What should the optimal age of consent be?

What should the optimal age of consent be?

Attached: 241252701939.jpg (1080x1350, 485K)

18+

Meme flag pedophiles need to get thefuck off this baord

This, pedos neck your selfs

Kill yourself, degenerate

Attached: An_hero_gun.jpg (750x600, 35K)

>showing up to an anime image board to attack "pedos"

imagine being this retarded

16

18. fuck off.

40

Age of consent should be marriage.

I did not hit her

Attached: 0205_-_jSi6bS7.png (445x477, 77K)

What's her age? That.

It's perfect as it is right now, fuck off, (((Mirjam Heine))). SAGE

THis seems reasonable to me. 18 also seems reasonable to me when Romeo and Juliet laws are in place. a 30 year old banging a 16 year old seems a bit off to me.

/thread

This.

/thread

This. Where marriage is the father giving his daughter away.

>a 30 year old banging a 16 year old seems a bit off to me.
I did that a while back.
Maybe the girl + her parents' consent if she's below 18 (but above 16 in any case)

Let the free market decide, filthy commies!

Attached: Facebook-362f5a.png (500x343, 58K)

There is no basis for age 18 adulthood. 21 would make more sense when you consider the reasons given for restricting alcohol to 21+

18. Though some call the actual agree arbitrary, it aligns with our societies' patterns of growing up ie. Graduating highschool

Why should sex be restricted before that?

How about no sex before marriage? This whole age of consent shit started because of birth control. Birth control allowed women to have sex without getting pregnant. So a 22 year old man could get with a 15 year old girl and use her up and not get her pregnant. Before he would have been forced to marry her by the father and brothers.
The sexual revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.

20. Ages 18 and 19 should be illegal cause they're still idiots at that age.

25. In most adults, the brain finishes developing at 25.

I dated a 16 year old when I was 24 and the maturity difference was just, impossible to get over. I even met her parents, they were ok with it. But at the end of the day she was just not mature enough. I realize some people that age are fairly mature, but certainly not the majority.
I'm 32 now and I find most 20 somethings to basically be children. Just getting old I guess.

>they're still idiots at that age.
And long after

Whatever the parents deem permissible.

Impossible to regulate. Girls mature and age differently. Some peak at 14, some 16, some 18.
Closest regulations I can think of would be like this:
AoC of 18. At 18 they can make their own decisions and consent to whomever.
Age of Marriage 14. At 14 they can get married with their parent's consent and approval. The man can be no older than 10 years of her age.

I did 16 when I was 29 and we got along great, stayed together a bit over 2 years. Her parents were cool with it, even sad that we split. I don't look at girls that age but I don't automatically say no if they come to me, they're not always retarded. At least not more than the average woman my age.

Lol yes fir non-whites. If they have to produce at all. Fucking strains that they are

Attached: 2CF361CC-5692-423D-9F99-32A47F98B19A.jpg (208x300, 8K)

The hell they do lol

Nature's quantity over quality breeding strategy suggests otherwise.
Think about all of the people you know who would never get laid if not for "lapses in judgement."

Age of consent is a spook invented by puritans.

you bring up a good point, "age of consent" should be in line with the age that they are allowed to get birth control. If a young woman knows she wants to fuck but not get pregnant, seems like "age of consent" has already been established by proxy.

Lets be real though, this is the one area that faggots who claim to be conservative will allow the government to make all the decisions for them

The age of consent should be the guy's age divided by 2 and then add 7.

Like normal people determine wether it's a no go or a green light.

Normal people have never heard of this made up "rule"

I don't even know where this comes from? Sounds like something a roastie would say.

this but unironically

Does the age of consent mean it's illegal for 2 minors to fuck?

If she can count, she can mount

the age of christ

I vaguely remember a case of this in France a long time ago but I don't remember the outcome. Probably varies from one country to another

When I was 14 I would have gladly had sex with women twice my age.

16 is the best time to marry, because that's the beginning of the most fertile part of a woman's life, and their capacity to pair-bond hasn't yet been jeopardized. Anything lower is pedophilia, anything higher feeds right into the Jewry's clammy hands.

13

80, only exception is when married (marriage no younger than 16).

I would say 14

This.

Pedophiles fuck off.

Pedophilia is attraction to pre-pubertal children. If they're older than 11, it's not pedophilia. And above 14-15 most have come a good way through puberty

It should, sadly there's usually Romeo and Juliet laws which means so long as they're within a few years of each other it's legal.

none. let the free market fix it

im not a pedo, though, for the record

13, and 18 in case of having a position of power.
Not a pedophile, not an argument.

6 if they have heroin to null the pain in their pussy from hard slamming.

Stupid pedophile

18

Upon marriage

fpbp

>When I was 14 I would have gladly had sex with women twice my age.

If you had a daughter that was 14 you'd be ok with her having sex with dudes that are 28? sick fuck.

paki u my man

Attached: 1459285812808.png (657x527, 36K)

After puberty.

