All whites are not better than all non-whites. Rather, the best whites are better than the best non-whites. There are millions of unintelligent and unattractive whites. Our goal must be to breed the best whites for they are better than the best non-whites. Non-white races may be intelligent or attractive but not both. This is what makes whites truly superior. We have the potential to craft the finest art and uncover the biggest scientific discoveries. These achievements do not come without sacrifice and perseverance. It is not enough to take pride in the accomplishment of our ancestors, we must surpass them.
On White Supremacy
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
rawstory.com
twitter.com
bump
You just described eugenics.
>Non-white races may be intelligent or attractive but not both. This is what makes whites truly superior. We have the potential to craft the finest art and uncover the biggest scientific discoveries. We have the potential to craft the finest art and uncover the biggest scientific discoveries
Ok, I will be going home with super intelligent white artist who is also a scientist and looks very pretty
>You just described eugenics.
I touched on it but the post is mainly about pride being meaningless without preservation.
No, this is dumb, you can't just disregard or hate those who aren't super-intelligent or good-looking, society has to function as a family with relative homogeneity where people identify with and care for each other and we all serve roles that benefit each other as part of a larger collective whole.
It's not about the individual, it's about the collective. Collectively, whites create the greatest art and craft the most inventions. An individual most likely cannot make significant contributions to both art and science, but collectively whites have done just that.
Collectively, the white woman are the most likely outside black race, to suck black cock
>muh collectivness
You say its dumb yet proceeded to reinforce my point. I agree with everything you stated after "u cant hate uggos"
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
Outside of the Jewish invention of modern pornography, whites are incredibly racially loyal. In fact, white women are more racially loyal than white men.
>All whites are not better than all non-whites.
As a white though, all other things being equal whites are advantageous to me due to their being in the same racial group as me whereas nonwhites are disadvantageous.
The Sun doesn't care if you're white ( actually it'll give you a nasty burn if you are ) but whites are actually *better* from my perspective
We have no obligation to be "objective" about white superiority. If you say you have the best kids in the world, only a retard would try to quantify your claim and determine its truth. I think the objective case can be made, but nothing depends on it. Even if we were shitty, whites would deserve to have homelands, deserve to decide who to exclude from them, deserve to develop according to our own lights, etc., to the degree that we assert and defend those rights. This goes for any race. The kicker is that nobody is obligated to respect what we deserve, so our rights end when we decide not to defend them, or when our defense fails.
Nordic is the onle White-White. The rest is a resemble.
wrong quote sorry
fuck off larper
>the post has nothing to do with national socialism or fascism
>posts an infographic about national socialism and fascism
hmm black IQ just hit an all time low. My post rings true regardless of whatever economic, social, or governmental institution is in place.
See here
I remember it wrong
Also I am 100% white and nordic
I just like "each race should be on it's own" more than "muh supremacy"
soon
>Even if we were shitty, whites would deserve to have homelands
No one deserves a homeland. Civilizations have always conquered or been conquered. Survival of the fittest.
If you arent easily deciphering this post you arent even in the ballpark.
Asians are smarter than Whites
Cool quote, but what does it have to do with my post? This isn't about Hitler or any form of government or economy.
>I just like "each race should be on it's own" more than "muh supremacy"
That's exactly what this post is about. Whites aren't supreme for simply being white. I allude to that a few times in the original post. You must be one of the unintelligent whites I mentioned given your poor reading comprehension.
Asians are considered smart because they work like ants. They are capable of studying for their college exam for hours on end but how many inventions and discoveries have they made? Modern medicine, architecture, and computing are almost single highhandedly pioneered by whites.
>All great inventions, discoveries, achievements were first product of an individual brain.
I think we should stop with the supremacy bullshit
In reality we need to decide who are the supreme people
>Middle class people/Average Joe
>Warriors
>Artists
>or Inventors/Geniuses
I want to choose warriors, but if we want a strong warrior class we must make a different society
>14 words
>14
>pete rose
>big red machine
>big red
>blackshirts
>hooliganism
>republican national convention
lmao but this is IQ
Collectivism is still good without kike shit which is what marxism is.
And what do they do with that IQ other than work like insects? Again, what inventions and discoveries have been made by Asians? The vast majority of all modern contributions to science have been made by whites. Respond to my statements directly instead of lmao-ing like a redditor
>vitriolic hateful
"WAAAH YOU HURT SOME NIGGER'S FEELINGS" - the post
black powder make magical boom boom
There are more low IQ whites, but there are more high IQ whites
There are more very high IQ whites, then there are very IQ Asians
I've seen Asians, they are very dumb, however are good at some things
I used to like it some years ago too, but now I understand it is complete bullshit
>Beta values
>Weak individuals
>Suppress yourself
More over, people who are real collectivists are more likely to support the current Zionist regime
Survival of the fittest is exactly what I described, only I didn't strip away the transcendent like you did. We aren't just animals in competition and we believe in things, e.g., justice. But justice is only good as long as there is power to enforce it, so ultimately your spiritually barren slogan appears to describe the world. But atheism is for faggots.
