I will accept racial intelligence is real if you accept the science of climate change

dont reply to it

>he thinks whether or not something is "accepted" has any bearing on objective reality
There is only one political philosophy that is based on the ruthless application of scientific principles to human endeavor.
But feel free to enjoy your idiotic Lysenkoism OP

>accept the science of climate change
I do, I just don't see why the state needs to concern itself with this.

Damn couldn't add more

The climate changes all the time. This is undeniable and there's written historical evidence of it.

There's very little evidence that human activity affects the global climate significantly. The contribution of solar flux and volcanic activity ARE significant and there's evidence for that, but not for human activity.

>if you accept the science of climate change.

Most people don't dispute climate change. They dispute the idea that taxing people and giving the money to giant corporations and governments because they said "We're green! Honest!" means they'll solve the problem.

>there is no science to climate change.
The Earth's climate changes dynamically and there are abundant physical observations to prove it.

>correlation != causation.
There are already a number of documented anthropomorphic causes of climate change. Deep tilling dry land caused the Oklahoma Dust Bowl. Deforestation of the Saharan rain forest caused it to become the Great Sahara Desert. The plastic garbage in the Pacific is warming the ocean and causing greater cyclonic activity. The warmer ocean cannot sink as much carbon dioxide, making the ocean more acidic. Thermohaline circulation is slowing from the albedo changes we're making on the Earth's surface, and the freshwater melts from the poles is accelerating this process. We've pumped over 5 gigatons of carbon in the atmosphere, so it would be ridiculous at this point to rule out any greenhouse gas impact merely because your confirmation bias refuses to accept legitimate observations.

Attached: 1529393866620.png (1471x1500, 1.36M)

post pic itt of yer bare gaping prolapsed anus op

science isn't a belief user. you can not like what science has to say about race, but its still true. no matter what your college professor says

When did global warming become climate change? It's June 23rd and we had a high of 67 here in Boston

deal

>not realizing we have to kill billions of Africans and Chinese to reduce our emissions enough to survive

its climate change so that any change in the weather can be attributed to it.

hell, the temperature routinely goes from 90ish to about 60 every 12 hours. no one is shitting themselves becuase of it

Attached: 1525988125736.gif (588x588, 3.4M)

Done.

I accept climate change.

Now - your turn.

climate has always changed retard
the global warming hoax is what people take issue with

God it is like you dumb fucks don't even know that water freezes at a specific temperature. Here let me spell it out for you real easy like Cletus. Water freezes at 32 degrees F (0 degrees C) that means if the average temperature in Antarctica rises above 32F, you will be watching Pawn Stars with your fat waifu under 6 feet of water. Oh wait nvm trailers float.

At least Antarctica can be of use to us then. But no Commies allowed, you already have the rest of the world.

water only freezes at 32 degrees if its distilled water at sea level

also, when water freezes it expands. so if an iceberg melts completely, the overall level of water goes down. try it with an ice cube in a glass of water

Black people literally have less gray matter by like 10% or so. Do you think a literal physical difference in how their brains are formed... has no effect what so ever? Or do you think being called a nigger physically shrinks their prefrontal cortex? It's either one or the other for you, buddy.

>I will accept 2 + 2 = 4 if you accept that alchemy is real science

This, anywhere with smog sucks anyways. End game renewable is way cheaper and more efficient anyway. Being anti green power is literally being anti fusion. Why?

Kek

Deal.

HOLY FUCKING SHIT THAT'S
RAAAAARE
A
A
A
A
A
R
E

triangle man posts here all the time Guiseppe

Niggers get billions more in education funds (really all gibs) and are SMOKED by rural whites

I've been here for over two years and I'm basically 24/7 on Jow Forums
never seen that flag

This could have been your flag you fucking leafs but you had to FUCK IT ALL UP

This is what jewry hath wrought upon the West. Even Goethe wrote: "The jew will not spare us".

Attached: moralsci.png (866x447, 74K)

Already do

Most people who have put a few hours into would not argue against the "science of climate change" of the world, since it has always been changing, and always will change, for obvious reasons.

What we (many of us) have a issues with, is Al Gores and the IPCCs claim that human emitted carbon dioxide at 400+ ppm is causing catastrophic global warming. Which is horseshit.

Also, a donkey is different from a horse, and a zebra.

you're a bad communist then.

sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2305050016300318

Proofs right here pussy nigger

Whom are smoked by city kids. Rural conservative people are the low IQ niggers of white society.

racial intelligence isn't real though, but climate change is, it's just not happening because of co2 because we found out how to convert co2 to gasoline 5 years ago: now it's HAARP attempting to control the weather by heating up (electrocuting) aluminum in the sky that planes leave in the atmosphere from chem-trails, but they fail miserably, kill thousands of birds, and make planes crash, and you libs know nothing about this because you listen to professor kike.

