NASA admits conspiracy theorists were right, 60 years on

would you WANT the soviets getting paranoid about spying from space?

>NOBODY COULD MAKE IT TO THE MOON
>SEE HERE'S NASA SAYING THEY WERE DELIBERATELY DOWNPLAYING THEIR CAPABILITIES
>EAT SHIT MOONLETS
Pathetic

DEFUND
E
F
U
N
D

>Jack Parson was connected to Aleister Crowely
>Therefore Nasa is a super evil aliester crowley organisation!!!!
This the is the intellectual might of Jow Forumstards. You people are fucking dumb as shit.
Also Parsons never founded Nasa, moron.

are you serious. i wanted them fearing nuclear death every night

the cunts had an amazing hardware back then. They were capable of shooting 1/million slowmos in the 50s, while modern state of the art comercial cameras still can't do it.

Thats a bird.

Attached: 1527173811967.gif (460x259, 1.93M)

I thought he was involved with JPL. Why hasn’t anyone mentioned Kubrick or Werner Von Braun yet? Who cares, the landings were so faked and anyone who believes we are looking at HD Mars footage sent wirelessly from 4 million miles away is a complete tard

No im not saying that the whole thing is Conspiratorial from head to toes. But the fact that NASA was started by a JEWlluminati government, operates inside a JEWlluminati government and was started by a JEWlluminati agent strongly indicates that there must be shady stuff going on in SOME of it's activities and SOME of it's sub-sections.

Most of us Conspiracy-tards are very sophisticated don't worry about us, we often deliberately simplify things for convenience.

Are you one of them Star Trekianists that worships NASA and space travel and all that shit? Roddenberry was 33 degree Freemason and Star Trek is pure ideological cancer, same for Sagan, Clark and all those Prophets of Science-Technology-Space...all putting in your subconscious Jew World Order cancer.

This. Literally the opposite is fucking true if the US actually had to hide how capable they were.

on mars... or is it? pic related shows how easy you can make a landscape on earth look like mars.

Attached: mars on earth.jpg (758x455, 45K)

so how big is north america really?
and someone in another discussion mentioned this could happen by taking pictures at different distances and it could be, but:

pic 2 (Blue marble 2002) has been done from 700km height
earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/BlueMarble/BlueMarble_2002.php
>Flying over 700 km above the Earth onboard the Terra satellite

the 4th picture (Blue Marble 2012) was made with the NPP/Suomi NPP sattalite orbiting at 824km
nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_2159.html
>A 'Blue Marble' image of the Earth taken from the VIIRS instrument aboard NASA's most recently launched Earth-observing satellite - Suomi NPP.
de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suomi_NPP
>The satellite was placed into a sun-synchronous orbit 824 km (512 miles) above the Earth.

So when the distance is the issue of the size difference the sizes should be reversed and i doubt it woul create such a big difference.
The pic allegedly gets created by taking a lot of smaller pics and stitching them together, but still that would mean that they do a fucking poor job in creating an accurate depiction of our planet when there are such big differences

Attached: blue marble.jpg (500x334, 133K)

>what is focal length

Attached: 1_GRID-Focal-Length-1_BLOG_final.jpg (2048x910, 655K)

appearently just zoom

So there is life on Mars after all?

you're a complete retard. the right one looks nothing like mars to any educated person.

No wonder you are confused.

You can literally shoot the lasers up and reflect off the mirrors they put up there dumb ass.

You are seriously underestimating Nazi technology. They were flying around in fucking JETS by 1944.

To be fair, that doesn't mean they went up there the first time. For all we know, they faked it just to beat the Russians and then made their way up there to plant the rest after.

Occams razor
that picture was taken on earth

again, any educated person knows that the location of the sun when the pic is taken can cause a lensing effect, making landmasses appear larger than they are, but never smaller than they are

That wouldn't make it larger when each picture is scaled down.

>Nasa doesnt lie.

and santa claus lives on the north pole

Yes, but no. You want them to fear what you have, but you want to make them think you're not as far as you really are, that way they won't prepare for it.

Then why did the Russians confirm it?
They were tracking it from the Earth to the Moon and then back
They may have even been monitoring communications

Hey focal fag! Then how come there's nice neat round edges around the pics? The pic should be a nice big rectangle of ocean with NA in the middle of it were muh focal langth

But all countries do this all the time

>You can literally shoot lasers up and reflect off the mirrors they hung off the dome
ftfy

In all likelihood, to avoid the US knowing they had them tapped already. If they're busy siphoning US intel without issue, it would be retarded of them to go "hold on, no you didn't" because then the US would know they're exposed.

Wow its nothing

Here's the kicker goys, enjoy life, do what Spock said, live long and prosper. We have free zero-point energy, the fluid realities everyone outside of this project inhabits can travel anywhere near instantaneously. You lucky sum have been apart of a study since your dawn of time began. The 'Aliens' will be revealed when the time comes but right now just keep frog posting and staying indoors!

