Do you think Trumpfags will still support Trump even after he caused them to lose their jobs?
> "Trade wars are easy to win," he says.
>Starts trade war, and loses incurring massive casualties
> Red State farmers hit hard by retaliatory tariffs
>Companies like GM , harley Davidson forced to move business overseas
>Workling class getting laid off and losing jobs
latimes.com
nbcnews.com
Other urls found in this thread:
bloomberg.com
bloomberg.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
articles.mercola.com
en.wikipedia.org
benefits.gov
investopedia.com
en.wikipedia.org
nypost.com
twitter.com
They will when the alternative is open borders and a flood of cheap labor to replace them.
There aren't any farmers anymore, only (((farmers))).
Trump is playing the long game knowing that America, being Earth's biggest consumer of everything, will always have the upper hand.
It needs to get worse before it gets better, simply put.
Furthermore, if you get laid off due to tariffs that means you qualify for unemployment benefits.
>posts speculation or opinion articles
>not data showing domestic workers and businesses are on the rise
check mein 5, juden
Aren't the farmers the ones employing the cheap Mexican labor? That would actually be a win for them.
This. Most “farmers” are actually just members of large Aggro-business.
farmer here. will support a prez that is against open borders and the insanity of the current demo-party whether or not it hurts the wallet.
These consolidated corporate media need to be exterminated
source? don't think you be able to produce any evidence to support that
>EU giving concessions
>china giving concessions
>US is losing trade war
sage
>Trade war
Aren't subsidies enough for these farmers?!
I mean if the gov didn't pay them subsidies they would have negative profits.
serious question... in a global society, where other countries farmers can grow crops for much cheaper than the US, what happens if there is a war or famine?
can anyone see the advantages of a country being able to produce its own food supply?
>ridiculous hard to follow government regulations
>race to the bottom as commercial farms hire illegals and have lawyers to navigate all the red tape.
>europe putting standards on a lot of their food that burgers do not have limiting market.
It was tariffs!
US can produce food in excess and has been doing that since it's inception.
So keep your expensive GM cancer giving crap.
source?
USA is a net importer of food, no?
God you're so fucking dumb.
Fuck off kike
enlighten me then prick.
the top link is about a nail manufacturing company that imports steel from mexico and most of it is the "journalist" attempting to say something bad about trump, but the workers are saying they understand there will be casualties and that they accept their misfortune because in the overall picture it will strengthen america. they are still pro-trump regardless of what this coastal cock sucker wants. the writer of this story must have been seething with rage during these interviews.
Ok, mouth-breather.
en.wikipedia.org
Granted not all of the agricultural products but the basics are well covered.
Look up the term "farm consolidation". Even the farms that are not technically owned by the usually stated corporations are still absolutely massive compared to what is traditionally thought of as being a "family farm", and these are practically indistinguishable from the mega corp owned ones. There's a reason the agricultural sector went from being 80% of the labor force to only 2%, and who knows how many of the latter figure are illegal aliens.
Also no, farmers were actually paid to produce less forever until Earl Butz came along.
Also GMOs don't give you cancer you fucking moron. If you plan on eating in 2030, you should probably change your tune and do some research.
yeah the reason is mechanization for the labor force stats.
I dunno if that blurb could come off as any more hyperbolic.
Farm consolidation due to leaps and bounds in technology and a lack of interest by heirs in running the average family farm. Also most "corporations" you think of aren't growing shit. They're buying from farmers or have a cooperative agreement.
Wow what will do without billionaire Welfare Queen (((farmers))) raping the land???
And from this, can you deduct why there's only "large Aggro-business" and not family farms? I'm only trying to help you understand here.
"Beginning with the administration of Secretary of Agriculture Henry A. Wallace, the United States had generally moved to curb overproduction. However, in the early 1970s, under Secretary of Agriculture Earl Butz, farmers were encouraged to "get big or get out" and to plant "hedgerow to hedgerow". Over the course of the 20th century, farms have consolidated into larger, more capital-intensive operations and subsidy policy under Butz encouraged these large farms at the expense of small and medium-sized family farms.[2]"
en.wikipedia.org
You're a fucking tool.
dont forget the estate/death tax.
