Was Hitler the good guy?

this. only subhuman wh*tes think he was a good guy

Weird, like 60% of Indians on here love Hitler.
More like he was trying to prevent the spread of communism. I'm sure life under Bela Kuhn is something you'd prefer though huh?

>subhuman wh*tes
you gotta pick one there, fella

Hitler was indeed a good goy

The holocaust was committed by Zionist Jews like George Soros against other Jews. You see the Balfour Declaration was signed in 1917 but the Jews of Europe didn't want to move to the desert. So during WW2 around 200,000 jews were slaughtered by Zionists to scare European Jewry to move to Israel. Antisemitism in modern times is done by Zionists to scare Jews in the west to move to Israel.

Attached: 1518362027219.jpg (3130x2454, 2.64M)

The reason why Germany has a tainted German identity
and why German nationalism or patriotism is considered bad, see Shuldkult etc.
In short, nazism destroyed and tainted lot of German culture.

And as of today, Germany has not a real constitution but just a Grundgesetz.
Moreover, Germany is still an occupied nation and doesn't have real sovereignty.

This guy gets it. It's good to see we still have at least some educated people on this wretched continent.

Exactly, Emil Maurice is the greatest proof that Hitler worked with the Jews.
NAZI's were always a boogyman created by Zionists. And they still use them as a boogyman to this day.
The people that push the Nat Soc meme are Zionists who want the right wing to continue to be that boogyman that they created.
It's the Ashke-NAZI's doing it
They tell you flat out they are behind it as a joke while they laugh at the suckers who fall for it.

Hitler didn't work with teh Jews you fuckign kike

Attached: 1515329433555.jpg (1200x1200, 282K)

Attached: 1519551800674.jpg (1680x1050, 274K)

Man cannot exist as an individual, only as a member of a community. Races, peoples, and nations are therefore more real than individuals. Therefore universalistic thought must replace individualistic thought in philosophy, and the organic view of the world must replace the mechanical view. But do not misunderstand what is meant here by universalistic. Community-consciousness that is fundamentally rooted in biology. Sociology was the beginning of an attempt to understand man in his collective nature, but it was in some ways on the wrong track, because „society“ is still an essentially individualistic term. „Community“ by contrast denotes an organic unity.

Recent thinkers who pointed the way to the new community-conscious thought are Johannes Rehmke and the National-Socialist Paul Krannhals. But really it has been a long time coming, foreshadowed by Meister Eckhart, Kant, and Fichte.

With the turn from individualistic to community-based epistemology, the divisions of scholarship will have to be reorganized in a way that makes sense within the new worldview.

This new mode of thought is valid for all races and peoples, even if not all are yet able to recognize it.

Hitler and WW2 lead to the expansion of Communism and the creation of Israel.

Most higher animals require a territory to survive. (Ardrey, 1966). So vitally do survival and reproductive success depend upon the possession of a territory that most animals will ferociously fight competitors to defend it. Every distinct population of man also requires a territory, a homeland. Without it, they will be nomads who, like the Gypsies, are despised and hated by those whose territory they cross. The Jews, who have been accused of trying to destroy white homelands by supporting massive non-white immigration into them, nevertheless went to extreme lengths to obtain their own homeland, Israel, into which they carefully restrict immigration to other Jews. Indeed, a homeland is so vital to survival that an ethnic group will go to almost any length to have and hold one. The “youth” in multi-racial cities organize by race and kill each other for trespassing into their territory, a few square blocks of the city, and entire countries follow the same pattern. Examples include the Balkan War that occurred after Tito died in 1980 and Yugoslavia disintegrated, the current civil war in Iraq between the Shiites and the Sunnis, the 1994 Rwanda Massacre between the Tutsis and the Hutus, and the endless slaughter in the Middle East between Israel and its Arab neighbors. The Japanese and Chinese do not permit others to settle in their country and the Africans are now murdering, raping, and disenfranchising the few remaining whites in Africa. As Michael Shermer aptly put it, “As a social primate, we evolved within-group amity and between-group enmity.”

