>>177881147

Q Thread Continued
>Shills BTFO Edition

Attached: HE WALKS AMONG US.png (3000x2000, 1.99M)

Other urls found in this thread:

anonfile.com/49J3kbf1be/Q.zip
threadreaderapp.com/thread/1014368693801742337.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Attached: Proof of Abedin and Mills server lie.jpg (1860x2896, 969K)

Attached: 1528993171261.png (934x894, 301K)

Attached: 01 - PRnj3Fd.jpg (639x96, 27K)

Attached: DdVmGd2UwAA91mp.jpg (900x1200, 332K)

Attached: 02 - qszOg5b.jpg (645x190, 49K)

Fucking retarded faggot

Attached: DgLFocYV4AAJdz3.jpg (400x300, 30K)

Attached: DgOyDQFU8AA8CXi.jpg (1065x1200, 322K)

Attached: 1529214254613.jpg (742x960, 52K)

:(

Attached: 03 - K0Np5Xq.jpg (638x188, 51K)

Cognitive infiltration

Rather than taking the continued existence of the hard core as a constraint, and addressing itself solely to the third-party mass audience, government might undertake (legal) tactics for breaking up the tight cognitive clusters of extremist theories, arguments and rhetoric that are produced by the hard core and reinforce it in turn. One promising tactic is cognitive infiltration of extremist groups. By this we do not mean 1960s-style infiltration with a view to surveillance and collecting information, possibly for use in future prosecutions. Rather, we mean that government efforts might succeed in weakening or even breaking up the ideological and epistemological complexes that constitute these networks and groups.

How might this tactic work? Recall that extremist networks and groups, including the groups that purvey conspiracy theories, typically suffer from a kind of crippled epistemology. Hearing only conspiratorial accounts of government behavior, their members become ever more prone to believe and generate such accounts. Informational and reputational cascades, group polarization, and selection effects suggest that the generation of ever-more-extreme views within these groups can be dampened or reversed by the introduction of cognitive diversity. We suggest a role for government efforts, and agents, in introducing such diversity. Government agents (and their allies) might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action.

Attached: 1500500548726.png (646x622, 377K)

Attached: 1508611699812.png (1230x1212, 1.12M)

Attached: 1511590532380.png (730x1166, 653K)

(((mods))) are deleting all threads related to the (Dead) get. The time of the Lord draws nigh.

Attached: great get.jpg (1250x872, 632K)

Attached: 1525461686418.png (839x455, 484K)

In one variant, government agents would openly proclaim, or at least make no effort to conceal, their institutional affiliations. A recent newspaper story recounts that Arabic-speaking Muslim officials from the State Department have participated in dialogues at radical Islamist chat rooms and websites in order to ventilate arguments not usually heard among the groups that cluster around those sites, with some success.68 In another variant, government officials would participate anonymously or even with false identities. Each approach has distinct costs and benefits; the second is riskier but potentially brings higher returns. In the former case, where government officials participate openly as such, hard-core members of the relevant networks, communities and conspiracy-minded organizations may entirely discount what the officials say, right from the beginning. The risk with tactics of anonymous participation, conversely, is that if the tactic becomes known, any true member of the relevant groups who raises doubts may be suspected of government connections. Despite these difficulties, the two forms of cognitive infiltration offer different risk-reward mixes and are both potentially useful instruments. There is a similar tradeoff along another dimension: whether the infiltration should occur in the real world, through physical penetration of conspiracist groups by undercover agents, or instead should occur strictly in cyberspace. The latter is safer, but potentially less productive. The former will sometimes be indispensable, where the groups that purvey conspiracy theories (and perhaps themselves formulate conspiracies) formulate their views through real-space informational networks rather than virtual networks.

Attached: 1524739959800.png (1364x1250, 1.38M)

Attached: 1504341168405.png (912x900, 490K)

Attached: 1528176694808.png (1272x1322, 886K)

Attached: 05 - SfoPGMS.jpg (635x146, 39K)

Attached: 1525275172550.png (992x1118, 1.12M)

DO YOU EVEN WATCH RICHARD AND MORTIMER

Attached: 06 - ezglLOr.jpg (644x44, 9K)

Attached: 1524371150400.png (541x611, 337K)

Infiltration of any kind poses well-known risks: perhaps agents will be asked to perform criminal acts to prove their bona fides, or (less plausibly) will themselves become persuaded by the conspiratorial views they are supposed to be undermining; perhaps agents will be unmasked and harmed by the infiltrated group. But the risks are generally greater for real-world infiltration, where the agent is exposed to more serious harms.

All these risk-reward tradeoffs deserve careful consideration. Particular tactics may or may not be cost-justified under particular circumstances. Our main suggestion is just that, whatever the tactical details, there would seem to be ample reason for government efforts to introduce some cognitive diversity into the groups that generate conspiracy theories. Social cascades are sometimes quite fragile, precisely because they are based on small slivers of information. Once corrective information is introduced, large numbers of people can be shifted to different views. If government is able to have credibility, or to act through credible agents, it might well be successful in dislodging beliefs that are held only because no one contradicts them. Likewise, polarization tends to decrease when divergent views are voiced within the group.69 Introducing a measure of cognitive diversity can break up the epistemological networks and clusters that supply conspiracy theories.

