Are you in favour of Fascism?

Would you support a genuine rise in Fascism in Europe?

Oswald Mosleys flavour of Fascism would have been good for the UK, apart from his submission to the Royals.

Attached: 51Jm1EzsKoL._UY550_.jpg (383x550, 16K)

I don't because i prefer freedom

never, i value my personal freedom above some cunts waving flags

Italians are goy and don't have the ability to prefer anything.

Elect these fucks into office and you'll turn Europe in a bloodbath withing a year. Just now nationalist pm in my country signed a treaty with a Serbian nationalist about the divsion of Croatia and Bosnia between greater Slovenian and greater Serbia.

They have no real influence now, and rightfully fascist fucks are a laughing stock, but make no mistake, if these creeps were to hold any real power , this would be the end of European civilization when every single one of them has some rightful clay to claim on someones elses country.

As per precept 50 of the 88 precepts of 1488...

>50. A democracy is always followed by a strongman... some call him dictator. It is
the only way to restore order out of the chaos caused by a democracy. Pick your
strongman wisely! He must be a guardian in his heart. He must be one who has
shown that his only purpose in life is the preservation of the folk. His ultimate aim
must be to restore the rule of Law based on the perfect Laws of Nature. Do not choose him by his words. Choose one who has sacrificed all in the face of tyranny;
choose one who has endured and persevered. This is the only reliable evidence of
his worthiness and motives.

to be fair, real fascism hasnt been tried.

Attached: 1528427557386.jpg (478x478, 27K)

"No!"

Yes

Attached: 710955709336.png (595x635, 399K)

i'd bring back absolute monarchy any day.

Precisely. Some people cannot comprehend this, but fascism is the natural response to democracy and 'muh freedom'. We aren't truly free. We're only free to endlessly consume. It's shameful.

Attached: 20180310_102557.jpg (4032x3024, 3.65M)

Only if it would guarantee the continued supremacy of the United States, otherwise no.

>apart from his submission to the Royals.
Why do you say that as a bad thing user?

Why fascism in particular and not another form of authoritarianism

capitalist liberal democracy >>>>>> fascism\commie shit

Attached: 1530567827245.webm (720x405, 2.39M)

For the US yes, but in Europe who knows what they'll do.

>but i want freeeedumb
>let's vote!
>what do you mean a subversive element wants to gain control and the only way to do that is to enact mass population control and change
>but voting is good!
wow, I wonder how this happened

Anything related to not having a choice is off the list.
Antifakers are also fascist, we can see how they act.

Attached: 1526027493937.png (1381x1080, 538K)

democracy doesn't work in multi-cult societies
Now consider your get and repent spawn of lucifer

Attached: 1529208566270.png (1008x760, 1.59M)

Wouldn't that be the 4th time you gay frog munchers bring back the monarchy?

Not really. I don't like the idea of a government committee deciding what movies/music/books I can or can't partake in.

No, ideally I would like to live in a Catholic monarchy, but realistically an aristocratic republic (like the Founding Father's) would be fine. Fascism makes too many assumptions that I don't agree with.

surprisingly not gay, for a Greek

Attached: greekgayclowns.jpg (650x497, 124K)

Fascism never actually succeeded for any significant length of time. Best you can hope for is occult-fascism like you have in Russia and the to a certain extent in the US.

Attached: IMaGe.jpg (640x640, 113K)

Absolutely disgusting. Democracy should be reduced to a few, and capitalism needs to be destroyed. Classical liberalism is garbage too. It's a bunch of materialist garbage.

Can yuropoors be trusted to not kill each other over border disputes and claims to ethnic lands if they were fascist and the US left the region to its own devices?

First fascism, the original idea of fascism, the social fascism, we can say when fascism was a left political movement, was really interesting.

then everything that has evolved is indefensible

>where would you and justin go for lunch afterwards
in hell, of course
because if that leafcuck is about to drown, I'll make sure he indeed drowns
which should grant me paradise, desu, but we all know it's not how it works

Attached: trudeauwins.webm (1024x576, 2.95M)

this

Suce ma bite fagotte

Who gives a shit? War is a good (although modern warfare must be changed to allow humanity to strive in war).

>absolute
Kraut education

see?
you're a faggot, leafcuck

Attached: ahgay.gif (400x225, 1.2M)

We miss you mosley! Come back!

