Logo of youth wing of Germany's AfD 'resembles insignia of early Nazi storm troopers'

The media doesn't even report the news anymore. They just attack people. It's fucking bullshit.

The person that spread the Image comparing these Logos got these as answers.
Also here is the Logo of the Federal Office for Labour.

Attached: Download.jpg (275x183, 8K)

pedo alert

I don't see it.

Idiot i´ve seen this post before.
Sturm abteiling. Storm division Is a lightning rod and a A for sturm (lightning) abteilung (division) so lightning rod and an A meshed together. .The AFD does not resemble it except without ridiculous coerced imagination. It´s a checkmark for voting yes. And A for AFD. Pic related are idiots such as yourself.
Also in this regard it´s very simple to understand the natsoc symbolism of the lightning rods for example of the SS Shutzstaffel (protection squad). It symbolizes two lightning rods, which is symbol of european intellect and intelligent mind. But again. If you like lightning rods you must be literally hitler. Right?
Please stop making these same posts over and over again.

Attached: 1528133746769.png (500x421, 143K)

And it´s not unusual to see A either, since it represents a pyramid with a capstone, and it is the first letter of the Alphabet. Its first origins can be traced back to a Proto-Sinaitic script developed in Ancient Egypt to represent the language of Semitic-speaking workers in Egypt. This script was partly influenced by the older Egyptian hieratic, a cursive script related to Egyptian hieroglyphs. So A is basically a pyramid. It´s also first letter in the Alphabet for a reason. So A is used a lot for that reason in logos etc. To represent something foremost.

>The media doesn't even report the news anymore. They just attack people. It's fucking bullshit.
They work for the same people and say the same sentences reading from a script because the same handful of people atleast in the US own these media organizations.
youtube.com/watch?v=_fHfgU8oMSo
youtube.com/watch?v=TM8L7bdwVaA
Here are examples of this speaking in unison of what you falsely believe are objective individual reporters and news organizations. Who repeat the exact same sentences because they read off a teleprompter. And which is why they are now finally called out for it and referred to fake news/spreaders of propaganda and telling you what to think instead of presenting objective and factual information and letting the viewer decide what to think/do with it. As is what they SHOULD be doing.
And you are right, they don´t know anything about what natsoc was, when they say nazi (which no national socialist would refer to himself as either) they just try to find something bad to call someone to demonize them, and to them the worst thing they can think of is a 'nazi' . But they don´t themselves have a clue abbout what natsoc stood for. Nor do like 98% of people in the world probably. Here is video in this regard. youtube.com/watch?v=3LnG8yECfLQ Infact if you blackboxed natsoc principles and veiled it so you took away reference from germans and presented the tenants of it. Which you can because it can be used for any monoethnic nation. And you presented them to someone who has no idea what natsoc stood for. At the end they will probably agree with like 80% of it. And then you can tell them afterwards. Congratulations you are a national socialist. And watch them in shock.
>b.but. NO I´M NOT.. they wanted to kill everyone like them didn´t they?
Not true.

Attached: 1525551919625.jpg (1000x1500, 278K)

> this.

But also abolish the state.

Attached: anarchodollar04.jpg (624x500, 24K)

Looks like a smog check auto place logo.

Yeah it does, Just noticed.

> defending and improving its race.

Racial identity is a spook, you are faaaar more than your race you and I are creative nothing, we are only what we wish we are.

Attached: images9.jpg (278x181, 5K)

>Racial identity is a spook, you are faaaar more than your race you and I are creative nothing, we are only what we wish we are.
Nonsense. You are not a butterfly because you wish you are. But back to the point. Any nationalism consideres nation and people one. If you replace germany with asians. It´s no longer germany. To natsoc which is a very very comprehensive form of nationalism. Nation and people are one. You have your family and then people like yourself are your extended family and this is what a nation is. It is like being on a big team and you want what is best for the whole team. But if you have many different ethnicities inside a nation, then they have different teams because they do not think and behave alike naturally like people of similar ethnicity tend to do. Thereore natsoc put the people first over individual interests of greed. It was loyalty first, selfishness second.
Did you even realize that before the war germans wanted to be isolationists to only have a greater germanic realm where only germans could be citizens and others living in germany which was not prohibited, but were subject to law of foreigners meaning they could not vote, could not participate in politics, and could not change german laws and interfere in that manner. This eradicates foreign influence where illegal aliens or immigrants can´t just come in and say we want more immigrants to come to germany. It made sure that the decisions made was in the german peoples best interest? You probably did not realize this did you.