Attached: 1503151719218.png (542x448, 56K)

>Quick! Discredit! Slide slide slide!

Attached: 07 - bEEYV55.jpg (633x135, 30K)

Attached: 1501462207418.png (582x497, 349K)

Attached: 1530030065458.png (1252x1430, 422K)

Attached: 08 - 8rGCnKb.jpg (578x152, 21K)

Attached: 1508916271410.png (1406x1066, 1.11M)

Attached: 1509959687093.png (676x554, 348K)

Attached: 10 - VMOx0cf.jpg (644x237, 54K)

Attached: 1518057085883.png (575x733, 265K)

Attached: 1504571958243.png (496x1258, 456K)

Attached: 1509865627958.png (884x874, 431K)

Attached: 1509623849347.jpg (1200x608, 79K)

Attached: 11 - VVx4DKv.jpg (627x115, 28K)

Attached: 12 - 2fxknok.jpg (613x75, 18K)

Attached: 13 - scLwR63.jpg (653x82, 20K)

Some conspiracy theories create serious risks. They do not merely undermine democratic debate; in extreme cases, they create or fuel violence. If government can dispel such theories, it should do so. One problem is that its efforts might be counterproductive, because efforts to rebut conspiracy theories also legitimate them. We have suggested, however, that government can minimize this effect by rebutting more rather than fewer theories, by enlisting independent groups to supply rebuttals, and by cognitive infiltration designed to break up the crippled epistemology of conspiracyminded groups and informationally isolated social networks

Q is propaganda. They let him """predict""" a few small things, and then use that as proof that 100 percent of what he says is true.

Attached: 15 - 2fqjlmd.jpg (642x236, 55K)

Attached: 53264758.jpg (834x1949, 665K)

What if the Time Traveler theory is correct and Trump knows the precise clues and phrases needed

Attached: 53937.jpg (225x350, 31K)

Why do I see this evwrywhere

DELETE THIS NOW

shameless repost

Attached: I wonder where Q gets his info.jpg (1000x526, 167K)

Bump

Are you Autistic

Someone EXPLANE This MEME NOW

>literal slide in action

Attached: stevecrowder-e1515599162821.jpg (1064x800, 80K)

Memeflag shills right on time to bump this shit thread

Based Redpilled Leaf

Why do you do this for

WHAT DO YOU MEME

>other thread dies just as this fag posts this
>no id
What did the mods mean by this?

Attached: mods.png (706x778, 84K)

Thread

Day of the rake when

What have you done about the kikes, Wang?

Wew

/ourschizo/

Wew Digits Confirmed

>mfw this type of sliding only confirms the existence of Q
Thanks shill

Attached: Q8.jpg (1200x929, 231K)

Attached: 1530410177411.jpg (768x1044, 350K)

Attached: Q11.jpg (1200x895, 196K)

Was getting caught part of you're plane

Attached: Q12.jpg (1200x897, 212K)

Yes

Attached: Q13.jpg (1200x942, 254K)

Attached: Q15.jpg (1200x930, 217K)

Based

Attached: Q18.jpg (1200x891, 157K)

Attached: Q19.jpg (1200x897, 190K)

Attached: Q23.jpg (1200x895, 219K)

Attached: Q24.jpg (1200x945, 203K)

Attached: Q27.jpg (1200x896, 153K)

Attached: Q30.jpg (1200x895, 176K)

Attached: Q31.jpg (1200x942, 207K)

Attached: Q33.jpg (1200x885, 234K)

BASED

Attached: Qisrael.png (1491x850, 739K)

Attached: Q40.jpg (1200x874, 161K)

Do you have a .zip of these?

>when the Chinadians come

Attached: chinadian.jpg (960x960, 146K)

The Absolute Madman

>Die for Israel Goy

Attached: 1530719233322.png (319x158, 8K)

>it's that same one post
>from the same brainlets
I like this episode but the re-runs are boring

anonfile.com/49J3kbf1be/Q.zip
Source: threadreaderapp.com/thread/1014368693801742337.html

Attached: Q48.jpg (1200x895, 177K)

Is this a shill

when trump leaves office is 2 to 6 years with none of the swamp being drained, will you accept it's a larp

Is king nigger in jail?
>No
Is queen cunt in jail?
>No
Is pedosta in jail?
>No
Did (((they))) lose control of anything?
>No

Fuck off.

Attached: 1529365397274.gif (800x371, 198K)

Attached: Q49.jpg (1200x895, 239K)

/ourshil/

Attached: Q53.jpg (1200x876, 215K)

>will you accept it's a larp
For many that's when the fun starts

Attached: ar.png (1028x803, 138K)

>memeflags
I wonder what it's like to be that pathetic

Everytime