Why don't we start NatSoc Communities?

We could buy property together as an organization and create a functional NatSoc society within Society. Helping eachother economically to ensure a future for white children. I am sure we have enough people in different occupational backgrounds to make this work. If the mormons can do it why can't we?

Attached: Behold+the+evil+american+nazi+family+the+pale+_a9dd5892230d45630173380bf357e6d6.jpg (599x938, 86K)

Other urls found in this thread:

swissinfo.ch/eng/directdemocracy/open-air-assembly_town-square-voting-all-pomp-or-pure-democracy/42210588
myredditvideos.com/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

We can start out small as we gain people, we fund land expansion through purchasing through private members, but contractually they have to sell it to us for free. This would get around land sale boycotts.

Now any ideas on how to create a functional society?

Those kind of exist. There are still small towns controlled by the KKK with no spics or niggers. We need to take over small towns like that until we get big enough where we can form our own sovereign state.

I disagree with forming a sovereign state. We simply breed and create voting blocks together, to take back the nation. We also advertise to whites after our society is successful. Some will see this and join.

The US is a lost cause in my opinion. There's no way we can fix it through getting our guys elected, and we obviously can't go against the military. The plan should be to secede and once the American empire falls we can take the land back for ourselves.

I’ve actually thought a lot about this. I have about 800 acres in northern Cali and have always wanted to do this type of thing. I have no idea where to begin tho. Do I just invite people over? Put up an ad? Is 800 a really even enough? Also I’m very paranoid about people stealing my land through some squatters right bullshit. Lead me pol, what should I do? What would you do in my position?

You think the military would allow us to secede. It's better we just breed at high rates and create economic power. More economic power and more of /ourguys/ in high positions.

its illegal to discriminate based on race. If you build anything nice, minorities would sue you for everything you own, then settle in your city.

electronic locks, there's a company that does this well. You have the right to change the locks, but can't use violents means of removal. Eventually the squatter will have to leave for food and you can easily change the lock via a main admin computer.

Or contractual agreements.

private property and it isn't a business.

idk man but you have the chance to start something big and the time is now. I would move there in a heartbeat and help in anyway i can and of course help recruit as many like minded whites as possible .

the biggest thing is jobs. is it near any towns or big cities ?

Infrastructure - Plumbers, Electricians, Mechanics, Welders, IT Technicians various other trades etc.

Healthcare - Doctors, Nurses

Education - Teachers

Food - Farmers, Ranchers, Butchers

Good example of communities working together are hippy communes who do farming together and then sell their produce to companies.

Cause we're not in junior high school anymore

Attached: peewee-620x400.jpg (620x400, 37K)

All business purposes would be outside interaction with the American economy. Instead of having non-whites and undesirables stepping foot on our property.

shill.

Hopefully whoever selling this land accepts payment in rare anime figurines.

How exactly would it be different than an Amish community?

for one more modern, yes i know some of them use technology only for work purposes. But Imagine a conservative 1950s Americana culture thriving in the modern world. And the amish still adopt black kids and etc.

>Voting
>Breeding

The white man is great at this. I can't imagine any natsoc would be in favor of voting.

Well we need to take power democratically then change the system to meet our needs. Just like the NSDAP originally tried to during the election of 1932. Taking over is a slow process.

This is honestly one the biggest questions on Jow Forums. We know the truth, but we're kind of our own islands floating in a sea of degeneracy. Starting a community wouldn't be the difficult part, we would just need money, land, and an ability to farm. The hard part is what criteria to allow entrance; this is where everybody disagrees. Obviously everyone needs to be white, culture will highly compatible in the U.S. so that's a nonissue. And we will all most likely speak English. The greatest problem lies with religious issues. Do we only allow only Protestants or only Catholics or both? Do we allow athiests or only athiests? What about pagans? If you allowed everyone who was just white and didn't care about religion the whole thing would just fall apart due to fastly different incompatible ideologies. Another thing, how to we weed out enemies and determine loyalty? Also, people are infinity more lazy than you would think. Just try starting a group of any kind and you will immediately see why it is so hard for us to make one of these communities (pic). If it's going to be done it will most likely need to be owned primarily by one man who decides the rules and has the financial capabilies of starting it. Sorry for the wall of text, just think these things are important.

Attached: c8e.jpg (4040x626, 451K)

>Golden Retriever
>Not a Rottweiler

richfag hass to get it started up. national socialism implies a commune of sorts on a small containable level

The Amish refuse to use technology in any way they're a bunch of gay fags

It's a virtuous idea. NatSoc can work as long as we value courtesy and do a lot to keep up a good public image.

Attached: 1528691818332.jpg (948x945, 142K)

Well forming an organization with one person (ruler) for life, with an elected successor for life each time of death or if ruler is incapable. Or perhaps a council of different heads of each profession?

Island takeover would be better and easier.

Attached: islandtakeover.png (1066x436, 56K)

unsuitable for agriculture. Plus expensive to get citizenship. Perhaps later when we have enough economic power?

>176156120
>Rottweiler
>not a German Shepherd

Rather than being violent towards those that go away from the path, instead giving them few warnings and ultimately deportation.

