SCOTUS and Justice Kennedy

Ignore my flag, I am on vacation. Let's say Kennedy, Ginsberg, and Breyer are all replaced with conservatives during Trump's term. What could a 7-2 stacked Conservative SCOTUS do?

Attached: ct-supreme-court-justice-anthony-kennedy-retires-20180627.jpg (1920x1080, 433K)

Other urls found in this thread:

fark.com/comments/10073670/Prepare-for-more-terrible-Supreme-Court-decisions-Anthony-Kennedy-announces-retirement
twitter.com/AnonBabble

¡TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN!

The real question is what couldn't it do?

Trump is not a lawyer and has no idea about who to pick for the court. So he'll just pick whoever they tell him to pick, which will likely be the most conservative people he can find. Conservative statists.

While we have had non-lawyer presidents before (Reagan and GW Bush come to mind) they were originally governors who had experience in nominating multiple judges to their state courts.

What I'm saying is don't expect anything special from his pick. Also Breyer and Ginsberg won't retire until there is a Democrat in office.

Knowing the cuckservatives? Nothing. Cuckservatives don't know that they are not playing by the same rules of the left. Cuckservatives still think we live in the times of Mayberry.

What is one positive thing a conservative SCOTUS could do? The SCOTUS doesn't make laws or anything.

Breyer and Ginsberg are both really old

Ginsburg is 85. If she survives until a Democrat is in office. You got this entire board praising to Kek that she bites it for the salt diet.

>What I'm saying is don't expect anything special from his pick. Also
No human can live this long.

Interpret legislations and ruling as written.

>SCOTUS doesn't make laws or anything
They practically do now days. Remember when congress passed that bill legalizing faggot marriage?

Attached: 1529722787708.jpg (800x715, 75K)

likely they'd reaffirm the 2A. then they'd just interpret the constitution as its written, which is what they should

Would it be possible for a 7-2 Conservative SCOTUS to overturn gay marriage?

Hijacking this thread with liberal tears
fark.com/comments/10073670/Prepare-for-more-terrible-Supreme-Court-decisions-Anthony-Kennedy-announces-retirement

Attached: lt.jpg (400x400, 22K)

Don't forget Sotomayor's beetus is catching up to her. Kagan could eventually be the odd man out.

Man what a fucking glorious day.
I really hope if any actual leftists are on Jow Forums just remember.
WE FUCKING HATE YOU SCUM

Attached: 1.jpg (140x376, 16K)

ginsberg will be dead before the end of summer

In theory yes, but the doctrine of stare decisis suggests that they wouldn't be revisiting that decision any time soon.

They certainly would. Without a doubt. We'll probably overturn it just from replacing Kennedy.

>that pic
I'm convinced more and more everyday that queers and all related crazy freaks should be killed. I used to think they should be impaled, but honestly I think they'd enjoy it. Sick fucks. Where was that picture taken?

How many Lady Bois have you had sex with so far, OP? Having fun?

Abortion = toast
Travel ban is on
No commie bullshit
No brown vs board of education
No activist judge bs
No illegal immigration

We're taking this country back.

That is Thailand not Taiwan.

No idea about pic location. But yeah, sickfucks should burn.

Attached: 1530067321624.gif (425x319, 803K)

Make America Great Again

I've been told that it will destroy all "our progress"

amen

You may be on to something here.

Good. “Progress” = Communism

Checked!

This

Shieeeeet

I don't hate the leftists. I think of them like untrained dogs.
Someone has to step in and rub their nose in the piddle they left on the floor for them to learn.

Technically a 5-4 can overturn gay marriage.

It's about stacking your odd against swing voters that is important, which is what makes Kennedy replacement so important.

The more libs you get rid of the better you here your odds, so with Ginsburg gone we may not guarantee but we do reduce risk

It'll probably take trump winning a second term.

>What could a 7-2 stacked Conservative SCOTUS do?
Rule on things that they decide is fit to be ruled on by their Court?
Same as any supreme court roster.
They don't make legislation, they review it, and ensure it is constitutional.

The thing people in general don't understand is that the Supreme Court is not like Congress, and it is not like The Presidency.
Politics is muffled in a courtroom.
Yes, a supreme court can make rulings along political ideology they hold.
But they are not going to, say, throw out the thirteenth amendment as some here would certainly hope for.

Say no to Israel.

No but they can absolutely save our fucking gun rights from these communist fucks in the government. Especially now that Kennedy is leaving.

I thought Trump was only getting 2 SCOTUS? With 4 may as well just Make America Great Again!

WEWWW

Attached: 1499327765631.jpg (960x739, 78K)

It would force Dems to expand the number of justices to 15 or more the next time they get in power. Collapse of civilization should soon follow

IF any of that was the case, they would have voted 9-0 in favor of the travel ban. The fact four of them don't understand the law, the powers of the executive branch, and the constitution is a major problem.

They could overturn abortion or gay marriage though, right? How would that work? Genuinely curious

(((Kagan and Sotomayor))) would murder goy SCOTUS appointees. they want a strong Talmudic alliance

THIS
only a few have are awake and willing to fight
the vast swatch of them still talk like broken ducks when attacking the enemy, and give them quarter and leave enormous doubt - I'd bet they just can't handle the stress, they turn the other cheek, they "forgive their brother" - who knows what ridiculous shit goes on inside their lame muther fucking pathetic heads
one exception is Joe diGenova - study and learn you PATHETIC FUCKING REPUBS

2 is more than enough to change American history for the next 30 years. 3 appointments would be complete insanity.

