1) despising homosexuals for being gross and bad for public health, but being relatively tolerant of obese straight men like Christie and Newt, who pose the same problems.
2) Mocking blacks for we wuz kangz but projecting the "white race" back onto European cultures (Nazis, Greeks, Romans) who didn't identify as white.
3) Bashing the intolerance of SJWs while wanting to create a fascist state with no free speech.
Did I leave anything out?
How many shills in your firm have already quit?
1 and 3 are self-evident; re #2: en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
"The concept of a unified white race did not achieve universal acceptance in Europe when it first came into use in the 17th century, or in the centuries afterwards. The strongest proponents of racialism in 20th century Europe, Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany, regarded some European peoples such as Slavs as racially distinct from themselves. Prior to the modern age, no European peoples regarded themselves as "white," but rather defined their race, ancestry, or ethnicity in terms of their nationality (Greek, Roman, etc). Moreover, there is no accepted standard for determining the geographic barrier between white and non-white people. Contemporary anthropologists and other scientists, while recognizing the reality of biological variation between different human populations, regard the concept of a "white race" as socially constructed."
congrats, you figured out the joke.. just let us have fun in this gay little clubhouse pls..
Is Laurence Fishburne white?
You're conflating HBD being real (i.e. Laurence Fishburne clearly not being the same race as a European) with the "white race" being real. A common fallacy here.
This forum debates ALL DAY over whether this or that ethnic group is white. What more proof do you need that the standards for this are somewhat arbitrary?
Is Whoopi Goldberg white? A simple yes or no answer will do
>3) Bashing the intolerance of SJWs while wanting to create a fascist state with no free speech.
We don't want free speech.
We want our truth to be the only one.
>despising homosexuals for being gross and bad for public health, but being relatively tolerant of obese straight men like Christie and Newt, who pose the same problems.
Jow Forums does not approve of obese people and the majority of this boards hates Christie and Newt because they are too moderate.
>Mocking blacks for we wuz kangz but projecting the "white race" back onto European cultures (Nazis, Greeks, Romans) who didn't identify as white.
There is a difference here, National Socialist Germany was a European Culture, Ancient Rome was a European Culture, Ancient Greece was a European Culture, however Ancient Egypt had nothing to do with Blacks as Egyptians are Meds and not Sub-Saharan Africans.
>Bashing the intolerance of SJWs while wanting to create a fascist state with no free speech.
Nobody here bashes the intolerance of SJW's, in fact we bash the tolerance of the SJW's. SJW's will watch as their country is torn to shreds by hordes of African migrants and pat themselves on the back for being "tolerant".
Sage all memeflag threads
>Did I leave anything out?
No, she is not white. Even the construct of "white race" has enough validity to clearly exclude her.
However, if you were to ask me whether Ayatollah Khomeini or Mia Khalafi or Nikki Haley are white, there would be no objective answer and no consensus.
The concept of whiteness is not 100% arbitrary. But it is mostly arbitrary. Such that nobody can agree whether 1/5 of the worlds population (south Asians, Arabs (esp. Levantine), North Africans, and Sicilians are white.
1) No one here is tolerant of obese people but even so they are still 100x better than homos
2) The difference is Egyptians aren't sub saharan africans and also no one ever claimed that the Nazis, Greeks and Romans etc. all have the same ethnicity
3) It's not about bashing the intolerance but about pointing out the hypocrisy
Now do you have any other strawmen, memeflag?
>most heterosexual men don't rape
>but most pedosexual men rape a lot because uuh magic
Nazi Germany was a "European culture" in the same sense Egypt was an "African culture." The Nazis viewed most European ethnicities as racially inferior and had plans to exterminate and subjugate, for example, Slavs. The Romans viewed Celts and most non-Meds as savages.
It's constantly claimed that the Nazis were white nationalists and that the "white race" is a thing in history, which is We Wuz Tier.
Fat people don't spread aids and aren't statistically prone to being pedophiles. Fat people aren't so sick in the head to put there dick in a shit hole.
And nobody here tolerates fatties anyway
European cultures s a whole were built upon Greek and roman philosophy,science, and specifically Roman Christianity.