Attached: socialism_stolen_term.jpg (2100x750, 820K)

this is the desired demographic isolationist border of the greater germanic realm. All these places and people are considered germanic tribes. Which people do not realize.

Attached: 1529200609591.jpg (2295x2756, 815K)

Basically natsoc was worried about the socialists/communists off the marxist brand which is opposite and a fraud compared to national socialism. And hitler considered it a stolen term. That the had taken put an ist at the end and changed the definition of entirely. To reclaim the proper definition is why he called his party nsdap. national socialistische deutsche (german) arbeiter (worker) partei. pic related. They wanted to a) kick the socialists/commies out of positions of power and avoid a bloody communist revolution like the one in russia. b) deal with communist russia that now posed a serious threat gepolitically for eastern europe and for germany aswell. So war is declared against germany way before they can get eastern europe onboard with some treaties etc. in this regard and get russia to the table to stop their madness. And so natsoc germany, who wanted to remain isolationist. basically did an hero attempt and pushed towards stalingrad to try to neutralize the communist menace whilst being attacked from all sides. In order to save germany and eastern europe from the commie menace, having successfully neutralized it in germany. And then it failed unfortunately. Russia took over eastern europe, and patton witnessed in dismay as the filthy commie jews that hitler had thrown out of positions of power in germany. reinstated themselves and threw all germans out of influential positions post war. This redpilled patton so much about jews that he a) wanted to kill himsel/wished he didn´t survive the war b) thought he basically had fought for the wrong side and they had failed to liberate europe c) almost rejected his entire career/military service to the US out of shame of what was going on when he realized what he had helped to fascilitate. And so now the filhty communist jews taken over germany. And merkel is former ddr right hand of erik honecker a communist. And they want to make germans and euros minority in own country.

Attached: 1528468164932.jpg (580x584, 113K)

Keep in mind that pic related. This was written in the time off hitler before he became reichkanzler. So the natsoc knew exactly what the communist jews and also what capitalist bankster jews (notice how commies have central banks), were planning to do to germany. This is what they are now trying to do through the (((EU))) that they have used former beautifful germany as a vessel for implementing. Which is. Create central control in bruxelles. Gradually entice/trick member nations to give away their national sovereignty and self determination. And then flood them with mass immigration whilst encouraging low birthrates.

Attached: cloudenhove-kalergi-plan.jpg (600x837, 100K)

“Literally” everyone is now a Nazi
>pic related

Attached: D45E0855-4A65-4AAC-8183-1AF3E1861ACA.png (502x686, 240K)

Remember when milk and the OK sign were made purported nazi symbols by the lugenpresse?

Exactly this is the message we need to push mainstream.

> nonsense
. You are not a butterfly because you wish you are.

Obviously, You are deliberately twisting what I'm saying, I'm saying the individual can and should move beyond social roles and opinions on the individual, each member of the collective should be conscientious egoists, they are fully aware of themselves and act according to themselves without any care of the opinions of others and acting in their own interests.

I honestly don't care, still full of spooks cause of collectivism and the state.

, natsoc is just like every other hierarchal system in that once it replaces one tyrant they themselves become tyrants, the only solution is an end to the state. In the case of Germany The Jews held control over major industry so shitler and his goons rounded them up and then themselves became tyrants, nothing changed.

Here´s a short version about natsoc´s victory in driving out this evil menace out of their political landscape. Unfortunately this victory did not last long as shortly thereafter war was declared against germany using the idiotic treaty of versailles which had taken land away from germany which they simply wanted back. And reunify with the germans now stuck in different nations. Including stealing crucial farmland from germany which was instrumental in starvation at that time in germany before natsoc.They talked about for 10 years before breaking it. And this was lied about and claimed this was a spontaneous militant aggression and attempt to take over europe which was nonsense. Go look up treaty of versailles germany loss of land and you will understand completely the german mindset in this. We have also danes played tit for tat with germany about this. And when sweden and norway and denmark split up. Germans took only what we had taken from them and that was that basically. And they wanted to do same thing with treaty of versailles. youtube.com/watch?v=Clbnfn8RR_w

So does the democratic party sign, it's inside a circle isn't it

I don't care, just more spooks, also the EU has its roots in Nazi Germany so I'm good. the only system I accept is anarchy, ego-mutualism.

