We rally round the family

Spread my asscheeks and get pozzed

No but they can take a stiff cock desu

shit in the pants

youtube.com/watch?v=oGxcY4G8TJw

Attached: download (13).jpg (300x168, 9K)

>coalburner worrying about racism
>her armed cuck guard feeling manly
Pathetic, just pathetic

Shoot at them. How many of them actually have any experience in combat? it's one thing to have a rifle, it's another to know how to use it especially in combat against others who also have rifles. On top of discipline and tactics.

Attached: 1497479682285.jpg (388x443, 151K)

implying they can shoot ONLY guns

youtube.com/watch?v=boEHCIugp9k

Attached: antifa-thugs-armed-777x397.png (777x397, 442K)

Attached: 5686cb48d024bb4e020b8d9343136e59ac82db55c6726c8fe112ce46fde0835c.jpg (450x510, 33K)

we have veterans also

youtube.com/watch?v=3IDyLk_EYdE

Attached: global-civil-war1-480x320.jpg (480x320, 52K)

Are those airsoft guns?

>Make racists afraid again
>Covered faces
>Cowering posture
>Armed with the cheapest weapons money could buy
>Possibly not even real weapons, they just need something to look tough
Ironically, these racists ARE afraid.

>WE WANT A KURDISH STATE

>evEN THOUGH WE ARE ANARCHISTS

retarded

Attached: Chadwarden1.jpg (1280x720, 64K)

Attached: Screen Shot 1.jpg (312x266, 31K)

edgelord faggots all of em.

S*yim.

Attached: pol.gif (498x278, 1.59M)

Do you believe all anarchists are members of antifa? I believe most of you to be larping as Anarchists.

Fight back until I'm out of ammo, I guess.

Attached: 20180203_122235.jpg (4032x3024, 3.86M)

we ain't larping

youtube.com/watch?v=CoxsDkB-rWU

youtube.com/watch?v=FR7ao-qdwg0

youtube.com/watch?v=XRHvDodOZEs

youtube.com/watch?v=z5TZV0sE2HU

Attached: 456262627.jpg (1166x1920, 473K)

>.45LC
we can be friends

Attached: 1336690828266.jpg (399x465, 155K)

That's pretty much larping, you're all ancom. Basically, Just communists pretending to be Anarchists.

That pic reminds me of this.

Attached: 1513602676689.jpg (1200x900, 219K)

Never respond to meme flag posters EVER

Just give them guns and you have the OP.

Attached: 1528500629169.gif (680x499, 1.64M)

we take what we lack witout respecting property rights, that's our communism. you share what you have with your friends and you take what you can from the rich, its a form of life not a form of government

youtube.com/watch?v=Xrw5Wbx_Yms

youtube.com/watch?v=WAGU5WCRZnE

Man, you niggers ain't SHIT. And your women are filthy whores.

>you eat what we produce
lost it

I can respect that you realize violence is the only way to claim property. Just don't cry when the fascists wake up and btfo you again. They realize this too.

the most advanced fraction of our movement is in greece, they handled golden dawn just fine

aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2015/11/anarchy-future-greece-151122113214286.html

Attached: 35524099_1782759125079356_8165138102810050560_n.jpg (320x392, 40K)

An opinion piece is supposed to prove a point?

there is a profound asymmetry between us and the fascists, fascists are intrested in taking state power, they battle over "hearts and minds" while we ARE THE HEARTS AND MINDS

>If the insurgents’ war against the government needs to be asymmetrical, it’s because there is an ontological asymmetry between them, and hence a disagreement about the very definition of war, about its methods as well as its objectives. We other revolutionaries are both the focus and the target of the permanent offensive that government has become. We are the “hearts and minds” that must be conquered. We are the “crowds” that are to be controlled. We are the environment in which the governmental agents evolve and which they mean to subdue, and not a rival entity in the race for power. We don’t fight in the midst of the people “like fish in water”; we’re the water itself, in which our enemies flounder—soluble fish. We don’t hide in ambush among the plebs of this world, because it’s also us that the plebs hide among. The vitality and the plundering, the rage and the craftiness, the truth and the subterfuge all spring from deep within us. There is no one to be organized. We are that material which grows from within, which organizes itself and develops itself. The true asymmetry lies there, and our real position of strength is there. Those who make their belief into an article of export, through terror or performance, instead of dealing with what exists where they are, only cut themselves off from themselves and their base. It’s not a matter of snatching the “support of the population,” nor even its indulgent passivity, from the enemy: we must make it so there is no longer a population. The population has never been the object of government without first being its product.

besides, even if fascist can indeed achieve taking state power they will soon find out that the state cant do much becouse it lost its autonomy vis-a-vis the private sector, the economy. its obvious to all that Trump, for example, did not, can not, drain the swamp.

the ship of the state is totally submerged under the ocean of global Capital. socialist Syriza took power in greece but there s nothing it could do with it. real power resides in the EU, which is nothing in turn but trade agreements.

So, what you're saying is:
>Those who do not think like us are not "The hearts and mind"
And Antifa are trying to take state power too, even if you call it by another name.

Join them to fight alt-right scumbags

Show them what the inside of their asshole looks like.