Attached: 20120603175044S.jpg (450x314, 25K)

But, nevertheless, whites are expected to welcome other races to their homelands - Europe, the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. Non-whites from the Third World are not only permitted to immigrate into white homelands, they are openly welcomed - white churches work to bring them over and white governments subsidize them when they have arrived. Indeed, governments give these often uneducated, illiterate, low IQ, disease-carrying, and crime-prone Third-World immigrants more benefits and rights than they give to their own people, then send their own people the bill and punish them severely for any discrimination against the unwelcome immigrants. One might think this is suicidal insanity, though the consensus among the ruling elites is that it is a moral necessity. But moral it is definitely not, for a morality that calls for the extinction of its adherents is fatally flawed.
By bringing non-whites into white territories the egalitarians are creating boiling pots whose lids can be kept held down only by police state tactics. When it comes to violence, status drives the individual (Buss, 2005; Barkow, 1991) and territory drives populations. (Ardrey, 1966). If whites do not defend their homelands, they will soon have no homelands, and not long after that, there will be no more whites. The left, even the white left, may cheer the demise of whites, which will also be their own demise, but for those of us who dearly love our culture, our accomplishments, and our people, there can be no greater tragedy.

Explain Emil Maurice

No he was a kike tool possibly gone roque but just look at the result. They did more to hurt whites than anyone else and GW Bush's grandpa a long with kikes funded the Nazi rise and GW Bush's grandpa sold them oil too.

The second world war was probably all kikery

Britain intervention in WW1 lead to WW2

always the anglo

>Man cannot exist as an individual

Maybe you can't.

>universalism

Intrinsically tied to individuality. One dies without the other.

Land is far too precious to be private property. Herein lies proof of what I said in my reply above. Your beliefs about territorial claims evaporates under scrutiny. Nations can only function as public property entities, administering this outrageously expensive resource for the good of every person. Ethnicity be damned. If we could survive in the way you imagine, civilization would never even have come to pass.

>But, nevertheless, whites are expected to welcome other races to their homelands

No such thing as whites. Every culture is an amalgamation of other cultures. Once again, the word you'd like to use out of context, universalism, is all I need to annihilate the claim that human cultures are distinct from one another. They are not. And that's precisely why all human territories and governments should be consolidated into one.

>Every culture is an amalgamation of other cultures.
What other cultures, there's only one culture the human culture

youtube.com/watch?v=ZEU35nDxXf4

There would be, if the average person was just a tiny bit smarter and more honest. Everything would be affordable and everyone would have a fair shot at decent living. But who am I telling this to, explaining this to someone from a hypercriminal shithole such as yours is the most futile thing.

Nazis and Hitler were very bad for white people. If you are pro-white, then he was not a good guy.

Attached: 1429149985891.jpg (640x640, 38K)

He further sauced hating white people.qek

>In short, nazism destroyed and tainted lot of German culture.
no, 70 years of de-nazification did that

Attached: 1501076128481.jpg (674x672, 93K)

One may pose a simple question: Is there less conflict between two groups of racially different people when they are interspersed or when they are segregated? There is little doubt that “stop the hate, segregate” is the answer. 5 Many primate species form “biological nations” of related individuals and defend their territory against contiguous nations of others of their species. The conflicts between these populations are often ritualized, rather than physical, and serve the purpose of unifying their populations (Ardrey, 1966, pp. 191-200), much as the leaders of human governments deliberately create external enemies to unify the country behind them. Egalitarians may be surprised to learn that territorial species have more social equality than non-territorial species.

“… through a wide variety of effective primate societies a clean line falls: territorial societies tend toward the [social] equalitarian, exhibit the lowest gradients of dominance, present the fewest example of physical conflict or punishment, and while attaining a maximum of social solidarity and co -operation, sacrifice a minimum of what a human being would call personal freedom.” (Ardrey, 1966, p. 223)

Thus, the egalitarians, by embracing multiculturalism and the immigration of non-whites in to white nations on the basis of the genetic equality of all peoples, undermine their social equality, and create societies of conflict, violence, ethnic cleansing, and civil war.

One might think that insuring domestic tranquility would be an objective of the U.S. government, but instead the Judicial and the Executive branches perversely uphold and enforce laws that lead to and, indeed, require, the exact opposite result. Even if two or more populations could peacefully occupy the same territory, it is a delusion to think that such a situation would be stable.
Then there is Gause’s Law of Competitive Exclusion:

“Two subspecies of the same species do not occupy the same geographical area. … To imagine one subspecies of man living together on equal terms for long with another subspecies is but wishful thinking and leads only to disaster and oblivion for one or the other.”