Attached: -charlie duke's dream.png (1317x592, 705K)

Attached: 15897445662.jpg (634x300, 44K)

>Nyuuuu muh spacies!!!
lol dork, choke on your star trek dvds.

nasa was a german run military program from the get go

don't discuss things you know nothing about bong

Dude what
All they'd have to do is just say they didn't, no need to point out how
Embarassing the US government would be the coup de grace since the USSR had already sent the first satelite, dog, man and woman into space

They'd get nothing for participating in the lie

>and the soviets just let them get away with it.

Fuck off with these stupid cop outs retard
"You dun know but muh sekrit club" is not an argument

flat-tards get the bullet too

Unless the USSR first man in space was also fake and the US knew it.

>We won't call you out on your bullshit if you don't call us out on ours.
Why would the US and the USSR agree to such a thing? Because both wanted the Cold War to go on. The US and the USSR being the only countries that benefitted from the Cold War, becoming super powers and all.

Pretty sure flat earthers and moon landing deniers have no concept of spacial reasoning. Literally the idea of the moon, how far away it is and how big the planet is and all is to much for them to understand, if they were smart enough they could prove it to themselves mathematically but instead they rely on bad images to try and prove their non existent spacial reasoning correct.

Probably the same people that praise BBC because they don't understand the relative sizes at play in their blacked porn.

Attached: nasa.jpg (633x301, 64K)

Why the fuck would either of them abide that agreement?
And why the fuck would the US pretend their launches were failures and that the USSR beat them at all

This is so fucking stupid

remove this please

The "no market processes" Soviet system was so dependent on JEWestern technology that they had to stick to being actors in the the "Capitalism vs Communism" theater and STFU when it comes to the things that were above the "Capitalism vs Communism" theater. Stalin ran the Jews out of town but was never able to end the dependency on JEWestern technology.

Pic and vid related.

youtube.com/watch?v=j3vZNSAi-QM

Attached: 51IQDLvVoxL._SX309_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (311x499, 38K)

Every time

Attached: QuickSippy.png (760x686, 646K)

>They were capable of shooting 1/million slowmos in the 50s, while modern state of the art comercial cameras still can't do it.

The absolute state of pollock education. Just because consumer grade cameras can't do it doesn't mean it isn't done commercially. These cameras weigh tons and they use spinning mirrors to film that fast. We have much better equipment available commercially now just not to jagoff consumers because they still cost millions and are filled with helium.

You are a fucking idiot

pic related
mars.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/all/1/p/3954/1P479207643ESFCM29P2377L5M1.JPG

the source
mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/msss/00710/mcam/0710MR0030150070402501E01_DXXX.jpg

Attached: Mars Ram.jpg (625x1024, 104K)

They could say they didn't, but the mere fact they're revealing they knew otherwise would lead to the US tightening up and doing a sweep. A race to the moon was clearly worth less than what they were getting out of other things.

Do you realize how absurd your statement is?

Are you saying that the only other nation on earth at the time with the proven capability of sending shit to the moon would have considered their ability to track shit headed to the moon a big secret?

You think they would have let their biggest geopolitical enemy "win" the space race instead of taking the chance to have the biggest scientific accomplishment ever exposed as a capitalist fraud?

You know the USSR literally had a probe orbiting the moon when NASA landed there, right?

Please tell me you're just pretending to be retarded.

Attached: areYouNotEntertained.jpg (5472x3294, 1.14M)

What am I supposed to see on the b/w one?

lol...Soviet Union was a captive market you fool. And the fact that it was also trapped inside the "Capitalism vs Communism" dialectic even made them more dependent because they needed the technology bad to keep up with the West.

The "Cold War" was the biggest scam that the JEWlluminati ever pulled on Mankind.

Read and calm yourself down, son.

>Thats a bird.
Exactly. All Mars footage is shot on Earth. The rover is just rolling around in Greenland.

You're a newfag. Not oy did they land there, they found a bunch of alien tech. The first person on moon was a facade to get the tech first. Now this little psyops has people believing the moon landing was a hoax. You're a subhuman for not knowing the truth.

>You think they would have let their biggest geopolitical enemy "win" the space race instead of taking the chance to have the biggest scientific accomplishment ever exposed as a capitalist fraud?

the soviets needed the usa to help them with their own moon missions they didn't have the capabilities you think they had.

Please educate me on my own homeland
Fucking conspiritard fruitcake retard, go neck yourself

You're just considering that NASA is a scapegoat now? Where have you been the past 60 years?

pic related

Attached: focal length.png (894x950, 21K)

Aleister Crowley was a great man. The reason you are badmouthing him is because youve fallen for the smear campaigns against him.

