Young women are not baby vessels

is this lena paul

>Educated women
Is the same thing as >trained dog
You can play around it all you want in the end all it can say is "bark".

Attached: 400px-ChaosDwarf.jpg (400x464, 71K)

Female education = low birthrate

They literally are, based on all science.

She's 40. No one impregnated her and it ended up like this.

>spend years whining about feminist bullshit
>finnally find a suitable dick, suddenly turn into a waifu

the cure to this madness is six inches of hard dick

I will therefore that the younger women marry, bear children, guide the house, give none occasion to the adversary to speak reproachfully.

These

They're also not that entertaining, I find. Years of brainwashing and slavery tend to break a person.

What's an educated woman?

Nothing is wrong with a woman that wants to step out of becoming a brainlet. It's just sad they'll join the rest of the career women that commit suicide in their 30's and 40's because they couldn't find a man to have a family with.

If women are not baby vessels then why do women use their bodies as a form of retaliation
For example
>daddy or boyfriend didnt treat me right going to get pregnant by some stranger
>some guy complained about my clothing or breastfeeding etc - slutwalk time

jesus it's almost like she didn't get laid the whole time she was there

Educated career women are almost the female equivalent of incels, except they voluntarily removed themselves from the gene pool and tried to reenter it when they're rapidly approaching their expiry date and men toss them aside for a woman a decade or two younger.

I genuinely feel sorry for women that were tricked by media and academia into thinking this was a good idea. The tick-tock feeling usually doesn't come into effect until its already too late.

Attached: tame.jpg (1210x6307, 1.86M)

>Educated women aren't that intimidating.

Where the hell does this feminist meme come from? I have never in my life seen a man shy away from a woman or express discomfort at being around one because she was too smart. I have however heard men upset about the exact opposite fairly frequently.

We love smart women, we love capable women. That's why we write so much fiction about them. At least then we can pretend women like that exist in our fantasies.

Attached: tame2.jpg (1210x6291, 1.83M)

id fuck the shit out of here but then beat the shit of here afterwards

HER* I FUCKED UP TOO MUCH STELLA

A educated woman knows shes a babby vessel

No man gives a fuck about your education. In fact, it may work against you as it signals you prioritized getting a degree over starting a family during your most fertile years. It shows bad planning on your part.

Try being tricked by their own leftist or even trad parents to go for an empowering career.

>only six
white boy detected

she's doing this entirely in the hopes that some guy will think she's so beautiful he'll ignore her feminist protestations and sweep her off her feet.

Sexual reproduction was a mistake.

Attached: Hydra.jpg (602x210, 41K)

>Young women are not baby vessels.

Women aren't pies either, but that doesn't stop Lindsey Green.

Attached: 1503792355161.png (1166x1250, 101K)

What's the point of marriage if the woman isn't interested in being a "baby vessel"

Also nice file name

This.

I'm seeing this now with the women around me at my job. I got 4 of these early 30s dried up cat ladies desperately throwing themselves at me and my polite disinterest seems to only amplify their drive. One of them even has kids. I'm the same age as them but fuck that I can date women in their early 20s no problem. I'm one of only two non-bugmen under the age of 50 at my office though so I guess their options are limited. I'm friends with the other dude and we joke about it all the time but I still feel sorry for these women. I think if they saw us out on the town with girls they would probably have some kind of breakdown.

Attached: 2345t78045345675876.jpg (480x360, 39K)

This shit was lame the first time you posted it.

Attached: 15E5885F-F020-438E-9347-807DD1196E49.jpg (640x630, 58K)

Men do not produce sperm
/thread

>Men do not produce sperm
>/thread
You're thinking of men with vaginas

She looks older than Courtney Cox.

This, i mever get the meme. Why would i be intimidated by someone who is intelligent or educated?

Typical feminist cunt.
No one's saying you have to make babies, feminist cunt.

Back to the kitchen with you!

What the fuck happened to millenials ?
How did youth go from Phoebe Cates to this cow in 30 years ?

THIS

oof those hips

Attached: ChubbyBunny.jpg (378x442, 12K)

No one's "intimidated" by your worthless degree

Smart women will accomplish much more for society if they have and raise many children than having a job. She could turn her high IQ genes into many other humans have also have high IQ genes there for improving the human stock. I got in an argument at a bar with some random bitch at a bar that was about to graduate law school about this. I told her she'd contribute 3 times as much as she could to society if she had 3 kids and never worked a single day in her life. She certainly was angry after hearing that.

