Why aren't you a libertarian, pol?
>Removes welfare
>Less taxes
>No refugees
>Only high IQ immigrants. The rest flee to a welfare state.
>No more deep state
>Levels playing field against Jews.
And if IQ is genetic, it's going to create a mixed race lower class of citizens that already live there. No new migrants when there's plenty of local manual labor.
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Based vote stealing party shill
If you actually believe that colored people are inferior, then why not put it to the test by not holding their hand? Why spend millions on removing them when we can get them to remove themselves?
Nope. Vote republican until the first past the post system is reformed. I'm not a shill.
bump
bump
>Levels playing field against Jews
>Doesn't know how tribalistic actions destroy a meritocracy
I used to be libertarian too before I grew a brain. Also you can't self bump retard. You clearly have no experience with Jow Forums. Many of the other points you've listed are also not libertarian and are more authoritarian thank you think. Consider taking a political compass test. And remember you're here forever.
It solves the immigration issue and removes welfare and affirmative action. How is any of that authoritarian?
This is pretty much my evolution but I started in top right instead of bottom left.
Libertarians don't have their shit sorted. The movement is too broad.
Jow Forums have a tendency of nudging people upward. Be careful dude.
en.wikipedia.org
Paleolibertarians are sleeper agents for the republican party. They all advocated for Trump over Gary.
I know this quite well, I've been bouncing back and forth between libertarian and natsoc a couple times. I think at heart I'm very much a right leaning libertarian (I like Hoppe, Jefferson, and early American ideals), but natsoc is a reactionary point of view for me. It's kind of like we need natsoc to secure a space for libertarianism to thrive, I don't think libertarianism can be implemented right away without practically castrating the government (specifically the welfare state).
Dude, I don't think bouncing back from natsoc to libertarianism will be a thing. Authoritarian governments aren't known for peacefully giving up power.
I'm not saying a nation would bounce between the two, but I've been trying to decide between the two as I form my own opinions of politics.
How can libertarianism thrive in a natsoc governemnt?
Because taking in only high IQ immigrants is actually worse for both your own nation and the immigrant's nation.
You should instead strive to create the best possible people you can in your own nation.
It's actually irrelevent to your own nation but yes, it does damage the original nation in a minor way. I don't particularly care about other nations that can't take care of their own middle class. That sounds like their problem not ours.
>Thinking socialists wouldn't just starve without the government.
>Libertarian
>Taxes
Pick one.
I-Is that a nose
>And if IQ is genetic, it's going to create a mixed race lower class of citizens that already live there. No new migrants when there's plenty of local manual labor.
Retard, do you think violent niggers are going to conform to being a caste? With no state to protect you, you will get killed by kikes, and a state will form from the power struggle anyway.
>inb4 private army
Who's going to be in the army? Disloyal niggers or disloyal people in general. May I remind you that private armies cause the destruction of many great empires, like Rome and the Spanish?
>inb4 drone army
Fuck off and LARP somewhere else.
I'm not an anarchist.
I don't support private armies.
UR MOM GAY
Anarcho-capitalism results in the state. Stifling competition through monopoly is the optimal strategy for a business, maximizing profits and eliminating risk. Once you have a large enough monopoly, you are de facto performing the functions of a state.
The entire philosophy of libertarianism is a fantasy as absurd as communism.
extreme newfag detected
Kys memeflaggot
1. I know economics
2. I know philosophy
3. I know history (2008)
"free market" caused feminism you dumb nigger
i'm libertarian mostly just because of the fact that shills show up screeching "REEEEETARD" at the top of their lungs every time the word is mentioned.
anything that triggers the kikes this hard has to be good.
I'm not an anarchist.
Postmodernist useful idiots for Neoliberalism caused feminism.
Why do you think they want both the welfare state and uncontrolled immigration? The beneficiary is painfully obvious. Jews if you are natsoc. Deep State if you are Libertarian. Same thing.
Again I never said that. It'd actually be the opposite, natsoc could be established in libertarianism (ancap), and it would be completely voluntary so nobody could bitch about being oppressed.
>Libertarian
You mean that illuminist kike-y idea born out of freemasons ass in the 18 century? Nope, thanks.
I thought the point of natsoc was that it doesn't allow people to make choices.
We are, but it is not possible, that is why most of Jow Forums converted to natsoc unless our countries have been pure white.
I can see ancaps and natsoc's working together unless you are that one degenerate sister fucker who is also a pedo.
Because I’m not 16
According to leddit libertarians, borders are for statists and we should allow all immigrants in
>jews continue to conspire
>employ anti-market particles
>cant stop them cause lolberarian
>end up with kike monopolies everywhere
>jewish corporations completely own the government and pass any laws they want
>country opens up to cheap migrant labour
>you get sent to die for israel
>Removes welfare
Fuck off