Mfw this is what "Natives" ACTUALLY believe

Injun pussy was the reason. And most of those men were criminals.

Some of my best friends are Native, they can be good self-aware people, but even they will tell you most Natives are useless lying fucks.

nationalhumanitiescenter.org/tserve/nattrans/ntecoindian/essays/buffalob.htm
Wow, I had no idea.

They were warring tribal nomads stuck in the Bronze Age.

Anyone who romanticizes Native Americans are doing so in bad faith in order to attack Europeans.

BATHED
what is the origin of this meme that white people could circumnavigate the world and invent all modern technology but couldn't splash some water on themselves?

>literal skull thrones
"spirituality"

North American horses migrated out of NA very early in history. They then became trapped in Europe and their NA ancestors were hunted out by native predator. Europeans brought back the descendants of those horses. Natives didn't kill them off.

There was a period where white people didn't bathe.
We call it the plague and water was contaminated.
They always forget this historical footnote.

If people think the Natives were the strongest and most intelligent, then why did they get fucked over so hard by the whites? Now in the 21st century people think whites need a nerf for being too overpowered. Our DPS is hella godlike and our INT is nearly at Asian levels.

>Chase buffalo herds off cliffs
>Leave numerous carcasses
>Ethical hunting
Based noble savages

It's niggers who think the Moors taught Europeans how to bathe
>what are Roman bathhouses

whites failed at genociding the indians lol

The myth of the noble savage

Ironically it was white people who made the idea up.

I'm a native (Taino) and I think Dems are literally worse than the conquistadors
Republicans too though, they're just slightly less liberal Dems who call themselves conservative
I swear on Hatuey's grave if I see these people in heaven I will rather go to hell

Once there were great forests that covered Western Nebraska and Kansas.

Savages burned them all down to make room to graze their buffalo beards.

Attached: F9B24E11-8CAD-4030-AD7F-C888F29AFA7D.jpg (1000x679, 394K)

...

Thanks for the link. Stupid shill

None of those things apply to our natives.

Ancient europeans did all of that

>Whites did all those things, but better
Sorry sweetie but get fucked you goddamn savage

Attached: 1507259742385.jpg (2000x1487, 1.91M)

A quote from a Great Taino Chief. You know. I might be part Taino. I'm short with narrow eyes and it is possible the Taino sailed to Ireland since the Hurricane path ends there.

>the way the dress hangs off the nipple
HNNNNNNNNNNG
COLONIZE ME BABY!

I'll never understand this line of logic

>MUH PEOPLE were smart and strong and civilized and clean
>YOUR PEOPLE were stinky non-bathers weak stupid white devils

Yet whites almost completely erased them from the face of the earth?

This is revenge for what they did to the Solutreans.

>Didn't invent the wheel
>Didn't invent advanced weapons due to "lmao being in peach with the world"
Savages ineeded

The "bathed" thing is something that lefties unironically believe, i.e., that Natives were clean and Europeans dirty. In reality, the ancient Greeks and Romans had baths and the latter's historians mentioned the cleanliness of the Celts as well. By contrast, early explorers in Canada noted how the Natives would wipe the grease from their food on their hair, and were too scared to bathe in lakes and rivers because they thought they would die

These people would promote death and starvation if they could link it against whites. It's that simple.

Never mind they are already for Communism.

It's what they call "making a virtue out of necessity". Of course you're going to be closer to the land if you live in a fucking wigwam, but so what?

The reason whites took over is because they had bigger ideas, they had plans beyond immediate needs, plans to build something greater than just a society that lives day to day like dumb animals.

there is some rationality to this considering things like crocs and alligators tho

>whites almost completely erased them from the face of the earth
Turns out that, along with the myth of the noble savage, the genocide of Native Americans is also a myth. see:
thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/06/02/the-non-genocide-of-northern-native-americans/

>were too scared to bathe in lakes and rivers because they thought they would die
considering they didn't have antibiotics, that's not a crazy belief.

>things like crocs and alligators

They don't have those in Canada. The Natives were probably just scared of getting hypothermia

The left truly live in a fantasy world.

