Can anyone explain to me why the left is so adamant on defending illegal immigrants and their third world children?

Can anyone explain to me why the left is so adamant on defending illegal immigrants and their third world children?

Attached: 1471749301.png (500x428, 58K)

expanding the democrat voter pool

>Using psychological research into the personality traits of ideologues, we show how Liberal openness to out-group interests, Liberal willingness to break rules, Liberal rejection of authority, and Liberal tendencies towards non-violence are all traits which would tend to being defeat to a society which followed them in a K-selective, group competitive environment. These are also traits designed to curry favor with individuals in the very out-groups which seek to defeat the Liberal’s in-group. We also note that the use of betrayal of one’s population as a survival strategy in group competition would allow an r-type psychology to use a foreign force of K-type individuals to eradicate the r-type individual’s local competition for mates and resources. If the r-type psychology curried favor with this enemy, before initiating the defeat of their population, they would be well positioned to actually use the K-type Warrior’s competitions against him, ala the r-type transvestite cuttlefish’s exploitation of the rules governing their flashing competitions. Following their society’s defeat, the conquering force would likely allow them to survive, and might even promote them to positions of power within the new occupation. Meanwhile, their primary competition within the population, the K-type Warriors, were killed in the defeat, without the r-type individuals even having to compete against them.

>Since the r-type adaption to group competition is such a complex divergence from simple individual Anticompetitiveness, we differentiate this further evolution of the r-type psychology by naming it Appeasement.

>In the book, we show how the Liberal’s diminished amygdala volume in their brain is associated with a tendency to judge threats as allies, as well as exhibit diminished pro-sociality, both of which would tend to produce defeat in group competition. We examine research showing Liberals will show increased openess to out-group interests, and diminished loyalty to in-group interests. We also point out how r-strategists need a form of mortality, applied to their population, to free up the resource availability they need to enjoy adantage, relative to K-strategists. Using violent conflict to reduce popualtion loads, and kill local K-selected competition is a brilliant strategy to increase the ability fo the r-strategist to survive, under what would otherwise be lethal K-selecting environmental conditions.

>Interestingly, faced with the prospect of certain defeat as a lone individual within a group competitive species during periods of K-selection, the r-type psychology adapted to be ready to seek a high risk, high reward strategy of using betrayal as a strategy in group competition, to eliminate their K-selected opponents. It is a brilliant adaption.

They're all faggots and hate their lives and have too much time and money because they don't have real jobs and their parents gave them everything they own. Plus, they're gay

>The only threat such a strategy offers, is the possibility of out-grouping, by K-selected members of the in-group. If out-grouped, or otherwise exposed for what they are, the r-selected Liberal will be quickly killed or perhaps expelled, which would likely prove just as fatal. As a result, it would be likely that Liberals would have evolved a strong aversion to any such stimulus.

>Before one criticizes this controversial conclusion, one must remember that ideology is a spectrum. On the one side will be the diehard nationalist. He will tend to embody K-type traits, such as support for freedom, reduced tendencies towards anticompetitiveness and redistributionism, increased support for abstinence until monogamy, and support for high-investment, traditional child rearing. On the other end of the spectrum will be the diehard Liberal Hippie, who opposes all forms of aggressive capitalism, competition, and economic freedom. The Hippie will tend to support promiscuity and early onset sexual behavior, and he will tend to perform lower investment child-rearing. Of course, the Hippie will also espouse pacifism, as a means of seeking his own nation’s defeat in times of war, against an evil communist enemy who tortured his own troops.

>These urges, including the urge to use betrayal in group competition, will present in all manner of leftism. The only difference in their presentation will be in degree of leftist ideology, and opportunity. From opposing the surge in Iraq, to supporting the release of detainees in Guantanamo, to viewing the US as inherently evil, this work is the only scientific study to date which explains all of these traits.

1) They believe everyone on earth to be exactly equal in all ways.

2) Corporations want as cheap a labour force as possible. Combine that with 1 in that they believe people are entirely interchangable.

They think it will net them votes.

Children tend to inherit their parents political views and leftists don't reproduce. The famous Hispanic wave the Democrats have been expecting 30 years keeps failing to materialize because conservative whites have more kids than second generation latinos who inevitably turn into blue-haired feminist dykes.
Without importation of more voters, they will fade into non-existence. With importation of more voters, whites will go extinct.
This is nothing less than a battle to the death.

Fpbp