I agree with everything you stated. Also this post isn't about spirituality.
It doesn't create weak individuals by any means if you do nationalist collectivism. The problem with communism and such is that it operates off of an inherent basis of equality which isn't present in something like national socialism or any other fascist ideology.
100% this
Cool ms paint pic, got any words to share?
It creates and here is how
>Authoritarianism will make people, therefore only warriors left will be soldiers, who only obey to the state
>Warriors will get killed at wars, therefore, warriors are less likely to have children
>Criminals, murders, rapists, thieves and robbers will be sentenced to prison or be killed, therefore they are less likely to have children
>only people left are obeying weak betas, who without any lead will end up like modern liberals, who do everything the state thinks is right
In a society where there is no state protecting you from criminality, you have to use your own strength to protect yourself
*will make people obey laws, to preserve it self
*laws to make people less violent
Individualism will inevitably lead to degeneracy like we see in the US because once people get to the point of modern development where evolutionary concepts no longer apply, people will inevitably become decadent and degenerate. In a national socialist system you can still start your own business and such, but the idea is you have collectivist systems in place to benefit the nation overall. Things like healthcare, schooling, etc.
>you can still start your own business a
Do you know who are experts when it comes to deals?
The Arabs and especially the Jews
Making reproduction based on how good your business is will eventually turn your whole population into Jews
>Individualism will inevitably lead to degeneracy like we see in the US because once people get to the point of modern development where evolutionary concepts no longer apply, people will inevitably become decadent and degenerate
At start, Individuals do not know how do act without state
Those Individuals will be just have less children, time after time. Individualism actually wipes out all degeneracy in a society
>No closet faggot will have Children anymore
etc
>Making reproduction based on how good your business is will eventually turn your whole population into Jews
Thanks for reflecting my argument.
>Individualism actually wipes out all degeneracy in a society
how is that this course of action went the opposite way in the US then? Which started off as the closest thing to a liberal state we've ever seen? Without society coming together to kill faggots they will be everywhere. America used to have this but not anymore, industrialization killed any possibility of liberal values working because the small level community died off.
Wrong, the Russian thieves by law (Vory) were released from the gulags after the USSR dissolved and became the billionaire oligarchs we know of today. Authoritarianism has good elements, but to follow any ism or book to a t from the koran to the communist manifesto to mein kempf is stupid.
>Do you know who are experts when it comes to deals?
I think so
>Things like healthcare, schooling, etc..
Healthcare is one reason why white race is so weak these days
Just think about how much times everyone is sick these days
Think what will happen when the medicine will be cut off
Lots of people will die, but the population will be healthier later on
>how is that this course of action went the opposite way in the US then? Which started off as the closest thing to a liberal state we've ever seen?
Authoritarianism has been in Europe for 2000 years and in it's very start, it was full of criminals, bandits
I said that the first look is completely different from the out come
Filter for reproduction will be changed from: "may" to "can"
This means at start, all the shit which was in the state as hidden will be exposed today and nature will take care of it right now, before this gets more wide spread in our population
Beautiful
This is why we need eugenics
Why the fuck don't you just call yourself a eugenicist
Being a "white supreeeeemist" is pretty short-sighted, as if "being white" is the sum total of all things we value in our biology.
Don't get me wrong, the ideal man is a white man, he has that quality, but he is also so much more.
So just call yourself a eugenicist for God's sake.
…
Oh, and your call for sacrifice and perseverance is literally just "clean your room, bucko!" Thanks for the pep talk, faggot.
Lol the Aks were made buy commie soviets
Health care so children dont die of infections isnt bad, thinking otherwise is ancap tier autism. Nature has nothing to do with liberal systems, its entirely socially imposed.
>Being a "white supreeeeemist" is pretty short-sighted
That's that the whole post is about.
>Don't get me wrong, the ideal man is a white man, he has that quality, but he is also so much more
Again, I mention this in the original post.
>and your call for sacrifice and perseverance is literally just "clean your room, bucko!" Thanks for the pep talk, faggot.
The sacrifice and perseverance bit is about the betterment of the collective not the individual which the "clean your room" bit is about. And this isn't a pep talk, I'm not pepping you up to do anything you stupid animal.
>Rather, the best whites are better than the best non-whites.
the best jews outperform the best whites