PragerJew going full cuck
Why do conservatives always do this shit? WHY DONT THEY EVER PUSH BACK AND BE AGGRESSIVE?
PragerJew going full cuck
Why do conservatives always do this shit? WHY DONT THEY EVER PUSH BACK AND BE AGGRESSIVE?
Other urls found in this thread:
(((conservatives?))) do you think anyone cares about this? gas yourself, you're the_donald trash and are part of the problem.
They're not conservatives though, they're neoliberals. Pat Buchanan called these fuckers out ages ago -
"It has always struck me as odd, even perverse, that former Marxists have been permitted, yes invited, to play such a leading role in the Conservative movement of the twentieth century. It is splendid when the town whore gets religion and joins the church. Now and then she makes a good choir director, but when she begins to tell the minister what he ought to say in his Sunday sermons, matters have been carried too far"
The woman is a notable anti-feminist. Maybe you should get some context instead of getting mad at headlines ya lil fgt
Shes the old kind of feminist and bitches about modern universities. Closest youll get to a rejection of Marxism probably.
>capitalism is bad
>implying unregulated free market isn't just social darwinism in a positive light
Piss off commie
bullshit, she wants all the promises of marxism with all the comforts of tradition. her arguments against feminists reach barely further than "that's not real feminism". she's a more haggard and estrogen drenched brendan o'neill
Freedom of choice aka wageslavery, lower wages for all, breakup of families, 40yo cumdumps with barren wombs
>she's for women in the workplace, abortion, and for women to act like men
>but she's not condoning pansexuality or trannies so that means she's not a feminist!
Fucking hell neolibs are the fucking worst
>"anti feminist"
>celebrates womens' ability to be whores, wageslaves and lesbians
FUCKING BASTE AMIRITE GUISE XD!
Just because the Overton window has been knocked miles out of alignment doesn't make this shit ok you absolute newfaggot.
see:
I hate capitalism noe
thats false.
the female vote is socialism
>capitalism is bad
It is if you're actually a conservative. Capitalism demands new markets, it is blind to such abstract concepts as duty, honour and self sacrifice. It's a monstrous behemoth that destroys nations, races and cultures.
You can not call yourself conservative and a capitalist. It doesn't work, even Hayek agreed. You're either a social conservative, in which case you fight against all those things, capitalism included, that seek to undermine your nation; or you're a capitalist, in which case, such things as nations and borders are only impediments to the free running of your chosen economic system.
this man gets it
>progressivism is a huge win
>t. cuckservacucks
Camille Paglia is a 2nd generation feminist that says very redpilled things about femnazis.
>looks like our unregulated free market shipped every single job to the 3rd world sweatshops
>yay capitalism!
False dichotomy is false.
youtube.com
>"The government of the world is the financial government! The power of money, and of money alone!"
The fuck is the problem with your pic? Camille Paglia is one of the most based dykes imaginable. She's better than Ann Coulter at tearing apart cultural marxism, third-wave feminism and pseudointellectualism. If you don't know who she is, confirmed that you suck cocks and need to kill yourself unironically.
>b a s t e d y k e
fighting the 3rd wave feminists does not absolve her. Let's make this perfectly clear:
ALL
FEMINISTS
ARE
BAD
PERIOD
>Assumes that everyone measures progress on distribution of wealth
>Attempts to redefine things to win argument
>Correlating jobs moving overseas as the same as mass starvation and genocides
Pretty sure you are communist scum user, and so is that (((Evola))) faggot.
>t. literally who???
Camille is based af u numbskull
Exactly. You () are putting yourself in a ridiculous position. By saying "Oh well this parasitical dyke who hates social conservatism and is for baby murder IS OK because she happens to be attacking the more extreme members of the sect which she belongs to", you are allowing her ideas to become the standard to which "conservatives" are held to.
There is no going back once you've done this. Once you've accepted her as a spokesperson, you have accepted - for all time - 2nd wave feminism. That's it. Instead of taking the proper conservative position, which is to condemn the lot of them and point to their infighting as proof of their incompetence and malfeasance, you have gone merrily along with the liberals.
>>Assumes that everyone measures progress on distribution of wealth
That is literally the cornerstone of capitalism, it is solely concerned with property and ownership (just like marxism)
>attempts to redefine things to win an argument
he didn't though
>correlating jobs moving overseas as the same as mass starvation and genocides
Both things are ultimately destructive (which makes them subversive) to the nation & people that employ them, he is 100% correct.
>calling Evola (and my posts) communist
W E W L A D
>ALL X ARE BAD PERIOD
brainlet newfag detected
>HURR DURR MUH IDEOLOGICAL PURITY
Trump was elected in spite of your kind, not because of them.
all feminists are bad, yes.
