I grew up around guns and have been hunting a handful of times over the years. That being said...

>and have been hunting a handful of times over the years

Im gonna stop you right there hoss, with all due respect, shut the fuck up son!

sage

kys

I'm rightwing as fuck but one thing I'll never agree with is America's retarded gun laws.

Jesus Christ, I can't even fathom living around with armed niggers, that shit sounds terrifying. Even if I had a firearm on me at all times, would still feel unsafe.

Maybe this would work in countries with 95%+ white people, but clearly not in Muttland neither Chinada. Stop being such gun nuts

"I agree with X and Y Opinion. BUT z is why we need so.ething different" fucking whatever
>inbf greentext
I'm a newfag...do something

I want you to tell me something. I'm pro gun. As a pro gun person I am always told what I have to forfeit to you gun control people under the guise of it being a "compromise". I want you to tell me what you, a person who wants gun control, is willing to forfeit to me a person who wants pro gun legislation.

No one needs high capacity paper clips.

Attached: 1457841366716.png (770x682, 191K)

>we need gun control measures
>need

Why?

Do you see? You get to keep your guns! They pinky triple swear that this is the last time they compromise, and that the second you give in they won’t start pushing for more. Fuck these people.

Freshman essay / 10

Sage

>I grew up around guns and have been hunting a handful of times over the years. That being said, even I realize that we need to have some more gun control measures put into place.
lol no faggot suck butt

No, but in all seriousness, come get em pussy LMAAOOOOOO

shut the fuck up bitch

>It's much better to compromise than to just lose everything.

Attached: lib-nra.png (328x314, 49K)

> (OP)
>I hope a pack of Muslim niggers break into your home, rape and murder your mother and loved ones.
>Then you'll change your mind.

Jesus, you went dark my friend.

Attached: 1487595336066.png (377x330, 6K)

Nah, I'm done giving your types anything. Fuck off or come and take em. I'm not giving you shit.

you went biographical anglo

>The 2nd Amendment was written to ensure Americans can hunt

Fuck off with your concern-trolling bait thread

Attached: slideBait.png (1156x2031, 290K)

Attached: global rates of murder compared to gun ownership.jpg (960x694, 67K)

Shut the fuck up boomer trash

Attached: BBD41506-1A0C-400E-87C5-9AD3E0A58D4D.jpg (275x183, 22K)

spoken like a right nonce. SAGE

Attached: FB_IMG_1521374063758.jpg (960x876, 74K)

If definetly noticed. That's why I'm going to start asking this of these people who say they aren't antigun but just pro control. The ones who say they just want common sense reform and compromise. Tired of all the simple falseness.

Yeah, same. I wish I could say come and take them though. I had a tragic accident and lost all six of my guns. I was at my uncles house and thought I would pretend to be rambo or something so I went riding jet skis while wearing all five of my guns. Took a turn too hard and flipped the jet ski. I felt my four guns sinking into the river, and I reached out, but I couldn’t touch even one of the three. Do you have any idea what it’s like to lose your two most important possessions for self defense? I lost the only rifle I ever owned that day, and from that only proved to me that only cowards own guns. I’m glad I’ve never owned a fire arm.

Claims to be a gun expert “high capacity clips”

Attached: 12E6E682-E11B-48B0-AA2F-03F17A41AE7C.jpg (399x400, 55K)

>can't even fathom living around with armed niggers
:O holy shit let's just make weapons posession ILLEGAL**** :O THEN THE NIGGERS WILL GIVE UP THEIR GUNS TOO!!! great idea faggot, eat smegma

Might I suggest you fuck off as well

>That being said, even I realize that we need to have some more gun control measures put into place.
If you have been around guns then you know this is already the case.
Fuck off.

I'm not saying we BAN guns! Fucking hell, you gun obsessed psychopaths, get a grip.

NO ONE is coming for your guns. NO ONE is saying ban all guns. I'm just saying that we need to further restrict something that is used to kill people.

I don't know where you deranged right-wingers come up with this bullshit.

>Colonists rebel against their government
>Form a new government with strict limits
>Add a bill of rights to be extra sure
>Include the 2nd amendment because deer hunting
Yeah, that totally makes sense

Let's compromise then. What pro gun legislation are you okay with passing in exchange for the support of some restriction?