On a side note, royalism in the 1930's was far more justified than now considering Edward VIII was a fascist.

Attached: untitled (7).png (332x318, 155K)

>flag

Just a cohencidence eh schlomo?

(((kek)))

Don’t be dense about what he means about losing personal freedom pussy.

There would be one party of pricks who determine what films, books, and music are made, where you can travel, and what form (if any) of recourse you have with corrupt officials.

>citing out of context Aristotle

Kek,

Aristotle was talking about small citiy-state communities where people knew each other, - it this had nothing to do with you feeling connected to someone living 300 km up north just because you share the same skin color, you stupid philistine! The Greeks didn't view themsleves as Greeks in the modern sense, but as a community of free men living in the same city-states. Modern ethno-nationalism is a product of the enlightenment era civic nationalism - not the small Aristotelian city-state type. Modern "civic" nationalism made people citizens of a state, meaning it was not required to live in a city to Identify as a french citizen but live on the territory of the former Ancien Regime.

--what white nationalism did is that it took the universality of the individualist civic nationalism and made it's subjects eligible for citizenship based on their skin color. This is not the city-state scenario where the community lives side by side and shares relative intimate daily experiences - white nationalism was a imagined community, you had not real daily connection to others except for sharing the same skin color, ehtnicity, etc...

Attached: blax.png (322x476, 185K)

White city states in Australia then you fucking idiot. No one wants niggers in any capacity in this country.

>tfw no modern integralist/falangist/strasserist movements

Attached: strasserism.png (1495x1256, 3.64M)

National Socialism with emphasis on the socialism.
Which is the wrong part to emphasize.

when a stormingger like youi talks about feeling connection to the white race - this feeling has nothing to do with what ancient community sense of belonging . If you were a subject of the crown, you didn't identify with other subjects living on the other part of the kingdom, you identified with your immediate family, the patriarch, the small village town you were born into. Your daily experiences with the immediate community was what you identified with, not a abstract concept such as a "nation" or "race". In other words you didn't identify with a fucking snownigger living somewhere in Norway just because you both happen to be pale you thick fuck.

Fascism seems to be the only chance you get at having a an unopposed leader whose heart is for his nation and its people.
You can say Monarchy but it is bogged down in the aristocracy and all of its corrupted workings. Plus you don't get the choice of getting a leader that will do whats truly best for the nation and its people.

Of course communism requires no explanation on why its authoritarian system doesn't work....

Attached: NxYVvAkPwpELy-0BQrXWnUYtJ1HLeGrNz_mTQyQrqMs.png (621x768, 323K)

kek giving the mark since that 7 shit yesterday..

Attached: notlaughinganymore.jpg (600x326, 162K)

>what is the golden dawn
>what is the nordic resistance
>what is russian nazbol

Whew, all that shit writing, and you still couldn't make a half decent, accurate point. It's highly unlikely that even within a state everyone personally knew everyone else. An immediate connection was not and is not necessary. Same in states. You don't know everyone, and it is likely you have extended family throughout the country. Further, and this is critical, by evolution you are incentivized to propagate your genes, right? Well, an ethnicity represents an entire pool of very similar genes whose reproductive success can be viewed as a kind of equivalent to your own reproductive success, and from which your own gene line must take partners, or it will lose its identity pretty quickly, right? Also, you seem to be suggesting that our ancestors simply got along with people because they were a part of their personal lives, and so I assume you are suggesting that multiculturalism would work if people just got along personally, right? Except studies just show the opposite, and that multiculturalism makes people less social not just across racial boundaries, but even within them. Society just breaks down. Multiculturalism does not work. The only sound foundation for a nation is a racial one. Surprise, the correct solution is the most obvious one.,

Oswald mosley’s Vision for Europe is absolutely beautiful.

Attached: 306CEB6E-E330-45E8-B786-A3C77BD5EB57.jpg (639x579, 99K)

theocracy

Attached: .......gif (700x488, 3.83M)

>Someone is authoritarian so they are fascist

Attached: 1530776100550.png (680x587, 185K)

>using force through the state isn't fascist
Hmmm something seems off here

No.
I'd prefer First Republic tier democracy.

>ywn live in 1970's Italy
>ywn work for Ferrovie dello Stato or other similar enormous government agencies
>ywn get paid more than most people to do absolutely fuck all

why even live