Why hasn't any fascist state been able to sustain itself for an extended period...

Why hasn't any fascist state been able to sustain itself for an extended period? Every fascist government that has ever held power has had pathetic longevity

Attached: 1502659729776.png (400x650, 68K)

i dunno, leftists keep saying your current government is facist and its a superpower

really makes me think tbhm8s

Jews don't like being thrown out.
Only folks who suck Jew cock posts threads like this, because the answer is obvious.

^This

Attached: Unknown copy 2.jpg (248x189, 14K)

China is doing well so far.

America isn't fascist though, you'd have to be ignorant of what fascism is to say that

>leftists are ignorant
Agree.

>Trump is literally Hitler.
>America is fascist.
>Fascism doesn't work.
>America isn't fascist
>America is fascist when I say it's fascist and not fascist when I say.
Antifa there much?

> what is spain
> what is portugal

Attached: 1496926300708.png (625x626, 30K)

You're strawmanning lol, I never said the US was fascist

I'd think the historical precursors to the doctrines that informed modern authoritative, hierarchical states would be a testament to the potential strength of fascist-like governance.

>le rome was fascist meme
Take this to /his/ and watch them laugh you off

Were you not just telling another user off for straw manning?

Because despite the redpiller shills it's hard to be happy when you lack freedom.
(Fuck you's all)

totalitarianism does not work in a modern democratically aware world. too many people with smartphones showing up the totalitarians. to many people that oppose totalitarianism.

it didn't collapse by itself, it took more than half of the world to destroy it
great proof, friendo, you should make yt channel debunking creationists

Japan as it stands is basically fascist. All the parties that matter have fascist roots, while the communist parties were eliminated.

Attached: communism means no bob.png (540x675, 247K)

It wasnt real fascism

What historical precursors are you referring to?

>Why hasn't any fascist state been able to sustain itself for an extended period?

Because kikes intentionally destroyed it every time.
Their influence does not work well under a fascist government and so they see it as a threat to their grip on the world.

You sound like a Marx Leninist. The USSR faced similar challenges from global superpowers, but they actually lasted a long time

If you didn’t say the sky was blue, does that make it any less true

Attached: 8473EECC-7A2C-4FC9-B27D-4A3C61B3483B.jpg (1000x692, 198K)

THIS

Attached: 135734.jpg (640x480, 39K)

6 minutes to swap your IP, huh.

You clearly you don't know about the history of spen. We have had 9 constitutions since 1812. That makes a new constitutional government each 22 years. Franco ruled for 40 years and wasn't overtrown. He just died and gave an opportunity to the liberal democracy.

no they weren't. they only faced economic problems (because they wanted them in the first place)

Depends how you define fascism. Being very orthodox in definitions italy is the only fascist country to ever exist, it’s failiures can be attributed to corporatist economics. However if we use a broader definition of fascism then modern china could be called fascist, and they sure as hell are sucesful.

What exactly would you copy from ancient regimes like greece and rome?

>you'd have to be ignorant of what fascism is to say that
Yes, shill, that's the entire point that is being made here

Because the ZOG attacks them each time. Under fascism Germany's unemployment went down by 6 million and GDP doubled, Japan's GDP went up by 250 percent and manufacturing by 140 percent and Italy constructed 4000 miles of roads, infrastructure, hospitals, orphanages, bridges and canals all the while having state created money and no debt

Before it was even properly born every super power on earth had been at war with USSR.

You might want to recheck germany’s debt.

Not modern Germany. In fascist systems they are anti ZOG and anti usury and debt slavery

the same can be said for communist regimes. there are a quite a few different systems of government that have had a lot of international mulligans. the best systems that have lasted the longest have lasted the longest and been the most economically prosperous been blended systems.

Because fascism is retarded and a form of marxism.

The true redpill is individualist anarcho capitalism

Attached: 1521592144339.png (313x590, 63K)

>30 years of economic stagnation
>sustaining

That's what the ZOG sponsors so every one is a degenerate out for themselves not a society fight back against them. Anything with anarcho in is faggotry

Germany had massive debt at the beginning of wwii. Their economic and social policies look good on the outside but closer examination shows them to be utter trash. For example their economy was solely based on taking massive amounts of debt and then looting neighboring countries once nobody is willing to lend you anymore. I can toss you a peer reviewed journal if you want to see the actual debt to gdp ratio. Also do understand that I know this information can be shocking and that this isn’t a personal attack, national socialism is simply a bad system.