Kangs have no culture and have never created or maintained any civilization
We bash sjqs for being retarded and wrong not for being fascist
> Jow Forums is one person
> UN flag
Yeah that's what Americans claim. And while the white race is a thing in the sense of Europeans everyone identifies with their ethnicity first. The only reason America doesn't do that is because they have been so mixed between different Europeans that they have no identity other than being the descendants of white Europeans.
Oh great, a globalist shill faggot who relies on Wikipedia as their only source of knowledge
4. Claiming gays and trannies are responsible for all kiddy diddling while completely flying off the rails when you remind them the only people in the news diddling kids seems to be their servants of God.
>who didn't identify as white.
This one pisses me off to no end, desu.
I mean, it's a term that is already stupid and dangerous in its longing for inclusivity.
>if it's not in the news it doesn't exist
imagine being this brainwashed
en.wikipedia.org
>The Federal Bureau of Investigation have also collected data cases involving victims and perpetrators of rape:
Sex offense victims in 2012 (FBI):[14]
67,345 female
12,100 male
As you can see there was a grand total of 67,345 rapes against women in 2012 in the US. In 2012 there was around 151 million males in the US. This mean that nowhere near the majority of men are rapists, however among pedophiles, the number of sexual assaults skyrocket. You must be very retarded to think that pedophiles aren't more like to rape then normal people.
Once again I will explain this to you, National Socialism was a WHITE culture, however, Ancient Egypt was not a black culture, it was a Mediterranean culture, (Meds are not black),
German National Socialism was a white culture***
At least we all agree that Whoopi Goldberg should be deported.
Your use of the term "Mediterranean," which most Egyptians would reject as a self-description (only a small minority of Egypt borders or is near the Med Sea) , again proves that these categories are fuzzy and socially constructed.
Pictured are how the Egyptians with the least foreign admixture (Copts from Middle Egypt*) look like. Would you consider them whites.
*Copts have no Western African (slave) or Arab ancestry. Southern Egyptian Copts are mixed with blacks, while northern are mixed with Europeans, but middle Egyptian Copts are almost entirely Egyptian. Pictured is them, literally the closest to Ancient Egyptians.
>relatively tolerant of obese
Wrong, fat fucks shoud be forced to make exercice and starved or lose right to health care.
>"white race" back onto European cultures (Nazis, Greeks, Romans) who didn't identify as white.
I never use the term white, only amerimutts do.
>Bashing the intolerance of SJWs
What?
>systematically covered up and hidden from public including every religious institution from Scientology to Christianity and still have to hear about 100's of kids being diddled by geriatric sky fairy worshippers literally every 3 days
>watch as I repost the same 50 year old study with no scientific merit and blame the gays
I think you forgot that for the most part all of the posts on Jow Forums are shitposts and the only people who actually believe this are brainlets like you
Then where do I belong? I hated the left for telling me what not to say or discuss, being against pragmatism, and being easily triggered. Now the far right is the same.
This isn't an explanation incidentally; you're just question-begging/engaged in circular reasoning by saying the Nazis 'were white' when they regarded many of (what you would call) their "fellow whites" as subhumans.
Talk to a Pole about how they were treated during WWII, you ignorant burger.
1) Very little people here actually tolerate obesity, did you miss the fat shaming threads? The reality is that this place hates fat obese retards more than any other place.
2) What is your point here? Nazis, Greeks, and Romans do see themselves as white, and if they don't then they certainly don't see themselves as a non-race or whatever you're trying to say.
3) We're not criticizing SJWs because they're "intolerant", we bash them because they want to bring an end to the white race and bring about the equivalence of what happened in South Africa. Just look at their policies they push like school admittance discrimination based on race, white "colonizer" rhetoric, and hatred of capitalism and so called white supremacy despite the fact that non-whites have it the easiest in terms of discrimination in the west (see: school admittance discrimination, and job discrimination for people of the same socioeconomic background).
>Egyptians are brown
Do you want a prize for such an unbelievable discovery professor?
Testing a thing in a shit thread.
