Woman shoots man in the head after he tried to steal her SUV with kids inside, Dallas police say...
dallasnews.com
Hugs not guns user!
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
fox4news.com
twitter.com
BASED MILF
good
shoot him again
>The suspect, 36-year-old Ricky Wright, was taken to a hospital with injuries that were not life-threatening.
>Shot in head
>not life-threatening
Jesus, Ricky. I ain't even mad at you anymore, you little trooper.
Check and kek. Little rickys hard to put down.
Anyone that is actively victimizing you (criminally) deserves to be shot in defense.
>robbery/mugging
>burglary
>assault
>rape/pedophilia
Most of the people sitting in our high security prisons should have been killed in the act.
There can be no recidivism if no one lives to reoffend.
One in a million gal right there. Good work!
>Jow Forums was right about the .38 being a shitty womans round
Don't mess with Texas
..38 is fine.
Carry 10mm
problem solved
50 bucks says it was a Ruger lcp in .380
>women's shooting skills
Archive? It no letting me read the article
>Ricky, you're so full of shit you wouldn't even die if somebody shot you in the head
>You got shit for brains you absolute shitnugget
It's not life threatening because Americans don't have brains anyway
God bless Texas
>Lack of brains to damage with a bullet
Nigger?
>The suspect, 36-year-old Ricky Wright, was taken to a hospital with injuries that were not life-threatening.
Probably in one nostril and out the other.
based babe
based fpbp
>shoot nigger in head
>bullet doesn’t hit anything life-threatening
I have a ruger lc 380. Bought it for my wife to practice weapons handling with. It was hands down the worst $300 I have ever spent. Both her and my mother hate the thing because its such a little piece of shit with controls that are near inoperable for a novice.
>muh stopping power
I bet you think there's a noteworthy difference between the combat performance of .45 and 9mm.
> she was a poor shot, but saved her kids
nigger is probably deaf as a post now.
Always a nigger. Always.
How do you file an insurance claim in this situation. She would have shot her own car, but she had reason to, is she still liable for the damages or is he? I imagine she would have to pay her deductible then go after him in court to recover it.
I would love to see a TV series about odd insurance claims.
No repeat offenders if we kill them the first time. I like the way you think
There is, objectively, I still remember that vid of the mom and her daughter working in that convenience store, and shooting the guy as he continued to chase them, like 7 times per 30 seconds before he collapsed.
>little piece of shit with controls that are near inoperable for a novice.
Maybe your wife and mom are retarded. I have an LC 9 that works just fine for my girlfriend and me. It's a pretty simple firearm. In fact, the only person I know that doesn't like it is my coworker because it hurts his delicate software engineer hands.
This is why the capacity of 9 mm beats .45 every time
how else he tryna get to bible study? sheeeeit you gossa see from HE point of view
.45 -> induces hydrostatic shock.
.9 -> Doesn’t.
The 9mm needs the extra capacity, and more skill because it is crappier.
not him. her aim sucked fucking dick. she fired a panic shot; missed vitals, then waited. if she hadn't hit him in a disabling way; he could have stabbed/shot her instead. you never fire on someone once and just wait. don't applaud some random cunt for being hero because she got lucky.
100% photoshop skill
execute the dumb whore, she killed a man for taking her car, kill her now.
Trauma surgeons have stated that they can not ascertain the difference in wound cavities when it comes to handgun wounds.
youtu.be
Quit repeating fuddlore like its true.
How do you miss a clean shot when the guy is in point fucking blank range.
>women
Neither of them produce hydrostatic shock as a wounding mechanism. Neither have remotely close to the energy needed for that. That only happens with rifle rounds, or select few magnum pistol rounds at high velocity.
Any gun is better than no gun, but I think .380 is way too borderline to be considered a self defense round, just underpowered and unreliable in terms of stopping power and penetration through heavy clothing/multiple layers etc. that being said, even if this woman in the OP used a .380, she still was able to keep Tyrone from taking her children and her vehicle. Obviously it would have been better if she killed him, because he was still a threat even after being shot, but it was better than nothing in this case.
God bless that woman for defending her children. And god bless Texas
37 hours in GIMP to produce that masterpiece
>There is, objectively
There isn't and stopping power is a meme. A sufficiently determined adversary will not stop until they are dead. Your best friend is a gunfight is a deep magazine because then you can shoot the threat more and every shot is a chance to hit something vital and put them down. I'm not even being snarky with you at this point, I just don't want you walking around with a misconception that could get you killed.
Sleep well Shitprince
F
Do you have the Lynda tutorial for that piece of work or is all self-taught?
>my YouTube video refutes the body of evidence for hydrostatic shock.
That (might) be true, but .45 ACP is continually referenced in discussion on the subject so I doubt it.
I’ve never seen a video of a (no armor) man taking seven .45 ACP to the chest before he went down, but I have for 9mm.