Champlain noted that the French in Canada would bathe in bodies of water, though, so it can't have been a completely rational fear

The Celts are literally the people that invented soap. Their soap was a lot stronger than ours though. They used it to burn off body hair because of it's potential to trap dirt and such.

We can never let these people back into political power ever again. They will go straight to concentration camps and genocide of Europeans if we lose.

>French
>bathing
lol

>Natives

Which ones? What a fucking worthless identifier. You may as well say "historically, Eurasians were known for their war elephants"
Are you Iroquois? Cherokee? Lakota? Aztec!? MAYAN!? FUCK ME, THOSE GUYS SURE TOOK CARE OF NATURE. WHAT VAGUE FUCKING SET OF VALUES ARE YOU CLAIMING TO HAIL FROM!?

The pan-Native shit is purely political (intended to divide the population via identity politics) and is actually detrimental to the preservation of distinct Native cultures

>had written histories
Uh, no?

In north america too. Iroquois were still cannibals in the early 1900s

because stupid
because Avatar

Because they think it allows for them to vilify white people.

They were pretty much 3000 years behind the Middle East and Europe. The last hunter gatherers adopted agriculture in Europe thousands of years before.

Attached: image.jpg (811x824, 229K)

Imagine being liberal and having been completely brainwashed. Imagine believing that native americans were this advanced, honorable, highly developed society. Imagine believing all Caucasian explorers and settlers were vile, evil, genocide soldiers. Imagine believing native Americans weren't savages, hadn't been slaughtering and torturing each other for hundreds of years.

I have a few close friends that a pretty hardcore liberal. Very firm in their social and political views. Here's the thing: they read ZERO news, ZERO scientific research, ZERO forum discussion outside of Leddit. Their views are almost exclusive formed around what "they heard" on reddit and HuffPo. The left is so desperate to fight le evil nazi trumpers that they blindly follow any narrative that dictates to their emotional state. It's truly fucking sad.

kek I love it when they rewrite history to make it seem like ancient civilizations were liberal progressives. Like I'm really supposed to believe Native Americans were "egalitarian" whatever that means. When in fact they had matriarchal and patriarch societies

What I don't understand is that while North American natives remained hunter-gatherers, the Central and South Americans created functional civilizations. You'd think the knowledge would have filtered up over the centuries.

Just goes to show you how stupid and easily led the average person truly is. 20 years ago if you'd said that a man can't turn into a woman you'd have been saying something perfectly obvious; today it's a hate crime. A couple of decades is all it took to persuade huge numbers of people of something which would have been regarded as insane for thousands of years of human history

I think comradery is needed with natives in the face of assimilation, but preservation of distinct languages is especially necessary.

It was harder for them to progress at the more northerly latitudes, though. Hunter-gatherers necessarily have very small populations in order not to exhaust the available stocks of game. In Maritime Canada, an area about twice the size of Ireland, there were only about 20,000 Micmacs before European contact, and parts of the region would be empty for years at a time, since they would leave to allow the animals time to reproduce

Do you think the north american tribal natives were aware of the shit going down south? I mean the cities and shit, along with child sacrifices n stuff.

If they were persuaded we wouldn't need such strict laws enforcing it.

>ethical hunting

Attached: FF860D3C-3879-478F-A515-62E29BBE09FC.jpg (1024x572, 140K)

Maybe the ones who were taken back to be sacrifices might have briefly had some idea.

I'd say at least one third of the Canadian population believes in the insane dogmas of the Left, maybe as much as a half. It's hard to tell for sure because people are often reluctant to express their true opinions for fear of being ostracized, or worse

jesus, just the thumbnail is enough to make me want to bone her

>noble savage fallacy
Yeah man, sure, uhuh.

Seminole ancestry due to my ancestors being one of the first families to settle Florida. Looked into their lives on both sides. A newspaper article details a native trying to rape my great-great-great-etc grandfathers daughter, him popping the guy in the face and sending him through a window, tribe leader arriving to find him unconscious outside and scalping him. He gave them the scalp as compensation for the trouble. They gave some injun who was fleeing tribal religious persecution (some taboo shit idk) a place to stay and he got drunk and raped one of the girls. Thanks, injun rapist for the violent genes.

