Is this even legal? How can airlines refuse service for lawful purposes?
Is this even legal? How can airlines refuse service for lawful purposes?
Unvaccinated third world disease vessels
but muh free market
free market, you dingus.
I'm confident the government doesn't care anyways.
Pic related is what would be viable transporting them via air, if not the current plan already. Military bases usually have access to Coaches also.
Airlines are privately owned businesses and they can serve whoever they wish or do not wish to serve.
They are private businesses???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
I wouldn't want them on my plane either
oh well, military has more than enough money
We don't have a free market, that is an illusion. We have a central bank a semi-centrally planned market.
>asks
Soo they're not actually saying no
so they can refuse to serve blacks? muslims?
Operating under US air law.
Markets. If the Government doesn't want to pay then those aircraft don't make money. Airlines love to make the most amount of money. If the aircraft is busy transporting illegals it isn't being used for back or connections.
It is a free market thing socialists wouldn't understand.
yeah plus we can save money by not landing
I would pay extra for this
just fill them up in a b2 bomber
fly over mexico
open rear door
You can refuse to serve anyone you want as long as it's not because of discrimination.
cnn.com
Disregard the misleading headline
>The Supreme Court issued a narrow ruling Monday in favor of Masterpiece Cakeshop bakery owner Jack Phillips, who refused to make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple due to the shop owner's religious beliefs.
We reserve the right to refuse service.
Are these children homosexual?
A cakeshop is not the same thing as an airline. False equivalence. An airline has to abide by a whole litany of laws and regulations set by the government.
That's stupid, include discrimination too
I agree with the companies.
The US govt should not be able to force companies to do anything
such as
>FBI ordred apple to unlock iphone
>fbi ordered microsoft to release paddocks one drive account
>what is kim.com
I want to deport these spics but I dont want a tyrannical government like under obama where they force companies to do shady shit like that
how about they pull funding from fucking israel and fly their own god damn planes
>I would pay extra for this
I would pay any amount of money to fly on a white/Far East Asian only airline.
Oh fuck! Airlines using the "fuck off, we're full" meme! My sides are destroyed!
lol not under (((us))) laws
Then I guess it's hot stuffy military choppers for the kiddos. Nice thinking. But I wouldn't want filthy immigrant trash stinking up my planes either so I understand.
What laws and regulations entitle a passenger to board their aircraft?
It's their business though. It would be like quartering soldiers.
ask the kikes, they wrote them all
That's fine, as long as they lose ALL their tax breaks. Free market? Then no gibs!
Delta, United, JetBlue, Southwest et all using the "fuck off we're full" meme
Wtf timeline is this?!
If any identify as commies i am sure we could arrange some trips
>conservative vs conservatard
Don't be a pleblet this is well within the rights of a private business. If /pol, and myself personally, want freedom of association in business to allow racial segregation then not allowing illegal immigrant spawns on their flights is nonsense. They're being crybabies because Fwaaark le Drumpft. SO what. This kind of virtue signalling will not benefit their business model in any way and only serves to make people choose another airline. Let them dig their own grave.
It's not in any way practicable in the first place since they can't ask "why" kids are on their planes to begin with.
>transport them using military aircraft
>take the cost of doing so out of the gibsmedats budget
Perfect solution.
>>"they wrote them all"
>literally one screenshot of an unsigned PDF
>only applies in Texas
>Governor Greg Abbott today signed into law House Bill 89 (HB 89), known as the Anti-BDS (Boycott, Divestments, and Sanctions) bill, which prohibits all state agencies from contracting with, and certain public funds from investing in, companies that boycott Israel.
>only applies to Texas state employees
>only applies to companies that *actively* boycott Israel
Good thing this applies to me
How dare these airlines discriminate against flying poor Mexicans? Racist much? This is not out country #Boycott45 #BoycottAirlines
WOMP
O
M
P
(There it is) by Corey Lewandowski m.youtube.com
Ask every fema contractor.... you literal fucking subhuman kike
>Asks
Just because you say "please" nicely, it doesn't mean they have to oblige.
I didn't say that there were, but the government has latitude on the issue due to these "private" companies having deals and agreements with the government.
They aren't refusing. They are asking. Legally you can ask almost anyone for almost anything.
how about they pay back that fucking bail out that they didn't fucking need.
Well at least I know there will not be any stinky illegals on my flight on Friday.
>ask
Doesn't mean it'll go their way
The more important question is how does an industry so well-known for not giving any fuck about mistreating passengers decide that Trumps mistreatment of little kids is so much worse.