Hey Austrians, any reason your chancellor endorses internet censorship?

Why is this Kurz guy such an opportunist? He talks big stuff about illegal migrants, then turns around and wants to ban free speech on the internet. Why?

Attached: download.jpg (745x500, 82K)

Other urls found in this thread:

savetheinternet.info/
data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-8672-2018-INIT/en/pdf
youtube.com/watch?v=9AFVAlaUk0o
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austrian_People's_Party
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfgang_Schüssel
legislationline.org/download/action/download/id/7184/file/Austria_settlement_and_residence_act_2005_am2006_en.pdf
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sebastian_Kurz
youtube.com/watch?v=Ev2l3giAkeU
youtube.com/watch?v=HmLk2vSXXtk
independent.co.uk/voices/article-13-european-parliament-internet-censorship-copyright-a8408531.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Have you read any articles explaining their rationale for doing so? I know the left says it's about big money etc, but what are Kurtz et al. saying about it?

The man could glide with those ears

because they are still a party for the rich, the anti refugee program is just a way to generate votes. The FPÖ (Austrian People Party) is the party to go- anti shitskin and still against that kind of shit

>Have you read any articles explaining their rationale for doing so?

The big media companies are all for upload filters and link taxes. They want an internet that goes back to how things were in the 1990s. People passively consume content on various media outlets and that is it. No comments, no user content, no discussions,... no problems.

Please consider signing the petition against internet censorship - it might do shit nothing, but it is a small thing we can actually do, to get this to at least 1 million

savetheinternet.info/

Yeah, yeah. I've heard this explanation already. What's the other side of the story, though?

hes corrupted by kikes like the rest of europe.

As long as the rest of the little EU people sit on their asses, they will continue to take from you until they come to take your life, which wont be long now since they have taken your land to give to foreigners.

Attached: 1528296319424.jpg (750x816, 128K)

Do you really need to ask that question?

Attached: 6DA76944-2497-4B9A-A1AD-B393DDE1D648.jpg (898x628, 140K)

Le 65% face

banning free entrance and banning free internet go hand in hand retard.

What other side? Those parties have tied contacts with big media outlets. They want this to happen. This has happened before, here in Germany we introduced a link tax which killed all Google competitors... and youtube already uses upload filters to censor people. This is going on right now. There is political gain from all this for the right wing.

Probably the usual "protect copyrights so that creators can get fair compensation for their arbeit"-schpiel

This is a good question, but I cannot find anything on the matter.

OP posted the text of the law in another tread
data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-8672-2018-INIT/en/pdf

I'm not a lawyer but it will stop mainstream media to propagate the same news over and over giving original contents a chance.
Also, it will deny jewtube the right to demonetize dissenting voices.
Also it won't apply to non-profit
Also it won't apply to already existing (old) contents

I'm against censorship and I don't want this law to pass, but it's not so bad as OP say.
Again, I'm not a lawyer, so I may miss some important points.

He’s a quark from Star Trek!

Attached: CE488E3F-D40A-4C6D-AF9C-48E5AE05083B.jpg (320x240, 20K)

>a
>quark
quark is a ferengi retard.

>What other side?
>Probably
So you haven't bothered looking it up? Nice critical thinking skills. No wonder you guys are fucking pinkos.

Thanks man. It's really odd, the media is completely united in bashing Article 13.
At this point I'm quite sure there's some technicality that we're not getting here, like the Net Neutrality thing. On the other hand the actual implementation of the law is on the hands of each country's own Government, and the Italian Supreme Court has already chimed in claiming link taxes etc. to be unconstitutional.

I’m not a Trekkie. I just typed “alien with big ears from Star Trek” and quark was the first result. We can’t all be turbo-autists Hans

Attached: 0A736F0B-9AB6-416D-9DEA-953F9842BA30.png (190x266, 5K)

then dont pretend to be in the know when you type "a quark"

>So you haven't bothered looking it up? Nice critical thinking skills.

I arrived at the conclusion due to my superior intellect, monkeyboy

I never claimed to be “in the know” you spergy low energy slavic rape baby. I just remembered the alien from Star Trek. That was my only point of reference. Get over yourself.

Attached: B24D137C-C526-436F-BD55-3F7F15EEB142.png (856x846, 85K)

youtube.com/watch?v=9AFVAlaUk0o

Haha accurate

Attached: 663E2008-D11E-43BA-AC21-E8F794569E90.jpg (697x661, 40K)

He's unironically a Russian puppet

This. Also, what would be a tool if control for the left would be as handy a tool for a conservative administration.

>I'm not a lawyer but it will stop mainstream media to propagate the same news over and over giving original contents a chance.
What you mean is that Article 11 will result in just Google getting licenses from all large medias to list their articls there - just as it happened in Germany in 2014, while all competitors are killed off. Thanks, but no thanks.

>Also, it will deny jewtube the right to demonetize dissenting voices.
What? Upload filters do exactly the opposite. Person A speaks out against e.g. a left wing position, Person B doesn't like this, files a copyright claim for the video on youtube, youtube has to automatically censor Person A's video. Well, thanks but no thanks.

>Also it won't apply to non-profit
Name one thing that is non-profit. Jow Forums isn't. Wikipedia isn't either, they get donations and thus monetarize content as per the copyright proposal. There is literally no popular content sharing website on the internet which wouldn't be required to implement automatic upload filters for "non-profit" purposes.