Literally anything is better than a Democrat.
>article from 2011
Holy fucking fuck this only proves you know nothing. Direct Payment subsidies ended in 2014. Nobody gets paid in the form of good old fashioned subsidies like you think anymore, and they never will again. It's much less now, given through ARC and PLC payments.
They still get gov handouts, you cretin, and that was my point.
US is one of the top agricultural producers on the globe.
investopedia.com
>Direct Payment subsidies ended in 2014. Nobody gets paid in the form of good old fashioned subsidies
My god... I never knew that.
This is true, coming from Wisconsin. All our family farms are being monopolized. Then you need college just to farm its bullshit.
>literally anything is better than economic growth and a successful country
okay cletus
No, you argued we've been producing food in excess since our inception, which is wrong. You also seem to assume farmers make money hand-over-fist year to year, which is also wrong. If you're involved in rice or cotton, you're basically being bent over a table every few years for the past two decades, with changing market conditions and each farm bill. Corn and basedbean farmers have it easier because of their necessity as feed grain producers; they supply the beef industry. They also vote Democrat to increase their subsidies so to speak, so you should be angry at them.
>You also seem to assume farmers make money hand-over-fist year to year, which is also wrong
I already said they depended on the subsidies.
>he's so delusional he thinks there's no economic growth right now
Donate some more to Bernie why don't you?
>what is enduring momentary setbacks for future security
Something you niggers will never understand is that we need to shake our dependence on foreigners, especially China, in order to stay independent in the coming century. All you niggers care about is GIBS NOW.
You're confusing huge industrial farms with family-owned farms.
I'm part of a corn and Angus cattle farming family, and we've just employed local huwhites for generations. Most of the work is done by our own family members (brothers, uncles, etc.).
>doesn't understand trade wars or basic economics
If he doesn't reverse his actions then you will see those numbers change Theres only short term economic growth because massive tax cuts to the rich, and an insane federal deficit. The saddest thing is that drumpf will reverse all that short term growth with trade war. What is that idiot thinking?
Missed that post above; noted. Yes, you are not wrong. It's specific to each commodity though. No doubt the subsidy program has granted Americans the ability to spend the least amount of their income on food in comparison to citizens of any other nation. Americans don't realize how cheap their food is, which in turn causes them to make too many assumptions about the world and the status of their own nation.
Don't worry about it. There's a labor shortage so they are in prime position to fill the spots.
Tariffs are the step to removing income tax. This is okay with me.
>UN flag arguing against trade protectionism
massive tax cuts to the rich? so you mean cutting the taxes of the ppl who actually pay them? how obscene
Because you dont actually care about your country being prosperous, and protecting itself
They're rich because people before them paid taxes. They should continue to do so if we want future rich individuals. You dont get rich without a well functioning society, and this requires you to pay taxex
R-r-r-right guys...? Validate my comment p-p-please.
Why don't shills get real jobs in this booming economy?
Actually, they don't pay their taxes at all, so the "cuts" don't even affect them.
nypost.com
Go be poor somewhere else.
Is this why dairy has been so cheap lately? I bought a gallon of milk for $1.20 yesterday, thought it must have been spoiled or something
It's true, some of your food it's cheaper than in third world countries.
1.5$/ beef burger for example.
maybe in the jewSA, not canada
Are you richer than warren buffet? Do you know his opinion on this matter?
no. indirect taxes until the 20th century... how did anyone before that get rich?
>Bracing
>could
>sources say
>goyim dont you want to be prosperous and protect yourself?
>Then do as I say and tax the life out of everyone who produces in your society, in order to pay for all these violent lazy brown people we are going to import into your country
What in God's cock does that have to do with anything? How about you read the part that says:
"More than 31% of all federal individual income tax is paid by those who bring in more than $1 million a year, who have a net effective tax rate of 25.3%, the highest of any group. Another 14% of income tax is paid by those who make between $500,000 and $1 million, who have a 20% tax rate, the second highest."