>I don't care, just more spooks, also the EU has its roots in Nazi Germany so I'm good. the only system I accept is anarchy, ego-mutualism.
No it doesn´t and this is what i am trying to tell you. The EU is the OPPOSITE of what natsoc wanted to achieve. The EU is what the communists wanted to achieve! Centralized government off all off europe. And mixing everyone together. Natsoc wanted a greater germanic realm meaning all germanic nations united in a greater germanic realm. Colonies for farmland and resettlement due to the bullshit treaty of versailles that removed all german colonies aswell as took huge swaths of land away from germany including important farmland which lead to starvation in germany. And other than that wanted to be demographic isolationists. And every other nation do whatever it is they want. But germany believed germanics would be better off unified and by themselves. Based on their ethnic similarity. This is why you had ahnenpass etc. This is the lie that i want to address here. (((EU))) that germany was used as a vehicle for post WWII as communists installed themselves in various positions is antithetical off natsoc. After WII the commies also even managed to divide germany up into east and west germany. Merkel comes from DDR and was former right hand of erik honecker a DDR communist. The communist wanted the berlin wall to be commies. Then when east germany failed spectacularly they could not wait but to beg to tear down the wall so they could go back into west germany again. And now with the EU they try to make all europe fucking communist with central control in bruxelles.

Attached: 1525552540746.jpg (1024x878, 196K)

The ones instrumental behind the formation of the (((EU))) was the very marxist/socialist communists that natsoc was kicking out of power in germany! And after WII they put themselves back in whilst kicking out germans out of positions off influence. This is what made patton almost want to kill himself and regretted he had even survived war, realizing then what he had helped to enable and through lies he had been fighting for the wrong side. And that communists would now take over europe and germany. Which they unfortunately did. Merkel is a DDR communist. People do not realize this. You don´t live in this neighbourghood and don´t know this history, so you don´t understand these very important details. And i´m not blaming you for not understanding that. But it´s important that you realize this.

Attached: patton_regrets_to_have_survived.jpg (1392x1781, 285K)

> common Good.

Man that can be used to justify all kinds of horrific shit.

> without giving up his individuality or personality or the product if his personal efficiency.

Literally impossible with a state.

I don't think you know what I'm getting at, I see all systems of collectivism and hierarchy as inherently oppressive, collectivism alienates the individual through various means.

even if the modern eu did that, it still has its basic roots in the same collectivist shithole.

>natsoc is just like every other hierarchal system in that once it replaces one tyrant they themselves become tyrants, the only solution is an end to the state. In the case of Germany The Jews held control over major industry so shitler and his goons rounded them up and then themselves became tyrants, nothing changed.
You know absolutely nothing about natsocs principles clearly. It will take long time for you to study this so we can reasonably talk about it.
They wanted to a) kick the socialists/commies out of positions of power and avoid a bloody communist revolution like the one in russia. b) deal with communist russia that now posed a serious threat gepolitically for eastern europe and for germany aswell.
The socialists/communists that were peddling this revolution in germany. Happened to be jewish lead! Same as they were in russia. And hitler and natsoc didn´t want no bloody bolshevik revolution in germany. natsoc declared that jews could not be citizens but had to either leave or be subject to law of foreigners. Which meant they could not participate in politics. This would effectively shut down marxist/socialist/communist parties in germany. And thus avoid a bloody revolution.

Attached: churchill.jpg (850x400, 75K)

Why even care.

The "Young Alternative" is full of edgelord LARPers and the whole organisation is a fucking burden on the party. People will call that punching right, but who shits on toilet seats like a fucking pajeet at Party Meetings and vomits his beer all over the place is an outright degenerate.

>even if the modern eu did that, it still has its basic roots in the same collectivist shithole.
It´s so annoying dealing with you americans about this. Calling germany a shithole. It was one of the big 5 that contributed most to scientific achievements and technology for the last 800 years. Nationalism which you call collectivism is healthy tribalism and taking care of your people and loving your people. The individualistic bullshit was literally created by jews in order to destroy these things like the authoritarian personality and the european family unit aswell as healthy european tribalism. Go read culture of critique.

Natsoc is essentially meritocracy on overdrive. you can go from farmer to reichkanzler if you are competent for it, which hitler also mentioned in his speeces. You are judged only by competence and performance. Not if your family has wealth or something, no plutocracy and these things. or if your family is poor or something. It creates full class mobility, the unification of all classes of society around helping eachother and having loyalty to eachother instead off only loyalty to their own person. youtube.com/watch?v=AnpTWKKWQ1o Everything about natsoc was concerned about betterment and doing good towards the people. Not some selfish dictatorial interests. The purpose of natsoc was that hitler was basically the title of reichkanzler was an avatar for the german people. If you wanted that title you would have to have absolute loyalty to the german people, to do their interest instead of their own. youtube.com/watch?v=AnpTWKKWQ1o go watch here a small compilation of his speeches to that efffect. And once you understand for instance that germany lost its colonies and crucial farmland under treaty of versailles. A lot of things of what he is saying start to make a lot of sense, where before you didn´t realize what he meant.