Actually, plenty of people are saying ban all guns. Unfortunately for you and your totalitarian plans, a few of your more eager attack dogs can’t control themselves. Don’t like guns? Move to one of the dozens of countries with equal or better living standards to the US, that restrict guns. I’ll never understand this obsession with doing what everyone else is doing. If you like their rules better, go play in their playground.

One bullet for the deer, 29 for the commie.

Attached: tktryuk.png (600x450, 326K)

There's nothing.

It's kind of like when a parent compromises and lets their kid stay up for a few minutes later. The parent does not get anything out of it.

It's basically the same, the gun owners don't necessarily get anything out of it per se, but they are able to keep what they already have. They just have to comply with a few more regulations to do so.

What a stupid meme. It assumes the 2nd Amendment is about deer hunting, when we all know it's the last bulwark against tyranny.

How ill informed and straw-Manish.

>that per capita gun ownership
Europoors only wish they could defend themselves from (((Brussels)))

Attached: 1391301176497.gif (285x171, 982K)

You telling me you've been hunting before doesn't mean anything to your arguement

Doesn't sound like too much of a win for gun owners, then. In that case I'll disregard your suggestions. Thanks for running all your proposals by us first!

checked

Attached: 1j9c03.jpg (500x500, 67K)

funny how you mention shooting back, something that niggers will do

Do you not care about this country? If you were REALLY a patriot like you claim to be then you'd be absolutely open to more gun control since doing so will benefit this country.

Bait or retarded. In either case, no bump for you

Attached: Bait (not).png (800x800, 21K)

Except we’ve “compromised” before again and again and it’s never enough for gun grabbers. It’s the philosophy of baby steps. You never make an overt gun grab, you chip away piece by “reasonable” piece until it’s all gone.
>National firearms act
>federal firearms act
>omnibus gun act
>firearm owners act or whatever it’s called saying no more full auto production
>assault weapons ban

You can still own a gun just fine, stop whining like your rights are being infringed on.

>they aren't.

You are not my metaphorical parent. You do not control me. If you want support of more "common sense" gun laws then go figure some real pro gun legislation you'd be willing to equally support as a real compromise. You can repeat the lie of "this is the last time I'd ask for restrictions I swear" all you want but I'm letting you know that you will be wasting typing stamina because this is not a compromise.

Now that's just a No True Scotsman argument. It's right there in the sticky. Can you explain in detail how this would benefit the country?

Declaring something doesn’t make it true. Gun rights have absolutely been infringed in this country, and it’s a tragedy traitors like you aren’t being lynched. You want to control guns? You have exactly one option. Call a constitutional convention, and repeal the second amendment. Until that is done, then the law of the land is that “the right of the people to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED”

sage faggot

I'd be willing to switch to a 29 round magazine. If the leftoids would stop whining.

Attached: 1523156849230.jpg (606x606, 185K)

OP is a fucking faggot kike

Attached: 03717A1A-3425-4190-8FD1-21FA11B4EB68.jpg (458x421, 43K)

Pretty sure psych tests will not work in 90% of cases. Ive been depressed and suicidal for years. If I lived in America id already be dead atleast 3 years. If you want to beat a psych eval you can, easily. Given that suicide accounts for the vast vast majority of gun deaths in the US, setting up some mandatory evaluation will not do anything to deter that.

Two things, sweetheart. In that analogy the metaphorical parent is the federal government. And second, your opinion does not matter because you don't have a second amendment in Canada.

>Can you explain in detail how this would benefit the country?
Really, you need me to break it down for you? Well my first suggestion would prevent straw purchases, which DO happen. My second suggestion would ensure that only the mentally sound have assault rifles. My third suggestion would ensure that even if someone fell through the cracks, they'd still have to be screened before being able to buy ammo.

If you can't see how this would benefit this nation then you can't really call yourself a patriot.

>Call a constitutional convention, and repeal the second amendment.
Cute, but that is not necessary. When the Supreme Court finally takes another gun case they WILL be on the right side of history.

OP literally a fucking faggot kike

Attached: 94A60BB9-21FE-481E-A28A-25F69A827039.jpg (924x889, 101K)

>we need to have some more gun control measures put into place
NOPE.

