I'm not a fascist so why shouldn't I sympathise with Antifa's aims? I mean, I don't support violence...

> antifa arent communist

They have literally always, since their inception, been a branch of the comintern.

In fact fascism was only ever a reaction to the comintern, and not the other way around.

Because everyone right of Antifa is fascist

This is a great article btw

unz.com/article/die-the-unlimited-radicalism-of-antifa/

>In some ways, the brand hasn’t even developed since the 1930s, as contemporary Antifa still use the “flags within flags” and “three arrows” logos first created by the German Communists (KPD) and Socialist (SPD) parties.

>“Anti-fascism,” as the author details, has been a remarkably consistent slogan of the Totalitarian Left in all its manifestations. From the Berlin Wall (the “Anti Fascist Protection Rampart”) to the British “Anti Nazi League” (a creation of the Socialist Workers Party), this Left (including left-anarchists such as the “autonomists”) always frames itself as the only defense against “fascism.” Of course, by “fascists,” it means everyone else in the world.

Attached: 2000px-Antifalogo.svg.png (2000x2000, 249K)

The desire of SJWs/Antifa to exterminate white males is still genocide...its still wanting to kill people for how they are born.

Because both are fringe groups with no real power in office. The only ones who shill for antifa are college professors and nobody publicly supports fascists that isn't just a literally who.

>the entire debate about fascism and “anti-fascism” is essentially backwards: Fascism arose as a reaction to the Communist revolution in Russia and the attempted Communist revolutions in Hungary, Slovakia and parts of Germany:

>“Without communist revolution and without the vanguard leftist parties that launched those revolutions, there would have been no reason for fascism ever to exit,” the anonymous author writes. “Essentially, the communist revolutionaries and their ‘direct action’ tactics had created their own nemesis capable of defeating them in the streets and willing to compete with them for the loyalty of the workers.

>As “Anti-fascism” quite explicitly defines itself as anti-liberal (in the classical sense of liberalism), repudiates the right to free speech and takes upon itself the responsibility to enforce though violence a remarkably narrow definition of what people can and cannot say, it is of course quintessentially totalitarian. And, not surprisingly, it is Main Stream Media journalists, who themselves now operate almost entirely as commissars, who enable these terrorists by consistently providing them adoring coverage and spearheading their attack campaigns. Indeed, reporters keep running interference for Antifa even as Antifa itself keeps physically attacking them

Attached: 1457815284266.jpg (1000x667, 199K)

Antifas violence helped Hitler gain votes

Attached: image.png (300x300, 8K)

yo im not arguing anything different
Im just getting ahead of the idiocy of plenty of people i had to argue about this on the internet
antifa = comminist
no doubt about it
stop bumping this shitty slide

Attached: 1530166733927.jpg (551x591, 36K)

The allies also weren't Antifa faggots.

Antifa created Hitler and OP needs to get a fucking clue about real history. Modern day Antifa is lucky in one regard. They have not been very successful. If they had? The fourth reich would be starting up about now. Might just anyways.

Attached: antifa.jpg (751x562, 105K)

>Similarly, instead of arising as a response to fascism, the modern Antifa movement was “just a brand for already existing communist and anarchist activists”—yet another “front group” in the long line of “front groups” the Reds have cobbled together throughout their bloody history.

>Of course, many “conservatives” don’t particularly want to hear this either. After all, Conservatism Inc. has a long history of tacitly working with Antifa to police “the movement.” Thus National Review was silent when Antifa began closing down American Renaissance conferences, even suppressing a diary item by John Derbyshire—because American Renaissance had made devastating criticisms of National Review’s cuckservatism and its betrayal of immigration patriotism that the NR girlyboys could not answer, especially while pursuing their real careers as MSM token rightists.

>And the Beltway Right is hardly interested in a serious discussion of political history anyway. It’s quite content to voice platitudes about Progressives of being “the real fascists.”

Ok I'll sage it then

Attached: 1453730488621.jpg (360x480, 25K)

>But Antifa demonstrates that “anti-fascism” is not merely Left Totalitarianism, but now deeply anti-White. All efforts by well-meaning grassroots conservatives to try to prove they are not “fascist” or “racist” are doomed to failure: “By definition, Antifa must have enemies that can be dehumanized as evil and dangerous; otherwise they lose their entire reason for existence.”

Attached: 1451256557095.jpg (960x639, 93K)

lol antifa the epitome for rich bourgeois liberal faggot kids trying to get laid or seem cool. the other half are fat retarded closet fags.

>I'm not a fascist so why shouldn't I sympathise with Antifa's aims?
Idiot or shill?

ANTIFA are the political enforcers of the global elite , most of them are so called 'useful idiots' , but there is a paid officer corps that coordinates the group's efforts and takes orders from their masters.