Attached: 1529240569777.jpg (523x587, 59K)

I don't need to its the same, it replaces one ruling class with another. I'm anti-communist too as well as anti-capitalist is not anti-market however since its reciprocal.

I wasn't referring to Germany I mean it comes from the same phenomenon of a continuous cycle of slaves into tyrants and tyrants into slaves, and vice versa. again, I am an anarchist I want to destroy the state, the collective alienates the individual from their true selves, their real wants, and desires.

> destroy the family unit

I don't know where you get your info but I see the family unit as an extension of the individual, they are generally speaking in the individuals best interest, However, I'm all for abolishing institutional hierarchy. I really don't give a single shit about any collectivist ideology. the only ideology I support is ego-mutualism nothing more nothing less.

>I don't need to its the same, it replaces one ruling class with another
No it literally doesn´t it does the exact opposite. It eradicates class differences in that all strata of society must have absolute loyalty to eachother. And those strata are only determined by competence and performance, not generational wealth or nepotism or such things. This would not help you under natsoc. If you were less competent you get a less competent position. It had free education and free healthcare guaranteed by the state. In exchange you had to perform either mental or physical labour. Best off body and mind regardless what strata you are you have full unabrided access, but social contract in that you have to contribute. No parasitism or these things. Through this all could prove themselves competent for whatever field and placed in them based on competence. if they decide they want to prove they can do a better thing in another field, they could do this and if proven. They would be put in that field! This eradicates class differences. That was the entire point!

Attached: pilpul_hitler_and_jews.jpg (1200x489, 128K)

These things are hard to achieve unless you have a monoethnic nation which is why natsoc is predicated on monoethnic/ethnocentrism in their own nation. Because similar people think alike and want the same things. Radically diferent people from other places in the world have a tendency to do the opposite. So they need to have their own nations where they can do their own thing. And natsoc certainly was not against other races but was for its own race and folk/volk in their own nations. And wished that others would do similar for theirs in their nation.

D-Delete this goyim!

Attached: 1394640793034.png (354x504, 129K)

>> destroy the family unit
>I don't know where you get your info
Go read a book called culture of critique by kevin mcdonald, it goes through how the jews were bragging about doing this shit.
youtube.com/watch?v=eCkc-ZF_TSY

You Don't Understand authority, the collective is the basis of authoritarianism (Controlled by an oligarchy), I am in direct conflict with all forms of unjustifiable the solution is to snuff out the state, capitalism, communism what have you all hierarchical systems go down, in its place you have co-ops,free-association, and Mutually owned banks without usury and agro-industrial federations.

don't you think anarchism is a Jewish ideology or whatever, even though it was created by an anti-semite

>I don't need to its the same, it replaces one ruling class with another.
"what we have dreamt of for years have finally come true. The symbol of the unification of all classes in germany, has become the new standard of the reich, the most priced posession you have in the world is your own people, and for the sake of this people, we will struggle this fight, and not slack, and not tire, and never lose courage, and never despair " - Adolf Hitler.
You know absolutely nothing about what natsoc was about unfortunately. Perhaps it is time you find out.
youtube.com/watch?v=AnpTWKKWQ1o
See the socialist/communists and the filthy plutocratic capitalists banksters, they want the exact opposite. The former present a fraudulent system shaming the term socialism by calling it this and changing its meaning into ridiculousness and stupidity. that doesn´t work and mix people up completely to which they can always cause infighting to keep the commie party on top. and the banksters want super rich and super poor. Natsoc was against both!

Attached: 1528067825510.jpg (280x380, 30K)

*unjustifyible violence or coercion.

>You Don't Understand authority, the collective is the basis of authoritarianism (Controlled by an oligarchy)
You don´t get it, you really don´t. Natsoc was anti oligarchical you moron! It was about unifying all strata and classes of society into not fighting eachother but doing good for eachother! Natsoc hated oligarchs. It is full meritocratic, not nepotistic or hidden plutocratic which is what oligarchy is. nothing of what you are saying is true about natsoc. you are arguing a general thing about class diffferences, neglecting that natsoc didn´t respect them. Natsoc had no respect of persons. You show competence and performance and you are put in that position regardless what strata you might have come from. And have unabridled access to best education and best healthcare to prove your worth. But you had to contribute and perform mental or physical labour. No freeloading. All must be doing something to benefit the society. Whilst having loyalty to doing good for it, instead of just good for themselves. This is what marxists/socialists/communists pervert into this destructive thing that went on in soviet russia and china and other places. And even today continue to destroy like in venezuela.