Attached: 40b.jpg (600x623, 28K)

Oh you don’t like my guns? NYS faggot Jew

Attached: 7450B91F-E8D8-4311-A14E-501D81EBFFCE.jpg (89x125, 10K)

Let me ask you gun control advocates something.
Do you honestly believe your government has your best interest at heart or do they have their own interests at heart?
The people who rule over you live in gated communities; surrounded by their own kind, and have armed police patrols driving up and down their streets making sure no one touches their property.
I don't have that same luxury. I have to wait 19 min for an armed policeman to show up to my property, and even then; they may or may not actually do anything.
Your vile fucks need to actually educate yourselves instead of thinking that guilt tripping folks will actually work.
sage

shut up bitch

Goblina la nocturna el grabbo

Attached: B01DC3B3-6610-48DA-84E4-92320707E27E.jpg (1024x762, 270K)

It’s “cute, but not necessary” that the official protocol for changing the constitution is just ignored? I can’t fathom the blind fanatical hatred of the opposing side that is a prerequisite for such a short sighted, dangerous precedent. Why not ignore all amendments? You don’t really have be right to privacy, because terrorism. You don’t have the right to free speech, because feelings. You don’t have the right to petition the government for greviences, you’re just a filthy “citizen”. You people are lunatics. The wording is very clear, we have the God-given right to deliver violence in retribution upon those who would do us harm. You want to contest that, out it a vote the real way, not this bullshit Supreme Court legislating from the bench nonsense. That isn’t the way to do things. Such a fickle thing to allow 9 people to decide for the whole country.
>this whole thread is bait

unironically this

>we
not Jow Forums
>high capacity clips
>clips
lol

>im just like you goy
>constitution, guns, god etc..
>but we should throw it all away for *straw man*

OP Is a cuck fsggot

Attached: D8D7CCCD-B7D2-4366-963E-C51816E29D16.jpg (640x604, 50K)

> "The constitution needs to be changed."
> Well I respect the constitution and the second amendment.
> "Well, if your drafted would you go fight?"
> I'm not dying for the jews unless a foreign army is in our borders.
> Then you hate the constitution and are a hippocrate because the draft is in the constitution.

I hate gun grabbers.

OP has wet dreams about being a Niggers Dick toy

Attached: A482173A-AED8-4895-9F58-DC729D9C0A37.jpg (300x168, 15K)

Well, it certainly seems like that would drive up convictions of everyday people. I guess if you wanted to load up the prisons this could be an effective way of doing that. But I don't see this benefiting the country.

Let's focus on that. The country.
>prevent straw purchases
This disallows free trade among the citizenry. This doesn't benefit the country.
>ensure that only the mentally sound have assault rifles
This assumes guilt of the citizenry. This doesn't benefit the country.
>ensure that even if someone fell through the cracks, they'd still have to be screened
This further presumes guilt. This doesn't benefit the country.

This was just a practice round, right? You did have actual suggestions coming? Ones that would, in fact, benefit the country?

Attached: 1527691873861m.jpg (1024x661, 114K)

Not one person for gun control can ever withstand the question of "why".

The children

As a NYC native I’ve lived in the city most of my life, and i usually vote and argue for democratic, liberal policies.

Personally I don’t think everyone should be able to acquire a gun, and hobbyists that hunt should use crossbows desu

However, i am completely against the way this is getting addressed, tearing down the 2nd amendment with arbitrary laws that essentially strip it away is dangerous.

Not only dangerous in a physical real world way, but also like other wellspoken redneck hillbillies here mentioned in a dangerous precedent kind away. If the “gun grabbers” win and successfully tear apart the 2nd amendment how long and what will it take to take care of other ones?

We are overdue for some real representation, as it’s very clear our government has grown too large and far too powerful.

It's the bill of rights, not the bill of needs. Kys faggot nigger

Attached: and not even then.jpg (500x628, 82K)

Then it's not a fucking compromise. Stop being a lying faggot and just say that then if you are so confident you are the moral arbiter of the subject. But you won't you kikelings never say what you actually want because you know the only way you will ever get your way is to lie. You don't want a compromise you want to dictate what my rights are. Either own your political and moral position on the subject or fuck off.