And then track them down, and give them a killing that points toward the blacks

My bad didn't realize they are actively looking for people. But it's too small to host a population that we would want.

Pitcairn receives funds from the UK Government.

We can simply import shit from NZ.

Get majority --> we allocate funds.

Again no, bad optics.

My GF called me a nice guy national socialist today. Life is good.

The future borders of the ethnostates are already being drawn by shifting demographics. Once ethnic tension reaches the level of real violence and racewar, plenty of currently apolitical whites will join our side out of necessity. Move to a place where white births are higher than white deaths

Attached: BD31795F-98D0-40BD-9125-E39D990CCD4B.jpg (634x550, 64K)

We won't surrender any territory, even if it's easier. Simply continue buying property and expand.

"As per the immigration policy anyone wishing to settle on Pitcairn must have evidence of savings or assets of at least NZ$30,000."

That isn't really much..

21,000 USD

Plus side is you would have people all over the world moving there.

Not simply a USA stronghold which will be lost as blacks/hispanics take over the red states.

Once a pro mixing president gets into office your stronghold will be lost.

Definitely not an outright technocracy. I think it would probably be wise the read up on John White in this instance. Perhaps a ruler for life, as you were saying, whose sole purpose is to guard the gates as it were both from non-whites and degenerate outside items (drugs, pornography, etc). Let the farmers and other workers to their own devices.

Switzerland has a brilliant way of voting.

swissinfo.ch/eng/directdemocracy/open-air-assembly_town-square-voting-all-pomp-or-pure-democracy/42210588

Like what towns?

You could definitely fit like 1,000 people.

Can't just let traitors walk out

You could also build one within 45 minutes of a relatively big city

Because our values are different from that of the Amish and you don't have to be born into our community you just have to be European.

All religions except non western, but like China banning any religion controlled by a seperate foreign entity for example the catholic church. So all religions are organized by the Organizaiton/State. And protected by the organizations charter/constitution. To stop subversion tactics to allow non-desirables, the charter/organization should be created once and never edited.

I think to

how will you advertise your community ? the moment you deny the first group of mexicans you'll have a few hundred leftist protesting at your door.

its almost impossible to pull this off with some kind of privacy.

DO NOT just invite them up, start with people you know and trust. My advice would be to start a some sort of non profit organization where you can of hire them as live-on-site "butlers" that way if anything goes wrong you can just fire them.
This. Except teachers would be a waste of resources, homeschooling is advanced enough now that it makes traditional education obsolete.
t. homeschooled with associates on highschool graduation

same

Because WOMEN hahahahahahahhahah niggers

I thought about the economic repercussions if liberals exposed us and other companies that would buy our goods react. Perhaps with our farmed goods to be brought to markets, so more individuals are selling our goods harder to identify everyone.

Not every household is able to do this especially with farming doing a lot of working during harvesting, plus this removes social interactions and makes it less of a community.

At that point though, wouldn't it be easier and ensure more cohesion to declare Protestantism as the "state" religion much like the northern colonies of the early U.S.? Shoot, Southerns would jump for joy at an all white, Protestant, American ministate XD

Some way of identification and be able to blackmail traitors. For example photos of people with a nazi tattoo with IDs as proof of identity. So if they do betray us, we would release it on to the internet. And they would no chance of financial survival outside our world.

If you actually think the US government would let any number of whites do that then you need to do some reading kiddo.

There should be a general for this topic.

The more concentrated our numbers, the more effective we will be. I think the PNW is ideal, but racial communities will likely sprout all over the country.

The best approach is through agriculture. Farms are experiencing severe labor shortages due to a drop in immigration. If white nationalists step up, we would gain a lot of respect for doing the hard labor most of our people are too soft to endure.

Also, integration into rural areas would give us a hold over the food supply and a safe haven from degeneracy.

What this would take is personal sacrifice from the first wave of settlers. Endure low wages and a lower standard of living for your people. Learn from your hardship and use it as an opportunity to raise natural children.

The Willamette Valley in Oregon State is the perfect location to accomplish this strategy.

Attached: C25932FC-3CC0-40DA-9BC0-62A2FE3A73BC.jpg (736x529, 94K)

>kiddo
Koomer detected

The thing is that it’s just land. No buildings, no fence, nothing. Just land and some small lakes

There is, but it's just someone spamming his website and books if I remember correctly. Perhaps a new one then? What will it be called? Also, as much as I hate the commie West, it is honestly a replica of England's weather (so I've heard) which would probably be perfect for farming and such (hopefully with bigger potatoes).

Rather it be owned by us then cuckservatives. Plus we aren't competing economically among ourselves so salaries aren't what we want. All money is goes to the state to ensure the national survival of the race.

But to argue for your point, this would be a deterrent to get boycotted, but then again it could backfire with companies refusing to hire if we get exposed.

It’s in the middle of nowhere which makes me think people would be hesitant to just want to come and live there. I usually go there with my survivalist wannabe buds. So there’s small little bushman shelters all over the place lol.

How far is it from civilization?

This is an interesting idea but is not sustainable. What you are arguing for is the creation of a mini-state within a state with its own laws and social norms.

