This image (from a body pillow cover) was the topic on a hot court case in Austria recently. An importer got stuck in customs and then reported to the police.
Eventually in court, he was convicted with child porn charges, but the case was brought to the supreme court where he was freed of all charges.
Austrian law defines porn as something that is meant to be sexually stimulating, so even though there's no nudity (apart from half her ass hanging out) it's still considered porn.
However, the girl in question was judged based on her body. The supreme court argue that she can not have been a child as her butt is too flabby. No, I'm not kidding. They're looking at "puberty development" (hips in this case), and the concluded a child with her body can not have a butt that flabby.
That means the image is still considered pornographic, but it does not depict a child. Since it was a supreme court ruling, it'll set a standard for how to rule in similar cases.
It was also reported that a lot of people in the courtroom were laughing when they were trying to analyze the hips of a cartoon character. But that's what the law forces them to do.
Pedophiles and lolicons are the same, they both should be summarily executed.
Robert Cooper
i'll execute YOU with my black cock, hick
Nathaniel Robinson
Dumb pedoniggers aren't human.
Wyatt Baker
It is fine as long as they start to bleed.
How stupid and unnatural you have to be for spending her eggs into celibate desu
Hudson Smith
An actual qyality post on pol? Whats happening?! Have a bump
Aussie elites are trying to be as cucked as the Brits but puritan on top of it. Nasty combo. Porn is undefinable ("I know it when I see it") so this will always be a judge simply virtue signalling whichever way he decides.
Tske Jap kiddie anime...the girls have lite boobs. Its not even pedo.
Blake Torres
Collect the murderers who kill in vidya too
Execution for all fantasy crime kek
Evan Adams
Also American Puritanism is tiresome. Real Pedos should be tortured then killed but loli shit is not a big deal.
You are physically jacking off to children getting molested, what a moral and righteous individual.
Landon Bailey
It's interesting that a flabby butt was what tipped their judgment over. With other words, another cartoon could be deemed CP
Lincoln Gomez
>You are physically pulling a trigger to butcher innocents, what a moral and righteous individual.
Evan Thomas
>white Melonpan come home
Oliver Johnson
False equivalence, you are clicking your mouse and keyboard to beat others in a competitive video game. Drawing, selling, and proliferating depictions of child molestation aren't on the same level as me playing Counter Strike, faggot.
Kayden Perry
that manga is so good congrats neighbour loli obviusly isn't for pedos, pedos are gay
Brody Rodriguez
we are so based I can't even imagine living anywhere that's not austria fucking LMFAO@ur lyves faggots
Dominic Price
Yes, we need to protect those precious pillow covers with cartoons drawn on them from the perverts.
Austin Jackson
>False equivalence, you are clicking your mouse and keyboard to look at pixels on a screen. Drawing, selling, and proliferating depictions of murder aren't on the same level as me browsing a loli thread on /b/, faggot.
Lucas Kelly
>gore torture is worse in a video game than jacking off to some anime chestlets
Eli Clark
They're both depictions that allow people to engage in socially unacceptable/illegal behavior in a fantasy world, with no victims involved.
Well, that's actually not quite true. There are victims in CounterStrike if you make them rage.
Cameron Smith
>However, the girl in question was judged based on her body. The supreme court argue that she can not have been a child as her butt is too flabby. No, I'm not kidding. They're looking at "puberty development" (hips in this case), and the concluded a child with her body can not have a butt that flabby. >That means the image is still considered pornographic, but it does not depict a child. Since it was a supreme court ruling, it'll set a standard for how to rule in similar cases.
What the fuck?
How about this: Child porn is illegal because it requires children to be a part of it. Drawn images cannot be illegal because nobody is harmed in the making of them.
Pretty simple, and no analysis of butt cheeks required. No, I don't fap to loli porn.
Kayden Thomas
Did I overestimate Jow Forums when I thought there would be an actual discussion about the court decision?
Thomas Martinez
You are training yourself to become a killer with those games. You already want to execute this guy. Don't think you are innocent.
Easton Phillips
How a bunch of lines Is considered a person with feelings ?
Angel Johnson
Killing an imaginary civilian in a video game like GTA is exactly the same as jerking it to an imaginary kid in a cartoon.
Cooper Anderson
>It was also reported that a lot of people in the courtroom were laughing when they were trying to analyze the hips of a cartoon character.
nothing to discuss they are correct, child porn is bad because it harm children while you make the only problem with loli is that they make old hags jelous nothing else
Isaac Nelson
nice virtue signal
Nicholas Richardson
He should have been imprisoned for getting a pillow of a character from a shit anime
Jack Rodriguez
the manga is much better
Brody Sanchez
based pedo judges
Isaac Butler
What a fucking retarded reason to rule it legal
Is this the judge forcing it to be a de facto illegal depending on how the state interprets it (protip: illegal). Because that standard is like wet toilet paper
Levi Flores
what is there to discuss? debating whether butt cheecks on a cartoon character are flabby or not and basing court rulings over that is retarded which ever way they rule.