That's 100% some kind of crab alien fuckin thing.

I used to think it would be cool to go help colonize mars, but fuck no after seeing that.

Lmfao at muppets who believe in ayylmaos. The world is a flat motionless plane and no human has ever passed the firmament.

Hold on buddy, that may be a bit difficult to grasp for them

I have a conspiracy theory that most conspiracy theorists are like shills who pile "the moon is flat!" and "the World Trade Center was hit by a cruise missile that was CGIed to look like an airplane" shit to discredit the whole site and cover up any normies who might wander in looking for the truth about the Israeli lobby/military industrial complex/false flag attacks/etc. by making everyone look like a crowd of babbling schizos

it's the base of a fossil crinoid.

unironically this

He was an evil fuck. He made evil babies with Barbara Bush, they're probably behind the scenes controlling all these elite politicians.

Australia had even bigger but they still colonized it

Attached: giant-coconut-crab-57bbf0cc3df78c8763928673[1].jpg (660x500, 75K)

So you think life existed there, but it's all dead?

Yeah pretty much

watch this video to know what is out there son

youtube.com/watch?v=nCZDqOrkXb8

>You can literally shoot the lasers up and reflect off the mirrors they put up there dumb ass.
lol stupid.
The moon is naturally highly reflective. Why do you think it shines so bright at night? Jesus think for yourself. Do you think you can shine a laser on a small mirror 238,000 miles away on an object moving through the sky at 3600 kilometers an hour while standing on a sphere spinning at 1600 kilometers an hour?

Is anyone here retarded enough to believe that? They merely aimed some lasers at the moon and determined which region has the best reflective qualities and said "here goy that's where the mirrors are, see how it reflects the lasers better?"

here is a fossil diatom recovered from a recent meteor - a fossil from space.

Attached: diatoom2.png (1192x764, 579K)

Because the Soviets knew they would've looked insane denying something that everyone had "watched" on a live broadcast and had plastered on every news broadcast, radio, and newspaper.

Sometimes it's easier to just go with the Big Lie and fight another day

Yeah I agree with this
Flat Earth, Moon Hoax, Lizard people, 9/11 missles, Ghosts, Illuminati and the whole new age bullshit about "energies" are always posted here by someone trying to derail actual discussion
I wonder (((who))) it might be
Highely likely that there was some very very primitive form of life but it ended up dead after Mars turned into a desert

Attached: jew[1].jpg_w=551&h=376.jpg (551x376, 25K)

I gave you all the education you need. Antony Sutton. And who cares if it's your homeland? Sutton was in a much better position to figure out what was going on than any Russian could.

Search all his videos on youtube and search his books onlines. Especially the "Wall Street and Bolsheviks/FDR/Rise of Hitler" trio, "Best Enemy Money can Buy" and "America's Secret Establishment".

>I don't understand something so it must not be true

Jow Forums everyone

>He was an evil fuck.

No he wasnt. Ask yourself why hes so vilified, so vilified in fact that most people refuse to even read his works? Kind of weird that a man who has been dead for over 50 years and who didnt even commit any horrid acts is still so vilified.

Says the guy that knows nothing about radio

shut your whore mouth, I know how it worked. It's just impressive the way they timed it precisely and the end effect. And I never said it can't be done commercially now, you strawmaning buffoon

From wiki, but still an interesting read:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polonnaruwa_(meteorite)

im considerring it for quite some time, its other people that act as if nasa is trustworthy. for me its just another alphabet soup like CIA or FBI

looks to me like a ram, but i dont know. make up your own mind

Attached: Nasa photographor.jpg (960x640, 129K)

Ignoring how difficult it would have been to fake the moon landing the Soviets were in the habit of denying obvious things (they denied they put missles in cuba, they denied they shot down a Korean airliner, they denied suppresing rebellion) this wouldn't be any different, if it were fake
A limp wristed school boy who never set foot in the USSR?
Please stop filling your head with this trash and pick up an actual history book

>but the speed of light

Coming from the guy who thinks you can shine a laser on a small mirror 238,000 miles away traveling through the sky at 3600 km/h while standing on a sphere spinning at 1600 km/h and still have the laser reflect off it and arrive right back where you're standing instead of thousands of miles away from even a millionth of a micro of imprecision.

i heard the nasa airports (normal airport for planes) are the best secured airports in the world, security level is even above military airports.

can someone confirm?

>The moon is naturally highly reflective. Why do you think it shines so bright at night?

Attached: plz-stop-post.jpg (500x375, 88K)

there are no ayys in the independence day or even fire in the sky sense.
there are, however, entities whom many confuse as such. You can confirm those yourself whenever you feel like it. a dose of DMT, a watcher/minder and fast for 24h beforehand... You'll know for sure right then and there.