Ironically, if this idea is followed, the best path would be as a faux religious cult in a developing nation. Look at the freedom and isolation Jonestown enjoyed. Buy your miles of jungle, and just don’t even allow visits from outsiders and tell them to fuck off.

However, using this kind of self determination while inside a first world nation (Burgerland seems to be goal of poster) would be seen as a challenge to sovereignty and the application of that nations anti-discrimination laws. Boycotts and protests galore the first time anyone is turned away for racial reasons.
Doesn’t deal with the problem of the coming demographic replacement and violence, the community cannot defend itself without a military, which would require a nation state's resources to compete with a hostile external power.
This would end up (decades from now) like white enclaves in South Africa. Better than nothing, but surrounded by danger. I guarantee that a small “racist” enclave of “evil white people” would be attacked by the USA after the demographic tipping point, no question.

Best path forward is succession ASAP and just going for nation status, BTFOing outsiders. More hard work but once one much more secure. Don’t let ((())) subvert the state and maintain national cohesion. I suggest TX, due to the nuke making capability which will be needed to deter (((UN))) intervention during mass deportations. Turn over empty dwellings to settlers, achieve goal.

nvm, answered here

There is already such a community: the Virgin Islands.

If you chucklefucks can't form a community of 5 people, how do you expect to make one of 500? This thread has been posted over and over, wannabe Kekistanis. Get your shit together or stick with rpgs to indulge your fantasy worlds. Americas coming back faggots. With or without you

Attached: 1529732626679m.jpg (1024x640, 33K)

private property and sole proprietor is exempt from these discrimination laws.

Trained militia as part of a "recreational shooting team"

Then they can't legally do anything.

Hope I don’t regret sharing this info, but it’s in Fort Bidwell, CA

Jonestown did immediately come to mind when I saw this thread as well as Waco. Interesting note about Texas is it retains the right to cut itself into 5 states whenever it wants which could be good leverage against Democrats for allowing us to secede.

Don't say anything more until you get a verification program.

You sure?

Looks blacked to me.

Attached: usure.png (1344x511, 1.11M)

if this is your goal, why not be a neo-colonialist and colonize a city?

can't make private roads in cities. Rather do like the mormons are planning for florida and create a new city.

If you cant keep your shit clean we are killing you

with hammer and sword, we serve our lord
Tonight we stand strong and carry on
for this land we labor, fight, and die
all is worth for our nations pride

Dang, that is really far north, practically in Oregon. If California decided to cut itself into 3 states, that would be sitting pretty with Republican laws and distance from the fruits and flakes. It might actually be worth developing at that point as we could get any early foothold on the state.

underrated

Yes the PNW’s climate is the closest to Northern Europe. Climate should be one of our most important considerations, because it is the main factor in racial evolution. Create an ethnostate in the southern United States and you’re cultivating a people in an environment that naturally spawns brown people.

The problem is that most of the farmland is already owned and I doubt many here have experience with crops. We need to learn from symphetic conservatives who would be more than happy to see white people work instead of beaners.

Agriculture would be the perfect bridge to mainstream conservatism. Once we win over farmers by demonstrating physical value and vitality, we can much more easily racialize Other right wing whites.

Attached: 498B0418-EE85-4F22-953D-EC2091602D02.jpg (506x594, 95K)

It’s not about what’s legal it’s about what’s popular to poc voting masses in 20-30 years.

Do you really think that demographically shifted America will respect those private property rights and militia? They will probably try to forcibly confiscate your guns and arrest you for hate crimes.

Also, that exemption for private property depends entirely on the Supreme Courts whim. It will be treated like racially restrictive housing covenants.

>good leverage against Democrats for allowing us to secede.
what would be great to see happen is the use of the threat of secession in the interest of returning power from the federal gov't to the states. something like that could only happen under Trump, who would not back a secessionist movement

This is the only thing Jow Forums should be talking about at this point. Burgers, this is your manifest destiny.
We do it right and we can achieve fertility levels rivaling that of the amish.

For sure.
It also had approx 40% of the population polling that they wanted to succeed if Hillary won. Way more than enough to win an actual independence struggle.

I’m reasonably sure the left would love to see the last big red electoral college state leave, and if not could be convinced to do so.

The most important advantage is the nukes, it is literally the only hope for a ethnostate or even just a white majority state to resist invasion and destruction in the future.

Just throwing it out there, but maybe do what hitler did.

Move to argentina.

Attached: 1493504802049.png (1344x842, 1.35M)

the attraction would be how well run our society is. How safe it is. How educated our people are, how healthy our people are, how happy our people are and finally how safe our community is.

I've got a couple of country friends down here in Texas who might be interested, I'll have to have a talk with them and see if they'd be willing to teach people in this hypothetical scenario. Might also take a few Agriculture classes at my local junior college to be able to help out a bit more.

Again, first point it is to have professionals create the basis of the foundation of our society. Then non professionals are allowed in and trained by our professionals.

in this hypothetical community would socialism be volountary? for instance if one of my neighbours has a broken fence would the leaders take my money to hire someone to repair it? or would the community volounteer to help them?

somebody buy an apartment complex and name it lebensraum