3% of U.S military spending could solve the world's hunger problem

We already have enough food and resources to feed everyone. We just don't bother.

>give africa enough food to end hunger
>birthrates stay at 7 per person
>in a year or two suddenly mass starvation
>increase food donations
>they have even more kids as a result
>more hunger and thus more food

Nukes are the only option to end african hunger

The money spent on illegal immigrants can solve the world's hunger problem.
But in reality after a year or two, niggers and shitskins will breed like cockroaches and they will be starving again.

Attached: IMG_0521.jpg (1013x933, 218K)

*sips tea*
>is op, dare I say it, our guy?
>look at this outrageous tweet guys
>what do you think of Rogue One? Redpilled?
>look at this reddit post guys
>It doesn't wo-
>furries are cool
>thinks his guns will protect him from drone strikes
>not all niggers
>look at this crazy tweet guys
>How can Jow Forums even compete?
>You mad white boy?
*sips tea*
>drumfkins
>take this jewish DNA test goys
>Jow Forums BTFO
>not all jews
>well?
>gays are people
>defend this poor shitskin
>POWERFUL
>Can I get a quick rundown guys?
>random nigger porn
>what did he mean by this
ONE POST BY THIS ID. CAN REDDIT NIGGERS FUCK OFF???

SAGE AND IGNORE ALL NIGGER TIER THREADS

Attached: 876584.jpg (476x477, 22K)

monarch butterflies dont exist anymore .neither do deer in most of the united states that they existed in 10 years ago. niggers in glass houses shouldnt throw stones

Why should we?
Feeding yourself is bare minimum, you aren't even above animal status if you can't feed yourself.

Wrong.

Attached: welfare, can't feed 'em, don't breed 'em.jpg (227x222, 15K)

And if I spent 3% of my income to feed the stray cats in my alley I would have twice as many stray cats in half a year. If I spent 6% of my income to feed those cats, I would have twice as many in half a year. If I spent 12% of my income to feed those cats, I would have twice as many in half a year.

How long until every dollar I earn goes to these useless cats? More importantly how long until they kill every small animal in the neighborhood.

Attached: letthemdie.jpg (480x360, 9K)

A massive genocide would as well. I know what I'd rather spend my tax dollars on.

Food is a meme, it is economics retard, and without money no one would be growing food. We don’t have a food problem, you are right, Africa has a work problem

This. But a more realistic answer is that the US has already, theoretically, solved world hunger, with GMOs.

However, my theory behind the negative attention behind GMOs and why they're frowned upon by some people in the USA and most people throughout the rest of the world is because propaganda. The two biggest entities behind GMOs are known for working with the US gov't to develop chemical and biological weapons. Thinking that these conglomerates who have a deep history of weapon development for the DoD are somehow intrinsically separate from the gov't would be a mistake, and I believe most of the world knows it at this point, otherwise the EU wouldn't be constantly pushing against GMOs

Stop breeding if you cant put food on the table your bastard child is not a fucking miracle

Less than 3% of our military power could kill off all the niggers and end world hunger.

You don't solve parasites by feeding them.

Attached: 1526209593054.gif (480x238, 443K)

But then the next year you'd need 6%.

because niggers breed like rats

How many times / pol / must this explain?

Attached: 1528792017834.jpg (500x492, 34K)

>one country must help the entire world feed itself
Please fuck off

I could solve her hunger with my cock if you catch my drift.

Give a nigger a fish, and he'll go around knocking up random whores;
teach a nigger to fish, and he'll kill you and still your fish.

We should be looking to inflict more death, not less. Let's all pray together for a global nuclear apocalypse.

This.

Attached: 1441823280760.jpg (600x814, 191K)

3% of US military spending is $18-25 billion per year. There are 7.5 billion people on the planet. This means that you could spend $3.3 per person for an entire year for food.
Even if only 1/3 of the world were that poor you're still looking at $10 per year.

Or we could just colonize Africa and actually use the farmland for something other than shitting in

We spent billions to install water pumps all over Africa, with technology that is hundred of years old to the west, and 40% of the pumps don't work due to a lack of basic maintenance.
>theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2016/mar/22/how-do-you-solve-a-problem-like-a-broken-water-pump
Africans are incapable of agriculture and basic maintenance of technology that is hundred of years old. There is nothing immoral by letting them fall back to their natural sate.

Killing all non whites would also solve it

i thought glassing africa would cost more than that desu

Or just enslaving them, then both benefit.

Solving the world's hunger problem is impossible. Niggers will never be able to feed themselves. If you feed niggers, they'll only make more niggers that can't feed themselves. If you're working to feed literal subhumans who can't feed themselves, you're only making more hungry.

World hunger has been solved quite some time ago. The problem is distribution and actually having the recipients be able to offer something in return.
If you feed people for free they will never fix their shit and start producing useful goods that the rest of the world wants. Feeding them for free condemns their societies into poverty.

one would think
But one day I calculated that it would cost around 50 trillion to glass all of Africa,
cost of logistics is insane, and with AIDS being a failure we now know biologicals are useless.