Attached: AntifaBTFO.jpg (480x853, 56K)

You still don't get it, it's not about how much money you have in your bank account, the inequality lies where the greater good is put above the individual, it separates collective from the individual, the individual, in turn, is subject to the social roles of the collective creating hierarchy. the idea is to abolish society as an institution responsible for its members as an anarchist to make things more equal is not seizing the means of production and redistributing the wealth each according to their need to their ability but seizing our true selves from society, the collective. Also, Nazism is an autocracy, it is a statist ideology, therefore, its my enemy.

Clean out your notifications

>You still don't get it, it's not about how much money you have in your bank account, the inequality lies where the greater good is put above the individual, it separates collective from the individual
WRONG AGAIN. natsoc makes it so the collective/people does what is best for the individual, and the individual in turn does what is best for the people. you just have general notions you are peddling but sadly you have misunderstood the entire thing of what natsoc is about. Infact you are more natsoc than you even realize with what you are saying.
>because we do not say to the rich people, please give something to the poor.
(as in gibsmedat and i do nothing in return).
>Instead we say german people help yourselves. Everyone must help eachother no matter if you are rich or poor! Everyone must have the belief that there is always someone in a much worse situation than i am in, and that person i want to help as a brother. - adolf hitler.
This was focused not internationally but within the german borders, for the people. So it was not about giving everything to africa at expense of yourself. But your people in your own nation are the ones you have loyalty to first! And meeting those needs first!

>Clean out your notifications
Haha it´s not mine.

Oh dear, an A looks like an A! We cn't stnd for such rcist displys!

ok, ill put this in the simplest terms.

One group (Nazis, communists, capitalists literally all statist ideologies) seized power over the initial power structure at the time, and in its place, they placed their own authoritarian structure nothing changed considering they just removed one Powerful and abusive institution with another. One that you must pay taxes to, one you are subject to the violence of the police, one where you are told what you can do with your body.

No I'm against natsoc as well as any other form of hierarchy.

>Update
also, I don't want any of that gibedat shit, the only thing I can own is something I labored for, I did not labor for something someone else bought.

>One group (Nazis, communists, capitalists literally all statist ideologies) seized power over the initial power structure at the time, and in its place, they placed their own authoritarian structure nothing changed considering they just removed one Powerful and abusive institution with another.
It´s simply wrong, because that was not what natsoc was about. The reason hitler was authoritarian was to create a system that is in itself anti oligarchical. You could not break up the oligarchical capitalist plutocratic stranglehold without rising above them to declare them false and inappropriate. Aswell as he was against the marxist/socialist/communist bubllshit that doesn´t work because it´s not meritocratic and has no idea off how to run a nation properly. Natsoc eradicated class diffferences by causing all strata of society to help eachother with loyalty to eachother. Rich and poor absolute loyalty to help eachother and their own people. Those on top help those on bottom, those on bottom help those on top. And all have full ´class´ mobility if they are competent to go from farmer to reichkanzler if they are competent at it. And every opportunity to become competent and prove their worth, it was not withheld from them due to financial things. You only see things as a general thing, and what natsoc is to you is a black box and you don´t know what is in it, because you have not dared to look apparently. You are like a rat in the maze being electrocuted everytime someone says natsoc. So you don´t even look anymore. But if you look you will see that it is nothing what they told you it was. I think i have demonstrated this throughout the thread whilst also highlighting your gross misconceptions about it. Many of which is directly the opposite of what you thought it was, and what you are saying.

It's not what communism was about either but its what happened, the only solution is the abolishment of the state.

This system natsoc was so effective in destroying oligarchical structures, that it resulted in a fucking world war II by the banksters declaring war on germany to try to shut it down under all conditions! It was the shortest fucking empire in human history probably for this reason, because how right they got it! Do you not get that. And then they have demonized it on top of it for 70 fucking years. Because it would be terrible if other nations and ethnicities decided to follow that example for their own nations. There goes the central bank shit down the tubes, aswell as the destructive socialist/communist garbage down the tubes aswell.

Attached: jews_declare_war_on_germany.jpg (1200x630, 273K)

They are so scared of that system that if they could they would throw you in jail for even looking into it and trying to be inspired by it. Because it ends their control system completely.

