What do Indians think about the Muslim empire in India?

Do they despise it, or do they think it really enriched the land?

Attached: mei.png (356x237, 361K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_massacres_in_India
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_massacres_in_China
youtu.be/JMNkfQwkRC4
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Every time India was touched by outside forces, it became worse. Invasions and colonisation turned it from a peaceful and organised society of (at the time) world-class academics with rigid but equally valuable roles to poverty stricken poo in loo (which as a phrase makes no sense given hardly anyone there actually poos in loos) with a divisive caste system.
Not to mention I personally hate it because I could have grown up in a culturally rich, intelligent, traditional Hindu family, but then Muslims, so I ended up in a backward family hailing from the false pseudostate known as "Pakistan", with a religion and thus culture drier than the sands the mughals hailed from.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_massacres_in_India

>they regularly kill eachother by the hundreds of thousands
>british colonialist killed them by the hundreds
seems like we improved the place, for a short time at least

They murdered us, burnt our libraries, destroyed our architecture. Yes, they culturally enriched us.

Attached: 14b0a0e1-c8e5-48af-a2d7-f0b245741d79.jpg (750x923, 187K)

Britain made India, it was the best thing that ever happened to them and the worst thing to ever happen to us! Pakis are Indians, the offspring of raped Hindu girls!

>Britain made India
I mean I fucking hate pahjeets, but India was a brilliant civilization two to three thousand years ago while Britain was just a bunch of savages running bucknaked in the forest, so no it didn't made India

Attached: 80c.png (645x729, 77K)

Before colonization India was merely a vague geographic term

The British actually helped merge them into a country and modernize them

Also the British helped spread Indian people and culture all over the world

When the British decided to end colonism in many countries (especially in Africa), they left their properties (and influence thereof) to their India/Paki servants

As a results, the said ethnic India/Paki communities still control economies of those countries today

Also you might wanna know the British colonization of India partly contributed to the founding of the famous/infamous Aryan thoery, which is kinda a base of Jow Forums

People started to realize there was a "proto white people" when they found out about similarities between Sanskrit and Yuropean languages

This assumes
>There was no real culture there before brits
>A unified nation system is objectively better than a nationless society (and distinction between the two is clear)
>Spreading Indian culture was a good thing, and didn't just lead to the barstardisation of curry dishes into a homogeneous slop by the eastern world
>India was more advanced and modern after colonialism than it was thousands of years ago
Fortunately, educated Indian youth are turning back to principles of ancient India, such as rejection of the isolationalist and divisive caste system and refusal to support unethical and industrial farming.
MIGA.

I hate it.it was tge worst cultural invasion. Which fucked tge kindset for 1000 tears and late result is open defecation.

Before mughal India controlled 40% of world trade.

Mindset*
Years*

>late result is open defecation
So street shitting wasn't a thing before mudshits enriched you? Interdasting... But doubtfully true.

Can confirm India used to have toilets in the good old days, 1000+ years BC. Would it surprise you that the founders of mathematics as we know it were reduced to skidmarks by a bunch of warmongering Jew2s, though?

Mudshits never conquered the entirety of India though. Their conquests were limited to the northwest.

And the northeast, though it can hardly be counted as an external conquest given that Bengal was an Indian realm

Talk as much as your solvency.
You debt ridden piece of crap.

for comparison

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_massacres_in_China

We don't despise it enough

The problem with India is we believe in God and believe in heaven after good deeds.
Muslims/Jews they don't that these concepts or don't follow. They kill to colonize. India never invaded any country because of same reason. Sadly soon our peaceful nature will go extinct along with us

>god and heaven
Kaun gaon?

North and South India are two very distinct regions with different languages and cultures. I can only speak for North India since I'm familiar with its state and culture. South may have always been a shitter for all I know.

Pluralirty isn't distinction

It makes them really buthurt that most of their historical bright sides arent Indian originated

They now make up the shit that Arabs where keeping them down and destroyed their WE WUZ MOGULS heritage and conveniently all history books

WE

Show flag ackmed

TIC

When it comes to killing each other, Chinese was Sub-saharan blacks level

Also I think some Mongolian massacres were left out in the table

Now let's give the spotlight back to India

Misinformed chink

Modern thunk would have been adopted with right mindset.

> with right mindset you can build empire, but with wrong one you can make build empire collapse.

If cultural invasion wouldn't have happened, we would have been much better.

You know why south India is more devloped than North. Its because South had king rulling which speared mughal rulling over the.

youtu.be/JMNkfQwkRC4

Spared**

>Two separate regions with separate mother tongues, races, methods of food preparation, etc. are not actually separate in any way