You've caught me. A baste oldfag such as yourself has clearly transcended beyond calling things like all denominations of feminism bad. How many levels of redpill are you on my dude??!
unregulated free market got you migrants and destruction of your culture, enjoy the money, oh wait you arent the capitalist at the top getting the cash, sucks to be your, enjoy niggers and death of your identity
all forms of feminism are bad, women shouldn't even have the right to vote
by the same token, all nazis are bad, yes.
Or, y'know, you're an empty-headed fuckwit that would nuke the world just to ensure nobody ever disagrees with you on anything, little different from the people you claim you oppose.
Pic related, newfag. Learn that there are always based examples of every identity group you can come up with. Ideology trumps identity.
>accuses me of acting like a retard
>is attempting to argue that "it's OK guys, it's only 2nd wave feminism and not that disgusting 3rd wave feminism" is proper conservative thinking
You are a whore. You think your principles are worth compromising on if you just achieve transient gain. What's it going to be in 50 years time when 4th wave feminism is going on, and some dyke with a blue mohawk who say she's a 3rd wave feminism starts saying "Well hang on, marrying your dog and having genetic man-dog children is a bit too far"? Will you rally around her, call her based for standing up to the dog fuckers, and then say "Well, 3rd wave feminism is actually conservative now"?
Where's the end point for you?
>ideology trumps identity
No, it doesn't you civic nationalist retard. Please go back to plebit and stay there.
>it's possible to promote a female encroachment into politics that is inextricably entangled with marxism without being an absolute shitcunt
Nobody cares that you're being mislabeled. Learn that the only way to deal is in Christ.
>accuses me of acting like a retard
Wrong. I accused you of being a mindless ideological robot. Get your shit straight.
>is attempting to argue that "it's OK guys, it's only 2nd wave feminism and not that disgusting 3rd wave feminism" is proper conservative thinking
I don't give a shit about conservative thinking. I stopped calling myself "conservative" the same time Pat Buchanan did, right after they stapled the word "compassionate" to the beginning. Savvy intellectuals recognize that when the tide changes and lava starts flowing in your direction, you don't stand there and drown with your feet engulfed in fire. Absolutist dullards like yourself seem content with incineration and asphyxiation as long as you can claim ideological consistency. That or you're a dumb kid who hasn't reached the age yet where you realize you're an asshole.
>claims ideology doesn't trump identity
>posts pic stating that sovereign strength lies in unity, which is better achieved through ideology than identity
Good job, retard.
Is this a doll or a human? Her eyes look like Captain Jaw's description of a shark's eye... black and soulless.
Shit tier memes are boring. Either put your beliefs into words or stop being such a lazy plebbiter.
>homogenous ethnic groups
>flesh and blood fraternity of citizens
Better read that one again champ.
Not Christian, either. Again with the labels. Too many here are focused more on labels than they are on ideas.
>he says as he posts reaction images and non-arguments
butthurt roastie spotted. feminism is indefensible
Am I supposed to continue to operate at a higher level than you when you're busily fishing in your shitty pampers for your next "thought"?
>focus on the ideas guise
>ideological consistency is retarded, go with the flow guise
Serious question, are you an idiot?
There are boundless factions on the right, and mainstream conservatives, the most common type, wouldn't have a problem with what is in that image. They have the FREEDOM to do those things, don't confuse recognising and approving of that freedom with APPROVING of how women use it. Even then, large swathes of regular conservatives wouldn't have much of an issue.
>roastie spotted
>disagrees with me on feminists, must be a woman
You disagree with me on feminists, you must be a mudslime.
>can't comprehend states of ideological commitment between 0 and infinity
Ironic considering your pic, but unsurprising considering your single-digit IQ.
>continue to operate at a higher level than you
I'm the one who's been dragged down to YOUR level nigger. I've posted a lot more arguments ITT than you have, everyone here can see that and you claiming otherwise while posting smug faces does not make it true.
>WHY DONT THEY EVER PUSH BACK AND BE AGGRESSIVE?
because Americans are comfort -seeking, self satisfied people
>Ideological commitment is a spectrum guise!
What the absolute fuck are you smoking? Conviction is a yes/no condition. You either have convictions or you do not there is no in-between.
If you stand for nothing, you will fall for anything.
ok you're legitimately schizo, take your meds roastie.
I've addressed your red herring of making the issue of whether or not Paglia is based due solely to whether she satisfies whatever your arbitrary litmus test for "conservative" involves. Being based has nothing to do with either conservatism, liberalism, or any of the other highly limited labels slung around to divide and conquer in contemporary societies. You've chosen not to respond. I will now patiently wait for you to finish stimulating your prostate and save a nugget to idly fling in my direction, now, so please ensure said dingleberry is nicely seasoned with the semen of the last priest that fucked you up the ass.
