Profit is theft

Ooga boogas who owned the wood

Refugees

Attached: 1508069512178.jpg (820x820, 65K)

Attached: 095.jpg (574x431, 47K)

>Where did I steal the 4€ from?
Greece

Presumably the man who made the knife, the man who cut down the tree you got the wood from, and the man who grew the food you ate so that you could have the energy to carve the wood, because Marxist economics is the economic equivalent of unfalsifiable psuedo-science.

>any individual person owning natural resources in a marxist economy
Gulag for you, comrade.

>profit is theft
Holy fuck can you be any more first-year-college-student.

"Redistribution" is theft.

>The only risk in business is physical
Kill yourself.

>build something
>costs me $10
>sell it for $100
>someone buys it
>they get what they want
>i get what i want
>i somehow stole $90

you fuckin vodkaniggers are shitting up my catalogueu

Capitalism isnt a meritocratic system so being smart doesnt mean being successful and vice versa.

in the thumbnail i thought these were minions lol

This, how is this difficult for libs?

All money you make is stealing from your parents, who made you.

You own the means of production and the product of your workforce user.

You're a proud communist who deserve the $s.

VERY gay and jewish

>Where did I steal the 4€ from?
From your labor. Isnt it obvious?

>Does not use mandatory harness.
>Breaks construction site rules.
>Drunk at job
>Falls from the scaffold

blames the owner.

The owners the one paying for the workman’s comp insurance in case of accidents you fucking pleb , Russians are such gypsies they don’t even have workman’s comp

Muh, difference between personal and private property. not joking, they make this distinction, it's next level marxist delusion

I second

Attached: yuri.png (1163x653, 1.17M)

If you don't like the pay, don't take the job.

based russian bot

Attached: 69d.png (680x458, 750K)

But you don't have to work for someone. You can start your own business.

And when you work for someone, you choose to do so because they offer to pay you.

Accidents only happen when people are being stuipd, 99% of the time. The risk factor depends on intelligence.

Also, bear in mind that most small business owners were in the trade for a long time, and did gritty shit. Even large scale companies won't hire someone to bid unless they've actually worked the trade or something similar.

Profit is necessary.

"Hey do X for me and I will give you money"
"Okay"

*socialist screeches*

give your money to me then. think of me as an angel.

Attached: this simple fact libertarians and capitalists DON'T want you to know.jpg (1312x1410, 355K)

It absolutely is.
If you were better and cheaper, people would use your services.
Because you are unwilling, unable, or too stupid to take advantage of a system, and fail, is not a reflection on the system.

It's a reflection you YOU.

owner makes more money because ITS HIS BUSINESS.

you're my little angel bby

Women of color probably.

>pic

No, of course it isn't the owner lying on the ground in a pool of his own blood. That worker and the company owner both took risks, but they took different kinds of risks. The worker could fall and break his head open (see pic). The owner could lose all his money, go into severe debt, and his family could be destitute, he could be sued, he could go to jail if he does something illegal (knowingly or otherwise), he could be stolen from, and he takes on the medical risks for his employees (I'll bet that medical insurance that he paid for sent that guy to the hospital, or the life insurance he paid for helped bury him). Again, both took risks, and those risks were different.

This has nothing to do with profit. This is purely a risk assessment.

Slide thread, but I was bored.

sage

Attached: PicsArt_06-21-02.01.16.jpg (2220x1080, 202K)

Sure enjoy filling 4284 forms pay fees and have fun completeing with shlomo shlomoberg who has politicians in his pocket.

Taxes are a tacit expectation of a social contract. Accepting a wage for work is not. If you disagree with the first, it seems like theft.

Lay your fucking hands off him! He's mine!

Attached: 1462217528229.jpg (840x467, 70K)

Communism is theft.

Womp womp

Than do it yourself. Now fuck off commie.

If you agree to have value extracted from labor there is no problem. If taxes were optional they would be fine.

1 post by this ID

Pablo is easy to replace

The guy with the money and expertise to run a construction company is not easy to replace.

These fucking leftist faggots vastly overestimate their value to society

>owner makes more money because ITS HIS BUSINESS.
the issue is with barriers to entry. Laborers MUST be laborers because of regulations, copyrights, patents, cost of production, ability of large companies to use anti-competitive pricing tactics.

Go back 30 years in this country and there were a ton more small businesses everywhere. We have been absorbed by corporations- which is NOT capitalism.