Having shot animal skulls and such with both rounds, I’m rather assured that .45 headshots are more effective than .9 as well.
good, well at least it avoids any political statements that might've been made by shooting him in the dick
geez you think she could've gotten it right
> let me guess it was a .22
see folks .45acp doesnt make these mistakes
also should have gotten pic related
a man's life has no value in the united states you silly camel
>stopping power is a meme
So a cannon ball doesn’t have more stopping power than a 9mm?
I think 45acp would kill from the blunt force trauma over the penetration.
It's just a transportation vehicle. The murderer should have let the hijacker have what he wanted. I am certain he would have spared the children, because most criminals are not that evil, and his intentions only involved appropriating the vehicle, not kidnapping. Now instead of it being a victimless robbery, it's a homicide. I feel no sympathy for the woman, she just assumed the worst, and the worst outcome happened by her hands. He murdered a man over something so trivial. She is the one that made the situation into a serious crime. I hope she gets punished under the full extent of the law for her violent crime.
>the size of an explosion is a meme, there’s no difference in a firecracker and a nuke.
>SHHHHHEEEEEEEEIIIITT
Noice!
>Having shot animal skulls and such with both rounds, I’m rather assured that .45 headshots are more effective than .9 as well.
I'm sorry user but that's pure confirmation bias at this point. .45 penetration is demonstrably worse than 9mm and will under no circumstances consistently perform better against anything like a skull. Assuming standard loads and similar barrel lengths.
You should look at Dr. Gary Roberts and Dr. Martin Fackler who are trauma surgeons and have done extensive work in ballistics.
Hydrostatic shock is primarily caused by velocity, not mass. .45 ACP is slow as balls. While heavy and effective, it's not nearly large enough to cause any hydrostatic shock with its velocity. The temporary stretch cavities you see in gel tests are just that, temporary. When using quality defensive HPs of the same make there is very little difference in effectiveness and expansion between 9mm and .45ACP (or .40, .357 sig, etc). That said, .45 will be larger and can destroy more tissue. You have to decide if a capacity reduction is worth it for a slight increase in performance (1/10ths of an inch in size). If you get shot 7 times and don't go down, it's not a caliber issue it's a shot placement issue.
He's alive
19+1 .45s are common in the USA.
You want more stopping power AND as many rounds as you can. You should be advocating .17 caliber for its potential magazine capacity, 9mm is crap in comparison by your logic.
>victimless robbery
Good bait.
>So a cannon ball doesn’t have more stopping power than a 9mm?
Do you think your chances of successfully defending yourself are better with a 6 pounder Hotchkiss or a Glock 19?
Thanks for making my point for me: quickly putting shots on target is your primary fucking concern.
>actual field testimony from trauma surgeons who operate on nogs with holes in them every day mean less than my jewtubers shooting boolits into jello because of the platform facts were delivered on
You sure you're not part jew, m8? You argue like a kike.
"hydrostatic shock" doesn't exist. That said, a temporary stretch cavity occurs when a projectile exceeding 2200 fps passes through an object. That's why rifle rounds are so god damned effective.
Isn't this how it's supposed to go? God bless America
Hope the SUV is okay
I only mentioned 9mm because of the common argument in relation to .45, it's availability and the sheer numbers of capable and reliable platforms for the cartridge. I'm of the opinion that 5.7 is the single best caliber for personal defense currently available, taking into account magazine capacity, muzzle energy, accuracy, platform, flat trajectory, penetration and the fact that it quickly becomes borderline harmless beyond realistic range of engagement.
aaaannnd it's a nigger
BASED
That's actually backwards if you're thinking of temporary cavitation when you say hydrostatic shock. Ball vs. ball, .45 drills clean half-inch holes through tissue medium while 9mm produces temporary cavitation and yawing effects. However, .45 being more massive means it's less likely to deflect off of bone and its cross section compared to 9mm means it's more likely for a single round to come into contact with something vital. ER docs agree that if you're going to shoot a single round at someone, that .45 is a better bet than 9mm.
You forgot to mention wound vectors.
>5.7
Bwhahahahahahahahahahaha
Swat teams trialed that shit in the 90s. Projectiles that small and that slow aren't particularly effective against people.
I hope your gun laws keep you safe user I fear for you thinking 5.7 is effective in semi automatic. And even here full automatic is unreasonably difficult to afford.
.22 magnum is basically the same shit.
A lady killed a world record grizzly bear with a .22 once, but it was only because she shot it through the eye, a very high skill/high luck thing to do to a charging bear.
I’d rather have .500 super or a 10 gauge though.
