Why are you in denial?

Third post best post. Sage and move on.

The world needs global winter.
Europeans survived through intelligence filtering to survive cold climate, since resources were scarce, Europeans only saved beautiful women.
That's why Europeans are the smartest and most physically aesthetically people on Earth.
Europeans lived in a perma war state that forced them to be in a state of constant innovation and improving.

aesthetics is subjective

>That feel when OP Doesn't understand How numbers work
Fuck off you 21 year old Boomer

there were multiple origin points for the different human species. whites originated in the south of the ukraine. niggers in africa.
we have nothing in common. proof: try finding donor organs for mischling children. we're not the same species

4thPBP

>Why are you in denial?
It's not science, it's dogma. We can trace geographic ancestry by comparing DNA of various ethnic groups, but DNA doesn't have date information encoded. We can tell if two ethnic groups are related, but we can't tell which one was the ancestor group. This means you can pick a starting point on your map arbitrarily, any one will be scientifically valid.

They picked Africa for political reasons, and dug until they found bones old enough. (Sometimes fudging the dates to make it fit.) That is not science.

(The Chinese do the same thing -- dig around Beijing until they find bones old enough and then declare China to be the 'cradle of humanity'.)

We can get a definitive answer if we dig up thousands of ancient graves and do DNA testing, but nobody is going to allow that. ('Muh venerable ancestors' n shiet.)

Because it's a river in Egypt...that my ancestors never came from.

We wuz niggas.

abos aren't black

Ice age hit the Americas just as bad dummy

Modern genetic and archaeological evidence only gives more reasons to question the out of Africa hypothesis. Worse for you, this hypothesis reinforces the idea that black Africans are less evolved.

The oldest bones found are European.

Is this the "Out of Juarez" theory?

I'd be perfectly fine if this was the case, but modern science has largely disproven the out of Africa theory

More and more anthropologists are beginning to question Out of Africa. It is actually becoming pretty antiquated as a theory. I surmise in about 10 or 15 years it will be considered obsolete, if leftists of course don't campaign against it which they probably will.

Non Africans have Neanderthal genes.
Neanderthals older than modern humans.
Non Africans have older DNA than Africans.
We was here first.

Interestingly the Camelids did the inverse jouney.

out of africa theory was debunked. it's now out of balkans.

literal nigger tier thinking. we wuz humanz n shiet.

>Abo's oldest recorded human civ

>yet everyone else has data that says they're "older" as being closer to Africa

>somehow south america is youngest peoples

yeah nah

Abo's are actually the first humans, and Uluru in the middle of Australia is actually the tip of a submerged comet. Everything shattered off around Australia.

The abo's moved up through to Africa, it happened in reverse.

It's also why abo's share DNA with asians and poo in loos

*Hides flag*
>is op, dare I say it, our guy?
>look at this outrageous tweet guys
>Lets team up with niggers
>what do you think of Rogue One? Redpilled?
>look at this reddit post guys
>It doesn't wo-
>furries are cool
>thinks his guns will protect him from drone strikes
*sips tea*
>not all niggers
>look at this crazy tweet guys
>How can Jow Forums even compete?
>You mad white boy?
>drumfkins
>take this jewish DNA test goys
>Jow Forums BTFO
>not all jews
>well?
*sips tea*
>Look at this qt jew
>gays are people
>defend this poor shitskin
>POWERFUL
>Can I get a quick rundown guys?
>random nigger porn
>what did he mean by this
ONE POST BY THIS ID. CAN REDDIT NIGGERS FUCK OFF???

SAGE AND IGNORE ALL NIGGER TIER THREADS

Attached: 876584.jpg (476x477, 22K)

Wrong, you have no idea how science works at all.

The Out of Africa theory has reached a scientific consensus due to the overwhelming amount of archaeological findings suggesting that humanity began in Africa. I'm talking about thousands of fossils here, all uncovered by European archaeologists and anthropologists.

Now and then, we hear about some new older fossil found in Europe or in China, but these are discarded by the scientific community because 1 fossil doesn't challenge thousands of fossils. Can be erased due to how statistical models work.

> DNA doesn't have date information encoded
Date ? No, indeed.
However you can easily get the genetic distance between groups, which allow to tell who branched from what and how far it was.
No accurate date, but order and approximate time is definitively encoded.

That's why blacks are "tan white people" and white people "pale black people. Like oreos, we have different colored cookies but the same white creme inside.

I see no problem with it. Natural selection happened.

>aesthetics is subjective
No, it isn't. The White Woman is the standard for the world. Black men want white women, Japanese Anime characters are drawn as white, Indian people want white women.
The choice of the Blonde sacrifice for King Kong wasn't "subjective".

My opinion isn't what matters here, experts have debunked this shit to hell. Sage.

You retard. Literally constantly one thing is found that "fundamentally changes" shit. This is archaeology, not fucking quality control for a beef jerky factory. If for example somebody found a single intricately wired electronic device and it was confirmed thousands of years old it'd blow the roof off anthropology, blow it clear into the sun. Retard.

Neanderthal inbreeding, by the way, blows "miscegenation is a thing so all humans are the same species" shit out of the water.

why are chinks so different from negros then?
its because they had to eat all that gross shit like squids frogs and eyes to survive?
men, I would go pale and had slant eyes after eating that shit

we came from a junkyard in mexico

Patently. wrong. Asian women + Latinas (who are Mongoloid by default) surpass white women in every poll and scientific study on attraction thus far, among white men and men of color.

It's white MEN who are disproportionately desirable relative to white women, not the other way around. White women are just plain fucking trash, an insult to womanhood and femaleness in general.

Because it's been disproven

nice source Rabbi

Roastie burnout detected.

Take your heroin, roasted slut.

If this is true, then niggers are an outdated model of bipedal monkey that failed to become human over tens of thousands of years. Quit BTFOing yourself OP.

>don’t point out my lies or ur a woman hurrrrrrr
kill yourself

Proven to be bullshit.

nice ad hom source you got there, you nigger-loving kike

>Latinas
Mexican women are the ugliest group of creatures on earth. South Americans are sexy though.

Not a single lie was told you smelly ass zombie skank. Now bite the curb, I want to enjoy this.

Cope. South Americans are infested with nigger and white "woman's" (gargoylic-zombie-crackhead) DNA. Mexican women are the best Latinas.

Why are people here against out of africa theory?
Because even if first humans originated somewhere else our DNA shows that migration routes in out of africa theory are correct.
That means we are descendants of niggers who killed original humans extinct.

That timeline is disproven (that's right, outright falsified) by the Chiribiquete cave paintings. The entire model is called into question by the Solutrean hypothesis and recent findings of Graecopithecus in Greece vastly predating the alleged out-of-Africa migration.

>*that means we are descendants of niggers who adapted to different environments and interbred with different hominids

Because it's a shit brainlet theory perpetuated by the establishment and the current "scientific community"

Wtf? I love niggers now. Shit

Genetics testing has shown that the interbreeding between Neanderthals and modern humans was primarily between Neanderthal males and modern human females.

So it's more like Neanderthals raping and dominating the modern humans.

Ditto for Denisovans, interbreeding events were distinctly male-biased.

EVOLVED
V
O
L
V
E
D

Because this map doen't you explain that 250k yo homo sapiens skull recently found in Moroco.

It's exactly opposite. There is no male Neanderthal DNA in modern humans.

>Be American
>Unable to explain things without food metaphors

Attached: 1529698496254.jpg (800x684, 88K)

Maybe the Neanderthal male offered the modern human female a part in his movie?