What would the school curriculum look like in an alt right, white ethnostate?

>alt right
>white ethnostate
Pick one

The alt right is not pro-White.

t. asian gf

no joke, my high school had a shooting range in the basement. wasn't used for that when I was there (turned it into a weight lifting room); but it was something that had been taught in schools, or as after school activities. Connecticut, BTW.

Basically the same to the Prussian model, only with white supremacy thrown into the mix. Students will still get a boring lecture about shit and doze off while the teacher is just following a shit model that no sane person would.

Would not change much.
Kids might be able to study properly since nogs and spics wont be yelling into their phones over the teacher who is too afraid of going to jail to discipline "students"

Attached: v3OA0sqlfo0.jpg (256x144, 7K)

Attached: Screenshot_20180622-043327.png (1440x2560, 481K)

Like shit. Nice psyop, though.

I see the soros shills are out early today. Work hard shitskin

How was it in Europe before all you white people left?

what about all the history and technology that has been hidden for centuries?

Stop teaching kids superfluous trash they will never use in the real world, like algebra. Science would have a heavy focus on biology (obviously). When I was a kid in the 90s, history was already heavily western tilted, but maybe it's less so these days. There are lots of specific things we don't want our kids being taught at school that I won't get into.

The main departure from our current system I want to see is how high school is viewed/used. In my opinion, High Schools in the modern western world are a continuation of grade school, that is to say they are just further generalizing these kids in order to make them fairly productive in whatever career they choose.

In my ideal system, generalization would more or less end with grade school, and specialization would begin in high school. If we have 4 grades, 9th grade would be solely about identifying which kids go into what general fields. If faculty notice you have an aptitude towards the technological, when you go into 10th grade you'd start learning about machinery, how engines work, the basics of electrical engineering. If the faculty notices you're leaning towards say, biology, you like animals or whatever, your 10th grade classes would be a diverse field of different medical and veterinary classes. 11th and 12th grade would just be further specialization, by graduation you would be ready made to enter into an apprenticeship, but your education wouldn't end there.

Out of graduation all kids would be pressed into mandatory labor service (6 months) and then military service (1-2 years). The military would take your broad recommended interest / specialization and you'd put what you learned to service in the military. When you finish your service, if you need/choose further education, the government gives you a free ride (based on the fact you've earned it via service and because the military confirms you actually have some knowledge of medicine or engineering or whatever else you go to school for).

Females should be taught how to raise a family, homemaking etc until they reach 13 and the father finds a suitor who courts them till marriage (around 15) while they help out look after children and mothers in other families and work in other roles they fit in.
The males should finish the basics of maths, language and science by 13 and then do find an apprenticeship/shadow a career of their choice or pursue a focus study and begin earning money by 15, then find a and court a girl and then get married by 18-20.

Attached: 1855934_vik_6782.jpg (1000x668, 152K)

The same as it is now, but a greater focus on the History of Europe.

The point of history lessons is to reinforce the existing narrative about the currently existing order.
Why else would you teach children about history, if not for that?

T. Happa baby

Let's not repeat histories mistakes and create a class of subhuman female breeding slaves. It's much more preferable for our society to have intelligent women than non-intelligent women. When men inevitably leave to fight, women have to (have to) enter the workforce, and some will have to be skilled workers to lead the unskilled workers. If women truly understand biology AND we encourage (not force) them to be mothers to large families, they naturally will choose to.

>implying school shooting isn't mandatory for the american curriculum

Attached: 1506146795728.jpg (184x184, 9K)

Probably the same but with much higher standards and more of a focus on traditional theory emphasising great European accomplishments and the removal of critical theory.

>Let's not repeat histories mistakes and create a class of subhuman female breeding slaves.
Yes, that's why they won't be taught to follow the (((college))) meme and end up in the state we're in today.

They'll be taught to put family first.
They can do other duties and work within the community while not actively raising their own children like helping other mothers, doing light work like farming etc and anything else in the community.

There is no need for any female "Scientists", "technicians" etc unless they're already capable anyway.

Attached: 963a4a7201b.jpg (1200x800, 183K)

Kids could actually learn without the baboons disrupting everything.

Any white kid that was a problem could get kicked out quick without any whines of racism.

I am not talking about this hittlerian bullshit that comes from lack of research (similar to what happens with flat earth conspiracies).

But the elites (they are hardcore athetists not from jewesh relitgion) did and are doing some stuff with schools. So if you want to see what would be removed.

