There are no arguments against pacifism and environmentalism and you know it

There are no arguments against pacifism and environmentalism and you know it.

Attached: B-CD8EpCEAEBA1a.jpg large.jpg (1024x1552, 189K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=k2xY2k26HFo
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Pascifists will be exterminated by warmongers who hate the environment and want to destroy it.
I.E. Pacifists are the cause of environmental destruction and do not prevent war.

Environmentalism? Okay that's cool. I also like the environment and I am even in favor of regulations to protect it. Lord knows those dirty kike bastard corporations don't care about the earth.

As for pacifism, if you try to hurt me or my family I'll fucking shoot you. So there's my argument against pacifism.

pacifism is not a winning strategy
there is nothing wrong with environmentalism though

if you are a pacifist how do you stop people that want to kill you?

Yep. Being a pacifist works when your country is doing the invading. Not so much when someone doesn't care about your life.

I guess I'm in favor of refusing to fight an unworthy cause. Like the Iraq or Afghanistan War, if they had tried to draft me I'd refuse. So I guess one could say that's a type of pacifism. But that's different from saying I'd never defend my country or my family.

just find hippie bush camps...
they're trashed..

you'll notice the people they shit on all the time, and rebel against are the ones picking up their trash and paying their way.

you wouldn't say that if I was punching you in the face or harming someone you loved or cared about.

Say something in Finnish, hintti.

OP is not a Finn.

There is a difference in knowing what to fight for and not fighting at all because reasons.

Pacifists are easy to conquer and cannot exist without non pacifists to protect them.

Faggot.

>Semmoset neronleimaukset sieltä
Vitun idiootti luulee että kaikki on samaa mieltä koska on sama lippu.

it's amazing how much the american phenotype has changed

Attached: america.jpg (1379x1800, 261K)

Si vis pacem, para bellum faggot

Attached: lanius.jpg (1191x670, 145K)

There is, and it's too much to talk about. Nature keeps imposing the balance onto everything, reason why any sort of extreme position will never work, since it's not majority of people who'd represent and stand up for those ideals, whatever they might be.

Yeah, you can be a sheep or a wolf, your choice.

environmentalism is a scam to buy green products and politicians only pretend to care when it fits their agenda.

Hahhah, pasifistihintti. Heti nyrkit pystyssä.
Tapa itsesi.

Pacifism is for weak cucks, but I like environmentalism. The earth should be protected at all costs and should not suffer from human greed.

>but I like environmentalism. The earth should be protected at all costs and should not suffer from human greed.

Why? You really think you are qualified to tell the planet earth what it needs and what it doesn't?
Planet earth is quite capable of taking care of her own affairs. Man isn't that big as you seem to think.

Overpopulation
#checkmate

lmao at least communism has actually been attempted, pacifism is so out of touch pacifists still haven't managed that much
environmental paternalism, however, is the patrician's choice

What about it?

>environmentalism
Wrong we must Genocide all non-Whites for the safety of the environment and animal rides for all White children.

You dont need to argue with pacifists just hit them.

pacifists are just waiting to be slaves

Wrong, environmentalists need to become druids and slay anyone who tries to ruin shit.

>There are no arguments against pacifism
If you're a pacifist you're already dead

getting a unanimous decision is fucking hard as balls.
and unless everyone unanimously agrees both these philosophies fall apart.

My dick in your old lady while I burn tires in your back yard.
Do something, Faggot.

Attached: 1527304957747.gif (720x480, 126K)

>Planet earth is quite capable of taking care of her own affairs. Man isn't that big as you seem to think.
tell that to the marine biologists

Are you a nigger or something?

>There are no arguments against pacifism
My boi C.S. Lewis disagrees
youtube.com/watch?v=k2xY2k26HFo

Attached: C.S. LOLis.jpg (632x810, 122K)

*shoots you*
No arguments for either.

the problem is a lot of environmentalists think any and all hunting should be banned which is retarded as shit. I wouldn't be surprised if they hated fishing too

There's (mostly) nothing wrong with environmentalism.
Regarding pacifism, it's like ancap- nice concept which will never work

enviromentalism = no electricity

The only authentic Environmentalists to make it into the public arena were both hardcore batshit lunatics, steeped in CIA influence that they broke away from, and both ended up being associated with mass murder (one unfairly): Charles Manson and the Unabomber.

As Charlie said with perfect clarity: "You can't protest the destruction of the environment all day and then come home and flick on the lights, it doesn't work that way."

As for Pacifism: name three politically succesful pacifists. You don't necessarily have to be a bully warmonger to survive, but if you're not martially Number One, than Number One is going to be able to push you around.

Attached: 1524503401356.png (1029x994, 953K)

>There are no arguments against pacifism and environmentalism and you know it.
I made an argument.
When I read it, It sounds like a nigger voice in my head.

Attached: 1527486872962.gif (528x555, 816K)

Hunting is good for the environment and fun too. Over fishing is a problem though.

WOMP WOMP

What about the billion strong shitskin muslim horde waiting at the gates?

sport hunting that doesn't involve consuming the animal is retarded
regular hunting and fishing is perfectly fine as long as it is regulated so we don't extinct them

Everyone dreams of utopia, only thing is, half the people want to live there, and half the people want to raid there.

Without war, we would not be at the level we are technologically. Nuclear, rockets to launch satellites, computers, manufacturing etc.

>Implying reducing human population, specifically Asia and Africa where environmental stress is highest, is bad

I would pick up that hitch hiker