Practical preparation for a US civil war

A lot of people in the US are expecting a civil war, many even hoping for it, but their stance on the matter is stupid.

My first issue is context of a civil war.
Many expect the government to start it, but that never ever happens because the government dies without economic support from the people.
If you want a civil war, you have to help start it without getting arrested.
The best way to help start it is simply to help others prepare for a civil war; the main reason one won't happen is because people know their livelihoods are screwed if a civil war occurs.

My second issue is the weaponry people stock.
It's one of the biggest focuses of people preparing for civil war, but fighting the military would work against revolutionaries unless assaulting a strategic target.
The ground forces would be both morally and officially divided between helping the populace and protecting the US as a political entity, if you kill innocent ground forces just trying to keep the peace you lose the many benefits of having them around and make the military more opposed to your cause.
The weaponry and quantity of bullets people stock (assault rifles and pistols with over 1000 bullets) suggests intent to gun down any infantry they see, which is terrible in so many ways.
The weapons that revolutionaries would actually need are sniper rifles and anything that can take down armoured vehicles or aircraft.

Attached: 1508718058359.gif (480x264, 1.54M)

My third issue is the non-weaponry equipment people stock, or more importantly the lack of it.
There will be no shortage of weaponry in a US civil war, but it's inevitable that utilities will go unmaintained or be deliberately cut off. You could buy the equipment to provide an indefinite (though minimalistic) supply of electricity and clean water to your neighbourhood, which would make you 10x more useful to revolutionaries than some lardass with an AR15.

Seriously, only a tiny part of civil war is actually shooting bullets into people's bodies. A great example of what not to do in a modern civil war was the Ukrainian revolution, where despite the massive scale only 13 government personnel died because due to poor supply and weaponry choices the rebels were helpless against being besieged by snipers.

Whoops, I mixed up my facts and apparently a good chunk of Ukraine is now an independent republic.

Maybe "civil war" isn't the best word to describe it, maybe "insurgency" would be more accurate. Now, will the left wing/Antifa insurgency we saw fizzle out not long after the election re-ignite or will the right begin to lash out at the left after having sat on their hands for so long while riding Trump's successes as their own? We'll see this summer I predict. I'd say the left is the key to any possible ignition of the right, as the right have no genuine "leadership", and so I think we are a just a couple of left wing outrages away from some violent activity being reciprocated by the right. Just my humble opinion.

Attached: 1503796254881.jpg (997x768, 161K)

A Left vs Right civil war is a totally retarded concept.
The US government is more of an enemy to both than the two are to each other, and would have little trouble nipping the quarrel in the bud.

No it isn’t. Crimea is illegally occupied but the Russian operatives in Donetsk don’t actually control a damn thing. They can just destroy things, that’s all.

You are making a lot of assumptions, and most of them are dumb.

The 2nd Civil War will be neighbor against neighbor, town against town, mob against mob. All that ammo isn’t for soldiers - it’s for rampaging half-starved niggers who will come flooding out of the cities a month after things fall apart.

I was talking about Luhansk.

fuck off jew

That's a fair point I hadn't considered, when I think about how scenarios will play out I don't factor in stupidity.