>One may pose a simple question: Is there less conflict between two groups of racially different people when they are interspersed or when they are segregated?

The former. It's fucking dumb to imply otherwise.

This is Germany some 800 years ago. This is the spitting image of your praised territorial way of thinking. You would actually pretend it was more harmonious back then than it is now, or even in the 19th century? Stop posting and hang yourself, you colossal retard.

I am not egalitarian. You don't have to be SJW, commie, Jew or anything of the other buzzwords to realize territorial claims do not stand the test of logic.

Attached: holy-roman-empire-1250-map-1.jpg (1561x1972, 1.83M)

People who react like this to comments they don't like are weak-minded fools. Falling to pieces and becoming hysterical at the first sign of disagreement is not the National Socialist way.

Go back to watching Hogan's Heros boy. You're not Nazi material.

Why did you think that the my country is >a hypercriminal shithole ?
If diversity is our strength why it is so bad?
Isn't my country diverse enough

Underlying individualistic thought is the premise, taken to be self-evident, that man is an individual essence (Einzelwesen). This premise – however firmly it may even be rooted in the universal conception – is false and based on a catastrophic error in thinking. Man confronts us in the world not as an individual essence but as a member of a community. Man is in all his actions a collective essence (Kollektivwesen), and is utterly unthinkable except in this way. Man by definition therefore lives in community with others; his life actualizes itself only in the community. Community is a concept to which the whole history of humanity is subordinate; it is the form in which human life runs its course from cradle to grave, without which it would be unthinkable.

The actual givens that we find in the world are not individual men but races, peoples, and nations. Man as individual may be an object of research for the natural sciences (Naturwissenschaften). But in the humanities (Geisteswissenschaften) he is an object of cognition only as a member of a community, in which his life has an effect and usefully (praktisch) runs its course.

The humanities, and especially philosophy in its epistemological ground-laying, must take account of this fundamental fact, if they want to assert their prominent position in the intellectual life of the German nation, and to maintain a living, fruitful connection to its evolution. Universalistic thought, community-conscious thought, must take the place of individualistic thought; and the universalistic – or if one wishes, the organic – picture of the world must take the place of the mechanical picture of the world..

Your country is a bloody mess because you're too stupid to constitute a public sovereign as every decent country on this planet has.

Yes, but so was Stalin.

What's truly soulcrushing is that I've never been able determine in an FDRpill or a Winstonpill exists, although evidence exists that Truman may have legitimately been /our president/.

What if he won?

You're a moron

Kek JF did a top-tier troll stream where he defended TYT Trump-Hitler comparisons

Speak for yourself you fucking virgin

His German reunification larp fucked Europe up pretty badly so no. His intentions did not lead to any objective good. Look at Germany now. Cult of personalities end up as circle jerks.

drink bleach kike

I think he had some perfectly reasonable ideas, and that his intentions were originally pure but like everyone else with power at the time it corrupted him and turned him into a mad man.

>was Hitler a good guy?
yes. Anyone who says other wise is a retard, a kike or a shill.

Attached: 1528128772160.jpg (1024x745, 166K)

Google the rebuttal to The Greatest Story Never Told. Lots of errors. Don't become a neo-Nazi without fact checking, so you don't go to Hell for vain.

Hitler was a Rothschild, and at least 50% jew. Merkle is his daughter

>You don't have to be SJW, commie, Jew
You're a kike.

>This is the spitting image of your praised territorial way of thinking.
Has nothing to do with it.
>This is Germany some 800 years ago
“Two subspecies of the same species do not occupy the same geographical area. … To imagine one subspecies of man living together on equal terms for long with another subspecies is but wishful thinking and leads only to disaster and oblivion for one or the other.”

I hope your friends get bombed when Iran invades Israel

>Man cannot exist as an individual, only as a member of a community.

Well that's bunch of bullshit. Whoever you copied this from was a long-winded buffoon. The whole post reads like an essay you'd buy on the Internet to avoid writing a term paper -- one that's on sale in the C+ section.

Go find a strong leader who can make me. I will never yield to you impotent, babydicked, majority manlet sycophants. And neither will Jews or anyone else.