AHHHH BASEDBEANS ARE DOWN A DOLLAR.
IM LOSING INTERNATIONAL MARKETS THANKS TO THIS ORANGE BUFFOON
DRUMPHHHHHHHH
Basically the farmers complaining about Trump were not real farmers to begin with. They were cash crop farmers who were riding the international market like the dow.
Because your comment implies that you must be poor to support higher taxes. Warren buffet is not poor and disagrees
the only thing that is fucking farmers are unbalanced government subsidies to corn and other crops we don't need. you're a shill or a fucking retard and plz fuck off
This makes me super proud of my grandfather who raises cattle :). They eat corn feed but also have like 100 acre to roam around and eat grass
The problem is that if the chinese suffer they will suck it up, if Americans lose just a bit they will vote Democrat. The Chinese know this, they don’t have to come out even because they know they can take much more damage
My business doesn't rely on foreign trade. I'm more or less insulated from a 'trade war'
ill believe it when i see it. the media has been doing its best to fearmonger, and call this a trade war, and seem to uave some mysterious power to see into the future and magically deduce te numbers, like they so successfully did during the 2016elections. but the facts of the matter remain...
>day 1
>tit for tat
>taking canadas knee jerk ass politically motivated economic policies seriously
china and the US are the players here. and it is only just day 1.
ill save my criticism and praise for when the real numbers come in, and even then, only after enough years have gone by to observe the effects objectively.
in the meantime, all criticism is bullshit, and you can guess all you want.
Nice source you fucking kike. Do you think I haven't read that one, Schlomo?
It includes 73 million unemployed people who didn't even file taxes as people not paying income tax. Of course they don't pay income tax, they don't have a fucking job!
Now out of those "75.1 million" people who aren't paying their income tax (mostly for very obvious reasons) that leaves 2.1 million people with an actual fucking income. And for reference, there are about 5 million millionaires in the US.
Pay your fucking taxes, Mr Kikenstein.
I hate my job, I just want to kill Jews.
The US is losing billions, but is making trillions and stands to gain even more.
Are you selling all your stuff overseas though? Pick a country not under tariffs then.
And it's literal ONIONS farmers getting btfo. Grow something else faggots.
Clearly English isn't your first language. Let me make it simple. According to IRS Adjusted Gross Income Tax Return data from the 2015 Tax Year, 1,323,670 Americans/Households made over $500,000 per year. Those are the same filers who pay 41% of all federal income tax in the United States. 41% of all federal income tax was paid by 0.4% of the population. Now tell me who isn't paying their fair share.
This is yuge don't worry
>NBC
>News
Choose one
>corporate welfare queens and employers of millions of illegals might get fucked
>local farmers who don't ship their shit out of the us won't feel a difference
oh no! that sucks!
How did these people make their money, was it, dare I say, using the Jew machine
Well, when the people in the instotutions start saying "its not your nation, its everyones" dont be surprised when people stop caring about whether its prosperous or not. Its called the Tragedy of the Commons. A nation that grants its its priveleges to anyone will find the people who were preiviously from the in-group will no longer care about supporting that kind of nation.
>tfw US farmers try to compete with China over literal fucking basedyybeans.
the unsustainable and disgusting situation brought about by globalism can only be reversed through some loss
i hope trump supporters understood that
Burn it all to the ground
There isn't open immigration though
>Bloomberg
yall are aware that most livestock is fed basedbeans, right?
*cries* the globalists daddy *sobs* they did this to us... not trumps fault!1
Good.
We started doing this and rich farmers get btfo
Not any more
Dunno, but i'll enjoy it either way.
woah
didn't see the pigs face in the thumbnail and thought the pig ear was the face and his finger was an arm and it looked he had a tiny 30cm loli elf that he was fingering with her legs spread towards the camera
I support Trump's tariffs. I was saying that retards who think all farming is done by spics are wrong.
Trump did this, brainlet. The point is that it's a necessary evil if the US is going to bring back jobs and labor home.
>777
>777