They produce most of the food you eat.

I will accept climate change if you accept that 3rd world countries, mainly asia, are responsible for it, and there is nothing white countries have done or could do to significantly affect climate change i.e. it's a total non-issue for the west.

Antarctic ice is on land, not floating in the ocean. If the Antarctic ice melts, sea levels will rise.

Since when are communists supposed to like niggers? Where there any niggers in the Soviet Union? No, because communism requires people work and contribute for the greater good, or go to gulag forced labor camps for being lazy fucks. Since when do niggers ever want to work?

proof:
axios.com/commercial-plane-crashes-2018-nepal-russia-iran-deaths-17e16549-e9ac-4d6a-be7c-15257764c34b.html

youtube.com/watch?v=ayA3U1mq4cE

but see most truthers think it's "directed energy" like (?), it's literally electrically charged aluminum being used to heat the atmosphere,

Answer this then:

They are good for nothing but menial tasks just one step up from niggers that are good for nothing?

Please be more specific. You wouldn't accept the narrative of racial intelligence science wholesale, so I have no reason to be any less picky.

Attached: All_palaeotemps.png (1753x565, 90K)

the land of antarctica has been pushed downward by the weight of ice on top of it. so its still displacing water

Of course the climate changes over time and is dynamic, however that is supposed to happen over hundreds of thousands of millions of years, the last time it happened as quickly as it is happening now it led to a mass extinction event. Fact.
Humans will live through this, we have the technology, but every other plant and animal is fucked.

fuckin' saved

I hope this is ironic

Stalin would have you shot for being bourgeois calling the rural workers niggers.

Not on a 1-to-1 basis. Sea levels would rise. They definitely would not drop as you stated.

just curious. the X axis of this chart is at the temperature that we measure in modern times. whats the average temeprature of earth since the start of the data there?

>I'll accept reality if you accept a myth as fact

I'm good, but you can kys anytime.

climate change is real

what do you think seasons are

but i do accept the science of climate change user. for example during roman times bananas and oranges grew in britain because the climate was warmer than it is now, thus the climate changed. i don't know of one person in the world who denies climate change. the climate is always naturally changing, getting warmer then cooler then warmer.
so you accept nogs are subhuman now?

Attached: 1523575861600.jpg (640x500, 101K)

Why would anybody want to be or be proud of being urban?

Most of the smart people are born in rural or suburban areas, study, move to the city for like 5 years to make their money and retire to the 'burbs when they have the cash to do so.

Staying in the city eternally is proof that you're a stupid nigger who couldn't make the money to move out.

>Chemistry is not science.
Gonna need some evidence to back that one up son.

Cheerfully accepted, as I affirm both premises based upon evidence.

I square this with my recent habit of voting republican through a specific /egoistic nihilism/. I don't care what happens to this world in the long term as long as I can enjoy a fairly pleasant existence for a few decades.

its a joke user

Birds lived through the Chicxulub impact. So did mammals. That brought about an ice age far faster than anything that's even projected right now. The animals that have it hardest during mass environmental shifts are the largest. The apex predators and large herbivores in particular are the most vulnerable, since they have the least genetic buffer available to adapt with.

If 99% of all ants die out, the remaining 1% with the gene set necessary to survive will replace them in a matter of months. It takes longer for mammoths. The planet's life will continue far past anything we do to fuck it over.

There was a period in the earth's history where there were gigantic forest fires that burned down continents at a time, because nothing could digest wood cellulose yet. Carbon would cycle in and out of the atmosphere thousands of times faster than anything we even begin to approach, and yet life went on just fine.

The Y scale is relative temperature. The average would be roughly 6C above today, which is supposed to be catastrophic, but looked about like this.

Attached: 300mil_years_ago.jpg (900x655, 194K)

Thank god because I almost had a heart attack.

Nope. Difference of under a standard deviation is irrelevant.

Wonderful

See
Being proud of being a cityfag is being proud of being one of the losers who couldn't get out of those hellholes.

=]]] but the climate always changes..
>=]

Attached: another-stalin-meme-is-always-accepted-by-most_o_7225035.jpg (1080x1080, 149K)

Okay. That doesn't chance the fact your approaches to solving climate chance are shit.

>if you accept the science of climate change.

I just don't accept your unscientific apocalyptic predictions. The only purpose of this lie is to make consumerism seem bad to benefit your retarded ideology. It isn't science.

sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2305050016300318

>selective reading
>having to lie on an image board to sustain your own false reality
Pathetic

we live in a world where neurogenesis exists, even in the frontal lobe.
although statistically it is correct blacks have a higher rate of dementia, there are some black people who simply... well, don't have it, and are not cognitively impaired. just like blacks should get osteoporosis more-so, but again: alot don't have that. so it goes to say sometimes their race affected them that way, sometimes it didn't. you need to separate the user, form the hardware, user. having a black body means you may be stronger, have a bigger d, mind is good with rhythm and literature, it's like having a good computer but the graphics card is a cheap one-off from shanghai. that's not the users fault.

sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2305050016300318
Commies and lies go hand in hand

The main fault of the Black Man is his impulsiveness.

