Was this high-ranking nazi correct?
Was this high-ranking nazi correct?
No
Sorry mate, official Jow Forumsicy on jewish warmongers is
>when two fish fight in the sea, you bet your arse the kikes were behind it
No
The Jews were not wholly responsible for everything. That's their brilliance - they infiltrate and subvert international finance just as they do their host countries. There are many different sects and classes within the "elite." All of them are variables except for one. I'm sure you can guess who.
He absolutely was correct. It's an age old technique. You get the soft brains all worked up over something they think they understand like race, play on their fears and prejudices.
>t. Aaron Kohn
Ribbentrop was your typical bureaucrat careerist with no real ideals or convictions
The war itself was Hitler and the Nazi fault above all. Now am I to deny that the resentment against jews in germany at the time was completely unjustified or not? No. But the starting of that god forsaken war, and the deaths of tens of millions of people (most of them white!) was Hitler's fault.
> >t. softbrain
Wrong. You see it on the nose.
But not always. Some jews, especially those who are half jewish, look completely and utterly white.
no one has ever liked jews.
I can sense kikedness. In the past I successfully detected kikes who otherwise looked white.
I'm sure his post war statements are unbiased by the fact his family would be sent to the gulag if he praised hitler
This
clearly all those people were just prejudiced against jews or somethin
Pseudo kike
>implying Hitler didn't just tell this one guy that in private so he would agree with Hitler and think of him as a genius manipulator and not a conspiracy theorist
even one of their own defined "Insanity" as 'doing the same thing over and over while expecting different results'
>any group that historically, consistently gets booted out of everywhere isn't too bright
>any group that is so self-important, drunk on narcissism while existing as a parasite, is doomed by their own hands
>they had damned-well better hope for divine intervention
>nazi
Barely, all he cared about was his status in the eyes of Hitler.
But hitler was pretty terrible himself, I wouldn't hold his words up as gospel either.
Few people have done as much as Hitler to destroy the white race. I'm sure those muslims like him, because they didn't in the war he started, but whites did die and in the tens of millions.
>Implying Sargon would ever expel the Jews
Not very liberalist my guy
It's funny and sad seeing Sarg'n sabotage himself by constantly refusing to engage with reality because to do otherwise would be "RACIST" and make him into a "RIGHT WING SJW" or something.
Annexation of Sudetenland and the resulting conquest and occupation of Czechoslovakia might have been the very last moment the National Socialist movement could have been salvaged- if the Allies had grew a spine and went to war over the easily defended mountainous region, Hitler would gotten coup attempted right there, so much earlier than the July plot of 1944.
I thought Europoors were supposed to know at least their own cuntry's history. What do you miss about Nazism? Like when the villages of Lidice and Lezaky were erased from existence in the aftermath of the Heydrich assassination? You cuck?
> *meant to reply to the Chilean, not the Swedistani
Zionist Bankers pushed America into WW1 despite overwhelming public opposition.
Jew Bankers caused a Great Depression 10x worse than what America had. People burned money to stay warm in winter.
Then Jewish Communists started a Civil War in Germany that killed over 1 million people.
Hitler wasn't a master propagandist, or even a persuasive speaker. He just told the truth that everyone already knew.
>h-he started it
It's much more complicated than that you imbecile.
He wasn't going to let the Germans in Poland be massacred anymore and decided to liberate them. Tough decision, but I suppose it was the only one that could be made in his mind.
Not exactly. He once volunteered to shoot Stalin with a revolver. Hitler said no but was impressed nonetheless.
anyone believes this bullshit?
literally the largest jewish populations are almost in all of the areas where they are claimed to be expelled from
this list is as fake as the news on CNN
plus i'm quite sure if jews really existed in the old days and did some horrid shit - they would be genocided looooooooong time ago.
the only real crime the jews did is communist red terror in russia but i haven't heard of any jews being punished for this. why? judging by the same lagic they should
but all of a sudden.. coutries that allegedly expelled jews in the past are suddenly pro-jewish and anti-white
WTF? well.. it's the ROME that's what
It is of my belief that if Hitler had not tried to annex Czechoslovakia (which I might add the Czech and Slovak people did NOT want to happen) the Poles and Allies would have caved on Danzig. But it is when they invaded Czechoslovakia and thereby conquering and subjucating a foreign people, where the Allies had it proven that hitler was out for conquest and blood and thus in my view correctly drew a final line in the sand and defended against Hitler's further aggression.
Of course he's right. Anything said after torture is correct
No. There are and were other problems besides the Jews but International Jewry was set against Germany.
I only know Ribbentrop from the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, what was he like?
And being a free speech advocated in fucking britain with whats going on right now.
His answer to why not send all the immigrants home is that there will be a civil war.
They came back after people forgot or they bribed someone, idiot.
Pol is a board of peace we hate nazism
>And being a free speech advocated in fucking britain with whats going on right now.
Why would that be bad?
>His answer to why not send all the immigrants home is that there will be a civil war.
Well I think sending them home is the only way to AVOID and eventual civil war, so ye he's st00pid.
The kikes were always going to force a war moron.
Yes. Hitler betrayed his people.
Making a claim without any evidence or reason does not make that claim true.
I mean, if you're talking about the Soviet Union, then that's not even true, because the soviets only began preparing to attack germany after the molotov ribbentrop pact. Which they from a purely strategical perspective SHOULD have done because not doing so would be strategically retarded (from the point of view of a selfish dictatorial regime).