I'm white with blue eyes.

15, but relationship with a guy older than 18 must have parental ascent. If we want to up our birthrates we need to marry off girls young before they hop from cock to cock and end up unable of pair bonding and raising a family

14, like it is where i live

10

Attached: 1525282333635.gif (320x289, 1.12M)

it's not some "rule" about age of consent, but about the acceptable age gap between the members of the couple

Yeah but it makes no sense and in some cases it also breaks the law

consent does not exist, it is enemies of USA society that want to interfere with the cycle of life

all life exists because of rape

the concept of consent is feminism designed to interfere with the cycle of life

the police that pretend age of consent exists are enemies of the cycle of life

the police that pretend age of consent exists are internal enemies of the people of the USA

these enemies demand the authority to control all life and become violent insane psychos when they are told this is not now the USA works

if you believe age of consent exists, then you are either a psycho politician who wants to rape kids or a psycho cop that wants to rape kids

age of consent = disrespect the cycle of lfie

16

Attached: 1529931963305.webm (640x800, 2.04M)

that doesn't sound reasonable to you?

The age that puberty kicks in. Females put out the best children in terms of health and strength during that time.

she is not white

>1 post by this ID

At what age can NPCs consent to anything at all? For the most part people are just throwing themselves into the rapids of life, hitting every piece of driftwood and sharp rock on the way down and suddenly they're old, grey and full of regret.

just imagine forcing yourself on a tiny little girl

as she weakly writhes and struggles against you, and then that final feeling of satisfaction as you pop her cherry

12 years old for girls and 16 for boys. Allah made it so.

13

marriage is consent, age of marriage should be age of ability to support children for men and age of ability to have children for women
no one who bears the burden of creating new life may sincerely be referred to as a child themselves

bleed = breed
immediately and constantly

Attached: 1528033914055.png (1268x1645, 738K)

30+

I can't get any harder, user

Attached: 1529991424434.jpg (1200x1800, 333K)

I think the age of consent should be 16, but sex with a man older than the age of 20 should require the consent and permission from the parents, because even though it's degenerate for a 20 year old to be having extra-marital sex with someone who is 17 or 16, I also don't think he should be labelled as a sex offender for it.

I also think people 20 and younger shouldn't be arrested or labelled as sexual predators for having sex with someone who is 15 and older. Within their age group, it's not worth marking them for life.
There is also a weird law here where teenagers who send each other nude pictures can be arrested for child porn and labelled as sex offenders once again, fucking up their lives, which is also silly. Dumb teenagers should be reprimanded for being dumb teenagers, but they should not be ruined for stupid decisions.

Based

Anyone saying over 13 is is falling for the same contemporary moralefagging PC cucks have bought into. Banging 13 year olds is completely natural and you are lying if you say you aren't attracted to girls that age.

With milkers like that you gotta be gay not to smash.

Attached: 1529958405338.webm (640x800, 1.71M)

Go away

Disgustingly big milkers

> 21 would make more sense when you consider the reasons given for restricting alcohol to 21+
The only reason they bumped it up from 18 to 21 is because they needed money for the interstate highway system. Look it up.

All rules are made up you retard.

12, 13 and 14 exists in a weird zone where the girl is often still developing physically depending on how fast she has grown. This is why I argue for an agent of consent that is 15 or preferably 16 because at that age a girl is undoubtedly fully developed and is no longer a "child" who is unable to make her own decisions.
I also think the permission and consent of the parents should be taken into consideration here.

I myself once saw a 12 year old girl who had a 100% fully developed body and was very much physically attractive, and you would be hardpressed to show me a guy who would have seen her and not have been surprisingly attracted.

At the same time, most 12 year old girls are not fully developed and look like innocent little girls, completely flat chested and not at all looking like women. 13 and 14 are full of even more of these inconsistencies.

16 is a reasonable number because there's really no doubt about physical or mental development.

>The stomach

that body is a temporary state of affairs

/thread

Kom deg for faen ut

I see your 16, and raise you 15, seems like the most logical age

14 is as high as I'll go. Have you seen younguns these days? Maybe if they stopped dumping hormones in the water supply we can go with 15 or 16. But they are growing up fast these days.

Optimally? We could drop a psychic mind probe that would evaluate emotional and sexual maturity of each individual and judge on the basis of that.
But barring sci-fi solutions, we're pretty alright the way we have things now.

16.
Anyone who thinks it should be older clearly values the life and safety of the spawnling and others less than they value the
>muh purity
of said spawnling. Driving is a bigger responsibility, and the price for a bad lapse in judgement is far greater.

Attached: 1522101023345.jpg (458x545, 53K)

It's still "made up" and done so by "other people" who "know whats best"

It sounds to me like your number is less about concern for society and more about "muh dick" so I'm gonna disregard your opinion based on that.

15, fine, but anything a 15 year old does with a man above the age of 20 requires consent from the parents or else should be illegal. Sounds fair?

For 16 the age can be 22.