Why does an owner own something? Because he worked to build it. Why does a corporation own something? Because it is a monolithic structure fed by the will of no individual person, but purely governed by the mandate of short term profitability, otherwise known as the fiduciary duty.

Tough shit, pinko. The strong rule the weak.

Attached: 1528575110479.jpg (513x510, 59K)

people who work dangerous jobs are paid way more than baristas
dont respons to maymay flags

USA tried that.
Nobody paid.

Attached: 1529615200048.jpg (2832x3208, 427K)

The saddest part about this is- people who think this way have no clue the amount of responsibility it is to be an owner. They haven't the balls to make tough decisions. Most of these socialist clowns would piss themselves if they had to be a business owner or top executive.

the difference is my boss isn't pointing a gun to my head

Theft within reason.

vanya you forgot to turn on your red memeflag

yeah, he took the risk of hiring dumbasses that and look what happened

is it not normal for the employees to get paid more for high risk work?

Attached: b7d.jpg (727x727, 45K)

this "fiduciary duty" is so vague. boards of directors are so scared of being sued by "shareholders" that they make ridiculous decisions which hurt long term health of a product/company. I'm no business guru, but just in my personal life i have noticed so many products/services that have been GUTTED and irrevocably destroyed in the name of cutting costs, brands ruined, so that they can make some short term profits, then shortly thereafter their sales tank. look up breyers ice cream and what happened in 2006, they ruined everything that made people like the brand once it was sold to a large conglomerate.

Some companies should pay higher wages.

Literally no one but idiots disagress with the above statement but only retard Leftists think that it means profit is evil.

But how can you put a dollar value on life?

>He thinks a commie government would let an individual keep both the means of production and the fruit is their labor.
Umm.. Sweetie, that's not how it works

Attached: 1529369673215m.jpg (545x1024, 95K)

the whining commie probably

kek

>It absolutely is.
Only in theory. In reality, capitalism is purely hierarchical and exploitative by nature; in fact, it cannot exist without explotation at both micro and macro levels.

So "the smartest = the most successful" is nothing more than a lie of bourgeois propagandists.

>You're a proud communist who deserve the $s.
Commies don't use money though. That user should have just made and given away the figurine for free because he's gonna get food and shelter for free, as well as the tools that he used to carve the statue and the wood, all free.

>me bang hammer
>me work hands
>why suitman get more green paper than I if he no bang hammer
>why suitman have fancy time disc when he no work hands
>it clear only I is of make work
>suitman only take what mine

Attached: images (1).jpg (235x215, 8K)

Mr Shekleberg who was granted a patent for wood figures from Mr Shecklstien at the patent office.

Success in capitalism happens when one figures out the rules and exploits them to his advantage. Just like any other system. Some people have the right combination of being smart enough to figure this out and connected enough to make it work (or are lucky enough to have natural attributes desired by people successfully working the system).

>Accidents only happen when people are being stuipd, 99% of the time. The risk factor depends on intelligence.
Thats extremely naive. Companies and bosses constantly push you to do things faster and harder. Time spent thinking about the problem is wasted money, especially if you're just an underling. Problems are always something to be passed to the next guy because they affect your perceived productivity. Creative and dangerous solutions are more profitable than safe and slow solutions because they can always just find a replacement worker.

construction workers make good money because of risk as well

This is fantastically well done.

Kek

Can't you commie fuckers literally just work for the State wherever you live? That's what you want!

>be self-employed
>be taking advantage of myself

*posts descriving how much you like sucking on rich people's dick*

Attached: 1528487588334.jpg (400x298, 38K)

I take time off from Jow Forums for a few days and come back and all the shills are using Russian flags.

Attached: 1517754264588.jpg (521x600, 30K)

Models for stock photos make a pretty good hourly rate

If it’s so fucking easy for the big bosses why are you not a boss and instead bitch about working hard as an excuse to not work hard?
>Every generation has a wave of weak workers and incompetent ideologist

Every employee of sub-negro intelligence thinks they can do better than the boss man, they're always wrong.

>If you were better and cheaper, people would use your services.
"Better" is subjective, while cheaper is objective.
You and I can say that a Concert Pianist is a better musician than Justin Bieber, but if more people want to buy his music, he will generate more income than the Classically trained musician. In other words, supply & demand isn't so much about objective quality as it is simply about demand - want.

*Not that that is necessarily a bad thing. But it's important not to fall for the "more financially successful = objectively better" meme.

Because you didnt build it

>im retarded so I should be as much rewarded as smarter people because Im a risk to society