Ok I dont care, the state still exists, that means the state must cease to exist, and no the banks didn't declare war on Germany they supported both sides, Hitler took money from the Bush family.

so does mutualism, with the benefit of also eradicating the tools that the oligarchs use to oppress the individual.

They look nothing alike

kek ich lieben die AfD. Deutschland aus Duetschlanders. Auslanders, neger schwein und Muslimmen RAUS

>Ok I dont care, the state still exists, that means the state must cease to exist, and no the banks didn't declare war on Germany they supported both sides, Hitler took money from the Bush family.
Look natsoc germany was very popular in the world, right till they realized where it was going with regards to banksters etc.
>the state still exists, that means the state must cease to exist
I don´t know what you are are you an anarchist, what kind of political affiliation do you have. But clearly i have to say you are very misguided with what you are saying and just have grave factual errors about what natsoc is about.

>so does mutualism
But natsoc IS meritocratic mutualism, using the state to create this structure, rather than serve oligarchs and upper class. That´s what it is!

youtube.com/watch?v=AnpTWKKWQ1o
Please just go watch this 10 minute video, a small compilation off some of hitlers speeches. Proves so many off your comments ITT wrong.

Yes ive been saying that forever now, i am an anarchist, i am a ego-mutualist, ill admitt i like the nazi economic side of the issue however the state of the philosohy needs to be scratched out all hierarchy must cease.

You cant have Mutualism with a state period otherwise it isn't anarchy, it isn't mutualism anarchism and mutualism should be considered synonyms.

So is this like how all the autists on Jow Forums always think two different people are the same because they suck at distinguishing faces in photos?

>You cant have Mutualism with a state period otherwise it isn't anarchy, it isn't mutualism anarchism and mutualism should be considered synonyms.
WRONG. You have the misplaced notion that the collective is always against the individual. natsoc creates a situation where the collective is for the individual, and the individual is then or the collective. Does what is best for the collective. Creating a feedback loop of mutualism. Through the state. Anarchists don´t cooperate this is the problem. How do you get individuals to cooperate without structure, this is why you fail. And even a system such as natsoc which eradicates the power of the oligarchy, you are principally against because you can´t get your head out off your ass to even realize what it means, and is about.

Ok, Mutualism is exclusive to anarchism also no they don't they still have two separate class of collective and individual, as well as social roles.

>Oy yey
>Zionist party

Individual and collective aren´t two diffferent classes. How can you be so semantically wrong?
It´s like saying.
>i don´t want to be on a team that helps eachother, all teams are bad. But somehow we are all going to cooperate to do things that´s good for eachother anyways, because reasons..
Gobbledigook. State in natsoc is intermediary to keep each classes from fucking eachother over. Which is what creates oligarchy in the first place which then takes over the state. It is this takeover you hate. Well so did natsoc. It does this by demanding loyalty of all classes not to the state first but to eachother! and to the state secondary to use as intermediary to resolve disputes/to keep this loyalty going. It´s anti oligarchical when used that way. You seem like a hopeless anarchist right now. I hope sincerely you look into these things with more interest.

> how do you get individuals to co-op without structure.

self-interest and freedom of association, this can take forms in various ways, people can still own their own businesses , people can co-operate and federate to expand to be more productive, mutualists do not have any limits to what the economy should be instead we are free to exchange in whatever way we want be it market or communal or barter

.> the state in natsoc is intermediary to keep people from fucking each other.
You mean The Marxist dictatorship of the proles that literally the same idea.

> Individual and collective aren´t two different classes. How can you be so semantically wrong?
It´s like saying.

I don't have a problem with people co-operating for the mutual benefit, I do have a problem with authority being placed over everything,

>You seem like a hopeless anarchist right now.

well, you seem like a hopeless abused wife of the state that just keeps going back to the state even after it fucks you. good job cuck.

Corporate and political logos have degenerated in a way similar to the way that between classical architecture to modern architecture all notions of beauty and emotion have been replaced by a cold and generic international aesthetic. Anyone else notice this?

