary is in the EU and nationalist.
norway isn't cucked.
Ukraine is probably 99% white without Crimea.
Our president has less power than the queen of England, he's just a ceremonial figure, a head of state. The prime minister is actually in charge of the government.
>Our president has less power than the queen of England, he's just a ceremonial figure, a head of state. The prime minister is actually in charge of the government.
Yes I know, that was exactly my point.
My bad, I see what you mean now
this might be freudian or something, but a dragon butt fucking a man (pic related) is all i can see now when i look at europe
No problem senpai.
Came here to say this. Oh kek, what a dumb map.
Poor Sweden what the fuck does there white guilt come from damn Jews...
what he said also defact and dejure you gave up kosovo recently
thou if the plan is to push for freedom of choice you will have business in Bosnia in the future
time will tell, but for now your government is not nationalistic
Very solid posts.
>almost all European cities in Russia are 100% Russian
Moscow is only ~85 Russian. Of course, that is amazing for a city of almost 10 million. But still, not 100%.
Not a bad map, but I would put Czechia as ethnonationalist.
>prime minister is actually in charge of the government.
Isn't your PM a literal kike?
i think these maps are bullshit
Sorry, I meant that to the Ukro poster.
> coping
>relationship with blacks
>relationship with asians
>relationship with jews
the three above dont exist in Croatia or Slovenia except mby some cryptojews
>relationship with muslims
if asked relationship with bosniak i doubt it would be close to ~10%
let alone some somali