This was a Good read

Danica McKeller = Hot smart girl

right. jewish women shouldn't breed.

Female education = low birthrate, promisicous, race traiting, broke, college debt, worthless degree, inflated ego, used up, old, slag, faded looks

Imagine licking her face as you explode inside her

shes in her 40s and still looks 24. Lucky girl indeed.

Wait till you are 30, you might end regretting choosing education over family. Feminists are notorious for fucking up their own future & children

quads of truth!

Attached: 1502401638205.gif (326x183, 3.72M)

>Remove feminist from genetic pool, cool

Yeah, they have opinions n shieeeeet.

It's not her bloody choice though and I'd ficking well tell her and phone the police.
Just like if I got my cock out and walked up waving it at people.
>my penis my choice
NO. It isn't. Don't expose yourself to me you repulsive old sack of shit.
I'd get our lass to give her such a bat.

Do nudes of her exist?
I need to see those milkers.

This.

Attached: 1501198881335.jpg (1600x900, 145K)

Witnessed. Please put this in the chan history books thanks

Attached: 1522764405132.gif (177x210, 2.12M)

Butterface.

Someone put a bag over her face

I think it stems from their fantasies of being a smart, well educated, intimidating woman, whether they are or not. Women that aren't particularly beautiful suffer especially from this delusion because its really the only thing they can hope for that will make them "attractive". Mass media reinforces all of this by having most female characters in movies, TV shows, and commercials, be the smart savvy one, and the man is typically the dumb buffoon.

a boring useless old slag with a college debt

Courtney Cox actually held her shit together really well. She's my mom's age now. I used to think she was Jewish because she played the character of a super jew's sister on TV, but she's an Anglo from the American South. She's 50 years old in pic-related. I hope my wife holds up that well.

Attached: a5ff08dbad45807317906dca23de03bb.jpg (800x1200, 83K)

I like smart women, but smart and educated aren't the same thing at all. Most "educated" women I've seen turn out to ne total bimbos.

Attached: 1527472812219.jpg (508x480, 76K)

seriously how does a girl with a body like this have problems getting laid? if she was a hambeast it would sense.

You can tell in her head it looked good.

>overcompensating tickler wearing nigger detected
You know everyone who has ever been in a locker room knows it's a myth, right?

proximately as the sun to the moon; only when the rays of the
sun die can the moon shine. Consequently, the hatred of all new
moons of humanity for the fixed stars is only too comprehensible.
In political life, such nonentities, if Fate temporarily casts power
in their lap, not only besmirch and befoul the past with untiring
zeal, but also remove themselves from general criticism by the
most extreme methods. The new German Reich's legislation for
the defense of the Republic may pass as an example of this.

Therefore, if any new idea, a doctrine, a new philosophy, or
even a political or economic movement tries to deny the entire
past, tries to make it bad or worthless, for this reason alone we
must be extremely cautious and suspicious. As a rule the reason
for such hatred is either its own inferiority or even an evil inten-
tion as such. A really beneficial renascence of humanity will
always have to continue building where the last good foundation
stops. It will not have to be ashamed of using already existing
truths. For the whole of human culture, as well as man himself,
is only the result of a single long development in which every
generation contributed and fitted in its stone. Thus the meaning
and purpose of revolutions is not to tear down the whole building,
but to remove what is bad or unsuitable and to continue building
on the sound spot that has been laid bare.

Thus alone can we and may we speak of the progress of hu-
manity. Otherwise the world would never be redeemed from
chaos, since every generation would be entitled to reject the past
and hence destroy the works of the past as the presupposition for
its own work.

Thus, the saddest thing about the state of our whole culture of
the pre-War period was not only the total impotence of artistic
and cultural creative power in general, but the hatred with
which the memory of the greater past was

She's got a great body for her age and her skin is like porcelain. Would let her lecture me.

Attached: victoria_bateman.jpg (1200x900, 143K)

at all. And from this effort to remove the past from the eyes of
the present, the evil intent of the apostles of the future could
clearly and distinctly be seen. By this it should have been rec-
ognized that these were no new, even if false, cultural conceptions,
but a process of destroying all culture, paving the way for a
stultification of healthy artistic feeling: the spiritual preparation
of political Bolshevism. For if the age of Pericles seems embodied
in the Parthenon, the Bolshevistic present is embodied in a cubist
monstrosity.