>You mean The Marxist dictatorship of the proles that literally the same idea.
No it´s not the same idea it´s bastardization of it. The two are diametrically opposed. Why do you think communists and socialists hate natsoc.
>I don't have a problem with people co-operating for the mutual benefit, I do have a problem with authority being placed over everything,
But that´s not what it does. as i have explained it to you countless times and proven you wrong countless times in your assertions ITT.
>well, you seem like a hopeless abused wife of the state that just keeps going back to the state even after it fucks you. good job cuck.
Weither you like it or not you are not an island, and you need people around you to do what is good for both of you, this is why anarchists are so fucking deluded. Also you seem to have a knack of not admitting when you are objectively wrong. If you want to win an argument even i you are wrong. You have not won anything, you have infact lost contact to the truth of the matter.. Germanic tribes of which i am part off are obsessed with objective facts and doing the correct and best thing based on this. It is always saddening to realize that others aren´t.

Attached: natsoc_loyalty_to_the_volk.png (864x486, 406K)

If i gave you as an anarchist right now 300 million dollars or whatever. You would not care about doing what is good for other people. Your resistance to oligarchy is simply that you are not one of them. Then you would just be a self serving plutocratic oligarch. That is the only difference between you and them. I do not think this way i want to do what is best for my people. Because when my people do good, then i also do good as a result of it. Because they will help me when i am loyal to them so will they be loyal to me. Anarchists have no loyalty they are just wannabe plutocrats who want any state, even a benign state such as under natsoc. To go away so they are not inhibited by any fucking thing they want to do. You do not even believe in teamwork of any kind unless you get more out of it than the other person. And giving and charity of mutualism to fascilitate a good situation or that all classes have loyalty to help eachother. you care nothing about either. So to achieve a stabil and wholesome society you are a dead end. Because ultimately you do not care about the people around you, not really.

If Merkel will cancel her leadership, the AfD will fall with her. It's like Kurz in Austria, he is doing a great job and after his first 4 years the FPÖ will die.

Interesting assessment
I know the Bavarians are only calling for Merkels ousting because they are getting their hold on power threatened
But who would replace Merkel?
Germany is more like Sweden in that all of the established parties are united in multiculturalism
If Merkel falls I think AfD will grow in the chaos
Austria has always been unique in Europe because if has always had an established "far-right" party and FPO will probably remain

>Austria has always been unique in Europe because if has always had an established "far-right" party and FPO will probably remain
Odds are not unlikely.

Attached: 1529360661250.png (668x582, 576K)

The thing about several countries in europe is that many of the upper class are very volkish oriented and not all of them have been gotten to. And they are forming their own allegiances aswell. They still have that volkish spirit of natsoc of loyalty to their people that socialist/communist bullshit aswell as the central bank capitalism shit wants to try to erode. To turn everyone into an individual just fighting eachother and label any teamwork or healthy tribalism as evil collectivism. They spread paranoia around authoritarian personality. But what is authoritarian personality? the european alpha that the jews if you read culture of critique has tried to systematically disassemble and as a consequence also destroy the family unit and the role of the father/male in it. it is incredibly atrocious because unlike blacks. (because alphas are diferent in diffferent ethnicities). The european alpha is more like avatar esque of service to his people. It is also wherefrom you get the concept of a hero. I don´t know i people know this but the concept of a hero is one who submits and sacrifices himself for the betterment of the whole rather than his own self interests. Does not have to be in a warfare form but sacricing his self interests which he could easily screw people over. But chooses to do what is best for the people. Which in for example the african alpha in dire contrast. It´s all about screwing people over and killing those who oppose him, he could be wrong in every way but he is right because he dominates. Far more bestial alpha there. Which unsurprisingly results in not very stable african societies.

The european alpha is a man of action the exact opposite of a cuck. but not a man of just go kill a bunch of people but of a personality of
>i will not accept this treatment of me and my people
With conflict only as the last resort, for refusal to come to the table to discuss and resolve the issue at hand. Not laying down and taking it. But by disassembling this through this jewish freudian psychology, you get a pathology of people just laying down and taking it thinking they are virtuous for doing so. And ofcourse those who want to mess with you just love people like that.

youtube.com/watch?v=1IXsTKzOTvo
Here´s a moderate example of the swiss politician oskar freysinger aswell.
>why don´t we have politicians like that.
Well if your society does not have loyalty to eachother, which is easiest achieved by national loyalty and volkish loyalty by you being the same people. Then ofcourse you will have a drag in different directions. But uniformity is beautiful. We are all individualists. But the recognition that we are part of a bigger family that is our nation. And to do what is good for that nation is oftentimes more important than ourselves, or everything we take for granted goes away. Then you will understand why nationalism is so important. You are part of a team. And when that team is destroyed, the nation is destroyed. and pitted against eachother which is what the socialist/communist want and the bankster capitalists aswell.

