National Libertarianism

Bc it’s a retarded made of meme ideology that is basically just basic bitch fascist who want to LARP with libertarian iconography. Literally cultural appropriation

Nice Luciferian Kabbalah reference there hon

Cause giving corporations full abilities to rape the land and kill the planet sucks

because I am a NatSoc Esoteric Jainist

Attached: 1530062970968.gif (528x555, 816K)

I'm in Illinois my friend. Death to anyone North of I80

We must go through a continuous transformation to reach anarcho-capitalism. Anarcho-capitalism pretty much only works with a >95% white christian-moral population. So we must protect our sovereignty and reduce the size of the state and the dependence on the evil of taxes to supply this tyrannical and inefficient monopoly

Blue state here, doing fucking awesome btw... Tons of new development, new business, craft beer industry booming, restaurants booming. Suck a cock faggot.

Attached: treelightsnake.jpg (600x481, 131K)

>At their origin, national liberals, although pro-business, were not necessarily advocates of free trade and economic liberalism per se and sometimes favoured cooperation between the government and the national industry, moderate levels of protectionism, the establishment of preferential custom unions, subsidies for infant industry or companies considered of national strategic importance and various forms of industrial planning.

>National liberalism was popular in a number of countries including Germany, Austria, Denmark, Sweden, Finland and Romania during the 19th century. In Germany, Austria and Romania, national liberals and/or "National Liberal" parties were long in government. More specifically, in German-speaking countries national liberals were also in favour of a more authoritarian or conservative political regime because of the multi-ethnic character or heterogeneous nature of countries like the Austrian Empire (later officially renamed Austria-Hungary) or the newly created Germany under Chancellor Otto von Bismarck.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_liberalism

Because i understand politics.

You're literally incoherent, you know that right?

>NatCap
Nationalism is simply incompatible with Capitalism, "National Capitalism" or "Capitalist Nationalism" is literally an oxymoron.

I don't know why all this fascism-derivative imagery is so full off kiked out occultism but it seems consistently the case

how national liberalism is not coherent? check this.

Nobody wants a store brand autismal political group. We're national socialists here, why don't you come on in for the big win?

I was responding to National Libertarianism being incoherent, not National Liberalism. That has it's own semantic problems, but I wouldn't classify as incoherent. Don't strawman me buddy.

i got the topic wrong then, i thought it was about discussing real ideas not lolberts bs.

Attached: 1530134556174.png (872x622, 1.05M)

>Rooting for something called national libertarianism
>any of your metal subsubgenre tier fanfiction fantasies.
The absolute state of irony

Attached: Irony.jpg (725x421, 80K)

I'm pretty sure National Libertarianism is just Liberalism

Because Jeffersonian Democracy is better than this fusion shit.

>Pic related

Attached: Jeffersonian Principles.png (2056x1678, 3.67M)

At the very least, the flag is pretty cool

That's civic nationalism.

Nationalism is simply the display of pride in your country, do you not wish to protect your country user?

Tell me OP, why aren't you a Jeffersonian Republican?

Attached: Jeff's Gang.jpg (570x692, 122K)

Because the ideals of Jefferson cannot be applied to the modern world.

So does libertarianism, but tell me, how so?

Because Nazism is a civic religion engineering to turn white men into niggers. It is the false marketing of ancient proto-human social organization (collectivist, tribal, totalitarian, stagnant/regressive) to modern men (actual people) as something new and original. They fall back to appropriating the most ancient symbols of 'modern man' (such as the swastika itself), from our transitory period when we were still using those (proto-human) social structures (because we simply hadn't worked out better ones, yet).

The truth is that ancient and indigenous cultures and societies have NO value to us. They should be studied, catalogued and known of, like literally everything - but the memes and structures themselves, having value if transplanted onto our own, modern societies? Fuck no. This is the enormous confusion at the root of a lot of the multikulti. They are objectively, literally inferior. They are the things we've already left behind.

National Libertarianism is not Liberalism.

This is the true anglo ideology, we don't adhere to continental big government cucks

Because jefferson did not experience the modern world. It has rapidly changed, there wasn't a large (((melting pot))) of races or cultures. Furthermore, you cannot lack an army and then proceed to secure your borders, unless you become the bitch of another nation state who does it for you,much like Costa Rica and the US

A man.

can i be an ethnocap in ancapistan?

Attached: thinking.png (435x468, 103K)

On your own property? yes.

>Thinks US would become defense less at border and country with no army
>Tfw there are well regulated militias (Police, national guard), the second amendment, and nukes
>tfw can still assemble a army in order to fight the wars

Plus, this is probably a way to prevent neo-cons from abusing the army by sending those of troops to spread (((Democracy))). We can also adopt the neutrality that Switzerland did.

>thinking that the police and the national guard are "well regulated" and also militias.

Attached: giphy.gif (290x189, 1.04M)

implying Jefferson was dumb enough to
not expect civilization to advance

user, why aren't you a National Compilationist?

Attached: 1510126414679.png (2560x1600, 280K)

Libertarianism is not a proper ideology so anything derived from it is bound to make no sense.

i was stating that society advance in a way that jefferson didnt expect, not that he didnt believe that society wouldnt advance.