In this connection we must also point to the cowardice which
here again was manifest in the section of our people which on the
basis of its education and position should have been obligated
to resist this cultural disgrace. But from pure fear of the clamor
raised by the apostles of Bolshevistic art, who furiously attacked
anyone who didn't want to recognize the crown of creation in
them and pilloried him as a backward philistine, they renounced
all serious resistance and reconciled themselves to what seemed
after all inevitable. They were positively scared stiff that these
half-wits or scoundrels would accuse them of lack of understand-
ing; as though it were a disgrace not to understand the products
of spiritual degenerates or slimy swindlers. These cultural dis-
ciples, it is true', possessed a very simple means of passing off their
nonsense as something God knows how important: they passed
off all sorts of incomprehensible and obviously crazy stuff on
their amazed fellow men as a so-called inner experience, a cheap
way of taking any word of opposition out of the mouths of most
people in advance. For beyond a doubt this could be an inner
experience; the doubtful part was whether it is permissible to
dish up the hallucinations of lunatics or criminals to the healthy
world. The works of a Moritz von Schwind, or of a Bocklin, were
also an inner experience, but of artists graced

She does have a good body. I will give you that, user. However, her being an insufferable cunt who can't get laid has two factors:
1. Her personality was and is absolute shit.
2. I'll let you guess.
Hint: it's something about her face.

>educated women
>laci bin green

order not to be considered lacking in artistic understanding, peo-
ple stood for every mockery of art and ended up by becoming
really uncertain in the judgment of good and bad.
All in all, these were tokens of times that were getting very bad.
As another disquieting attribute, the following must yet be
stated:

In the nineteenth century our cities began more and more to
lose the character of cultural sites and to descend to the level of
mere human settlements. The small attachment of our present
big-city proletariat for the town they live in is the consequence of
the fact that it is only the individual's accidental local stopping
place, and nothing more. This is partly connected with the fre-
quent change of residence caused by social conditions, which do
not give a man time to form a closer bond with the city, and an-
other cause is to be found in the general cultural insignificance
and poverty of our present-day cities per se.

At the time of the wars of liberation, the German cities were
not only small in number, but also modest as to size. The few
really big cities were mostly princely residences, and as such
nearly always possessed a certain cultural value and for the most
part also a certain artistic picture. The few places with more than
fifty thousand inhabitants were, compared to present-day cities
with the same population, rich in scientific and artistic treasures.
When Munich numbered sixty thousand souls, it was already
on its way to becoming one of the first German art centers; today
nearly every factory town has reached this number, if not many
times surpassed it, yet some cannot lay claim to the slightest real
values. Masses of apartments and tenements, and nothing more.
How, in view of such emptiness, any special bond could be ex-
pected to arise with such a town must remain a mystery. No one
will be particularly attached to a city which has

which everything has been carefully avoided which might even
look like art or anything of the sort.

But, as if this were not enough, even the really big cities grow
relatively poorer in real art treasures with the mounting increase
in the population. They seem more and more standardized and
give entirely the same picture as the poor little factory towns,
though in larger dimensions. What recent times have added to
the cultural content of our big cities is totally inadequate. All
our cities are living on the fame and treasures of the past. For
instance, take from present-day Munich everything that was
created under Ludwig I, 1 and you will note with horror how poor
the addition of significant artistic creations has been since that
time. The same is true of Berlin and most other big cities.

The essential point, however, is the following: our big cities of
today possess no monuments dominating the city picture, which
might somehow be regarded as the symbols of the whole epoch.
This was true in the cities of antiquity, since nearly every one
possessed a special monument in which it took pride. The char-
acteristic aspect of the ancient city did not lie in private buildings,
but in the community monuments which seemed made, not for
the moment, but for eternity, because they were intended to re-
flect, not the wealth of an individual owner, but the greatness and
wealth of the community. Thus arose monuments which were
very well suited to unite the individual inhabitant with his city in
a way which today sometimes seems almost incomprehensible to
us. For what the ancient had before his eyes was less the humble
houses of private owners than the magnificent edifices of the
whole community. Compared to them the dwelling house really
sank to the level of an insignificant object of secondary impor-
tance.