Fascists don't actually target only the state. They target mega corps. The reason you will never win is because it is not profitable for those with power to allow you to.

no. obviously people who resent us are "hearts and minds" its just that they are conquered hearts and minds. they're not free.

how can "antifa" want to take state power? to take state power you need a face, a leader, you need some political celebrity, can you think of one antifa celebrity? "antifa" is masked. its a refusal to play the game and the insistence of a whole other game.

this is bad faith. in capitalist societies no one is said to be free, we all have a boss, we are all employed. non acts on his own accord.

you saying that we can not win becouse we are not sponsored by some corporation like an american politician means that you cant imagine freedom, you cant imagine a reality beyond capital.

however, revolutions are a historical fact.

When you take up a name and a mask, you become the name and the mask. You chose to stand for something, you made your banner and your icons. And yes, I can think of an Antifa celebrity. I feel like you need to read Stirner.

Revolutions have always been backed by a party who profits from it. Where do you think all the ammo, food, and other supplies come from?

Shoot them with my guns because unlike them, I won't miss. A good commie is a dead commie

i get what you are saying... we are being produced as a subject, as a things, "Antifa" is this case.

you are totally right that we need to escape the label, the brand (all brands are capitalist brands) the image of "antifa". we need to become truly and fully anonymous. we have to be "whatever"

>When the most indiscriminate repression comes down on us, we should be careful, then, not to see it as the conclusive proof of our radicality. We shouldn’t think they are out to destroy us. We should start rather from the hypothesis that they’re out to produce us. Produce us as a political subject, as “anarchists,” as “Black Bloc,” as “anti-system” radicals, to extract us from the generic population by assigning us a political identity. When repression strikes us, let’s begin by not taking ourselves for ourselves. Let’s dissolve the fantastical terrorist subject which the counterinsurgency theorists take such pains to impersonate, a subject the representation of which serves mainly to produce the “population” as a foil—the population as an apathetic and apolitical heap, an immature mass just good enough for being governed, for having its hunger pangs and consumer dreams satisfied.

and yes, our project is fundamentally Stirnerite

theanarchistlibrary.org/library/the-invisible-committe-to-our-friends#toc24

>It was T.E. Lawrence that worked out the principles of guerrilla war from his experience of fighting alongside the Arabs against the Turks in 1916. What does Lawrence tell us? That the battle itself is no longer the only process involved in war, in the same way as the destruction of the heart of the enemy is no longer its central objective; a fortiori if this enemy is faceless, as is the case when dealing with the impersonal power materialized in the Empire’s cybernetic devices: “The majority of wars are contact based; two forces struggling to remain close to one another in order to avoid any tactical surprises. The war of the Arabs had to be a rupture based war: containing the enemy with the silent threat of a vast desert unknown to it and only revealing themselves at the moment of attack.” Deleuze, though he too rigidly opposed guerrilla war, posed the problem of individuality and war, and that of collective organization, clarified that it was a question of opening up space as much as possible, and making prophecies, or rather of “fabricating the real instead of responding to it.” The invisible revolt and diffuse guerrilla war do not sanction injustices, they create a possible world. In the language of the cybernetic hypothesis, I can create invisible revolt and diffuse guerrilla war on the molecular level in two ways. First gesture: I fabricate the real, I break things down, and break myself down by breaking it all down. This is the source of all acts of sabotage What my act represents at this moment doesn’t exist for the device breaking down with me. Neither 0 nor 1, I am the absolute outsider/third party. My orgasm surpasses devices/my joy infuriates them. Second gesture: I do not respond to the human or mechanical feedback loops that attempt to encircle me/figure me out; like Bartleby, I’d “prefer not to.”

Kill, kill, kill.

Stirner would rather be an ancap tho. What is there to gain in your brand of freedom?

a complete, free, ungovernable life. the destruction of all barriers, all walls. the destruction of "me", "my brand", the destruction of "you" and all that keeps "me" and "you" apart.

the destruction of the spectacle and the beginning of an unmediated joy. the joy of life ungovernable.

youtube.com/watch?v=irdHSmRrdh0

Attached: 251180._UY630_SR1200,630_.jpg (1200x630, 134K)

That does not seem desirable. It seems the opposite.

>The history of the world, whose shaping properly belongs altogether to the Caucasian race, seems until now to have run through two Caucasian ages, in the first of which we had to work out and work off our innate negroidity; this was followed in the second by Mongoloidity (Chineseness), which must likewise be terribly made an end of. Negroidity represents antiquity, the time of dependence on things (on cocks’ eating, birds’ flight, on sneezing, on thunder and lightning, on the rustling of sacred trees, and so forth); Mongoloidity the time of dependence on thoughts, the Christian time. Reserved for the future are the words, “I am the owner of the world of things, I am the owner of the world of mind.”

bro why are you posting here

racism is a category of bio-power.

Biopower is that stage in the evolution of government that marks the animalisation of man.

to adhere to Race is to accept yourself as a breeding stoke, literally accepting yourself as a farm animal.

shoot them

lol, you handled golden dawn and ensured that Greece (a nation that'll never experience meaningful economic growth again thanks to the EU) would remain a European transhipment point for cheap foreign labour and political terror for Germany's fascist oligarchs.

middle-class, white 'anarchists' 0
Germany's fascist oligarchs 1,000,000 billion

Oh wait, that's how it's meant to go isn't it? Faggot.

Attached: 1529082582872.png (868x534, 574K)

Here's me wishing a communigger would.

When are they actually going to show the fuck up?

Attached: Sam Houston Protest.jpg (1440x1080, 300K)