I'm gonna start shotgunning this meme at people who think individual anecdotes disprove general trends. >yeah well here's a really smart black guy >yeah well here's a female powerlifter >bet ya didn't know they existed huh?
So if we add all these together we get roughly 400 out of every 100,000 black people is a criminal of some sort. This means 99,600 out of 100,000 blacks are law abiding citizens. Would you condem all of them for the actions of a small minority? How does that make any sense?
You could easily just single out some other characteristic like gender since the male criminality rate is much much higher than the female criminal rate, but of course since you all belong to that particular group then you think it's unreasonable to condemn the good majority for the actions of a few bad apples. You're all illogical emotionally driven retards.
they just answer with >blacks are poor and get discriminated to the point that they don't get such a nice education as privileged whites. i heard it all...
Why should a Hispanic that looks like Andy Garcia be blamed for the actions of a hispanic that looks like George Lopez
Ayden Wilson
Interesting image. it means that 99,988 black out of 100,000 murder nobody for example.
Modern society is run by fear, especially the USA. Sadly, it effects everyone else today. Beware fear: it's an uncontrollable force of nature. Dictatorships are born from that.
I bet you're a mexican mestizo that still uses the word hispanic as a race since you want the whiter spics like Spaniards and Argentinians to take the blame for your crimes
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_Select_Committee_to_Investigate_Tax-Exempt_Foundations_and_Comparable_Organizations >In the Dodd report to the Reece Committee on Foundations, he gave a definition of the word "subversive", saying that the term referred to "Any action having as its purpose the alteration of either the principle or the form of the United States Government by other than constitutional means." He then argued that the Ford Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, and Carnegie Endowment were using funds excessively on projects at Columbia, Harvard, Chicago University and the University of California, in order to enable oligarchical collectivism >"The purported deterioration in scholarship and in the techniques of teaching which, lately, has attracted the attention of the American public, has apparently been caused primarily by a premature effort to reduce our meager knowledge of social phenomena to the level of an applied science." >They also indicated conclusively that the responsibility for the economic welfare of the American people had been transferred heavily to the Executive Branch of the Federal Government; that a corresponding change in education had taken place from an impetus outside of the local community, and that this "revolution" had occurred without violence and with the full consent of an overwhelming majority of the electorate.
>He stated that this revolution "could not have occurred peacefully, or with the consent of the majority, unless education in the United States had been prepared in advance to endorse it