Sauce?

No argument was found. Jewry is out tonight

the shill-count on Jow Forums is reaching 6 gorillian%

Attached: 1526229184599.jpg (590x350, 45K)

>Not liking one of the most destructive people in Europe's history means your a shill.

Hitler's positions stand in start contrast to those who are pro-white.

>Hitler's positions stand in stark contrast to those who are pro-white
no. Anyone who is Pro-White will eventually come to the conclusion that Uncle Adolf fought for the survival of the White races, and their ability to self-govern away from (((influences))). shill somewhere else

Attached: 1528938860804.jpg (460x341, 46K)

Where do you guys get this shit? Is "British intervention" a code-phrase for not letting the Kaiser do whatever he wanted on the Continent?

British foreign policy since Elizabethan times had been to oppose the dominant power in Europe. This wasn't a secret. If the Kaiser wasn't paying attention, that's on him. His grandmother was Queen Victoria for Christ's sake!

A Jow Forums education: decide in advance what you want to believe based on arbitrary preferences and whims. From that point forward read (i.e., watch on Youtube) only content that reinforces your views.

>fought for the survival of the White races
Yeah, that's why he bombed London. Because he wanted the white people there to survive.

That's why he took loans from white counties to enrich his own before going to war with them. (you don't pay back your loans to someone you're invading, do you?)

That's why he was going to make the holocaust look small by killing and forced migration of tens of millions of white people from eastern europe.

You're talking about a guy who thought jews were harmful to society, but did he kill them all? No, before he started killing he was forcing them into other white countries. Does dumping something you think is harmful into other white counties sound like advocating for other whites?

You can call yourself pro-white and pro-hitler if you want, but it doesn't make much sense. Hitler probably would have killed your family if he saw it as a way to ensure a better future for Germany, even if you are white.

Attached: 1517009138989.jpg (500x500, 37K)

They'll use their vast navy to sail around the Cape of Good Hope, run the British blockade at Gibraltar and stage a massive amphibious landing off Tel Aviv and then march triumphantly into Jerusalem.

>if you don't roll over you lose
>t. trudeau

Attached: hmf.jpg (750x1055, 150K)

>that's why he bombed london
The Brits declared war on him after he made 20+ letters practically begging for war to not be started
>that's why he was going to make the holocaust look small by killing and forced migration of tens of millions of white people from eastern europe
stopped reading that line after knowing you think the holohoax has any shred of truth.
ps. Hitler thought he could change the jewish nature of the kikes (parasitic) into contributing members of society, and succeeded to an extent. like i said, shill somewhere else schlomo

Attached: HalfJews.gif (457x422, 164K)

>Yeah, that's why he bombed London.
British started the night terror bombing. Hitler dumped hundreds of thousands of peace leaflets over the UK after the BEF and France were defeated in six weeks.

>That's why he took loans from white counties
The entire Nazi debt including MEFO was dwarfed by both the British and French 1938 *deficits*.

>make the holocaust look small
Most jews have to be interned he had no choice.

>a guy who thought jews were harmful to society
His view on the JQ was far more nuanced than that.

>pro-white and pro-hitler if you want
Hitler never spoke against the Magyar/Slavs in Germany. All pre-war racial laws targeted kikes/gypsies because they were non-European.

Attached: 1524907954675.png (894x894, 1.72M)

Yes and he now resides in Valhalla.

Attached: swasss.png (1920x1080, 2.93M)

>We can't just roll over!
>So we must invade and occupy norway!
That's also what I would plan to do if I liked white people. Oh wait, no I wouldn't.

>I'm just going to ignore the fact that he was planning genocide of white people in eastern europe
Nice. You're a good ally to white people to not care about what would have happened to tens of millions of whites.

>Hitler probably would have killed your family if he saw it as a way to ensure a better future for Germany
Hitler certainly killed whomever he felt he had to kill to realize his goal. This is indisputable.

bitchute.com/video/DfQZXx71J6MV/

Adolf Hitler speaks to Americans

Attached: 1503090254361.jpg (922x482, 150K)

Hitler a good boi who dindu nuffin wrong. He just needed money 4 dem programs

Attached: 1529598218688.jpg (821x1024, 147K)

"I have been Europe's last hope. She proved incapable of refashioning herself by means of voluntary reform. She showed herself impervious to charm and persuasion. To take her I had to use violence."