>Beary quotes Bernal Díaz del Castillo’s The Conquest of New Spain, which chronicles Hernán Cortés’ discovery and conquest of the Aztec empire. As Díaz reports, in the town of Cempoala near the Gulf of Mexico:

>Every day they [the Native American priests] sacrificed before our eyes three, four, or five Indians, whose hearts were offered to those idols, and whose blood was plastered on the walls. The feet, arms, and legs of their victims were cut off and eaten, just as we eat beef from the butcher’s in our country. I even believe that they sold it in the tianguez or markets.

Attached: 1527361508179.jpg (284x300, 52K)

There was Cahokia
>Cahokia was a city that, at its peak from A.D. 1050-1200, was larger than many European cities, including London. The city was spread out over six square miles (16 square kilometers) and encompassed at least 120 mounds and a population between 10,000 and 20,000 people.

Attached: Cahokia Mounds Iseminger Painting.jpg (1512x1023, 559K)

>When the Spaniards reached Tenochtitlan, the capital of the Aztec empire and the site of present-day Mexico City, Díaz had occasion to observe the Emperor Montezuma’s dinner table:

>. . . more than thirty dishes [were] cooked in their native style . . . I have heard that they used to cook him the flesh of young boys. But as he had such a variety of dishes, made of so many different ingredients, we could not tell whether a dish was of human flesh or anything else . . . I know for certain, however, that after our Captain spoke against the sacrifice of human beings and the eating of their flesh, Montezuma ordered that it should no longer be served to him.

Attached: 1527361508179.jpg (552x407, 108K)

This. I am part Sioux, and am vey proud of my heritage and what they had focused on. Lack of waste, no urbanization, no usury or poverty, strong sense of identity and family etc.

In some ways they were never jewed and thats where the idea of the Noble Savage came from, they weren't peaceful pussys, but they weren't brutal mauraders either.

>Díaz also describes how the Aztecs performed human sacrifices:

>They strike open the wretched Indian’s chest with flint knives and hastily tear out the palpitating heart which, with the blood, they present to the idols in whose name they have performed the sacrifice. Then they cut off the arms, thighs, and head, eating the arms and thighs at their ceremonial banquets. The head they hang up on a beam, and the body of the sacrificed man is not eaten but given to the beasts of prey.

Attached: 1527361508179.jpg (550x362, 221K)

>egalitarian
no they weren't. women did most of the labor, cooking, camp prep. Men hunted and put their lives on the line warring, but were generally pretty lazy.

the comanche killed men, women and babies, but would enslave adolescents, making those that assimilated part of the tribe.

tonkawa were cannibals

there were tribal nomads, that killed outsiders, including other bands of ethnically, linguistically similar people over resources. They were just as savage as every other group of humans throughout time.

Well, I enjoy Sioux City Sarsaparilla, so you got that going.

>Díaz also describes the widespread practice of slavery in the Aztec empire. In the great market of Tenochtitlan, he saw:

>. . . dealers in gold, silver, and precious stones, feather, cloaks, and embroidered goods, and male and female slaves who are also sold there. They bring as many slaves to be sold in that market as the Portuguese bring Negroes from Guinea. Some are brought there attached to long poles by means of collars round their necks to prevent them from escaping, but others are left loose.

Attached: 1527361508179.jpg (550x391, 126K)

>Beary quotes Francis Parkman’s France and England in North America, where he describes an attack by the Iroquois on an Algonquin hunting party, in the autumn of 1641, and the Iroquois’ treatment of their prisoners:

>They bound the prisoners hand and foot, rekindled the fire, slung the kettles, cut the bodies of the slain to pieces, and boiled and devoured them before the eyes of the wretched survivors. “In a word,” says the narrator [that is, the Algonquin woman who escaped to tell the tale], “they ate men with as much appetite and more pleasure than hunters eat a boar or a stag . . .”

>The conquerors feasted in the lodge till nearly daybreak . . . then began their march homeward with their prisoners. Among these were three women, of whom the narrator was one, who had each a child of a few weeks or months old. At the first halt, their captors took the infants from them, tied them to wooden spits, placed them to die slowly before a fire, and feasted on them before the eyes of the agonized mothers, whose shrieks, supplications, and frantic efforts to break the cords that bound them were met with mockery and laughter . . .