From new order of barbarians, some bits that are related to school:
If you want more info related specifically about school you need to read the deliberated dumbing down of america

"SEX EDUCATION AS A TOOL OF WORLD GOVERNMENT
The sex education was to get kids interested early, making the connection between sex and the need for contraception early in their lives, even before they became very active. At this point I was recalling some of my teachers, particularly in high school and found it totally unbelievable to think of them agreeing, much less participating in, distributing of contraceptives to students. But, that only reflected my lack of understanding of how these people operate. That was before the school-based clinic programs got started. Many, many cities in the United States by this time have already set up school-based clinics which are primarily contraception, birth control, population control clinics. The idea then is that the connection between sex and contraception introduced and reinforced in school would carry over into marriage. Indeed, if young people when they matured decided to get married, marriage itself would be diminished in importance. He indicated some recognition that most people probably would want to be married. .. but that this certainly would not be any longer considered to be necessary for sexual activity."

>If you want more info related specifically about school you need to read the deliberated dumbing down of america
A 700s page book

"EDUCATION AS A TOOL FOR ACCELERATING
THE ONSET OF PUBERTY AND EVOLUTION
Somewhere along in here there was also something about accelerating the onset of puberty. And this was said in connection with health, and later in connection with education, and connecting to accelerating the process of evolutionary change. There was a statement that "we think that we can push evolution faster and in the direction we want it to go." I remember this only as a general statement. I don't recall if any details were given beyond that."

"MORE TIME IN SCHOOLS, BUT THEY "WOULDN'T LEARN ANYTHING."
As regards education, he indicated that kids would spend more time in schools, but in many schools they wouldn't learn anything. They'll learn some things, but not as much as formerly. Better schools in better areas with better people - their kids will learn more. In the better schools Iearning would be accelerated. And this is another time where he said, "We think we can push evolution." By pushing kids to learn more he seemed to be suggesting that their brains would evolve, that their offspring would evolve .. sort of pushing evolution .. where kids would learn and be more intelligent at a younger age. As if this pushing would alter their physiology. Overall, schooling would be prolonged. This meant prolonged through the school year. I'm not sure what he said about a long school day, I do remember he said that school was planned to go all summer, that the summer school vacation would become a thing of the past. Not only for schools, but for other reasons. People would begin to think of vacation times year round, not just in the summer. For most people it would take longer to complete their education. To get what originally had been in a bachelor's program would now require advanced degrees and more schooling. So that a lot of school time would be just wasted time. Good schools would become more competitive. I inferred when he said that, that he was including all schools - elementary up through college - but I don't recall whether he said that. Students would have to decide at a younger age what they would want to study and get onto their track early, if they would qualify. It would be harder to change to another field of study once you get started.

Studies would be concentrated in much greater depth, but narrowed. You wouldn't have access to material in other fields, outside your own area of study, without approval. This seem to be more .. where he talked about limited access to other fields .. I seem to recall that as being more at the college level. high school and college level, perhaps. People would be very specialized in their own area of expertise. But they won't be able to get a broad education and won't be able to understand what is going on overall."

"SCHOOLS AS THE HUB OF THE COMMUNITY
Another angle was that the schools would become more important in people's overall life. Kids in addition to their academics would have to get into school activities unless they wanted to feel completely out of it. But spontaneous activities among kids.. the thing that came to my mind when I heard this was - sand lot football and sand lot baseball teams that we worked up as kids growing up. I said the kids wanting any activities outside of school would be almost forced to get them through the school. There would be few opportunities outside. Now the pressures of the accelerated academic program, the accelerated demands. where kids would feel they had to be part of something - one or another athletic club or some school activity - these pressures he recognized would cause some students to burn out. He said. "the smartest ones will learn how to cope with pressures and to survive. There will be some help available to students in handling stress, but the unfit won't be able to make it.

They will then move on to other things." In this connection and later on in the connection with drug abuse and alcohol abuse he indicated that psychiatric services to help would be increased dramatically. In all the pushing for achievement, it was recognized that many people would need help, and the people worth keeping around would be able to accept and benefit from that help, and still be super achievers. Those who could not would fall by the wayside and therefore were sort of dispensable - "expendable" I guess is the word I want. Education would be lifelong. Adults would be going to school. There'll always be new information that adults must have to keep up. When you can't keep up anymore, you're too old. This was another way of letting older people know that the time had come for them to move on and take the demise pill. If you got too tired to keep up with your education, or you got too old to learn new information, then this was a signal - you begin to prepare to get ready to step aside."

