Someone explain this political compass to me plz

>The most right wing you can get is Karl Marx's communist utopia.
Wew.

>First panel, he's forcing someone to watch him pee (Authoritarian left)
>Second panel, the peeing man is showing his dominance by peeing really really hard (Authoritarian right)
>Third panel, the other man is staring at the other guy's dick, like a degenerate (libertarian left)
>Fourth panel, it only shows the individual over the collective (libertarian right)

American """education"""

This scale is bullshit.

Are you retarded?

Pretty high iq post

Top stands for Authoritarian
Bottom stands for Libertarian
Left stand for Communism
Right stands for Capitalism

Take a chart test for more info

>Socialism less than republican party

My sides.

Nah, far too biased of wording.
"Left" wants to force everyone to love each other, right wants freedom to say no, the actual left (often called third position because the "left" can't handle the idea that they could possibly be anything other than the saviors of the world) want the freedom to say no coupled with honor, the idea that if someone hasn't dishonored themselves and they need help, they will get it, but the moment they dishonor you they're done.

He's correct though. Marx wanted a stateless society as the end goal of communism as he believed that it was the primitive state of man.

I dunno what's going through your head, so I'll refrain from slinging insults, but have you taken a moment to actually think about what freedom is and what it's implications are? All freedom is for one person is a restriction on another. In the Soviet system, one of the most totalitarian states in human history, even Post-Stalin, do you think that the average working Soviet man during the cold war had more or less freedom in that totalitarian system than his counterpart today? The answer is more. Access to all levels of education and healthcare, guaranteed a job and thus the income to do things. Does he have less freedom than the Russian today who has access to none of those things and as such has no freedom to actually do any of the things he wants?

You can't base an entire political scale/spectrum on something as abstract as freedom, it doesn't work that way. The left-right divide is retarded, but it does stand for something: Egalitarianism(left) is the base point and everything moving further right is less egalitarian. Such a thing is specifically definable, draws the lines between radically different views on the world. "Freedom" is neither and freedoms gained by one is freedoms taken away by another.