>Bong never seen how militarize the police is here,

>hurr durr ur ideology isnt "proper"
Any ideology is proper when embraced and believed.

It's simple, you have a big army and a bigger militia, so that the army is only every used against foreign entities.

You can support national trotskyism if you want but that doesn’t mean that it’s sensible.

A cuck. With that attitude you will never have a say in how much is taken from you and what for. You're merely rationalizing theft. You're wife is getting fucked by another man and you're trying to cope.

You can blame fucking Lincoln for that. But I get it OP, Jeffersonian Democracy is not modern because relies on agrarianism.

Which my solution is Georgism should be an economic model of Jeffersonian Democracy!

youtube.com/watch?v=JkXEM7fgGDc

youtube.com/watch?v=jFQgOy-5Tng&t=178s

Attached: good old henry.jpg (1200x1747, 302K)

Fuck your implications commie
>National
>ism
I'm loyal to my nation based on FREEDOM

Attached: quote-then-you-should-say-what-you-mean-the-march-hare-went-on-i-do-alice-hastily-replied-at-lewis-c (850x400, 98K)

You know, fuck you dude. People like you like to pretend as if you would go wild at any discretion. AND....you're just some shit-talker on the internet/

>National Libertarian
What meme is this? Cool logo though. Can I be Cobra Commander?

>national libertarian
>oxymoron
You statist fuck.

No murder please
Some of us cannot chose to not be here

Attached: 1488516500336.jpg (402x405, 16K)

the nation is not the state

jahanist
and what the fuck ever happened to him. he gets no love anymore on here

t.national SOCIALIST

Attached: mcnuke.png (793x794, 602K)

>What's the policy that I work hard everyday and just want to come home and be left alone, however I don't mind paying extra in taxes as long as they actually fucking do something productive with it.
anarcho capitalism with you paying voluntary taxes to someone who larps as "government"

Because it's contradictory and not a thing. Just grow up already. Lolbertarianism is a kike ideology, and Locke was a faggot. You can't care about your race and also be a libertarian.

i don't care about muh race. all I care about is me

...still waiting for you to make any kind of point.

Attached: 1471820388412.png (429x410, 11K)

People like you will hang first.

Right wing libertarian is an oxymoron.

Nation =/= state

Both of your ideologies are shit, none of you promote the hard working farmer and there corn!

Attached: Agragrian republic.jpg (2541x1962, 1.42M)

I already am. This is unironically a party I want to establish within the UK.

>valuing my property rights and the right to preserve life and liberty, by force if necessary is somehow oxymoronic

also nationalism isn't right wing, it spans both wings.

National socialism isn’t socialist in the marxist sense.
T. Everybody who isn’t retarded.

>tfw any party outside of the tories gets shut down for being "too extremist"
>tfw UKIP is being populated with "aha le based kekistani" youtubers

What's the difference between libertarianism and anarchism?
Is it similar to the difference between a statist and a libertarian?

Alright, but libertarianism is a far left progressive doctrine.

ich bin doch nicht bloed

Wut?

Hey I'm no fool!

>lolberts
Government is a necessary evil
>anarchist
No government, what we use to run our society is a collection of individuals or just lawless anarchy

Libertarian Minarchist with string dissatisfaction in the current system. You've echoed my sentiment almost exactly.

I like to think most adults are this way.

Not if your nation is based liberty retard

Attached: 1530251580533.jpg (326x320, 51K)

They need deprogramming first.

Attached: f0475c911e.gif (363x249, 190K)

I think the national libertarian angle can work though.

why is evil necessary?
or rather
Why is 'that which is necessary' considered evil?

Fiscal conservative probably

Because I know who you really are even if you don't

Attached: dont-tread-on-me-meaning.jpg (2000x1334, 380K)

how is libertarianism a "far left progressive doctrine"

I wish, but i doubt it will gain much traction. Most political parties only become popular after a couple of elections and party leader rotations.

>Libertarianism
Leave me the fuck alone
>Anarchism
Leave it the fuck alo--- squirrel!

kek

Not even remotely. Pure centrist since each individual has their own scales

How is it not?

>National Socialism is Marxist Socialism

The most boomer argument probably ever

Attached: 1458569119928.png (300x436, 112K)

Because it encompasses each individual to fend for themselves and protect their property, life and liberty, by force if necessary

>Libertarian
The rights of the individual are greater than the rights of the many
>Anarchist
Fuck society, straight Darwin

>Nationalism is simply incompatible with Capitalism
No it isn't. You could simply have capitalism restrained by patriotism. People have done this willingly throughout US history to varying degrees. Sometimes it's more capitalist like with the robber barons, sometimes it's more nationalist like during WW2.

In a libertarian society what rights exist?
Who were they created by?
What enforces them?
Just the government?

Also, how would the seizure of rights, or gradual erosion of rights be stopped?

Doesnt have to be a snake bro, if only there was something that has venom, but could still something to represent us white anglo saxons and still support our religious freedom. Our "protest" if you will against organized religion...
>White
>Anglo Saxon
>Protestant...

Attached: sketch-1530290464118.png (1620x1080, 72K)