"SPORTS AS A TOOL OF SOCIAL CHANGE
And along these lines then we can talk about sports. Sports in the United States was to be changed, in part as a way of de-emphasizing nationalism. Soccer, a world-wide sport, was to be emphasized and pushed in the United States. This was of interest because in this area the game of soccer was virtually unknown at that time. I had a few friends who attended an elementary school other than the one I attended where they played soccer at their school, and they were a real novelty. This was back in the 50's. So to hear this man speak of soccer in this area was kind of surprising.

Anyhow, soccer is seen as an international sport and would be promoted and the traditional sport of American baseball would be de-emphasized and possibly eliminated because it might be seen as too American. And he discussed eliminating this. one's first reaction would be - well, they pay the players poorly and they don't want to play for poor pay so they give up baseball and go into some other sport or some other activity. But he said that's really not how it works. Actually, the way to break down baseball would be to make the salaries go very high. The idea behind this was that as the salaries got ridiculously high there would be a certain amount of discontent and antagonism as people resented the athletes being paid so much, and the athletes would begin more and more to resent among themselves what other players were paid and would tend to abandon the sport. And these high salaries also could break the owners and alienate the fans. And then the fans would support soccer and the baseball fields could be used as soccer fields. It wasn't said definitely this would have to happen, but if the international flavor didn't come around rapidly enough this could be done. There was some comment along the same lines about football, although I seem to recall he said football would be harder to dismantle because it was so widely played in colleges as well as in the professional leagues and would be harder to tear down. There was something else also about the violence in football that met a psychological need that was perceived, and people have a need for this vicarious violence.

So football, for that reason, might be left around to meet that vicarious need. The same thing is true of hockey. Hockey had more of an international flavor and would be emphasized. There was some foreseeable international competition about hockey and particularly soccer. At that time hockey was international between the United States and Canada. I was kind of surprised because I thought the speaker just never impressed me as being a hockey fan, and I am. And it turns out he was not. He just knew about the game and what it would do to this changing sports program. But in any event soccer was to be the keystone of athletics because it is already a world wide sport in South America, Europe, and parts of Asia and the United States should get on the bandwagon. All this would foster international competition so that we would all become citizens of the world to a greater extent than citizens of our own narrow nations. There was some discussion about hunting, not surprisingly. Hunting requires guns and gun control is a big element in these plans. I don't remember the details much, but the idea is that gun ownership is a privilege and not everybody should have guns. Hunting was an inadequate excuse for owning guns and everybody should be restricted in gun ownership.

The few privileged people who should be allowed to hunt could maybe rent or borrow a gun from official quarters rather than own their own. After all, everybody doesn't have a need for a gun, is the way it was put. Very important in sports was sports for girls. Athletics would be pushed for girls. This was intended to replace dolls. Baby dolls would still be around, a few of them, but you would not see the number and variety of dolls. Dolls would not be pushed because girls should not be thinking about babies and reproduction. Girls should be out on the athletic field just as the boys are. Girls and boys really don't need to be all that different. Tea sets were to go the way of dolls, and all these things that traditionally were thought of as feminine would be de-emphasized as girls got into more masculine pursuits. Just one other things I recall was that the sports pages would be full of the scores of girls teams just right along- there with the boys teams. And that's recently begun to appear after 20 years in our local papers. The girls sports scores are right along with the boys sports scores. So all of this is to change the role model of what young girls should look to be. While she's growing up she should look to be an athlete rather than to look forward to being a mother."

1952?

Like twelve white people left in t he public schools in 2018.

Attached: 08c642e38ab3c66db961fbb9c8381d8a.jpg (420x294, 32K)

The whole more time in schools is ONLY to babysit niggers.
They want the baboons in state custody from sun up to sun down. Nobody thinks they will learn anything, it's just to babysit them.

no bullshit hologram class to remind us all why we have to go fight wars in the middle east for worthless weaklings who can't protect themselves even after having billions and decades dumped into them

Like the early days of America. Then it will slowly realize that race realism is actually racism. Then it will start giving monorities rights. Then it will have a civil war. Then the future postmodernists will infiltrate the education system and you'll get the multicultural utopia.

Literal merchant low iq posts, niggered slavs arent people fucking faggot meme flag nigger