KEK FPBP

Attached: Bonjour Chang Chongdanoff here.jpg (600x400, 40K)

They'll expire before the end of Trump's second term in 2024

That is a truly good point.

>The fact four of them don't understand the law...,
It is worse than that, they understand the law and they don't care.

>No brown vs board of education
AND THE ILLEGALS WILL JUST SELF DEPORT!!! ALL 20+MILLION OF THEM!!!

this is realistically his last one.

Even if he gets re-elected and all 9 of them die, democrats are going to win enough of the house to block 100% of appointments going forward

Kind of this and I hate it. It has really begun to piss me off. You have a used car dealer and a grandma paying full price in a pawn shop. As far as the list, have you guys studied it? Not a real conservative I see anywhere. Who made up this list?

Who is this seemingly important individual? Can I get a quick rundown?

>and heres why thats a bad thing

Attached: 1529569864242.jpg (500x568, 131K)

Attached: 1530147768090m.jpg (1024x634, 58K)

Nobody cares about those issues. Our country is being invaded. Communism is being pushed. Our Constitutional Rights are under attack every fucking day. And you want to deal with faggots and niggers having abortions? Fuck. You.

> Fark.com
Drew needs to be pillars for what he let happen to that site

they could but they wont. they almost never overturn previous rulings.

Question. I'm an American so I'm entitled to an answer

So if we get like 7,8,9 conse4vative judges, does their ability for judicial activism increase? Like if all 9 vote to dropkick Mexicans out of America will it become constitutional and thus legal?

muhh constitution

Take away all Jewish and Feminist idealogies.

(((Civil Rights)))
(((Roe V Wade)))
(((Freedom Of Assocation is back)))
(((Gun Laws become law of the land))))
(((Religion back in schools)))
(((Alimony is no longer owed back to females)))

God this is great. It will be 1950's in 10 years easily. And we will have many white babies.

No, it just increases odds of the magic 5-4 ruling.

Though the larger the spread the better the presedence. A 9-0 ruling is basically an Admendment kek

If by mexicans you mean actual mexicans, then maybe.

Dems will just increase seats to 15 seats then.

Please God let that happen. My word she’d never be confirmed but we can dream can’t we.

8-1
Liberalism extinct for 35+ years.

Attached: death exile.gif (500x221, 395K)

That thing that's keeping you alive at the moment, yes.

>吃狗屎同性戀艾滋病我喜歡狗屎黑鬼黑鬼黑鬼我喜歡陰莖在我的屁股我是中國人我們是外星人唉笑我的屁股唉笑我
>的屁股唉笑我的屁股關外國人的怪異中國外星人是誰我們是熱狗中國外星人幽靈我們 是間
>諜中國外星人嘿嘿笑我的屁股我們是間距中國羅斯柴爾德外星人從太空
>屎黑鬼黑鬼黑鬼我喜歡陰莖在我的屁股我是中國人我們是外星人唉笑我的屁股唉笑我
>股唉笑我的屁股關外國人的怪異中國外星人是誰我們是熱狗中國外星人幽靈我們 是間唉笑我的屁股唉笑我
>吃狗屎同性戀艾滋病我喜歡狗屎黑鬼黑鬼黑鬼我喜歡陰莖在我的屁股我是中國人我們是外星人唉笑我的屁股唉笑我的屁股唉笑我的屁股關外國人的怪異中國外星人是誰我們是熱狗中國外星人幽靈我們 是間諜中國外星人嘿嘿笑我的屁股我們是間距中國羅斯柴爾德外星人從太空

Look at this picture. She is at fucking terrible health.

Attached: static.politico.com.jpg (1160x629, 95K)

No, it's not. That's the thing allowing people to be protected by the law while betraying my country and affording millions of imported foreigners an equal status as me. The only thing keeping me alive is the fact that they're half-retarded and don't have the competence to organize a martial-enough society for ethnic cleansing.

He should pick me

Jesus, you were not kidding. That is the Dead Sea of salt.

Attached: a702ZCU.png (640x300, 2K)

This.

>conservative organization introduces lawsuit about marriage, probably to do with "religious freedom"
>district court rules against
>appeal
>appellate court upholds district ruling
>appeal
>Supreme Court hears case, overturns ruling
Same process for Roe v. Wade.

For some reason I thought you were a leftist smartass with your first comment. Because yeah, if the constitution ever went away, there will be lots of dead people.

What if people don't get married in a church? I got my marriage license through the State. Was officiated by a retired judge. Zero god involved. Nothing stopping fags from doing the same thing.

There needs to be lots of dead people. That's why I don't understand people who are redpilled but still try to hold onto the constitution.

Because people that are "on our side" keep telling the rest of us to do nothing.
>Jesus is going to make it all better any minute.
>Million Mexicans later.
>Any minute now..
>Millions more Muslims.
>Any second, Jesus will be here.
There's a point where those people "on our side" become irrelevant. If they think they are going to be our equals after the dust settles, they are mistaken.

Oh and then the boomer. Don't forget we need approval from boomers for some reason. Wouldn't want to disrupt their social security checks.