>The Iroquois arrived at their village with their prisoners, whose torture was designed to cause all possible suffering without touching life. It consisted in blows with sticks and cudgels, gashing their limbs with knives, cutting off their fingers with clam-shells, scorching them with firebrands, and other indescribable torments. The women were stripped naked, and forced to dance to the singing of the male prisoners, amid the applause and laughter of the crowd . . .

You can see where the spic cartels get it from.

Attached: 1527361508179.jpg (1200x1200, 228K)

>Bronze age
There was one NA civ deep in South America with very primitive bronze works. The rest were full stone age

>considering they didn't have antibiotics
What do you mean? That people get infections by bathing in a river?

>On the following morning, they were placed on a large scaffold, in sight of the whole population. It was a gala-day. Young and old were gathered from far and near. Some mounted the scaffold, and scorched them with torches and firebrands; while the children, standing beneath the bark platform, applied fire to the feet of the prisoners between the crevices . . . The stoicism of one of the warriors enraged his captors beyond measure . . . they fell upon him with redoubled fury, till their knives and firebrands left in him no semblance of humanity. He was defiant to the last, and when death came to his relief, they tore out his heart and devoured it; then hacked him in pieces, and made their feast of triumph on his mangled limbs.

>All the men and all the old women of the party were put to death in a similar manner, though but few displayed the same amazing fortitude. The younger women, of whom there were about thirty, after passing their ordeal of torture, were permitted to live; and, disfigured as they were, were distributed among the several villages, as concubines or slaves to the Iroquois warriors. Of this number were the narrator and her companion, who . . . escaped at night into the forest . . .

Attached: 1527361508179.jpg (737x957, 111K)

Yes.
>Just because it's a river doesn't mean it's safe.

The Iroquois were fucking nuts, they even wiped out the Hurons in southern Ontario in a genocidal campaign. But the British thought that they were more intelligent than the Algonquins, interestingly enough.

I'd recommend the movie "Black Robe" very highly to anyone who hasn't yet seen it -- it's the most realistic depiction of the 1600s in Canada you'll ever find

>Bartolomé de Las Casas was the first and fiercest critic of Spanish colonialism in the New World. An early traveller to the Americas who sailed on one of Columbus’s voyages, Las Casas was so horrified by the wholesale massacre he witnessed that he dedicated his life to protecting the Indian community.
>'They made gallows just high enough for the feet to nearly touch the ground ... and they burned the Indians alive.' Illustration by Theodor de Bry, published in 1552 in 'A Short Account of the Destruction of the Indies'

Attached: de-bry-1c-conquistadors_article_column.jpg (600x381, 46K)

fpbp

I liked Black Robe too. It was filmed not far from where I live. I mention it because it was the only one.

Kek. Indians were savage animals. You can still read about it before they burn the history books.

because they were captured as kids and grew up assimilating.

>filmed not far from where I live

Saguenay/St. Lawrence River area, wasn't it?

>If native american societies were in fact, most close to our true human nature suppressed by then "modern" societies why are millions of "natives" trying their damnedest to get into the countries that are most European?

and from all this they couldn't lay down a single yard of road

What the fuck is wrong with american rivers? I bath in rivers pretty much everyday and i never got sick. And the rivers i bathed in were filled with pollution.

You are going to have to explain me how the fuck it is dangerous to bathe in a river.

The pollution turned you into a Communist.

Yes, in La Baie (The Bay city) on Saguenay river. I think the huron village they built is still there.

In Canada rivers and lakes can be very cold even in the summer, and dangerous on that account alone

A beautiful region. I've never been to the Saguenay (though I've always wanted to go), but I love Quebec

They have these things in their rivers. No good for health. Sad!

Attached: American-alligators-on-a-river-bank.jpg (650x428, 109K)

Native Americans are uncivilised. They never ever smile. They smell like shit, cigarettes, and alcohol even early in the morning. Nobody gives a fuck about native Americans. Or abos. Or any other race or people that has done fuck all throughout history.

giardia from the water at least thats what i was told in some of the lakes in the rockies. we had to filter the water to be safe.

>some
Those were the slaves you retard