>Also it won't apply to already existing (old) contents
WHAT THE FUCK? It applies to all copyrighted content, no matter when the material was created. It applies to Star Wars scripts from the 1970s. It freaking applies to 1984 (published in 1948 and still under copyright!).

Reminder that Vienna is full of foreigners and that Austrian People's Party wrote refugee laws.

AUSTRIA:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austrian_People's_Party
>The Austrian People's Party (German: Österreichische Volkspartei; ÖVP) is a Christian democratic[2][3][4] and conservative[5][6] political party in Austria.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfgang_Schüssel
>He was Chancellor of Austria for two consecutive terms from February 2000 to January 2007. While being recognised as a rare example of an active reformer in contemporary Austrian politics, his governments were also highly controversial from the beginning, starting with the fact that he formed a coalition government with Jörg Haider's Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ) on both occasions.

legislationline.org/download/action/download/id/7184/file/Austria_settlement_and_residence_act_2005_am2006_en.pdf

Kurt was also foreign minister during height of migration to Austria.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sebastian_Kurz
>Foreign Minister of Austria (2013–2017)

Attached: Vienna Austria school Christian capitalism privatization.jpg (3214x1493, 1.56M)

Nono you don't understand imagine the following
>qt 13.14 boypussy German-user is angry because foreigners are being criminal little shits
>He posts on 4chins
>to support his claim he posts a links to some online-news site
>and because he's a good lad he copy-pastes the text into the 4chins textbox
>now he commited breach of copyright-laws because he didn't write that obviously
>germanon now gets fucked in prison

Now ofcourse they won't go after 4chins post (if they don't shut the site down completely ;'( )
but they have an unbelievable leverage against little newspapers who often have to cite bigger news to write their articles

>muh Communism

They are opposite of Communism, they are capitalists.
CDU = Austrian People's Party = Conservatives of UK.
All Christian Jews.

Conservatives of UK entered EU, CDU entered EU.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austrian_People's_Party
>political party in Austria. A successor to the Christian Social Party of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, it is similar to the CDU/CSU

Christians are traitors of Europe and Communism, they are anti-Communism because they love free trade of foreign bank investments and migrants in their companies.

Because being right wing doesn't mean you do the right thing, dummies.

youtube.com/watch?v=Ev2l3giAkeU

The left didn't enter EU, didn't enter NATO, didn't import refugees. It's always right wing who imports refugees, censures for their Jew lord brands and prays to Israel. Not saying that left wing is much better, but it is right wing parties who entered EU and wrote 100% of all open border laws.

youtube.com/watch?v=HmLk2vSXXtk

data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-8672-2018-INIT/en/pdf

Page 35
Apparently this law will hurt only big news media, not lone autists on Jow Forums and other forum like sites, unless you want to send "necessary and relevant" information for each single meme you want to ban.

I don't like censhorship, but all this shilling is suspicious.

Attached: 00_n.jpg (817x514, 209K)

>lega nord voted for it
>front national voted for it
>kurz voted for it
thing like that are trial by fire on who is truly who
((((They)))) truly own them all
there is truly no hope for europe its all over
If this law passes this would be the end of the internet
this will essentially block all dissenting content and turn it into mainstream TV propaganda

>reposting article from RT about rapefugees in germany to redpill normies
>*CONTENT BLOCK* REQUEST COPYRIGHT PERMISSION

Attached: badcropmeem.jpg (600x600, 39K)

KEK

They do anything to protect their Jewish brands to make more money. None of those political parties of right wing are against migration or against foreign races, they are only against Muslim illegals, because they are pro-Jewish and illegals because they can't charge them money, not because they see anything wrong with migration.

Attached: pro-israel right wing left wing political parties.png (1507x966, 741K)

>any reason
always the same reason

Attached: 2018-06-13_233116.png (603x830, 71K)

>party X is AGAINST pro-corporation ideas, vote for party Y!!!
I seriously hope you're not this retarded

It's what you faggots need. European governments are too far gone for you to be able to shitpost your way out of this. You've got to go outside and take kinetic action.

>unless you want to send "necessary and relevant" information for each single meme you want to ban.

Not how it works. Every rightsholder (or alleged rightsholder) can submit any claim to any online website based on the proposal. There doesn't even have to be a copyright violation in the first place.

So what will happen is that you create an automatic system where a law firm can send out claims for any copyrighted material for their clients to all websites operating in the EU. Of course, as 99% of those websites cannot afford to role their own compliant system, there will be a centralized censorship system run by some company (probably Google or Facebook) which will offer its censorship services to the little guys... which pay for it.

Anyway, the idea that only the big guys are targeted here is absolutely ridiculous. This is what people said about the GDPR, and now guess what, it is all the small guys which have range blocked EU residents, not the big guys.

Maybe it's because he's a zionist and people say mean things about the jews on the internet?

>internet censorship
does not exist
nice try EU

this dude became president at like what age? 30 something. You fucking virgins are still watching hentai at 30. To stay in power you have to satisfy those that keep you in power

Sounds like nationalism to me.

>being this retarded
alter. stop watching porn and observe the world around you. you are part of the problem

Attached: 56zazat.jpg (480x360, 25K)

>does not exist
>nice try EU
That is the point, the right wing parties in the EU want to introduce rigorous internet censorship.

independent.co.uk/voices/article-13-european-parliament-internet-censorship-copyright-a8408531.html