Attached: 1528065923232.jpg (1280x993, 347K)

Attached: trust_and_difference.png (2220x2920, 762K)

THIS is why they want a multiethnic society, because it erodes trust in eachother, so they can do divide and conquer in your nation! Whilst the upper class promotes its own nepotism, and the jews try to take over the upper class via judaism and tribal nepotism whilst hilariously making tribalism illegal for everyone else. It is the equivalent of asking you to put down your shield, whilst someone is lunging their sword feriociously into you.

Attached: 1529455625848.png (800x524, 54K)

Attached: 1527986668094.jpg (700x544, 74K)

Attached: why_do_they_persecute_me.jpg (248x400, 47K)

Attached: 1530164357867.png (690x5604, 552K)

Change the channel. Understand what natsoc was really about.

Attached: 1530124473261.jpg (521x697, 67K)

youtube.com/watch?v=Clbnfn8RR_w

Attached: 1530118179944.jpg (446x505, 59K)

Attached: Gaza666.jpg (500x483, 63K)

>my german (or insert whatever ethnicity) youth.
>Just as we are gathered here today, my young comrades (another term perverted by the socialist/communists) a part of the life of the people. so must you gather together. (to do good to eachother).
>So must the rest of the people unite together. It was not always so. In the past our people did not want to understand eachother, each thought only of themselves. At the best their own class alone. We have been witnesses to this confusion of the german state of mind.
>In your youth you must safeguard that which you posess. The great feeling of fellowship and being part of the group. (that serves eachother as servants). If you hold on to this there will be no force in the world, that will ever be able to take it away from you. - Adolf hitler.
Only when you abandon this is what is causing this current situation and it´s true. Letting the jews and the communists which they have inspired and created separate you from even your own people and tell you that your an an individual and nothing else, and your own people are not to be trusted. To inspire this antagonism in our own ranks!

Attached: 1528477714189.png (640x300, 114K)

And the jews admit it aswell.
youtube.com/watch?v=qTYSv_YQOVo
he can´t help but have somewhat insincerity in it. Jews are so blatantly incapable of objectivism that it´s actually distasteful. But atleast they admit it somewhat. And that´s a start in the right direction. pic related. jews do not correct themselves. I have come to contemplate that they might not have objective morality. All is subjective to them, so they can bend the things to a way that it benefits them, and then call truth. Truth is objective reality, it is not relative, it is not subjective. This insults the mind of objectivists who are zealous about facts reason logic and objective reality and moving forward with those in mind. So there are vast disagreements between the jewish mind and the germanic mind. In that they don´t want the same thing, believe in the same thing. Germanics are procedural based on facts. Build upon foundation of such things. Jews are like it´s all subjective, because what you say is very nice as long as it benefits me. If i need to do things differently, i have a problem with this.

Attached: 1530101955235.jpg (2852x1534, 462K)

When you present a germanic with objective facts. And that person before thought diffferently based on erroneous notions. He goes. Ok i realize that, i will now have to reevaluate how i approach things. A jew does not. He will claim it is false to do so. Thus a jew does not move with truth. He is antagonistic to it only adherent to his personal truth which is completely subjective and as such can be complete nonsense. But you see how this personal truth and all is relative you see where this comes from!

And the reason the jew cares about subjective truth more than rational and objective truth is that the jew is antagonistic to anything that does not ultimately benefit him. Such as. you need to stop being an asshole.
>NO YOU ARE THE ASSHOLE!

Attached: 1530106300319.jpg (500x500, 54K)

Now ultimately it would benefit the jew to stop being an asshole. Over time, as it would benefit the whole aswell. But if it immediately does not benefit he does not see any rhyme or reason to it. Because he is disconnected and jews as a tribe are disconnected from other people. So they don´t care about that. So they do not even understand what you mean. This is two seperate mindsets. One is hollistic avatar of man like that wants all man to improve. The other wants only jews to improve and benefit at the expense of everyone else. People claim that we think the same when everything the jews do shows clearly that we do not!

>regurgitating the writings of a cuck who got killed by a bug bite
KYS

Even with all this propaganda upon us what can they call us the worst they can call us is cucks. That we go out of our way to help other people. Whilst the jew who has fascilitated this confusion of the european mind only wishes to help itself.
>ah you want to help all mankind improve even at the expense off yourself because of this subversion you are told to not even take care o your own people. What a fucking asshole you are, you deserve to die.
>can´t critique the jews though
HAHA

Attached: 1530117156203.jpg (182x277, 10K)

Lack of a state creates a vaccuum that another leader can and will fill.
It's better to have a tyrant that has the best of the people in mind than a random Marxist.