>his entire argument is based upon if it's not in the media it doesn't exist and if it is in the media it's 100% real
good goy, keep believing the media with no questions asked.
Catholicism is massively blasphemous though.
Designed to lure faggots into priesthood.
Firstly, Ancient Egypt and Modern Egypt are very different are extremely different, a majority of Ancient Egypt either bordered the Mediterranean or went along the Nile River, a river that leads directly to the Mediterranean Sea, so in Ancient times a majority of Egyptians were Meds. Secondly, you have completely missed my point once again, my arguement is not that Ancient Egyptians were White, (they were not White), my arguement is that they are not Sub-Saharan Africans. The entire meme of "We Wuz Kangz" is that Black people look up to Ancient Egpytians and think of them as their ancestors, when in fact the genetic family that they come from stems from completely different phenotype. The point is that Blacks claim they were Pharaohs when they were not.
Hard to argue with these double trips, my dude.
I'm definetly more than right-leaning but I do see these things you point edes out. There won't ever be a perfect system when billions of people are involved. Hell, even secluded communities of less than 100 clash, sometimes violently
>1) despising homosexuals for being gross and bad for public health, but being relatively tolerant of obese straight men like Christie and Newt, who pose the same problems.
not really. fat people are stupid and weak. happy?
>2) Mocking blacks for we wuz kangz but projecting the "white race" back onto European cultures (Nazis, Greeks, Romans) who didn't identify as white
see, european revolution, hajnal line
>3) Bashing the intolerance of SJWs while wanting to create a fascist state with no free speech.
forced exclusion and forced inclusion are two entirely different things
>Did I leave anything out?
a point to make
>Democrats eat pizza during campaign
>MASSIVE SATANIC PEDOPHILE SEX RING GOTTA VOTE EM OUT
>zero hard evidence, no witnesses, no basement
>DOESNT MATTER VOTE EM OUT
>Anthony wiener pulls his anthony wiener out for internet teens
>THESE DISGUSTING SEX PERVERTS NOOSE WHEN
>Roy moore and trump have long lists of sex assault accusers
>This is fine. Boys will be boys, amirite?
White is not some social construct, it is and has always been a specific genetic variant, the National Socialists acknowledged that Poles were white, the reason why they saw them as subhumans was because they were not German. White is a pejorative used to describe people of Indo-European descent. You are mixing up the difference between nationalities and races, also in the category "Indo-European" there are multiple subgroups, such as Anglos and Slavs.
>servants of God
What are you even trying to say here? And at least it's considered a scandal in the right. It seems to be becoming more and more acceptable to be a pedo in the left. It was a few years ago when that pro-pedophile article came out on the left wing news site salon, and many other left wing news sites also had similar pro-pedo acceptance articles. Just look at all the "amazing" socialist countries in Europe, they all have disgusting age of consent laws, down to 14 in Germany for example, while the average age of puberty is 16.
This is an American's perspective:
So did Theodore Roosevelt, what ever is your point? I have no desire to exterminate any group of people wholesale. Contrary to you globalists, I'd prefer creating an Imperium with a militarized society (or at least mandatory service with a militarized education) because I have no desire to wait in my home as the decay of decadence, degeneracy and weakness creeps to my doorstep. Explain to me why it makes more sense to take in endless droves of refugees than it does to actually go to these shitholes, purge the dregs from their lands and set up institutions and local industry that can be used to shape these half formed civilizations into something worth cherishing? Why do you wish to spread their misery throughout the world and sew discontent and distrust among the populous? Either these people are truly running from terrible hardships (which will FOLLOW THEM TO WHERE THEY ARE RUNNING) or it's a smoke screen to justify economic migration.
Why do you want to completely eradicate the true diversity of the world and its vast wealth of cultural and genetic differences through a constant policy of mixture in which implicit caste systems are formed? I've literally heard the supposed "anti racists" say we need "colored" migrants because, and I quote, "someone needs to pick fruit." What despicable weakness. On the other end, you seek to nullify this appearance of racial bias through implicit quotas which necessarily disenfranchise the domestic populous. Further still people are being conditioned to be taught not to judge people based on what they believe unless they are of European stock. I can't believe that you guys literally think this is going to go off without a hitch and that you can totally dissolve the European identity without any protest or resistance.