YYyeep.

Worked pretty well here.
In fact, our economy never grew so much. Ever.
We were finally getting rid of our debt, too.

communism has never worked and people talk about it like it isent responsible for genocides and countless deaths

Attached: 1511567439544.jpg (751x882, 51K)

Go away. You’re either a shill or dumb enough to repeat what the shills tell you. I can dig up some sources on the history of libertarianism, it’s not a political movement, it’s the political arm of the zionist neoliberal establishment. Salon antifa is a good describtion.

fpbp

Forgive me but didn't a lot of Italians starve too? Or am I getting my disinfo wrong again

Youre aware its to be used as a temporary system like in times of war right?

>ancaps thinking the jews won't abuse their ideology to make the world a worse place to be
kek get ready buckeroo, you ancaps are going to be the new neoliberals in 15 years.

Attached: brap.jpg (1550x2328, 197K)

Read the history of central banking and the enslavement of mankind by Stephen Goodson it will show you the truth

During Mussolini's rule Italy was self sufficient in wheat and multiple food sources. They might have starved in the war due to the allied campaings

Ancaps are neoliberals. They both worship the same figures like murray friedman.

Do you have any specific pages in mind? Does he deny that germany took massive amounts of debt? If he does then he better have some excellent sources since german intake of debt is historical cencus.

He has a corner dedicated to Japan, Germany, Italy, Libya and Tsarist Russia I believe and talks of their economic programs and miracles free from the ZOG there should be a PDF where you can read the extract.

What sources does he use?

>imagine ANY of pic related being built under that administration lol

Attached: passeport.jpg (1600x899, 111K)

White people are still around so that how i know it works

I don't remember but have a look if your curious

Brazil was under Getúlio Vargas, leader of the Estado Novo. The Integralist movement tried to take over, but they failed. Nice bait tho.
>fun fact: Getúlio Vargas was the only dictator to be democratically elected after its mandate

I’ll have to do that but for now it does still seem like the german economic system was simply bad, I doubt that this book manages to flip the entire german economic system on its head.

well most of those parties were forcibly stopped
the communist ones get stopped by their sheer retardation.

Communism fails the moment it is created
And democracy fails every 4 years

because everyone else gets jealous and throws a hissy fit

Why hasn't any state been able to sustain itself for an extended period? Every government that has ever held power has had pathetic longevity.
ftfy

"The United States is" fascist.
Oh I get it now. You're just retarded.

Attached: titus get the cross.jpg (480x712, 15K)

a bad leader always comes along eventually

Attached: 1525848070181.jpg (540x524, 109K)

Capitalists and communists gang up to destroy you.

Actually originally fascists and communist came along really well and mussolini actually congratulated lenin. All was going well until hitler came along and instigated a conflict between the two.

the purpose of any neoliberal government is to achieve tyranny. when a democracy runs under capitalist motives, it's not truly democracy but rather provides the masses an illusion of choice to placate them. any government by design will always be fascist in some capacity.

Its too authoritarian to work well
You can be nationalist without being fascist

Today i will remind them

Attached: 1528445860476.jpg (1042x596, 325K)

>Spain
>Portugal
>Chile
What

How much debt? like modern countries with 100-200% GDP?
Its a weird time to compare countries as every country was hurting, ppl all over were starving. Nazis were actually privatizing while USA and UK were nationalizing. fascist economic control was not as dominant as is taught.
I wish I had the pdf link. I lost the book that dwelled deeply into this

caga nisso não vais conseguir ensinar algo a estes mongoloides

Attached: 17ac781b4f3b1d0de5c62a678e81eb08.jpg (481x656, 62K)

government bloat and idleness. its cures are being conquered, military coup, outsider coup

You mean wages of destruction? That book also concludes that the german economy was dependent on taking debt and that had they not gone to war their system would have collapsed.

It's commies trying to create a "not real fascism"-response through strawmen.

Already have this one, anything else except for pic related?

Attached: portugese autism1.jpg (1025x576, 124K)

Salazar's regime was the best Portugal has had in at least the last 200 years. Then it got couped by commies and CIA mutts. Plus, it was a Catholic Autocracy, not really fascist though we liked Mussolini.