Attached: 1514121969101.png (877x588, 656K)

>dur he wanted to genocide his own people!
>HE ALSO GASSED THE GOD'S CHOSEN TOO!

Attached: 1522279861485.gif (480x360, 1.84M)

>Man cannot exist without food, only as a consumer of food. Food is therefore more real than the individual. Therefore you are what you eat.

Britain also promised the Kingdom of Hejaz their own independent land after they defeated the Ottomans. Instead, we got Syria, Iraq, Jordan, and the worst of them all, Saudi Arabia.

>By killing my brother, I have saved him!
Is this some sort of reverse trudeau?

Do you have any arguments? Some Americans seem to hate Hitler because he warned you precisely of what would befall your once great nation well before it actually happened.

Attached: 1507382174633.jpg (984x550, 177K)

He made nationalism unacceptable.

he's one of (((them))). don't mind him, leaf.

Adam & Eve != Adam & Apple

I tell you that he planned direct action against tens of millions of white people in eastern europe. Then you just respond to me with quotes and ask if I have an argument? What world do I live in?

Australians were nationalist decades after the war. You're blaming the man that warned you this would happen for events that took place decades after he was crushed by the capitalist-communist alliance.

Attached: 1524910831769.png (400x558, 630K)

Attached: 1520492199170.jpg (640x572, 151K)

>Look at that user, he cares about white people
>he must be a jew

Hitler had just watched kike NKVD head Yagoda, kike Kaganovich and kike-married Molotov famine 6,000,000+ Slavs around the Black Sea in the 1930's. There was no more legitimate enemy than the Soviet Union. Anglo-Americans funded/fed/armed the Red Army after it invaded Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Poland, Finland and Romania. That needs to be explained. Not Hitler's crusade against bolshevism.

Attached: 1524907893592.png (640x838, 967K)

"If we Germans were to lose this war.."

bitchute.com/video/p6ANm8yZUyB0/

Attached: 1499672966011.jpg (3000x1800, 771K)

says the nongoyboy.

That's rich. I love how you guys pretend to be disciplined logicians when it suits you but never apply those standards to your own bullshit.

And the whining about shills and "Jewry being out tonight" is pathetic. Who cares if they are? If this is a big, crying problem for you then what are fucking good for?

I agree calling people a kike isn't good form. I'd rather debate.

Attached: 1514135652898.jpg (584x819, 129K)

No.

The only difference between Hitler and Stalin was the race purity ideology. If Hitler had won a military victory he'd engage in a Cold War with the US and the concentration camps would have turned into GULAGs.

>Yes goys, i care about you!
>Now ONLY listen to me! If you listen to that evil man Adolf, you will NEVER have a state for yourselves!

Attached: 1520600468449.png (214x198, 1K)

>The only difference between Hitler and Stalin was the race purity ideology
The only difference eh?

Attached: 1402596136897.jpg (482x685, 52K)

Waaaaah! Shills! Mommie I wet my pants because the shill scared me. I think there's a shill under my bed. Can I leave the light on tonight mommie?

Yes

youtube.com/watch?v=qTYSv_YQOVo

youtube.com/watch?v=7sXbB1g7GW0&t

The whole "race purity" shit is garbage regardless. One look at the man himself, and his cabinet, should have given that one away.

"Our racial pride is not aggressive except in so far as the Jewish race is concerned. We use the term Jewish race as a matter of convenience, for in reality and from the genetic point of view there is no such thing as the Jewish race. There does, however, exist a community, to which, in fact, the term can be applied and the existence of which is admitted by the Jews themselves. It is the spiritually homogeneous group, to membership of which all Jews throughout the world deliberately adhere, regardless of their whereabouts and of their country of domicile; and it is this group of human beings to which we give the title Jewish race."

Attached: 1514121878795.png (889x590, 693K)

>apply those standards to your own bullshit.
Moshe, see>Who cares if they are?
They argue like rats, and shit up this community

What the hell am I reading? So the red army invades Latvia. So he believes the right thing to do is to remove Latvians from Latvia and force relocate them to Siberia, or kill them? And that's what you call a "crusade against bolshevism?"

This makes no sense.