> he lives in austrailia
> they dont have guns there
confirmed noguns
> 8 shots in 8 seconds
> 8 pellets per shell
> 8 counts of assault with a deadly weapon per shot
> nobody is faster than a shotgun, stop the violence
I wish I could find a 19+1 fiddyfive
Best combo currently is 10mm Auto for firepower, diameter, and magazine capacity. I wish springfield would get off their ass and make an XDm in 10mm. Theyve been twiddling their thumbs about it for more than a year now.
.45acp is more lethal than 9mm but it has the same stopping power. Because its slower and heavier there's less chance of deflection or fragmentation and the target is forced to absorb more of the energy from the shot. Leaving a bigger hole is also better, more organ tissue is destroyed and it causes faster bleeding.
Remember that the amount of pressure exerted on a surface by a fluid increases by the 4th power, due to an increase in radius. In fact an increase of just 2.5mm has a big impact on the amount of pressure it exerts on the surrounding tissues even if its going slower.
now there's a jew response
Now the tax payers get to pay for his medical bills, his lawyer, his room and board for the next 20 years. Always shoot 3 times.
Here's your (You), now fuck off.
underrated
I can quickly put shots on a target with any common pistol caliber.
If you could fire the canon balls as quick and accurate as the pistol rounds you’d still choose a “5.7” over a cannonball?
Because you CAN fire just as well with a .45 ACP AND it’s bigger.
>I have a ruger lc 380.
shit teir, if you want something small try a sig 938, gonna have to teach them the single action thing but got one for my wife and she loves it, in 9mm it "kicks" less than the lcp380 and packs a decent punch.
>was taken to a hospital with injuries that were not life-threatening.
Happy ending?
>YouTube amateurs with “gel” actually believe it’s 1:1 to a human body.
Are you being intentionally ironic?
Only one group actually looked at what the round did to HUMANS (not gel), and they determined hydrostatic shock causing neural damage from chest impacts.
Ballistic gel is of one consistency. Your brain and chest cavity are equal in this sense, at all.
It didn't hit any vital organs.
>carjacker
>shot in head
>didn't die
Aaaaaaand it's a nigger.
fox4news.com
Someone post the picture.
As someone who has stolen a few cars myself, good. Don't steal a car with kids inside that's just fucked up.
Also if you're going to steal a car it needs to be a lone driver and you need to get the drop on them. Too many people have guns now. I just hit them with the ole chloroform rag. Time tested and works.
Can't trust a woman to get the job done.
I loved you John.
Rip. You beautiful bastard.
even the 'zealander knows about the 5.7
The only thing that would make the 5.7 actually work is blowing out the neck on it and chambering it as a 7mm pill. But really the case head is too weak to increase the powder load so you would still get the same firepower as a 9mm. Though it would be more Effective than the smaller round.
Anything smaller than about 6.5mm is a Harassment round that can be life threatening but isnt all that effective. Even 5.56mm has problems with stopping power.
No what you really need to do is take a 5.56mm case and cut it down to about 25-28mm length, then chamber it as an 8mm (.32cal) projectile. Because you could load that up to .357 magnum strength and still put it in an autoloader.
> then again you can load a .45acp up to .357mag strength too
Looks like Ricky was *Wrong* this time. :^)
Based mom
Blessed mother. Got mitt us
2000 fps is needed to induce hydrostatic shock...your .45 is going at 900 fps if your lucky...
so get the fuck out with that bullshit...
.45>.9 though so your not a complete fag
Now now user, a true artisan never reveals his methods. I will say this, my talents were clearly recognizable from an early age. By the time I was able to walk, I was able to color within the lines with ease. While my plebian classmates were busy chasing girls and drinking, I was practicing my stick figures and bbc drawings. I am not sure why I was blessed with this gift, but I guess a prodigy never questions his god given talents
based.
ignore the argumentum ad extremis folks.
Wrong.
Its around 650-700 foot-pounds (880-950 joules) which is an energy issue not velocity.
Increasing velocity does add energy, but its been proven that a .357magnum and .44 magnum will induce hydrostatic shock.
And of further note if you get shot in the head by a .40 s&w which comes close to that it will cavitate the skull and blow the brains out the back of it. And a .45acp hits slightly less hard than a .40 s&w but because of its larger diameter it will knock a large hole in the skull.
> the meme of blowing someone's head off may not exactly be true, but ive seen photos of people who took a headshot from a .40 and the internal structure of the skull was simply destroyed and their brains were scattered all over the floor. Presumably at a distance too not from passenger seat distance. One of these pictures was some poor bastard who pissed of the TSA at the airport and made a run for it.
I hate canadians so much. Nuke me pls.
:/
Kekd
Why is it always a leaf.
Ruger P89 worth $225? Local gunshop has one in good shape.
My dude
Is that the bullet ricocheted off his forehead?
Pop pop pop
Watchin' niggas drop.
The only thing this bitch did wrong is not have a higher caliber bullet. Hopefully she learned a lesson and gets a new gun.