Genetic or social construct or both?

Genetic or social construct or both?

Ill go first... ONE HUNDRED AND FUCKING TEN PERCENT CONSTRUCT

Attached: final-gay-baby.jpg (1440x504, 237K)

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.is/yfjOu
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3535560/
youtu.be/wNvK2WHBQpw
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/175970619/#q175989069
scientificamerican.com/article/identical-twins-genes-are-not-identical/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Either way it's a defect. Gay males would not have been selected in an evolutionary sense - if it's genetic, it's just as much a fault as Down's.

>Study: Homosexuality Linked with Childhood Trauma
archive.is/yfjOu

>Does Maltreatment in Childhood Affect Sexual Orientation in Adulthood?
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3535560/

trauma based

Most gay people were molested as kids. That being said there is a very small percentage of gays that were born gay.

if women had brains in their heads I would never let men suck my dick. but women are insane, violent and dangerous. even gay men have accused me of rape before. I guess it's what happens when you're rich, ugly, horny, and for some reason everyone puts out like they're gonna win a free bump of coke EVERY time we fuck. lol

Attached: garnish.jpg (1024x576, 118K)

This episode really did redpill me on the gay issue

youtu.be/wNvK2WHBQpw

I would say not 100% Social construct... More like 90% social construct, and like 10% genetic based on things like birth order, or being a nigger.

100% genetic originated,
probably more like 60% genetic determination
if you cant accept this fact you are a creationist who doesnt believe in evolution.
your move "superior" male.

gays can and do most certainly get selected for or we wouldnt exist.

How is it possible the "gay gene" is here? For that gene to be passed down means that the holder of that gene needs to reproduce and since the carrier is gay means he will not mate due to lack of attraction.


Get out of here with your Marxist pills kike