Is a slippery slope still a fallacy even when this entire board predicts it? I don't but it.
Is a slippery slope still a fallacy even when this entire board predicts it? I don't but it
>buy
A slippery slope is not a fallacy.
Calling something a slippery slope do dismiss a statement or argument is a fallacy.
Context matters.
I just think people hide true intentions and write then off as "how can you claim something that hasn't happened?" and conspiracy theories.When in reality people who realize this use it to their advantage.
>write them off as
This is the context that makes the use of slippery slope a fallacy. When the intent is to dismiss it doesn't really matter what string of words are used.
Example of indirect slippery slope
>Guns cause violence
Fallacious on many levels and only really applies to a specific context. By ignoring context, or imposing the context universally, it becomes a dismissal.
>but blacks cause more violence
>>dats racist!
>Jews fund terrorism
>>oy vey anti-semitic
Basically slippery slope for me but not for thee.
this is now a Jimmy Neutron thread
holy shit jimmys dad was redpilled af
i needa rewatch this shit
this is one of the most underated memes
what is the meme called?
don't know why i don't see it more often. uses humor and facts to get a point across
The one in the OP was good, the rest of these all have the same artificial feel as lefty memes
>doesn't know that's the point
OP's is actually funny though, just assumed that's what the others were going for
humor isn't necessary, though it is good to have. Most leftists wouldn't know humor if it fucked their girlfriend. All it takes is a slight bit of humor with facts slid in. Leftists like having things slid in where they normally wouldn't
>Most leftists wouldn't know humor if it fucked their girlfriend.
pic related
jesus christ. The nukes need to fly
>im so not mad that I made a custom fucking pillow to show how not mad I am
wew