Is the stab in the back theory actually true?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
G*RMS DINDU NUFFIN
G*RM WAS A GOOD BOY HE WAS GOING BACK TO ART SCHOOL AND GETTING HIS LIFE TOGETHER
I posit that Germany was really stabbed in the back by the lax enforcement of the Treaty of Versailles.
If Britain or France had just enforced their document...Hitler and Mussolini would have been peaceful boys.
no. g*rmans just got absolutely BTFO by anglos and French
yes, *nglos stabbed g*rms in the back
I got something to stab you with pal
It is true that there were Jews in the press, writing demoralizing articles during WW1.
It is also true that the German Army wasn't really losing in WW1.
However, with the introduction of the American economy and army onto the European front, it is hard to determine how long they could have held out.
Germany was defeated in the field by Ludendorff's own admission
The allies never stepped foot on German soil.
The russians had recently been knocked out of the war, turning it into a one front war.
German submarine warfare was crippling the supply chain to western europe, and only getting worse the longer the war dragged on.
The US would have gotten tired of the war in another couple of years, and probably been forced out (or someone else elected that would).
France was on the verge of collapse, as was the UK.
You tell me, what's more likely, Germany saw the above situation and went "WE'RE TOTALLY DEAD GUYS, QUICK, UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!", or jewish politicians stabbed them in the back.
The US public was NOT eager to enter WW1, isolationism was still very strong at that time. Given the draft, it was even less popular. Eventually, the furor over unrestricted submarine warfare would have been eclipsed by their distaste for dying in some shitty European war. I seriously doubt that the hawks would have remained in power for more than another election cycle or two.
Literal khazar milkers...
Also, if Britain wasn't so fucking scared of the French then maybe Germany would not have even been able to fight.
yes
>The US would have gotten tired of the war in another couple of years
Except they didn't and Germany got their shit pushed in during the hundred days offensive.
What happened in Germany in WW1 happened in France in WW2, except instead of meddling jews it was meddling nazis
There was a German civil war
Read your link lad:
>The roots of the revolution lay in the German Empire's defeat in the First World War and the social tensions that came to a head shortly thereafter.
Yes the Balfour Declaration was an agreement between Britain (Who at the time controlled Palestine) and Lionel Walter Rothschild, a zionist Jew, giving British support for a Jewish state in what is now Israel. This was in exchange for American Jews to convince the United States to enter the was on the side of Britain.
Enter Samuel Untermeyer, A jewish lawyer who prior to this represented a woman Woodrow Wilson had an affair with prior to his presidency and was blackmailing Wilson. Untermeyer offered to pay the blackmail in exchange for picking the next justice for the supreme court. This came to pass and Louis Brandeis the first jew to serve on the supreme court was nominated and later confirmed to the court. Brandeis, a member of the Federation of American Zionists, became close to Wilson and was one of the most supportive of US entry into ww1.
Later, Arthur Zimmerman, while not a Jew was a zionist, sent a telegram to Mexico asking for a mutual protection pact in case the US entered the war. This telegram was used as propaganda in the US by Wilson to get the US into war. The Zimmerman telegram was suspicious for several reasons,
1. Mexico was never going to agree and Zimmerman knew this. Mexico had neither the men, supplies, or will to fight another war against the US.
2. The telegram was sent in such a way that is was definitely going to be intercepted and decrypted by the British.
3. The telegram mentions that Germany would restart their U-boat campaigns in the Atlantic. There would have been no reason to mention this other than to anger the Americans once it was made public.
4. Zimmerman was also heavily involved in German support for the Jewish led Bolshevik Revolution in Russia.
The American entry into ww1 was coordinated by Jews in Germany, Britain, and the US. They betrayed the only Western Country that gave them asylum during the Russian pogroms so that they would be given land of their own after the war.
>Later, Arthur Zimmerman, while not a Jew was a zionist
source?
>Eventually, the furor over unrestricted submarine warfare would have been eclipsed by their distaste for dying in some shitty European war
The predation of American ships was encouraged and done on purpose by both US and UK elites. (to get us into the war)
>US and UK elites
Which elites specifically?
JP Morgan was a giant war monger, and Churchill (most evil human of the 20th century) was personally responsible for making sure that the Lusitania was stocked with military munitions (war crime) and that it would travel in the most U-boat infested waters (war crime), which was done on purpose so that it would be sunk and the US would join the war.
>Churchill (most evil human of the 20th century) was personally responsible for making sure that the Lusitania was stocked with military munitions
Source? I know the Lusitania was carrying munitions but I never heard that Churchill actively made sure it was stocked with weapons
Don't have a video handy, but you can see on wiki that the Germans filed several legal cases against the US gvt. from their embassy to get them to stop arming civilian ships. They tried to prevent it.
The germans were also experiencing a naval blockade by Britain and those troops being transferred from the eastern front wouldve been exhausted and undersupplied. The Americans wouldnt have gotten tired because Germany would not be able to win against constant american reinforcements that although werent experienced were fresh and motivated.