Only if we compare the dimensions of the ancient state struc-
tures with contemporary dwelling houses can we understand the
overpowering sweep and force of this emphasis on the princi-
ple of giving first place to public works. The few still towering
colossuses which we admire in the ruins and wreckage of the
ancient world are not former business palaces, but temples and
state structures; in other words, works whose owner was the
community. Even in the splendor of late Rome the first place
was not taken by the villas and palaces of individual citizens, but
by the temples and baths, the stadiums, circuses, aqueducts,
basilicas, etc., of the state, hence of the whole people.

Even the Germanic Middle Ages upheld the same guiding
principle, though amid totally different conceptions of art. What
in antiquity found its expression in the Acropolis or the Pantheon
now cloaked itself in the forms of the Gothic Cathedral. Like
giants these monumental structures towered over the swarming
frame, wooden, and brick buildings of the medieval city, and thus
became symbols which even today, with the tenements climbing
higher and higher beside them, determine the character and pic-
ture of these towns. Cathedrals, town halls, grain markets, and
battlements are the visible signs of a conception which in the last
analysis was the same as that of antiquity.

Yet how truly deplorable the relation between state buildings
and private buildings has become today! If the fate of Rome
should strike Berlin, future generations would some day admire
the department stores of a few Jews as the mightiest works of our
era and the hotels of a few corporations as the characteristic ex-
pression of the culture of our times. Just compare the miserable
discrepancy prevailing in a city like even Berlin between the
structures of the Reich and those of finance and commerce.

Even the sum of money spent on state buildings is usually

As far as basic biology is concerned: yes, they literally are. In fact they are the only humans even capable of being baby vessels. Virtually every unique trait they have accumulated through evolution has been to assist in this regard.
At the most fundamental level it is their natural purpose.

ship represented a value of approximately sixty millions, hardly
half of this sum was approved for the first magnificent building
of the Reich, intended to stand for eternity, the Reichstag Build-
ing. Indeed, when the question of interior furnishings came up
for decision, the exalted house voted against the use of stone and
ordered the walls trimmed with plaster; this time, I must admit,
the parliamentarians did right for a change: stone walls are no
place for plaster heads.

Thus, our cities of the present lack the outstanding symbol of
national community which, we must therefore not be surprised to
find, sees no symbol of itself in the cities. The inevitable result
is a desolation whose practical effect is the total indifference of
the big-city dweller to the destiny of his city.

This, too, is a sign of our declining culture and our general col-
lapse. The epoch is stifling in the pettiest utilitarianism or better
expressed in the service of money. And we have no call for sur-
prise if under such a deity little sense of heroism remains. The
present time is only harvesting what the immediate past has
sown.
All these symptoms of decay are in the last analysis only the
consequences of the absence of a definite, uniformly acknowledged
philosophy and the resultant general uncertainty in the judgment
and attitude toward the various great problems of the time.
That is why, beginning in education, everyone is half-hearted
and vacillating, shunning responsibility and thus ending in
cowardly tolerance of even recognized abuses. Humanitarian
bilge becomes stylish and, by weakly yielding to cankers and
sparing individuals, the future of millions is sacrificed.

How widespread the general disunity was growing is shown by
an examination of religious conditions before the War. Here,
too, a unified and effective philosophical conviction had long since
been lost in large sections of the nation. In this the members

Liberal women are brainwashed & mentally ill.

Most girls would kill not to have to work a day in their lives

officially breaking away from the churches play a less important
r61e than those who are completely indifferent. While both de-
nominations maintain missions in Asia and Africa in order to win
new followers for their doctrine — an activity which can boast
but very modest success compared to the advance of the Moham-
medan faith in particular — right here in Europe they lose mil-
lions and millions of inward adherents who either are alien to all
religious life or simply go their own ways. The consequences,
particularly from the moral point of view, are not favorable.