Attached: science pepe.jpg (480x480, 37K)

also
>American individuals, estates, foundations and corporations contributed an estimated $390.05 billion to U.S. charities in 2016, according to Giving USA 2017
we don't need to give shit to anybody, we do plenty

I like the way you think... We could always use a good field test. Plus it'll help reduce the overall population that the lefties love to bang on about.

>If you feed niggers, they'll only make more niggers that can't feed themselves.
tfw you realise those UN "refugee" camps are really just nigger farms to flood the first world with subhumans

In Haiti they killed all the fish by cutting down the trees to make charcoal to sell for money to buy mud cookies.

Why the fuck should we solve world hunger? Starving third worlders are already overpopulating the fuck out of the world even without food (but remember, the solution to overpopulating is making sure white people have less kids!). Can you imagine how bad it would be if we started feeding them en masse? It's bad for us, it's bad for them, it's bad for the world. But at least you get to have nice fee fees about your lofty liberal "save the world" ideals, right?

>contributing to the unsustainable population explosion of orcs in Africa.

Boomer education. Boomer morals.

Attached: 1469337787307.jpg (461x427, 30K)

>3% of U.S military spending could solve the world's hunger problem
So would cannibalism, what's your point faggot?

>implying you don’t need a military to safe guard the food from nigger warlords that steal it just because they can.
See black hawk down

>giving people free shit solves ANY problem

Attached: 1519489909756.jpg (709x1000, 105K)

fpbp

If you agree with my premise, that world hunger has been "solved" by GMOs, then I think it has more to do with the fact that most of the world doesn't want to inflate the stocks of Monsanto and DuPont, which would, in turn, greatly empower two of the most reliable non-conventional weapons developers for the USA.

So.....GMOs are invented by kikes, but are so bad Eurofags don't want them, so we should use them? Fuck off Monsanto. Make yourself useful inventing a do-it-yourself CRISPR kit or something.

r u stupid or just naive?

Attached: african-manual.jpg (550x1600, 107K)

you forgot to add "temporarily"

Free food is akin to wiping people's asses for them.

Feed yourself or die nigger.

Ain't our job to feed the world. There are other governments around, you know - some even in charge of the people who are starving!

I could point out that the US provides more aid than all other countries combined...but...bait thread.

Robot slaves would be more efficient and clean

Let's be fair, like 80-90% of that money is going to "raising awareness" and paying fat salaries to the charity organization employees.
But yes, you nor anybody owes these people anything. If they want to become a developed nation then they need to start setting up conditions so that people build factories there. A couple of decades of sweatshops and these countries might start becoming wealthier just like China. Every country had to go through this.

Based

So could 0.01% of jewish wealth. Fuck off

Nice.

But who would have thought that a nation birthed in Voodoo ritual would be blighted by God for over a hundred years?
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bois_Caïman
>library.brown.edu/haitihistory/5.html

What rules us now is a soft-headed, mushy, egalitarian, feminine sort of altruism, where we are more inclined to feed the starving picaninnies of Africa than to take account of the fact that every picaninny who doesn’t starve to death now will grow up to breed more picaninnies. We feel sorry for the disease-ridden Blacks and Browns of the world, and instead of keeping them and their diseases strictly confined to their part of the world, we bring them into our part of the world so that we can share their diseases — as in the case of New York’s current outbreak of West Nile encephalitis imported from Africa.

What we need is a hard-headed, masculine sort of altruism, which makes us as concerned for the preservation of our own racial quality as for the stamping out of the fur trade, the sort of altruism which leads us to sterilize our own defectives rather than permitting them to breed a White welfare class, just as it leads us to thin out the two-legged population of Africa rather than permitting it to continue encroaching on the four-legged populations.

And you know, whenever I say something like that I can hear the screams of protest in the background. I can hear the softheaded altruists screaming that I am advocating genocide, and oh, isn’t that awful. But as a matter of fact, it is their policies which are leading to a far more terrible genocide, with our race as the victim.

When one has a world overcrowded with races competing for a limited living area and limited resources, there will be genocide. The feminine altruists cannot face that hard fact, and their activities simply guarantee a bloodier and more destructive genocide in the end. The masculine altruists, on the other hand, should be capable of imposing a necessary discipline in order to preserve the health of a beleaguered planet and permit its most valuable life forms to continue developing, instead of being dragged down by the least valuable.

Attached: pierce.jpg (460x268, 105K)

And could solve it permanently
It is totally impossible to solve world hunger by feeding them. They will simply have more kids, they will eat the entire planet. And then they will kill and eat you and have more kids before your remains have left their digestive system.
Shitskins should have been eradicated centuries ago. They were simply a stepping stone in the evolution of modern man. They have no ability to think beyond the moment and if we don’t put a permanent end to this problem, 4 billion years of evolution will have been for nothing.

Scientists talk about the great filter. The theory that *something* stops a species from ascending to interstellar status and which is why we have yet to find any evidence of other intelligent life despite it being a mathematic certainty. That thing is niggers or the equivalent for non-earth based life. Empathy for these evolutionary relics will destroy us if we don’t take measures to eradicate them, or at least recognize their inferiority and confine them to animal status.