Levi Long
A drawing shouldn't be a crime for any reason I can think of. Well, I guess if you draw that loli next to Muhammad and you live in a sharia law area like London then you'd be hosed. But seriously. it's a DRAWING.
Hudson Bailey
Now all that's left is for them to legalize the real thing.
Wyatt Cook
Anime isn't real.
Carter Price
Go back to upvote land fag
Christian James
>An importer got stuck in customs and then reported to the police.
some triggered fat feminist no doubt, image clearly shows a young fully clothed cartoonish Asian women with tits, it boggles my mind that anyone could find this offensive...
But what if someone draws an image of a real child?
Jack Rodriguez
based CRINGE
Daniel Thomas
Based supreme court.
If she has puberty signs, she should be attractive to men.
Jace Moore
its a drawing
Adrian Phillips
Didn't aussies ban women with small breasts in porn? This is pretty interesting.
Well, I mean men are naturally attracted to younger girls. Younger girls are going to have a combination of features, some are childish features, some are more adult features. When you have the right mix that indicates, to the male brain, that she's a good candidate for motherhood. After she's lost her last child-like features she's too old, and before she gains any adult-like features she's too young, probably physically can't get pregnant.
So it does make sense that drawings that combine those features in a similar way would be harder to argue against than -- lets say photo-realistic drawings of per-pubecent individuals.
Isaac Morris
It's not a matter of protecting fictional characters, it's the fact you're jacking off to a pictures of child molestation and then making excuses about it. It's always been fucking sad and disgusting to see other anons go such depths to defend their inhumanity, if you were a normal human being or at least had enough contact with females you would have a normal attraction to adult females and would instead go after petite sized, adults. But no, xd dude those anime children are SO HOT!
roastie being toastie, not our fault nobody fucks your dusty vagina
Aaron Wright
You mean like have a naked child pose for them as a model? That's just as illegal whether he's drawing or not.
Logan Adams
>its disgusting so it should be banned People like you are more disgusting. You should be banned first, then I would be fine with getting rid of the lolis
Jack Rivera
I think it's time to change your tampon.
Jackson Harris
Japs and spics are pathetic.
Noah Johnson
>It's not a matter of protecting fictional characters, it's the fact you're murdering innocent people without remorse and then making excuses about it. It's always been fucking sad and disgusting to see other anons go such depths to defend their inhumanity, if you were a normal human being or at least had enough contact with people you would have a friends and would instead go after harmless dummies at the range, shooting mannequins that don't bleed. But no, xd dude those bloodied innocents are SO VULNERABLE!
Sebastian Wright
Wait what? Australian Ass Scientists report in and tell me how this all works
>hate niggers >love lolis Who do I side with here?
Ian Rogers
Wouldn't a big butt rather be an adult feature?
I find it interesting that they didn't refer to her butt size when judging her puberty development.
Aaron Adams
>However, the girl in question was judged based on her body. The supreme court argue that she can not have been a child as her butt is too flabby. No, I'm not kidding. They're looking at "puberty development" (hips in this case), and the concluded a child with her body can not have a butt that flabby. kek, I love it when serious law people are reduced to such nonsense
Robert Reed
Wheres the option for retarded ruling regardless of opinion on lolis?
Carter Robinson
>fap to Taiga >jury says she's too young
Wonder how long it'll be for someone to get put down for shota.
>guys we need to destroy degeneracy like homosexuality, zionism, niggers, etc >not lolicon though that's virtue signaling You guys will forever be the eternal retards of Jow Forums, /l/ was deleted for a reason.
Ok, you are right, I will stop fapping to loli manga and start playing videogames. I will pick this game called HoneySelect, it looks interesting, and with lots of modding potential.
But shape is probably most reliable. But also look at the arms and fingers. Actual little kids are chubby and have significantly different proportions than the pic in the OP. She's significantly more woman-like in that sense.
Daniel Sullivan
>the law is the same as social norms Hurr durrrrrrrrrrrr
Imagine there are posters on Jow Forums who don't even remember /l/ existing.
Jonathan Peterson
This is the probably the most legitimate concern against legislation I've seen.
Reminds me of all those "Y" images that kept being posted on Jow Forums when UK banned loli. The Y looks like a mons pubis.
Or that lamp that looks like a woman in a thong. "experts" can barely tell the difference between a real child and woman, let along a cartoon one, if that one Lupe Fuentes case is any indication.