Also noteworthy is the increasingly violent struggle against
the dogmatic foundations of the various churches without which
in this human world the practical existence of a religious faith is
not conceivable. The great masses of people do not consist of
philosophers; precisely for the masses, faith is often the sole
foundation of a moral attitude. The various substitutes have not
proved so successful from the standpoint of results that they could
be regarded as a useful replacement for previous religious creeds.
But if religious doctrine and faith are really to embrace the broad
masses, the unconditional authority of the content of this faith
is the foundation of all efficacy. What the current mores,
without which assuredly hundreds of thousands of well-bred
people would live sensibly and reasonably but millions of others
would not, are for general living, state principles are for the state,
and dogmas for the current religion. Only through them is the
wavering and infinitely interpretable, purely intellectual idea
delimited and brought into a form without which it could never
become faith. Otherwise the idea would never pass beyond a
metaphysical conception; in short, a philosophical opinion. The
attack against dogmas as such, therefore, strongly resembles the
struggle against the general legal foundations

Not intimidating. Tedious.
An intelligent woman isn't worth being around. Even worse is a woman who believes that she is intelligent when she really isn't. Colleges these days have a way of spewing out these kinds of people and it's not a quality I want in even an acquaintance.
If you won't make the kind of mother that I want for my future children then I have no interest in you. I don't want you as a friend or lover.

Not the smallest blame for the none too delectable religious
conditions must be borne by those who encumber the religious
idea with too many things of a purely earthly nature and thus
often bring it into a totally unnecessary conflict with so-called
exact science. In this victory will almost always fall to the latter,
though perhaps after a hard struggle, and religion will suffer
serious damage in -the eyes of all those who are unable to raise
themselves above a purely superficial knowledge.

Worst of -"all; however, is the devastation wrought by the misuse
of religious conviction for political ends. In truth, we cannot
sharply enough attack those wretched xrooks who would like to
make religion an implement toperf orm political or rather business
services for them. These insolent liars, itis true, proclaim their
creed in a? stentorian voice to the whole world for other sinners to
hear; but their intention is not, if necessary, to die for it, but to
live better. For a single political swindle, provided it brings in
enough, they are willing to sell the heart of a whole religion; for
ten parliamentary mandates they would ally themselves with
the Marxistic mortal^nemies of all religions — and for a minister's
chair they would even enter into marriage with the devil, unless
the devil were deterred by a remnant of decency.

If in Germany before the War religious life for many had an
unpleasant aftertaste, this could be attributed to the abuse of
Christianity on the part of a so-called 'Christian 'party and the
shameless way in which they attempted to identify the Catholic
faith with a political party.

This'false association was a calamity which may have brought
parliamentary mandates to a number of good-for-nothings but
injury to the Church.

The consequence, however, had to be. borne by the whole na-
tion, since the outcome of the resultant slackening of religious life
occurred at a time when everyone was

Jesus I can almost smell the cat piss/rotten fish odor from here, far left looks like Miss Trunchbull's daughter.

inevitably became catastrophic when by the force of great events
the question of the inner solidity of the nation achieved decisive
importance.
Likewise in the field of politics the observant eye could discern
evils which, if not remedied or altered within a reasonable time,
could be and had to be regarded as signs of the Reich's coming
decay. The aimlessness of German domestic and foreign policy
was apparent to everyone who was not purposely blind. The
regime of compromise seemed to be most in keeping with Bis-
marck's conception that 'politics is an art of the possible.' But
between Bismarck and the later German chancellors there was
a slight difference which made it permissible for the former to
let fall such an utterance on the nature of politics while the same
view from the mouths of his successors could not but take on an
entirely different meaning. For Bismarck with this phrase only
wanted to say that for the achievement of a definite political
goal all possibilities should be utilized, or, in other words, that
all possibilities should be taken into account; in the view of his
successors, however, this utterance solemnly released them from
the necessity of having any political ideas or goals whatever.
And the leadership of the Reich at this time really had no more
political goals; for the necessary foundation of a definite philos-
ophy was lacking, as well as the necessary clarity on the inner
laws governing the development of all political life.

There were not a few who saw things blackly in this respect
and flayed the planlessness and heedlessness of the Reich's poli-
cies, and well recognized their inner weakness and hollowness,
but these were only outsiders in political life; the official govern-
ment authorities passed by the observations of a Houston Stewart
Chamberlain * with the same indifference as still occurs today.

Mario & Politics do not mix.

different before the revolution. In reality the effect of this insti-
tution can be nothing else than devastating — and this was true
even in those days when most people wore blinders and saw
nothing and wanted to see nothing. For if Germany was crushed,
it was owing not least to this institution; no thanks are owing
to the Reichstag that the catastrophe did not occur earlier;
this must be attributed to the resistance to the activity of this
gravedigger of the German nation and the German Reich, which
persisted in the years of peace.

