Holy shit, TheCommunist is going all out

holy shit, TheCommunist is going all out

mobile.twitter.com/TheEconomist/status/1009644421875453953

Attached: IMG_20180621_064134.jpg (720x1007, 109K)

Other urls found in this thread:

debates.economist.com/debate/immigration?fsrc=scn/tw/te/bl/ed/immigrationdebates
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Lynn if you read this you should kys

We tried that with NAFTA, the companies that moved to Mexico just paid $3 a day and people just came to the US to work under the table hanging drywall for $8 and hour.

Attached: 1529449276018.jpg (735x794, 141K)

>WOMP WOMP
#openfuture

Getting rich involves hard work. Most countries are just too lazy for that.

I mean I look at the foreigners that come to my country, thinking they will be rich if they work here like they did back home. They go to a factory and see they have to work for 8 hours straight. No chitchat, no slacking off, just straight work. They can't do that. And so they go mind uncle Ahmed's kebab shop and are back to minimum wage. If even that.

wtf i love the economist now

Are you stupid or trolling?

The main reason people come to nice white countries is their countries are shitholes. Part of the reason for that is our capitalist overlords loot them to various degrees to line their pockets. If we reigned them in and stopped taking in as many refugees and focused on improving shithole countries, we'd probably spend half the money for better results than just taking them all in.

Equally rich means equally shitty

Its because we let them in. This wasnt a thing 60 years ago and we were taking their shit then too.

Now we are giving them more resources and theyre over populating.

theres two types of leftist, one with a bank account over 9 digetsand one without. to someone with a 9 digit bank account theres no diffrence betwen a person who makes 18k a year in food stamps and a person who works 40 hours a week to make 60k a year. both thoes people are the same to them, which is why they dont care about immigration or the welfare state.

You fucking dumb mutt. Shithole countries are shit because the people that live there are shit. They belong in shitholes. Shitskins don't create they destroy.

Do you really think shitskins are capable of running mining operations? Fuck your dumb.

OR, we should wall up our borders and forget they exist.

Literally White man's burden. We tried that, it was called colonialism. It didn't work.

really makes you think

Attached: soyviet flag.jpg (600x300, 22K)

David Goodhart wants to make as much money as he can before the world implodes, and he's doing that by preying on feeble minded liberal scumbags who care more about how the look in the eyes of others than anything else.

They are as rich as the us.

This

Canadabro gets it.

How about we barricade Africa and stop all transportation to and from, let evolution runs it's course. Maybe blacks will one day evolve to our level.

They just won't accept that the people don't want to feel like foreigners in their own countries.

Go vote.
>debates.economist.com/debate/immigration?fsrc=scn/tw/te/bl/ed/immigrationdebates

Attached: d.png (720x5078, 697K)

>The arguments in favour of people being able to choose the country where they live are based on long-established axioms of liberal theory. Well-accepted truisms that assume outcomes based on individual effort and merit, not ancestral status, apply with no less force and logic to a person’s prerogative to choose a country of residence than to one’s ability to choose one’s level of education, income, or a chance to hold political office.

Attached: Screenshot_20180621-004646.png (934x551, 151K)

Having them be as rich as we are means that we're also as poor as they are.

>Countries used to belong to their monarchs. In the democratic age they belong to their citizens. And those citizens, through their governments, decide who comes to live in them. It is a duty of the state to protect its citizens. And that duty extends to protecting those citizens from large inflows of people from other countries. So, no people should not be free to live wherever they like. That utopian right is trumped by the real-world right of democratic ownership.

Attached: Screenshot_20180621-004826_1529556536443.png (1200x647, 162K)

keep voting no
debates.economist.com/debate/immigration?fsrc=scn/tw/te/bl/ed/immigrationdebates

That's the misconception the West has about Africa. They don't NEED to get on our level. Those fuhks were happy before we tried "helping" them by artificially inflating their numbers with handouts and whatnot. They were fine picking berries off trees that the land provided them all the while their population remained steady.

Attached: 1528936881966.png (181x217, 24K)

Can't help those that can't help themselves.

Sure, Europe tried that in Africa but they all cried colonization

Substitute communist for globalist and you have it right, user.