Now that Kennedy is gone, what are the chances that Gay Marriage will become illegal again?

Now that Kennedy is gone, what are the chances that Gay Marriage will become illegal again?

Attached: D2658643-DBC5-49A0-9A5C-361AA508515F.jpg (1200x813, 113K)

Other urls found in this thread:

realclearpolitics.com/2018/06/29/what_should_we_expect_from_a_more_originalist_court_446155.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

0%

literally a non-issue, we need to get the NFA overturned

The stance on marriage should be if the religious institution will allow the marriage. That is it. Get government out of marriage outside of upholding the contract.

/thread

/thread.

Pretty high

Nobody cares about muhchine guns sperg.

realclearpolitics.com/2018/06/29/what_should_we_expect_from_a_more_originalist_court_446155.html

>nobody cares about the 2nd Amendment

Attached: 1440480146833.png (584x553, 672K)

/thread
also this

if people cared it wouldn't be SECOND
it'd be first
checkmate

Attached: 1526959915373.jpg (525x420, 31K)

Fags shouldn't be allowed to marry in the same way
State qualified marriage is an incentive to procreate
Homos can't have fucking children, therefore they have no right to state sanctioned marriage the way it is now

Probably be up to the local states governments to decide whether or not it should be legal in their states.

What flag are you?

>Homos can't have fucking children

Things that exist:
Bisexuals
Children from previous marriages
Adoption
Surrogates
Turkey basters and sperm donors

I don't understand why you would want to protect Gay's rights.

They should have to deal with divorce, just like the rest of us.

none the court will however overturn the ruling decriminalizing sodomy

so how is the country of Unknown?

I honestly don't give a shit if fags and dykes want to get married.

I do however think they should be prohibited from adopting children.

Has the SCOTUS ever taken up a case they previously ruled on for a second time?

Problem is the definition of marriage is already changed even if the gov steps back

It'd be defining it as a civil union or a pact like Europe and leaving the marriage label for a church. I believe that was what they wanted 10-20 years ago.