-Signed
A blue-eyed Sicilian.
>however among pedophiles, the number of sexual assaults skyrocket.
Where are the proofs? You don't even know how many pedophiles exist.
Firstly the far-right is not one person, many people on the far-right believe in free speech and many believe that only the truth should be allowed, the far-right is not a single ideology but more of a coalition of rightist ideals and icons, if you believe in freedom of speech there is still a huge space for you in the alt right. Secondly, the far-right is not the same as SJW's because they both agree in censorship, the far-right believes in censoring untruthful and subversive ideologies such as communism, SJW's believe in censoring the truth because it is too "offensive".
Apologies for the autocorrect: I meant an Imperial kingdom.
> Jow Forums is one person
Almost 20% of children have been sexually molested, is that enough proof you fucking degenerate?
Lmao bullshit. I don't think I've seen a thread about a massive religious child abuse scandal EVER on Jow Forums. Ironically I only ever see them on Reddit, coupled with outrage, which seems to be the direct opposite of the narrative you're pushing.
Who the fuck doesn't hit puberty until 16. Are you fucking retarded? 14 or 15 is fine for age of consent. If you don't know who you would consentually fornicate with by the time your a freshman/sophomore in high school you should be flung off a cliff like the Romans did to retarded children anyway.
Where in your law does it say that?
§ 176: "(1) Whoever commits sexual acts on a person under fourteen (14) years of age (a child) or allows them to be committed on themself by the child, shall be punished by imprisonment from six months to ten years [...]"
by acting as an intermediary; or
by furnishing or creating an opportunity,
shall be punished with imprisonment for not more than three years or a fine. [...]"
§ 182: "(2) A person over twenty-one years of age who abuses a person under sixteen years of age, in that he: 1. commits sexual acts on the person or allows them to be committed on himself by the person; or 2. induces the person to commit sexual acts on a third person or to allow them to be committed on the person by a third person, and thereby exploits the victim's lack of capacity for sexual self-determination, shall be punished with imprisonment for not more than three years or a fine. [...] The act shall only be prosecuted upon complaint, unless the prosecuting authority considers ex officio that it is required to enter the case because of the special public interest therein. [...] The court may dispense with punishment pursuant to these provisions if, in consideration of the conduct of the person against whom the act was directed, the wrongfulness of the act is slight."
"The age of consent in Germany is 14, as long as a person over the age of 21 does not exploit a 14- to 15-year-old person's lack of capacity for sexual self-determination"
What are these severe restrictions? It seems that even if you sexually exploit a 14 year old, they themselves have to report it to even be considered a crime. Meaning a 40 yr old can coerce a 14 year old in Germany to have sex with him and easily get away with it if the 14 year old doesn't report it. Or just have sex with the 14 year old under normal circumstances and still not get prosecuted. Your system is fucked, mate.
>Ironically I only ever see them on Reddit, coupled with outrage, which seems to be the direct opposite of the narrative you're pushing
You said earlier that you wanted proof that homosexuals commit more child abuse acts than normal people, well where's your proof that religious people commit more sexual child abuse acts than the normal population? You're the one pushing an agenda, you fucking retard. Stats only matter when other people provide their view? In fact, I have evidence, unlike you. Only 0.3% of the population of clergy have actually been afflicted with pedophilic tendancies. -Pedophiles and Priests Philip Jenkins. Go back to your safe space on reddit and stay there you fucking absolute retard.
>14 or 15 is fine for age of consent
Yes, raping a child when their brain and body aren't fully developed is perfectly fine. Are you fucking stupid? Good job admitting child sexual abuse is perfectly fine, it just reveals how hypocritical your views are when your amazing socialist countries are revealed to be fucked beyond belief. Kill yourself pedophile subhuman. You literally can't criticize any group for having a pedo problem when you yourself are one.
>Did I leave anything out?
Yes, memeflags' opinions don't matter
Standards are good, double standars are twice as good. Think it was a Danish proverb.
>le Jow Forums is one person who has the same stormfag views maymay