Out of the vast number of devastating evils for which this
institution was directly or indirectly responsible, I shall pick
only a single one which is most in keeping with the inner essence
of this most irresponsible institution of all times: the terrible
half-heartedness and weakness of the political leaders of the
Reich both at home and abroad, which, primarily attributable to
the" activities of the Reichstag, developed into one of the chief
reasons for the political collapse.

Half-hearted was everything that was subject in any way to
the influence of this parliament, regardless which way you look.

Half-hearted and weak was the alliance policy of the Reich
in its foreign relations. By trying to preserve peace it steered
inevitably toward war.

Half-hearted was the Polish policy. It consisted in irritating
without ever seriously going through with anything. The result
was neither a victory for the Germans nor conciliation of the
Poles, but hostility with Russia instead.

Half-hearted was the solution of the Alsace-Lorraine question.
Instead of crushing the head of the French hydra once and for
all with a brutal fist, and then granting the Alsatian equal rights,
neither of the two was done. Nor could it be, for in the ranks
of the biggest parties sat the biggest traitors — in the Center,
for example, Herr Wetterle. 1

Mmmmm, butter.

Attached: Its A Stone.png (1300x720, 1.46M)

All this, however, would have been bearable if the general
half-heartedness had not taken possession of that power on whose
existence the survival of the Reich ultimately depended: the
army.

The sins of the so-called 'German Reichstag' would alone
suffice to cover it for all times with the curse of the German
nation. For the most miserable reasons, these parliamentary
rabble stole and struck from the hand of the nation its weapon
of self-preservation, the only defense of our people's freedom and
independence. If today the graves of Flanders field were to
open, from them would arise the bloody accusers, hundreds of
thousands of the best young Germans who, due to the unscrupu-
lousness of these parliamentarian criminals, were driven, poorly
trained and half -trained, into the arms of death; the fatherland
lost them and millions of crippled and dead, solely and alone so
that a few hundred misleaders of the people could perpetrate
their political swindles and blackmail, or merely rattle off their
doctrinaire theories.

While the Jews in their Marxist and democratic press pro-
claimed to the whole world the lie about 'German militarism'
and sought to incriminate Germany by all means, the Marxist
and democratic parties were obstructing any comprehensive
training of the German national man-power. The enormous
crime that was thus committed could not help but be clear to
everyone who just considered that, in case of a coming war, the
entire nation would have to take up arms, and that, therefore,
through the rascality of these savory representatives of their
own so-called 'popular representation,' millions of Germans were
driven to face the enemy half-trained and badly trained. But
even if the consequences resulting from the brutal and savage
unscrupulousness of these parliamentary pimps were left entirely
out of consideration: this lack of trained soldiers at the begin-

manifested even in peacetime as regards drafting the entire
national man-power for the defense of the fatherland.
If too few recruits were trained on the land, the same half-
heartedness was at work on the sea, making the weapon of
national self-preservation more or less worthless.* Unfortunately^
the navy leadership was itself infected with the spirit of half-
heartedness. The tendency to build all ships a little smaller than
the English ships which were being launched at the same time
was hardly farsighted, much less brilliant. Especially a fleet
which from the beginning can in point of pure numbers not be
brought to the same level as its presumable adversary must, seek
to compensate for. the lack of numbers by the superior fighting
power of its individual ships. It is the superior fighting power
which matters and not any legendary superiority in 'quality.'
Actually modern technology is so far advanced and has achieved
so much uniformity in the various civilized countries that it
must be held impossible to give the ships of one power an appreci-
ably larger combat value than the ships of like tonnage of an-
other state. And it is even less conceivable to achieve a superi-
ority with smaller deplacement as compared to larger.

In actual. fact,, the smaller tonnage of the German, ships was
possible only at the cost of speed and armament. The phrase
with which people attempted to justify this fact showed a very
serious lack of logic in the department responsible for this in,
peacetime. They declared, for instance, that the material of the
German guns was so obviously superior to the British that the
German 28-centimeter gun was not behind the British 30.5-
centimeter gun in performance!!

But for this very reason it would have been our duty to change
over to the 30.5-centimeter gun, for the goal should have been
the achievement,, not of equal but of superior fighting power.

Top kek

Attached: IMG_6664.jpg (480x360, 20K)

Faggot stop

She wasting her youth. Watch her crash & burn. It's gonna be hilarious!

fuck off weirdo

Back into the kitchen with you