This alone is enough to tell me will 1488% certainty that even if we fucked up and gave you this concession of our rights. You would be right back tomorrow telling us how we need to "compromise and give up more. Lets do an honesty check. What would you want to ban after 30 round magazines. Literally everyone here with an IQ above room temp knows you already have the next thing that I need to give up for you to feel better already lined up in your head.

Attached: I want my cake back.jpg (750x3200, 719K)

>Hunting
>In the constitution
Pick one and KILL YOUR SELF

The 30 rounds are for the muslims, not the deer. Faggot.

Whatcha doin rabbi?

Seriously, fuck off you fucking Jewish faggot. I can’t wait until we can throw you all in the oven or hang you with a short rope.

I really look forward to seeing all you Jewish faggots kick and struggle while you slowly strangle to death for 15-60 minutes. Either that or hear your screams from the oven.

Fuck off you worthless fucking kike.

It falls apart though when gun control cannot help save children. You would have to confiscate and destroy the ability for all people to obtain guns. And this is exactly what they say they're not advocating.

no, it's incase someone breaks into your home.

You are the biggest faggot I’ve ever seen. Fuck of rabbi.

Wrong. High capacity magazines are slower to reload and jam much much more often. It is actually dangerous to ban them. Low capacity, specifically handguns, hardly ever jam.

News flash Canadacuck, niggs don't by their guns through legal channels.

Attached: 1453358592931.png (600x829, 76K)

Fuck off shill. Your story is bullshit, and your not interested in comprimise, only slowly chisling away at the second ammendment until nothing is left. More people are killed annually from hammers than assault rifles.

The government is corrupt and corporate
Power has never been more omnipresent and your dumbass wants to disarm the populous.

You've never hunted an entire herd of deer?

>If we are going to maintain our gun rights we need to be prepared to give up some ground in other areas.

We tried that for the entire 20th century It didn't work well. Then Timmy blew up a building, everyone radicalized, and we broke the back of gun control in America through a combination of a 50 State Strategy and litigation.

So, you know, no.

>First, all guns should be required to be registered by a certain cut-off date

Absolutely the fuck not. Registration is off the table. Its been tried and failed as a crime prevention measure and it ALWAYS leads to the state using registration records to demand compliance on ever more restrictive measures.

>every private firearm sale should be required to fill out the same 4473 sheet that a business would

Fine, but NICS is opened to the public, make/model/serial number data is removed from the 4473, and record retention for both private citizens and FFLs is 36 months. In exchange, mail order sales are back on the table.

>Secondly, in order to own an assault rifle you must first pass through a mandatory psych evaluation.

I'm a psychologist, I do evaluations, such a system would be a serious financial boon for me. It would just be a feel good measure, though. Psychological assessment is very good at diagnosis, its terrible at prediction. You're talking about $1500 worth of tests for nothing. Who is going to pay for it? The prospective gun owner?

Adding a poll tax to a literacy test doesn't make either less repellent.

>all ammo purchases should be subject to the same background checks as buying a firearm.
To what end? If someone buys a gun illegally, do you really think they won't be able to get ammo? You're just talking about making things more difficult and expensive.

>consider getting rid of high capacity clips

Fine, but any restriction on magazine size must also be followed by state and federal officers, no exceptions.

great opportunity to drop some RPs

Attached: 1503550686756.png (597x441, 39K)

>registered
Why should the government get to know who has guns? So you can take them away when you decide later on that we shouldn't be allowed to have them? No thank you.

>assault rifle
Define this, please.

>mandatory psych evaluation
Violation of the 5th amendment. The only thing that can relieve you of your rights is due process. That means a judge, NOT A DOCTOR, must declare you unfit to own a gun as a result of crimes that you have already committed.

>license to reload
It's a right, not a privilege. We don't need licenses to exercise rights.

Attached: 1519151858906.jpg (750x748, 174K)

Attached: 1509333331136.jpg (1000x866, 162K)

Attached: japanon.png (872x886, 220K)

If you think that’s dark you must be new here.

I wouldnt recommend debating the OP, they are clearly a shill. Just save some of these pics and drop em next time you see a similar OP

Attached: 1510518294561.jpg (775x491, 56K)