Paglia often talks about how destructive fags and transgenders are to society.
She has shown a pattern of sexual degeneracy coming just before numerous civilizations have collapsed.
Listening to kikes
you just linked two different posters m8, we both have green IDs and America flags.
It's a knockout combination.
>Conviction is a yes/no condition.
Yeah, try getting a movement going on that absolutist basis. See how it works out for you. ISIS was a fine example of absolutist groupthink. How'd that work out? Absolutists achieve nothing but destruction because nothing that can be created will satisfy your bipolar paradigms.
You should try sewing your dick back on. Might make your opinions less cringe.
Feminism like Modern Art has been promoted by the CIA to create a “anti-Soviet Let” (official designation of the US State Department and CIA)
Indentity politics is a weapon of the Deep Star and ZOG
This we need to be civic nationalist and accept all people as long as they follow the ideology.
> I've addressed your red herring of making the issue of whether or not Paglia is based due solely to whether she satisfies whatever your arbitrary litmus test for "conservative" involves.
She is not based because she supports things that are bad, it has very little to do with whether she is a "conservative" or not. Condoning homosexuality and slut-culture is not based even if you argue against even more egregious aberrations of the spirit such as transexuality.
>Being based has nothing to do with either conservatism, liberalism or any of the other highly limited labels slung around to divide and conquer in contemporary societies.
Yes it does. If you support the tenants of a shit ideology you cannot be based.
>You've chosen not to respond.
I've been responding this entire time, but it's honestly difficult to deal with people like you because you literally have no convictions and will argue semantics and labels (who can say what conservatism REALLY is) more than you will argue the actual core issue (that she is bad because she supports bad things)
>muh prostate, muh nugget, muh dingleberry, muh semen, my preist rape
Careful with that edge lad, you're gonna cut yourself
>having convictions makes you ISIS
Camille Paglia is /ourgal/. She identifies as a feminist to troll feminists. She refutes the idea of toxic masculinity, calling it Heroic Masculinity. She says that the west is doomed and we can see that by examining history. She says that heroic masculinity has always been lurking at the fringes of hyper feminized societies like Rome. She says that the heroic masculinity of Islam will come to fill the vacuum caused by feminizing our boys.
This is why you guys always end up like this.
I think it's a good thing whites got replaced by the Chinese or Hispanics, they seem to be less enslaved/subverted by Jews.
My God are these excerpts from Pat Buchanans books? If so,they are spot on.
Accept Sharia
No they aren't excerpts, but they are spot-on arguments nonetheless.
Who told you I didnt?
yes it's a modern take on Godwins Law it seems.
Your continued attempt to misstate my description of absolutist ideology as simply ideology is little different than open borders faggots claiming anyone who doesn't agree with them is "anti-immigrant", when the issue is illegal fucking aliens, which are not immigrants. Again, you show yourself to be a mirror image of leftist swine. This is why I'm not bothering engaging you with any effort. If you're unable to argue without misrepresenting the views of your opponents, you need to neck yourself unironically.
>Yes it does.
Continually responding with "nuh uh" and thinking that you have the capability to win a debate with anything but a glass of water is the height of delusion. Go see your waifu in the rope wonderland, nigger.
Control the narrative (Jewish political pinball)
It was the commies, No it was the capitalists, it's the whites, its the blacks, it s the conservatives, no it's the liberals. These are keywords invented by jews, to define the left and right edges of jewish influence. If you hate one and love the other, you might as well love both, cause your right in the middle of a jew scheme
BUT SHE THINKS WOMEN SHOULD BE ABLE TO WORK WHICH MEANS SHE HAS NO PRINCIPLES REEEEEEEEEE
>don't pick a side guys because that's a jew plot
subversive subversion., very nice.
>Except we don't. We measure personal success and the success of the nation in such acts such as winning wars, landing on the moon, and other great feats. I don't care about how much property niggers or wiggers own, since they will just fuck it up anyways. Simply because both socialism and capitalism are about money doesn't mean they are the same thing. Socialism is where you give dumb niggers who will undoubtedly fuck it up a share of the pie, capitalism is where everyone has to earn there pie, thereby giving them the right to fuck it up if they so choose.
>redefines progress
>They are nothing alike. One losing his job and having the ability to get another job is nothing like an entire nation running out of food or killing those that cannot find a job.
>What would you rather call this no name?
I hope for your own sake that you wake up.
Are you fucking retarded? This tweet is basically checkmating 90% of retarded leftists parasite feminists who lean the commie way.