You don't "accept" science and nature, retard. It just is, whether you like it or not.

>The only purpose of this lie is to make consumerism seem bad to benefit your retarded ideology. It isn't science.

This. Instead of spending money on goods and services, I'd be forced to give to companies that claim they're using it for green energy projects, which usually involve embezzlement scams in Africa where 1/10th of the money is used for cheap supplies to Africans that use it up in a year and 9/10ths get used for human trafficking, drugs, and political influence

Done. But instead of selling the right to fuck up the planet on the open market, I want strict rules and government-funded technological research into how to completely unfuck the environment. Ideally by the end of it advanced carbon recapture can turn gasoline into a renewable resource.

but a lot of people already accept climate change. The thing they don't accept which isn't really touched on when people bitch about climate change deniers is humanity's actual affect on the climate and whether or not we are contributing 80% or 1% towards its change

>The warmer ocean cannot sink as much carbon dioxide, making the ocean more acidic.
Funny you should point that out
pmel.noaa.gov/co2/story/What is Ocean Acidification?

Attached: download.jpg (742x555, 66K)

youtube.com/watch?v=My3e-MuhEkU
youtube.com/watch?v=qr63Kl0SuFo
youtube.com/watch?v=mDRjKpt3gXY

now is it the actual haarp that heats the particles? probably not, it's probably cell phone towers.

It literally doesn't matter whether or not we accept climate change, I personally do, but it's more important that we do something about demography.

It's like economics, I don't care if it's "Left wing" or "Right wing", I fundamentally reject progressivism and it's social aims, I'm fully open to using Socialism if it's pragmatic at the time and doesn't help progressivist social aims develop.

OK, my solution to climate change

take 100 African men

genetically modify them to only have male sperm, and that their children only have male sperm

release them with $5000usd each.

watch as africa wipes itself out :^)

with a conservative 5 kids a man, within 20 years 100 is 500, then 500 is 2500

the numbers grow exponentially as more and more men are born who can only have male offspring. the last of the women become valued commodities, entire nations become men only and start invading their neighbouring nations in rape raids for women

honestly deal

if you figure out how to also make every sperm end up as twins you could double your numbers

this technology exists, it's been done on carp in australia.

5 kids is conservative, and 5k usd is two years wages or more in most African countries . they would most likely have a dozen or more children each

Attached: cancer.jpg (807x586, 126K)

also, twins are set by the woman having two eggs or the egg splitting in a freak accident.

the sex of the child is 100% decided by the sperm though, a sperm is either Y or X.

The science of climate change is based on flawed computer models. When they start basing it on real evidence and stop screaming the end of the world is next decade, like they have been for three decades now, then I will consider it.

I have been on the fence about climate change for a while, mainly due to blatant exaggeration from both sides in many cases, but I do believe there are solid arguments both for and against. Anyone good with science able to argue against this video: youtube.com/watch?v=OWXoRSIxyIU
I'm not overly informed on climate science so anyone who has anything for me is appreciated, I dont like being confused.

>I will accept racial intelligence is real if you accept the science of climate change.
No one in their right mind is against climate change you blithering retard. The quantity of atmospheric CO2 is increasing, this is non-negotiable and has been verified.

Here's what IS up for debate: does this increase in CO2 cause global warming?

And the reason for why this is up for debate is the following:
>space.com/33001-mars-ice-age-ending-now.html
What this basically said is that the ice caps on Mars (made up of frozen CO2) are also melting, just like the ice caps on Earth are melting. ARE THE MARTIAN ICE CAPS MELTING BECAUSE OF MAN-MADE ACTIVITY? OR IS THERE SOMETHING ELSE IN PLAY THAT IS CAUSING THIS RISE IN TEMPERATURE? (i.e. change in solar output)

Either way, why am I arguing with a commie? You're nothing short of a traitor and a piece of meat to your jewish masters.

KYS

Attached: 1523945585091.gif (149x181, 836K)

Attached: 1502399707763.png (824x792, 47K)

Bruh, the question isn’t if it’s real or not. It’s whether us giving other countries our money is going to magically make it go away. If polluting less is the answer then why don’t we just do so at home without having to join some global organization? You fucks hear “yeah, I don’t want to spend money on global warming programs” and think “reeee he doesn’t believe in global warming.” I’m just not a dipshit with my money.

Well it's nice to see that the right can strawman just as hard as the left.

It's like reading an article written by someone right on the edge of self-awareness.