What's even the point of fighter pilots when we have drones?

What's even the point of fighter pilots when we have drones?

Attached: 1200px-Defense.gov_News_Photo_060803-F-2907C-107.jpg (1200x797, 171K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=siwpn14IE7E
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

whats the point of having ground troops when you have weaponised eod bots?

Attached: EODBOT.jpg (600x450, 78K)

Drones aren't very maneuverable yet, and they can be easily shot down. They're only good for reconaissance and striking targets on the ground, but not so much at air superiority

they´re faster user
plus, drones aren't that advanced nowadays

They still suck.

That danger zone song doesn't go quite as well with drones for one.

Much faster, doesn't necessarily need satellites for navigation, more maneuverable, can carry far more weapons, can stay in the air for far longer, can defend itself from airborne threats such as drones and other fighter jets.

NEXT

Better to use both.

you get to blast awesome theme music in the cockpit. duh.

youtube.com/watch?v=siwpn14IE7E

Attached: pol_bas.png (756x795, 360K)

you sound like a sore loser desk jockey air force baby boy who didnt make the cut back in pilot training!

Attached: 1529429028163.jpg (900x720, 43K)

now OP is roleplaying a tajaran on some weird erp ss13 server, sad!

im a poilot in the marines btw (flew 18 missions in Beirut back in 83. I shit down 19 Iranian Jets)

>other fighter jets
>implying dogfights are still a thing today

Attached: tenor (2).gif (480x270, 524K)

no you didnt

id show you proof but it classified

Attached: lil buttons.gif (400x296, 1.95M)

Many technical obstacles remain. There is significant latency in communications, especially if it uses satellite. Non-satellite less but range becomes a problem and to make it worst the longer the distance the easier to jam the signal. Also, putting all your eggs into such systems can turn into a nightmare because the enemy can "hack" the whole thing and take control of the drone.

Also very important is that so far nothing beats the human eye.

SAS General here, AMA

this

It's all just bombers and anti-air

Wait a week.

Attached: Dauntless_bomb_drop.png (480x427, 234K)

Rich kids like to fly them.

>What's the point of fighter pilots?
So finally your girlfriend an orgasm.

less likely to be brought down with an industrial sized signal jammer

>dogfights aren't a thing anymore
well it seems like every air force on the planet didn't get the memo

if anything dogfights are going to become more common once everyone is rocking stealth fighters

The ultimate future of air warfare will be a myriad of drones launched from large bombers at a safe distance. But we aren't there yet.

feels

True. 5th generation tech greatly increases the chance of WVR fighting. Especially since the range of WVR has increased substantially with improvements in EO.

>can stay in the for far longer
Yeah nope. Drones can stay in the air for 24+ hours while most fighters can only stay airborne for a few hours without mid-air refueling.

The rest is true though

>be US air force and also (you)
>remove guns from jets during Vietnam War because "dog fights don't happen anymore"
>bad things happen
>put guns back on jets

Attached: megabrainlet.jpg (645x773, 39K)

this

Attached: n2oaaG.jpg (221x250, 5K)

>So finally your girlfriend an orgasm.
not a grammar nazi, but keked on this one.

Attached: 1523717708926.jpg (964x872, 329K)

bang bitches when u get home

Stanislav Lem predicted this. Aircraft carriers are even more vulnerable. It's a drone-eat-drone world now, their drone factories against our drone factories. Perhaps we can make killing people in battle a war crime.

My self replicating drone army will eat both and convert them into more drones for me. The only question is how I should run the world government.