When people say "porn" it seems like they are referring to the cuck variety that involved a guy and a girl having sexual relations on film or in still photography.
Is it still porn if the woman's genitals are not exposed, it's not explicitly sexual, and no guy is involved?
pic related.
If it's 3D, it's wrong - and should be outright banned.
2D is a morally gray area to some Christians, such as myself.
www.ProjectLifeguard.net
Pornography is a sexual act, or anything that references sexual activity. Pretty self explanatory.
So, would you consider virtually *any* photo of a nekkid woman to inherently be pornographic?
yea
Addictive poison that will mess up your life. Avoid it at all costs.
Did you even read what I said? A sexy woman posing nude is not pornography (though it's immodest). It has to directly or indirectly be a sex act.
A pic of ur naked mom lying on her carcass on a dirty encrusted bed is not porn
a pic of a hot grill with bob out is porn bcz i can jerk it off to it
is that clar underage trash?
Your photo in the OP is not porn, it's art, a celebration of the human form. People fucking on video is degenerate though and corrosive to society.
But it makes me want to jerk off. Isn't that the end goal of porn?
I've found that tasteful "nude art" satiates my interest in looking at nekkid women, but does not induce any sexual impulses or need for more extreme hypersexual imagery.
Perhaps I am wrong, but could "nude art" be used to help detox from the hardcore degenerate filth or no to anything that might ignite sexual impulses? It's been working for me for years now.
>t. Yellow fever faggot
I would never race mix with Asians, Africans, Aboriginals or Arabs.
European or Latin only.
Die faggot
That’s because modern porn and hentai (if you’re a pathetic yellow fever faggot) have conditioned you to do so due to hypersexualization of everything.
In a sane society the government kills people who sexualize children.
Why do you have that picture on your HDD, user?
Good to hear. Just drop the degenerate hentai and 2D porn shit.
Someone played themself
If it produces sexual arousal in the viewer, it's porn. That could be "tasteful artistic nudes" or a BDSM gang bang or a shiny new car or a kitten in a teacup. Whatever turns you on is, for you, porn. So the question is "Why should anyone cares that you're turned on?" Well because images of nude women are supposedly demeaning to women... unless the women like them, then they're empowering. Scratch that... images of women that arouse men are demeaning whereas images of women that disgust men are empowering. It's not about porn, it's about hating men.
There is a reason that all the ancient celebrated the female form in statues or paintings
That's one of the few things I agree with the bible thumpers on. Porn is social cancer and anyone who produced it should be shot
if it gives me chub it’s porn
>post non-pornographic picture illustrating how some retards call anything and everything porn
>mods ban for it and delete because they're scumbags
>retarded newfags applaud
I hate this place now. Fuck the mods and fuck the newfags who have ruined this site.
Is this picture porn too? It's a promotional photo of an actress but I've seen bans for promotioonal photos of actresses before.
>In a sane society the government kills people who sexualize children.
No, that's a fucked up insane feminist society that would do that. Children are sexy, they'd on't need to be "sexualized", they are sexy. And you're the one sexualizing that picture.
We could make porn that promotes marriage. But it would involve having draconian laws that would basically require syltars to be married. We could have government ran swingers clubs that only allowed married couples. Restructuring degeneracy in our favour so to speak. But we’d have to nuke Hollywood first. Create movies with these themes.
If only it were so easy to rub my belly and make my hunger disappear.
Don't justify the kike paedos anneposter.
I've been on Jow Forums 10 years this summer.
>If it produces sexual arousal in the viewer, it's porn.
I think the intent (which is quite obvious) of the imagery is a key factor. If the intent is to cause sexual arousal in the view I stay away from it as much as possible. However, if the imagery is aesthetically pleasing and there is not an obvious intent to encourage the viewer to become aroused and jerk off, then I stay away from that.
Remember back when you would run across an infant with sharpies inserted in it? The good old days.
>and no guy is involved?
yes. when a guy is involved it just makes you a cuck as a bonus
That's why the mods on /b/ are who they are now.
Revelation chapter 2 and 3.
But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.
Nude statues are acceptable as they are culturally signifigant, playboy in magazine form is fine as long as society pretends they are taboo, man hides stash etc.
But can you commit adultery with a waifu?
2D might be morally grey, but we are talking normal porn.
If you like that Furry, Loli or half animal half human you are a sick fuck.
Lust: 1. Concupiscence; carnal appetite; unlawful desire of carnal pleasure.
2. To have carnal desire; to desire eagerly the gratification of carnal appetite.
webstersdictionary1828.com
If a man is looking on a nude woman with no lust, difficult as that may be for some, do you consider that to be inherently immoral?
Also, checked.
Pretty much this. Of course, it sounds extreme to us though lust is a slippery slope. There's a fine line between erotic art and porn. You might start with Playboy telling yourself its hardly anything and be a hardcore porn freak within a few years. That's the point of that injunction. As an oldfag I can tell you what's good: get you a woman you care about and exercise your lust out of affection. Same nut but very different effects on your wellbeing
People bringing themselves off 3D often need to slowly come down by going to /d/ first followed by /e/ which is a long way from /gif/.
>do you consider that to be
of course not but a man who is guarding his heart will not keep looking because he is wise enough to understand lust will arise if he remains and keeps his aim on the goal.
>There's a fine line
Ever hear Ted Bundy talk about what porn did to him?
Every time I jack off I enter cognitive dissonance and depress myself into a spiral of sin.
It feels even worse knowing that I tried to evade God's laws by using some stupid loop-hole like hentai and AKABUR, fucking depressing.
I think that men who have been exposed to ultradegenerate filth need to be reacquainted with aesthetically pleasing women in a non-sexual context - to see them as something beautiful, to be cherished, and not debauch oneself with (in their mind or in reality).
Triple lucky checked.