Attached: image.jpg (750x626, 209K)

Yeah, why would we want to though? Think we're a bunch of altruists over here? Fuck off

why spend anything on world hunger? that's a self-solving problem.

That's exactly the problem. Developed nations have a birthrate that's below replacement rate, whereas developing nations have a population explosion. You want to make them rich enough so they stop increasing their numbers.

It's not our damn problem to solve.

We can't keep babysitting the world forever.

like its us's job to feed the world. fuck off

I bet even less.
>kill the 3rd worlders

For how long, a year? And then these stupid niggers haven’t learned how to do anything and need us to pay for them to eat ad infinitum. Maybe they should teach themselves to do something productive and not chimp out.

I just realized that the German conglomerate, Bayer, bought Monsanto last month. Damn

Also, I'm not saying that GMOs are good or bad. I'm pointing out an obvious observation. DuPont and Monsanto pioneered GMOs in the production of food. Theoretically, their food GMOs should allow crops to flourish throughout the entire world and could easily feed the entire planet. However, DuPont and Monsanto are also known for developing weapons for the DoD. I'm not taking any stance either way. I'm just making observations.

stop questioning our overlords

How does this kill fish? I thought cutting the trees just ruined the soil

Or we could just nuke Africa......

It's not due to Monsanto, but rather that if you give stuff to people for free then they will never develop things further. They will stay poor and the moment you cut off aid they can't do anything. They need to get their shit together and start building a sustainable economy.

Hypothetically, how much money would a really rich person need to pay to get together a private military group that could go through and genocide Africa? Could we crowd fund it?

>You want to make them rich enough so they stop increasing their numbers.
Too bad that will never happen as niggers are too violent and stupid to run a fuctioning country.

natural selection cannot be solved

>3% of U.S military spending could solve the world's hunger problem
OK so...

3% this year and everybody is saved from starving.
4% five years later because the population has grwn
7% in 10 years because the population has doubled
15% in 20 years..........

Get the fuck out of here.

Attached: ea6.png (600x600, 140K)

We need world hunger.
AIDS was also a manmade creation.
So is overmedication.

We effectively eliminated natural predators, disease, famine ect... in the 19th and 20th century, as well as conventional war with nuclear proliferation. People generally suck and dont need to be around user. There's literally not enough land in all the world to cultivate to feed africa if its population was allowed to grow.

Mark my words, in your lifetime, probably very soon, something catastrophic will hit africa and Asia that either kills 10s of millions, or sterilizes them. I'm betting they fire up that earthquake machine and kill everyone within 10 miles of the coast. AIDS was intended to sterilize but they fucked it up. If Africa was allowed to go unchecked they would literally breed 1 billion people a year.

They’ll never stop. They’re R (as opposed to K) selected. Just look at the ones who move to western countries as “””refugees”””. They still have shitloads of kids.

Bayer creates food that makes you sick.

Bayer sells you expensive drugs to cure that sickness.

They already did it with cancer.

Why is it the US business to solve the problems of over populated 3rd world shit holes?

Hint: it’s not.

/thread

Attached: 1498072161968s.jpg (125x62, 2K)

hivemind

Wouldn't it be cheaper, faster, and more environmentally friendly to kill them all instead?

>1 post by this ID
Imagine that.

why do people who are on the verge of death by starvation bring a new child to this miserable world every year?

Funny, but not our problem. You can give a nigger a fish, and he eats for a day. Teach a nigger to fish and he gets on welfare and slings dope until dayquan down on the corner figures out he is slinging dope in his territory and pulls a drive by and kills the nigger and dayquan goes to jail. All while black lives matter is ordered by the jews to protest police self defense cases. Oh and it wouldn't help for the US to use its money to cure world hunger, because the niggers in those 3rd world countries are too stupid to figure out they are living in a desert where nothing will grow, they have had thousands of years to figure this out, yet they stay. Darwinism works in mysterious ways.

so dumb fucking niggers can have 12 kinds instead of 9, no thanks.

Bayer merged with Monsanto

Attached: IMG_0522.jpg (1536x1526, 461K)

The topsoil washed into the sea and holocausted everything.

This is not enough money. Even the entire US military budget would have trouble feeding the world for a year.

They do stop. Every single country in the world that has become rich has a birthrate below the replacement rate. There have been zero exceptions.

Yes, but people would never agree to such a plan. People feel compassion.

I wish I had enough autism (and motivation) to dig deeper and find out if there's any link between Operation Paperclip and agricultural companies that moonlight as weapons developers. After all, it wasn't just rocket scientists the US poached from Germany. Russia chose Germany's scientists that favored conventional warfare, such as the development of tanks. US chose scientists that were masters of rocket science and chemical weapon development.

I'm sure someone will look into it now that the seeds are planted, though.

This the world dumb and poor will breed even more if you feed them.

Saudi Arabia is 2.7

would need to be 6% the year after, 12% the year after that and so on and so on.

Must I really say more?

Attached: CostlyMess.png (500x397, 109K)